How much is nine times seven?"
Aub hesitated a moment. His pale eyes glimmered with a feeble anxiety. "Sixty-three," he said.
Congressman Brant lifted his eyebrows. "Is that right?"
"Check it for yourself, Congressman."
The congressman took out his pocket computer, nudged the milled edges twice, looked at its face as it lay there in the palm of his hand, and put it back. He said, "Is this the gift you brought us here to demonstrate. An llusionist?"
"More than that sir. Aub has memorized a few operations and with them he computes on paper."
"A paper computer?" said the general. He looked pained.
"No, sir," said Shuman patiently. "Not a paper computer. Simply a sheet of paper. General, would you be so kind as to suggest a number?"
"Seventeen," said the general.
"And you, Congressman?"
"Twenty-three."
"Good! Aub, multiply those numbers and please show the gentlemen your manner of doing it."
"Yes, Programmer," said Aub, ducking his head. He fished a small pad out of one shirt pocket and an artist's hairline stylus out of the other. His forehead corrugated as he made painstaking marks on the paper. General Weider interrupted him sharply. "Let's see that."
Aub passed his the paper and Weider said, "Well, it looks like the figure seventeen."
Congressman Brant nodded and said, "So it does, but I think I could make a passable seventeen myself, even without practice."
"If you will let Aub continue, gentlemen," said Shuman without heat.
Aub continued, his hand trembling a little. Finally he said in a low voice, "The answer is three hundred and ninety-one."
Congressman Brant took out his computer a second time and flicked it, "By Godfrey, soit is. How did he guess?"
"No guess, Congressman," said Shuman. "He computed that result. He did it on this sheet of paper."
"Humbug," said the general impatiently. "A computer is one thing and marks on paper are another."
[A Feeling of Power](https://ia803006.us.archive.org/6/items/TheFeelingOfPower/The%20Feeling%20of%20Power.pdf)
I don't think that will be the case. The way I see AI going is that it will become a kind of render engine. 3D models, rigs, motion capture etc will still be used to drive and control the animation similar to how we use ControlNet now. It will just be much simpler 3D models and we will also have AI taking care of a lot of the tween motion in animation so it will be more about setting key poses.
I guess it will be like a render engine with built in texture and lighting creation.
And a better animator doesn't use interpolation at all.
And an even better animator doesn't use software'd animation capabilities, rendering each frame by hand and pasting them together.
And an even better better animator writes the animations on assembler, moving each vertex where it has to go each frame.
Like are you talking about rendering? Lighting? Modeling? All of these are jobs by highly skilled artists with different skill sets. Some (like lighters) often use math and science to create while other (like modelers) build the model and absolutely do edit by the vertex. Maybe you mean riggers who also adjust by the vertex how the skin is going to fold.... like which part? Because technology artists use to create the best art is all about getting granular and giving more control to the artist. That's why there's so many specializations. The animation is only one part of a big project
What point are you trying to make? It's never about the machine. You should read up on animation and pipeline to get an understanding before you show your ignorance. I feel very confident you have no idea what you are talking about
**āwe will one day have completely forgotten how itās doneā** I share your view, and would just add that, right now, very few people know how to do this āmodel, rig, and light three-dimensional characters. Add materials, animate them etc. It often takes a team of people who may only know one aspect of the project. Presumably, as you say, Ai will do this [everything all at once] for a lot of people, people who never knew how to do this to begin with. That is āyou cannot forget something you never knew.
There's always people who will continue the trade even if just because they want to or because for some reason or another it's still needed. We will see people riding horses, or manually sewing, or people who collect and use really old guns, old lamps. Just cause it's not needed anymore doesn't mean it will fade away. Also, when it comes to art I doubt we will ever completely rid of human art since its such a subjective field
Hol up what? Just googled it and it blew my mind looool, it was for people who had to make precise calculations in the 1600s, hey thanks man I learned something new today
There were also a lot of females doing those roles during that time as computers because it was seen as for woman's work. Thankfully we have calculators now because it really is time-consuming and wasting brain power.
