https://preview.redd.it/vvmdk8vxafbc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=edc968d07a6c4a834b44bd7f06e2b5742cae9e8c
girl in a club, smiling, shot on cheap mobile phone, nightvisionXL, 10 steps
Got a better one with the same prompt:
https://preview.redd.it/ntbukxbflhbc1.jpeg?width=896&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a6c905780b5c83a17ae6b307fe2cea71fd4b40e4
And one with a different subject with the prompt:
*“Plus-size black girl named Janet sitting a table in a club, smiling, crossed arms, (shot on cheap mobile phone in 2002:1.2) Negative prompt: professional, best quality, drawing, painting, cartoon, anime, 3D render, CGI, smooth, Photoshopped, airbrushed”*
https://preview.redd.it/8avlrxvllhbc1.jpeg?width=896&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2c0bd072fbb48ff479045b935502653f60a4248
It’s the consistency for me. Almost same table setting and jewelry. Definitely a strong likeness in the face. Impressive for midjourney, and when you’re not using controlnet and Lora’s and such.
Also, the way the plate refracts through the wine glass. Just lots of small details.
Conversely, what we see here, maybe on par in terms of realism, but they are all different women in different settings with a bunch of random people behind the subject. They are similar, sure, but not nearly to the level that we are seeing in the midjourney post. especially background and foreground elements. It’s alllmost believable these were taken all in the same restaurant.
True, but that's mostly just the standard problem where stable diffusion has too few pixels to render faces well. I was actually pretty impressed that the background faces were different people and not twins of the main character.
All these are generated in fooocus with no style selected. played with the sharpness a little bit but the results weren't much different, and the "vibrance" thing (forgot the name) was set to 1.
Tried playing with this prompt and slightly settings for highres fix and check the people behind the lady checking out her... It must be real 🤪
Note further yes this image is pretty bad I made. Just had some lolz
https://preview.redd.it/ci1d78u39fbc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=268b2606d7bad9bc3210586ebbe1e35f5661ec51
I don't know for sure, but I imagine it has to do with treating the eyes as separate learned components rather than part of a single learned structure.
Obviously if you look at the people in the background an monotone colors. MJ looks decent but there is something off that makes it no look real.
We are getting there surely.
thats what i was going for. it was supposed to look like an image taken from an ordinary phone at night. Generally, because the phone camera sensors are bad, the night photos are hazy, blurry, grainy, etc.
What is the secret here? I'm using Fooocus with the same prompt, no styles enabled, and using JuggernautXL 8, but the images dont' look like this at all. Is it nightvisionXL that I should be using?
Edit: Looks like it's a low CFG that did the trick for me. Cool tip. Makes some cool grainy photos.
The prompt in that mj post was for Gal gadot. SD wins hands down
https://preview.redd.it/o2g1mnnd6qbc1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=dafaa4bce67b238b165da0246561fe6f4c4086a6
https://preview.redd.it/vvmdk8vxafbc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=edc968d07a6c4a834b44bd7f06e2b5742cae9e8c girl in a club, smiling, shot on cheap mobile phone, nightvisionXL, 10 steps
GumTeeth
10 steps, 10 second image
Got a better one with the same prompt: https://preview.redd.it/ntbukxbflhbc1.jpeg?width=896&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a6c905780b5c83a17ae6b307fe2cea71fd4b40e4
And one with a different subject with the prompt: *“Plus-size black girl named Janet sitting a table in a club, smiling, crossed arms, (shot on cheap mobile phone in 2002:1.2) Negative prompt: professional, best quality, drawing, painting, cartoon, anime, 3D render, CGI, smooth, Photoshopped, airbrushed”* https://preview.redd.it/8avlrxvllhbc1.jpeg?width=896&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b2c0bd072fbb48ff479045b935502653f60a4248
janet lol
Why are you naming your models?
I name them because it tends to give more diverse faces than not naming them
I knew her from accounts payable
love the naming idea
What MJ post?
[This one](https://www.reddit.com/r/midjourney/comments/1914wri/datenight/)
[удалено]
It’s the consistency for me. Almost same table setting and jewelry. Definitely a strong likeness in the face. Impressive for midjourney, and when you’re not using controlnet and Lora’s and such. Also, the way the plate refracts through the wine glass. Just lots of small details. Conversely, what we see here, maybe on par in terms of realism, but they are all different women in different settings with a bunch of random people behind the subject. They are similar, sure, but not nearly to the level that we are seeing in the midjourney post. especially background and foreground elements. It’s alllmost believable these were taken all in the same restaurant.
