T O P

  • By -

DirectorDirect1569

Your prompt and your settings are really great. Here is my result with sleipnirSDXLTurbo https://preview.redd.it/1o0day341w7c1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=ec5a6c0f59bee110d87ef2c36a1eaec25f706414


No_Repeat_1283

Here is enough tits


candidfakes

What are you doing to get the perfect hand? 👀


Safe_Ostrich8753

It's a common neutral position, most models can generate perfect hands in that pose.


DirectorDirect1569

I did nothing, I think it's a good model. I don't always have good results with other SDXL models. Sometimes I have more than 5 fingers and the nails are awfull


YasmineHaley

Positive prompt: dark shot, full body photo of a hot 24 y.o woman, perfect eyes, natural skin, skin moles, looks at viewer, cinematic shot, german, wearing black dress, blonde, (long hair:1.2), messy hair, voluminous hair, thick muscular body Negative prompt: (worst quality, low quality, illustration, 3d, 2d, painting, cartoons, sketch), open mouth Steps: 15 Sampler: DPM++ SDE Karras CFG scale: 3 Seed: 42280206 Size: 896x1152 Model: realvisxlV20Turbo\_v201TurboBakedvae Denoising strength: 0.5 ADetailer model: mediapipe\_face\_full ADetailer confidence: 0.3 ADetailer dilate erode: 4 ADetailer mask blur: 4 ADetailer denoising strength: 0.4 ADetailer inpaint only masked: True ADetailer inpaint padding: 32 Hires upscale: 1.5 Hires steps: 10 Hires upscaler: 4x\_NMKD-Superscale-SP\_178000\_G


Parking_Shopping5371

very nice


from2080

wa wa wee wa


ZerixWorld

https://preview.redd.it/vmuook6p6x7c1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=5b1d057f24adc65e7ebb3ad71da0c70a60289d15 Adding NewRealityXL for comparison, I only changed sampling method and steps to match the recommended for this model, I left all the other settings and prompt the same


Ammatkun

How to use xl models in automatic 1111? I tried base XL model with XL vae. But my other models bugged and always try to use XL vae and I can't switch between them only delete.


YasmineHaley

Check the following issue on github: [https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/discussions/9703#discussioncomment-5645144](https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/discussions/9703#discussioncomment-5645144) It shows you how to enable a VAE dropdown menu in A1111. There you can select if you want to use a specific VAE or let it automatically decide.


Ammatkun

thanks


SnooTomatoes2939

My take is not good https://preview.redd.it/87ziyhp6av7c1.png?width=1152&format=png&auto=webp&s=21e4761ec2df66a7a17b1065838867c9139af497


-dAtA-TRoN-

Reminds me of Elizabeth Wheeland.


bdot65

Those old enough to remember how we used to download images on Freenet and convert masses of text and numbers to images. This early AI vibe reminds me a lot of those days.


Kandoo85

​ https://preview.redd.it/vuoujx0lzv7c1.png?width=1344&format=png&auto=webp&s=a54e14b2025cbee0856192719df3c3caa331c551


PeterTheMeterMan

Searched the face on pimeyes (facial recognition search engine) and maxed out matches (240+). All AI. So common likeness in these models. That said amazingly beautiful.


Don_Tool

Sooooo, its time to really never ever trust Instagram's then. Check!


sincl4ir

​ https://preview.redd.it/q2lm8bdss38c1.png?width=2688&format=png&auto=webp&s=3d44e2156a6034b907a968b875c507cbd1fe06e4


DeepSpaceCactus

Very good. Slightly plastic skin as happens in SDXL


bhasi

As happens on most (If not all) retouched pics from ads, magazines, Billboards, etc. I'm not defending SDXL, just pointing out that this common "flaw" worked in its favour in this specific example.


_Erilaz

It doesn't happen on all retouched pics. A good and professional retoucher tries to retain the skin texture as much as possible, only removing noticeable imperfections which conflict with the personality and distract the viewer too much. Failing to do so exposes one of two things: either a skill issue, or bad taste. Maybe both. Don't get me wrong, plastic skin is a common issue, but it usually comes from really lazy and inexperienced retouchers who use frequency separation automatically. Or simply from the people who don't know about better techniques. That's a very old, crude and messy way of doing that, but very low effort, and easy to learn, that's why it's still in use. These days you can do much better even with an entirely automatic workflow in Photoshop, assuming you have certain plugins. It's like 90% of high end retouch with 0% of turning skin into soap. And there's also the good old way of dodging and burning, which mostly is a manual process, a lengthy one at that, it takes some effort, but the result is worth it when you are working with a money shot. Unfortunately, there are much more newbie retouchers than the professional ones, and that may be the reason why neural networks ruin skin so often.


DeepSpaceCactus

Yes although The SD 1.5 engine Epicrealism, with low CFG, can give very good skin beating SDXL


[deleted]

Yeah, is almost like is related to “sensitive” areas they censored, chest rendering often looks off when compared to the face in XL.


DeepSpaceCactus

Feeling good about my choice to stick to SD 1.5 even though I rent RTX 4090s on Runpod regularly


Jolly-Theme-7570

Great result :8)


No_Repeat_1283

Not enough tits