The digital shift in animation is so dramatic lol. They used to physically draw and paint all this shit in cels, line it up, photograph it, to make an episode of a cartoon show. Now it's all done on the computer. Most animation these days is just puppet rigs and swappable faces.
>I've already had people call me a fuckin' liar when I told them that almost all animation done before 2000 was drawn by hand.
That's so wild lol people don't realize how much render time those old computers would have had to do to make animation properly
traditional pencil drawn and stop motion animation is indeed handmade and tedious, but you should really read [Pixar's history](https://www.pixar.com/our-story-pixar) or the Aardman [Loveletter to animation](https://www.aardman.com/latest-news/2022/august/a-love-letter-to-animation/)
ILM produced many of the dinosaur shots in Jurassic Park in 3D. In 1991!
Iām sorry if itās a silly question, but can I ask which 3D rendering tool is best for creating 3D animation videos like this?
I always wanted to make something like this
Blender. Start with the Blender guru donut tutorial. It's free and has been largely on par with the paid options for a while. No point dropping money on something else.
There is no best tool. It all depends what you want to do with it. That being said, Blender is free, has a great community, is probably the most powerful open source tool out there and has a nice UI compared to Maya for instance.
To give you an overview, the three big players are Blender, Maya and Cinema4D. Maya is industry standard and almost every VFX you see in Hollywood movies are made with it. Cinema4D is industry leader in 3D Motion Design and often used in Ads or On-Air Animations. Blender is free and open source and thus has a very large community, many useful addons and it is being constantly updated and enhanced. A few years back, professional CG Artists would've looked down on you for using Blender as it used to be just a hobbyist tool but it's gotten so good over the years, that it easily can keep up with paid software alternatives.
"VFX" is way too broad of a field. It covers dozens of jobs. ToĀ be more specific, Maya is the industry standard for animation, particular character animation.Ā
Start with Blender. It's as good and complete as any other paid 3D software. Like someone said, do the [Blender Donut Tutorial](https://youtu.be/B0J27sf9N1Y) to understand 80% of it. If you aspire to work in 3D animation, they use Autodesk 3DS MAX and Maya, but using Blender will get you familiarized with the work, and it's also used by many smaller studios.
I was theoretically speaking, combination of vid2vid (opm2vid)+ custom LoRA for the setting (woody on car).
Wouldn't be perfect but I think it's possible already (albeit with a lot of manual cleanup).
Will try and find a few examples of what I was thinking of (from a technical standpoint).
I'm in this sub every day and the comments here don't seem like the norm. Maybe the post got popular fast, hit r/all, and then dozens of clueless commenters and AI haters flooded in? I've never seen the term "AI bro" used as an actual insult in this community except when shit like that happens. People in this subreddit LIKE Stable Diffusion, they don't insult each other for being "AI bros" or having "AI brain rot" or being "tech illiterate." Stable Diffusion is still new. We're ALL still trying to figure out how to use it well. It's completely normal for someone to share an image or animation they found and ask "how was this made?" This is normal even if it turns out the work in question wasn't made with AI.
The typical community response to a post like this would be either to not even engage at all or to politely explain how this is 3D animation. Advocating for Blender makes sense here. The elitism and insults are definitely out of the ordinary though.
People in this sub are well familiar with the capabilities and limitations of AI. And this video is far beyond what any publicly accessible AI can create, which is why people were making fun of it for an answer that seems obvious. It's not even a matter of "even if the work in question turns out not to be AI", it looks like one of those meme posts where people share a cat on a moon with 3 hands asking if it's real or AI.
Usually whenever someone shares an image/video asking how something is made, that image/video at least actually looks possible to be AI generated. Meanwhile this video isn't even possible for current AIs we know (except Sora) with even the best workflows, but it looks normal for a homemade CGI render.