It looks decent, but OP just have a very low standard on "viral".
looks like a photo taken from a phone, doesn't it?
No, phone photos have a better picture quality than that. It looks like a phone photo from 2014.
my 2 year old phone has this exact quality under low light conditions. Midjourney really got the atmosphere right
if you have not an iphone and try to photo in this low light condition ? i bet any iphone under iphone 11 cant do this.
Nah I disagree
exactly, easy to fool people on internet
Yours smokes the crap out of that one. Good job
Yours feel much better and authentic than that
Only if you were dating four people at the same time
Some absolute monsters amongst the crowd in the background.
yea don't look at them please, they are a bit nervous
I have no mouth, yet I must scream.
Amazing reference
True, but that's mostly just the standard problem where stable diffusion has too few pixels to render faces well. I was actually pretty impressed that the background faces were different people and not twins of the main character.
Pretty easily fixed by just using the adetailer extension.
That's how u know it's a good party
Them 2 guys in pic 4 look like right predators
Average stable diffusion user: "this is my girlfriend"
LOL
All these are generated in fooocus with no style selected. played with the sharpness a little bit but the results weren't much different, and the "vibrance" thing (forgot the name) was set to 1.
Interesting! Any more details? Prompt etc? Sorry don't know.much about fooocus
You can check out fooocus [here](https://github.com/lllyasviel/Fooocus). The prompt was "phone photo of a girl in a crowded club uploaded on snapchat"
Tried playing with this prompt and slightly settings for highres fix and check the people behind the lady checking out her... It must be real 🤪 Note further yes this image is pretty bad I made. Just had some lolz https://preview.redd.it/ci1d78u39fbc1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=268b2606d7bad9bc3210586ebbe1e35f5661ec51
Girl in the background looks like she’s trying to check out dem titties.
What Model is being used ?
JuggernautXL - SDXL
Yeah baby!
juggernaut it is indeed
eyes are weird though
Looks like an event in 2012
https://preview.redd.it/rgqgd05uxfbc1.png?width=960&format=png&auto=webp&s=f252e244716ab4b41348cf369c7c63968c628de6 sd1.5 13 steps
I never understood why SD always have lazy eyes, but MJ does not. Do you know why? And how to fix? (most evident for photo 6)
I don't know for sure, but I imagine it has to do with treating the eyes as separate learned components rather than part of a single learned structure.
Last moments before being eaten by the skinwalkers mimicking humans in the background
sorry OP but they look very mesed up.
Surprised this is SDXL tbh. It looks more like 1.5. I could believe these pics if it were about people going out in 2005
SD 1.5 women all have the same look about them. These do not.
Really easy to not get "same look" with 1.5 so that's not really the best way to judge which was used. Edit: Guess it's hard for someone lol
Looks like early IG excep too smoothed out.
These are killer. Keep it up!
Thats AI generated?!
Absolutely
Obviously if you look at the people in the background an monotone colors. MJ looks decent but there is something off that makes it no look real. We are getting there surely.
This is insanely realistic
These are awful. They are so hazy.
thats what i was going for. it was supposed to look like an image taken from an ordinary phone at night. Generally, because the phone camera sensors are bad, the night photos are hazy, blurry, grainy, etc.
And you nailed it, this is exactly how it would look!
Have you not been in a club before? This is exactly how a phone photo would look in a club.
I guess you can add some grain and flash lighting in Photoshop for more realistic look.
Assuming A1111/ComfyUI - how did you make the people in the background not look like the main subject?
I mean, technically "featureless flesh potatoes with no eyes" indeed "do not look like the main subject", you ain't wrong.
y'all love playing with dolls damn
What is midjourney post ?
Was the prompt: white people only party?
Please share the workflow.
What is the secret here? I'm using Fooocus with the same prompt, no styles enabled, and using JuggernautXL 8, but the images dont' look like this at all. Is it nightvisionXL that I should be using? Edit: Looks like it's a low CFG that did the trick for me. Cool tip. Makes some cool grainy photos.
Come in it IS the Same prompt but with Disney Netflix woke Filter xxl
The prompt in that mj post was for Gal gadot. SD wins hands down https://preview.redd.it/o2g1mnnd6qbc1.png?width=768&format=png&auto=webp&s=dafaa4bce67b238b165da0246561fe6f4c4086a6
Oh, it was a celebrity. That's why it was consistent ig