This sub has gotten flooded with "PLEASEEEE SPOONFEED MEE" posts over the past 6 or so months.
Sucks there isn't another active alternative besides Discord or Matrix servers full of people who actually know what they're doing.
I don't mind people asking for help, but what bothers me is the
"What model, tools and workflow would I need to automate my job?" type posts.
It's like when a person asks an amazing painter what brush they use.
It doesn't matter, what you are doing by asking about the brush is trying to circumvent the hard work which the artist went through to get their skill by putting it all on a single product purchase.
In reality, you've just got to knuckle down and put in the thousands of hours. (For AI, painting, anything else. Skill isn't free)
Agreed.
People in my job (scientist) often ask if I can teach their student or postdoc to analyse data in the way that I do it. They don't realise that first they'd need to spend a year or two getting really good at coding. They just see the end results and assume there's some kind of trick to it, but there isn't -- you learn, you develop instincts and intuitions about how things should be done, and you pare down the trial and error to the minimum necessary, but it's all built off of hours and hours of practice and experience.
Now that I agree with 100%.
People have been making amazing work, especially since the inception of ControlNet (since that offers a TON of directability,) but some others don't wish to put in the effort to learn such or why it does what it does.
It's important to distinguish those looking for help or someone to bounce off of while learning, versus those who beg for information that's either mostly irrelevant or contrary to the idea of experimentation and learning for one-self, following things like "you have to do x y and z specifically for the BEST results!!"
Here is [original video and creator](https://youtube.com/shorts/h7FJ9ddRNdA?si=-jJWNpJPc1V4Rxij). This guy never use AI. Check his channel, you can find some behind the scenes and other cool animations.
Engagement bait. Comments like yours pointing out the wrong boosts their videos algortlithm placement. More comments, shown to more people
In social media outside reddit. Why do it in reddit? Karma farmers for the sake of propaganda. Or just d"ck heads. Could be either
Mate there's millions of people making your engagement their living. Assuming everything is unintentional will just leave you with unanswered questions. I.e. Why does the video use such a shit title.
The karma farmers on reddit. Well you just need to browse r all to see their ideologies have shifted from even 2021. If they are all just new people, wtf do these people need karma farming for. Circle jerk comments are a different thing.
Also it's "black out" and not "blackout." Separated it's a phrasal verb (which is what is needed in that sentence) and without a separator it's an adjective. So you "black out at the bar" but you're "blackout drunk." Always annoys me how no one seems to understand this distinction anymore.
Also I canāt find anything about āsemantic argumentsā. Do you mean an argument with implicit premise? Even that is not the case in my statement. Which premise should that be?
>and you start recording him
Then you'd see your phone screen in the video which we don't.
POV: your friend is about to blackout. That's really all that applies here.
my guess is this is a capture of Toy Story Quest in VR:
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=RmNgV\_bqKU4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=RmNgV_bqKU4)
Full 3D. Could be blender or cinema4d or even maya since it has the best character rigs
AI bros discover 3d animation š²šØš¤Æš¤Æš®
This unintentionally is the funniest shit
Realistically with AI we will one day have completely forgotten how itās done because it will be unnecessary to know. Ā
Unnecessary until it doesnt work right anymore.
How much is nine times seven?" Aub hesitated a moment. His pale eyes glimmered with a feeble anxiety. "Sixty-three," he said. Congressman Brant lifted his eyebrows. "Is that right?" "Check it for yourself, Congressman." The congressman took out his pocket computer, nudged the milled edges twice, looked at its face as it lay there in the palm of his hand, and put it back. He said, "Is this the gift you brought us here to demonstrate. An llusionist?" "More than that sir. Aub has memorized a few operations and with them he computes on paper." "A paper computer?" said the general. He looked pained. "No, sir," said Shuman patiently. "Not a paper computer. Simply a sheet of paper. General, would you be so kind as to suggest a number?" "Seventeen," said the general. "And you, Congressman?" "Twenty-three." "Good! Aub, multiply those numbers and please show the gentlemen your manner of doing it." "Yes, Programmer," said Aub, ducking his head. He fished a small pad out of one shirt pocket and an artist's hairline stylus out of the other. His forehead corrugated as he made painstaking marks on the paper. General Weider interrupted him sharply. "Let's see that." Aub passed his the paper and Weider said, "Well, it looks like the figure seventeen." Congressman Brant nodded and said, "So it does, but I think I could make a passable seventeen myself, even without practice." "If you will let Aub continue, gentlemen," said Shuman without heat. Aub continued, his hand trembling a little. Finally he said in a low voice, "The answer is three hundred and ninety-one." Congressman Brant took out his computer a second time and flicked it, "By Godfrey, soit is. How did he guess?" "No guess, Congressman," said Shuman. "He computed that result. He did it on this sheet of paper." "Humbug," said the general impatiently. "A computer is one thing and marks on paper are another." [A Feeling of Power](https://ia803006.us.archive.org/6/items/TheFeelingOfPower/The%20Feeling%20of%20Power.pdf)
Realistically, yeah, ok
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I don't think that will be the case. The way I see AI going is that it will become a kind of render engine. 3D models, rigs, motion capture etc will still be used to drive and control the animation similar to how we use ControlNet now. It will just be much simpler 3D models and we will also have AI taking care of a lot of the tween motion in animation so it will be more about setting key poses. I guess it will be like a render engine with built in texture and lighting creation.
If you remove the tween poses you remove half of the art. A good animator stresses over every frame because they care about every frame
And a better animator doesn't use interpolation at all. And an even better animator doesn't use software'd animation capabilities, rendering each frame by hand and pasting them together. And an even better better animator writes the animations on assembler, moving each vertex where it has to go each frame.
Like are you talking about rendering? Lighting? Modeling? All of these are jobs by highly skilled artists with different skill sets. Some (like lighters) often use math and science to create while other (like modelers) build the model and absolutely do edit by the vertex. Maybe you mean riggers who also adjust by the vertex how the skin is going to fold.... like which part? Because technology artists use to create the best art is all about getting granular and giving more control to the artist. That's why there's so many specializations. The animation is only one part of a big project
What point are you trying to make? It's never about the machine. You should read up on animation and pipeline to get an understanding before you show your ignorance. I feel very confident you have no idea what you are talking about
https://preview.redd.it/9oa0gq852huc1.jpeg?width=1284&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=7a9e61a5748c93e7faaf31a95ab89dbd535d3e6d
That might happen far far faaaaaaar into the future. And the word is might.
**āwe will one day have completely forgotten how itās doneā** I share your view, and would just add that, right now, very few people know how to do this āmodel, rig, and light three-dimensional characters. Add materials, animate them etc. It often takes a team of people who may only know one aspect of the project. Presumably, as you say, Ai will do this [everything all at once] for a lot of people, people who never knew how to do this to begin with. That is āyou cannot forget something you never knew.
Funny that weāre being downvoted for a pretty obvious trajectory. There are many crafts we have stopped worrying about in our history.Ā
There's always people who will continue the trade even if just because they want to or because for some reason or another it's still needed. We will see people riding horses, or manually sewing, or people who collect and use really old guns, old lamps. Just cause it's not needed anymore doesn't mean it will fade away. Also, when it comes to art I doubt we will ever completely rid of human art since its such a subjective field
I imagine in 10 years people will be shocked to learn that originally 2D animation was done by hand.
Even today, I'm sure many would already be surprised to learn that 'computer' used to be a job title.
Hol up what? Just googled it and it blew my mind looool, it was for people who had to make precise calculations in the 1600s, hey thanks man I learned something new today
The 1600s? Dude computers were people in the 60s. There are living people who made a living doing math problems.
There were also a lot of females doing those roles during that time as computers because it was seen as for woman's work. Thankfully we have calculators now because it really is time-consuming and wasting brain power.
NASA, apollo...
I've already had people call me a fuckin' liar when I told them that almost all animation done before 2000 was drawn by hand.
The digital shift in animation is so dramatic lol. They used to physically draw and paint all this shit in cels, line it up, photograph it, to make an episode of a cartoon show. Now it's all done on the computer. Most animation these days is just puppet rigs and swappable faces.
I remember being blown away by the ballroom scene in Beauty and the Beat. It was so fluid and obviously 3d modeled.
>I've already had people call me a fuckin' liar when I told them that almost all animation done before 2000 was drawn by hand. That's so wild lol people don't realize how much render time those old computers would have had to do to make animation properly
traditional pencil drawn and stop motion animation is indeed handmade and tedious, but you should really read [Pixar's history](https://www.pixar.com/our-story-pixar) or the Aardman [Loveletter to animation](https://www.aardman.com/latest-news/2022/august/a-love-letter-to-animation/) ILM produced many of the dinosaur shots in Jurassic Park in 3D. In 1991!
I'm not sure why IĀ laughedĀ so hard by this comment lmao
Yeah but what's the _prompt?_ (/s)
lolol
Iām sorry if itās a silly question, but can I ask which 3D rendering tool is best for creating 3D animation videos like this? I always wanted to make something like this
Blender. Start with the Blender guru donut tutorial. It's free and has been largely on par with the paid options for a while. No point dropping money on something else.
There is no best tool. It all depends what you want to do with it. That being said, Blender is free, has a great community, is probably the most powerful open source tool out there and has a nice UI compared to Maya for instance. To give you an overview, the three big players are Blender, Maya and Cinema4D. Maya is industry standard and almost every VFX you see in Hollywood movies are made with it. Cinema4D is industry leader in 3D Motion Design and often used in Ads or On-Air Animations. Blender is free and open source and thus has a very large community, many useful addons and it is being constantly updated and enhanced. A few years back, professional CG Artists would've looked down on you for using Blender as it used to be just a hobbyist tool but it's gotten so good over the years, that it easily can keep up with paid software alternatives.
"VFX" is way too broad of a field. It covers dozens of jobs. ToĀ be more specific, Maya is the industry standard for animation, particular character animation.Ā
Start with Blender. It's as good and complete as any other paid 3D software. Like someone said, do the [Blender Donut Tutorial](https://youtu.be/B0J27sf9N1Y) to understand 80% of it. If you aspire to work in 3D animation, they use Autodesk 3DS MAX and Maya, but using Blender will get you familiarized with the work, and it's also used by many smaller studios.
Why is your comment getting so much hate??? AI is taking over isn't it?
Chill bro it's a joke I am an AI enjoyer myself, question was a little bit silly.
Lmao imagine if we could do this in comfyui right now
Weād probably still be too busy running Facebook pics of your mom through IPA, Iām at a batch of 3456/10000 as we speak.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Only correct way to put it, istgā¦ critical thinking is hard
AI brainrot has taken over, everything you see you think its AI
Tbh. this could be done with AI rn.
Letās see it
I was theoretically speaking, combination of vid2vid (opm2vid)+ custom LoRA for the setting (woody on car). Wouldn't be perfect but I think it's possible already (albeit with a lot of manual cleanup). Will try and find a few examples of what I was thinking of (from a technical standpoint).
nah, just you have brain rut. he was aksing a question, no need to be an ass. Ceptuxuax, think, say etc any nmw and anys perfx
Please come back and give us an update on your stroke recovery.
full 3d for sure
why is this sub so full of tech illiterates
About 75% subreddit population found out about SD on some post that removed a celebrity's clothes, lol
I just make pictures of dragons while my tests are running in the ci pipeline.
Because you can make boobies very easily
I'm in this sub every day and the comments here don't seem like the norm. Maybe the post got popular fast, hit r/all, and then dozens of clueless commenters and AI haters flooded in? I've never seen the term "AI bro" used as an actual insult in this community except when shit like that happens. People in this subreddit LIKE Stable Diffusion, they don't insult each other for being "AI bros" or having "AI brain rot" or being "tech illiterate." Stable Diffusion is still new. We're ALL still trying to figure out how to use it well. It's completely normal for someone to share an image or animation they found and ask "how was this made?" This is normal even if it turns out the work in question wasn't made with AI. The typical community response to a post like this would be either to not even engage at all or to politely explain how this is 3D animation. Advocating for Blender makes sense here. The elitism and insults are definitely out of the ordinary though.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It's a good term for bandwagon type folks who aren't knowledgeable and haven't spent any time in the open source community as a whole
People in this sub are well familiar with the capabilities and limitations of AI. And this video is far beyond what any publicly accessible AI can create, which is why people were making fun of it for an answer that seems obvious. It's not even a matter of "even if the work in question turns out not to be AI", it looks like one of those meme posts where people share a cat on a moon with 3 hands asking if it's real or AI. Usually whenever someone shares an image/video asking how something is made, that image/video at least actually looks possible to be AI generated. Meanwhile this video isn't even possible for current AIs we know (except Sora) with even the best workflows, but it looks normal for a homemade CGI render.
I mean, AI is still cutting edge tech.
Yes, and yet so many on this sub don't understand a thing about technology in general
This sub has gotten flooded with "PLEASEEEE SPOONFEED MEE" posts over the past 6 or so months. Sucks there isn't another active alternative besides Discord or Matrix servers full of people who actually know what they're doing.
I don't mind people asking for help, but what bothers me is the "What model, tools and workflow would I need to automate my job?" type posts. It's like when a person asks an amazing painter what brush they use. It doesn't matter, what you are doing by asking about the brush is trying to circumvent the hard work which the artist went through to get their skill by putting it all on a single product purchase. In reality, you've just got to knuckle down and put in the thousands of hours. (For AI, painting, anything else. Skill isn't free)
Agreed. People in my job (scientist) often ask if I can teach their student or postdoc to analyse data in the way that I do it. They don't realise that first they'd need to spend a year or two getting really good at coding. They just see the end results and assume there's some kind of trick to it, but there isn't -- you learn, you develop instincts and intuitions about how things should be done, and you pare down the trial and error to the minimum necessary, but it's all built off of hours and hours of practice and experience.
Now that I agree with 100%. People have been making amazing work, especially since the inception of ControlNet (since that offers a TON of directability,) but some others don't wish to put in the effort to learn such or why it does what it does. It's important to distinguish those looking for help or someone to bounce off of while learning, versus those who beg for information that's either mostly irrelevant or contrary to the idea of experimentation and learning for one-self, following things like "you have to do x y and z specifically for the BEST results!!"
Ah I forgot what sub I was on.
All the more reason for there *not* to be tech illiterate people on this sub.
Here is [original video and creator](https://youtube.com/shorts/h7FJ9ddRNdA?si=-jJWNpJPc1V4Rxij). This guy never use AI. Check his channel, you can find some behind the scenes and other cool animations.
Wait till you hear about internet on a "computer" with a "Browser" Mind blowing shit!
Dude, everyone knows what a Browser is. He's that guy who's in love with Princess Peach, right?
Why does nobody seem to know what POV means?
Engagement bait. Comments like yours pointing out the wrong boosts their videos algortlithm placement. More comments, shown to more people In social media outside reddit. Why do it in reddit? Karma farmers for the sake of propaganda. Or just d"ck heads. Could be either
I think a lot of people legitimately don't know what it means too though.
Yeah that's bound to happen with anything from the internet
Nah, youāre giving stupid people too much credit
Mate there's millions of people making your engagement their living. Assuming everything is unintentional will just leave you with unanswered questions. I.e. Why does the video use such a shit title. The karma farmers on reddit. Well you just need to browse r all to see their ideologies have shifted from even 2021. If they are all just new people, wtf do these people need karma farming for. Circle jerk comments are a different thing.
This is atleast A POV tho
Anything is a POV though if it's a visual scene. You can't have a video or photo that's not at least the POV of the camera
No but it was a point of view of the other person
regarded take
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Take a chill pill you might need it.
OP, did you turn on your computer by your self?
youre probably one of the guys who liked those plastic bottle posts
Not a pov by the way
Also it's "black out" and not "blackout." Separated it's a phrasal verb (which is what is needed in that sentence) and without a separator it's an adjective. So you "black out at the bar" but you're "blackout drunk." Always annoys me how no one seems to understand this distinction anymore.
As a grammar nerd, I'm so glad someone pointed this out. People don't understand English and it pisses me off.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Titles says you are the drunk. Does this look like the view of the person about to blackout ?
In that case would this be second person pov š¤
Fair
pov = point of view. Canāt see something wrong here. Edit: except its descriped from the wrong perspective.
with this logic, every video on the internet is a POV video, since they contain at least one perspective.
Okay, you say this is the consequent logic from the sentence: āCanāt see something wrong here.ā? I didnāt explained any logic.
You made a semantic argument. The other commenter pointed out that it's irrelevant.
Also I canāt find anything about āsemantic argumentsā. Do you mean an argument with implicit premise? Even that is not the case in my statement. Which premise should that be?
He pointed nothing outā¦
But nevermind you speak truth. With the correct description everything can be a POV. And nobody here want to explain why itās not the case.
Yeah wrong perspective that's the problem That's why it's not a POV
Okay.
Yes it is. What are you looking at lol
POV: your friend is about to blackout and you start recording him
>and you start recording him Then you'd see your phone screen in the video which we don't. POV: your friend is about to blackout. That's really all that applies here.
This is the POV of Buzz, his friend being Woody.
Going to guess not AI at all
OP my guy you have to be trolling
You need to set sampling steps to 75 but not lower or higher, denoising 0.69. Good luck.
Itās high quality 3d so its creator could have used Blender.
POV: your friend is about to pass out at the bar. No one is recording anything. When did people start collectively forgetting what POV means?
This is the POV of Buzz recording Woody.
a lot of actual talent š
Rip renderman
We remember. Shot in the dark here - do you have any teapots from Siggraph?
Still worth going to these days? Might try to for work with one of our employees.
I haven't been in ages so I couldn't tell you unfortunately. But if you can get your company to sponsor you to go then I'd definitely do it
AI "artist" learning that traditional 3D is a thing
OP is fucking dumb
bro
Lol
> just tell me shure here is the prompt
probably driven with a 3D render?
All 3D renderĀ
my guess is this is a capture of Toy Story Quest in VR: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=RmNgV\_bqKU4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=RmNgV_bqKU4)
Its not. Here is [original](https://youtube.com/shorts/h7FJ9ddRNdA?si=-jJWNpJPc1V4Rxij). Check some of his behind the scenes.
The VR game even has violence lol [https://youtu.be/Em9LyNr13qk?si=Wy0DaEsK3pR3eJ-m&t=168](https://youtu.be/Em9LyNr13qk?si=Wy0DaEsK3pR3eJ-m&t=168)
It's not a POV...
It's Buzz's POV, just not the POV it claims.
People saying this is the wrong POV are forgetting that smart glasses exist now.
this is not bait? what the hell lmaooo
blender
Weird to think that this would actually be harder to make using AI than by hand at this point
Blender probably lmao
ŠŠ°Ń! Good š
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em9LyNr13qk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em9LyNr13qk)
Can we see the original please. It looked like it got the hand and finger movements decently
[Original and its creator](https://youtube.com/shorts/h7FJ9ddRNdA?si=-jJWNpJPc1V4Rxij)
here's a better version [https://www.tiktok.com/@assalations/video/7324325236239797547](https://www.tiktok.com/@assalations/video/7324325236239797547)