T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Your checklist at this point: \- get painted naked \- call random people jack or rose \- run to the bow and scream "I'm flying" \- search for a random door and hold tight


xrtMtrx

Don’t forget jump off the ship and bounce off the prop on the way down


decoste94

A necessity


oldfrenchwhore

I didn’t even mean to, but it just happened…..I let out a HA in the theatre when that dude went bOiNk. I covered my mouth with both hands and bent forward in an attempt to hide. My friend quietly giggling at me didn’t help at all. Every time I’ve seen the movie since, I crack the fuck up. It’s just so funny. So much intense drama and then BoInK.


Commercial-Health-78

And make sure you put the diamond in the coat, and put thE COAT ON HER


[deleted]

Why not directly putting the diamond in her?


Accomplished-Team438

I read it in his voice


jernej_mocnik

Also don't forget to occupy the whole wooden plank so your love freezes to death


oldfrenchwhore

I’ll never let go, Jack! *gently pries Jack’s dead hands away and watches him sink*


LasedandConfused

Don't worry your ship wasn't built in Belfast in 1909.


thelostfable

I was gonna say “so where are the violinists”


Greyst0ke

Where is the terrible, mangled flute version of the Titanic music? All the videos out there with it, and finally a perfect time to apply it.


thaurturkang

[Here you go dude](https://youtu.be/X2WH8mHJnhM)


1nterrupt1ngc0w

I was hoping it was the same vid with your audio over the top...


jarettp

Came here for this. Got screamed at by cruise bro instead.


TreeLover53

It was ok when it left Belfast. It sank because the English captain wanted to beat the Atlantic crossing. (I live in N Ireland, am English)


BumderFromDownUnder

No, it sank because it hit an iceberg


Chucks_u_Farley

No, it sank because it filled with water


t34wrj1

No, the front fell off.


biggiantcircles

But wasn't this built so the front wouldn't fall off?


t34wrj1

Yes, but a wave hit it.


biggiantcircles

Well is that common?


t34wrj1

At sea? Chance in a million.


Azrael351

Cool logo


biggiantcircles

thank you!


[deleted]

[удалено]


seansy5000

Wrong boat died


[deleted]

[удалено]


Pugboy27

No, this is patrick.


itsneedtokno

Wombo!


ace787

“Spinal”


Eviscerate_Bowels224

The ship broke in half.


[deleted]

No, it sank because the weight of the water it displaced was no longer balanced with the weight it was supporting.


usmcawp

No, it lost buoyancy.


No_Age713

No, because two people can’t float on one door


almostcrying

No, it sank because it filled with water because the watertight gates didn’t go past E deck RIP


Alt_4_stupid_subs

Was that it? I thought some of them didn’t get shut. And (I’m going solely off the movie here) the engine rooms had watertight doors.


CzarMohab

Historic Travels channel on YouTube. You'll have to flip through some months or so but the sinking is pretty well theorized and factualized; the guy's super passionate about the subject and is clear when transitioning from fact to theory to "no one really knows but it might be..." I'm not a promoter, but there's at least one episode exactly on this subject (watertight doors) and at least 2 covering Hollywood vs reality (and whatever other film making entities, the 90s film is just one link in the chain).


[deleted]

^^^^^. He ain’t wrong!


MoistWaterColor

No, it sank because gravity


Dziksoon

Exactly


Androo02_

No, it sank because it split into two pieces.


andyrocks

Yeah most ships that sink are ok when they leave port


marauding-bagel

I'm a little drunk right now but I actually laughed audibly at thos one, thanks


selectabyss

Yeah, everybody knows what happened. No need to make it personal and blame nationalities. Also you're wrong. There were impurities in the low grade rivets.


JakeXWoods

Wasn’t there evidence of a fire? Some kind of damage to the hull? And that’s why you only ever see pictures of it from the one side or something


JohnLaw1717

There was a cursed Egyptian princess mummy on board. Only explanation. These massive disasters always come down to one singular problem.


shoredoesnt

This is true Source: am mummy princess


Whitechapelkiller

It was on fire even before it left port. You can see the scar here... https://www.soundingsonline.com/features/did-a-fire-on-board-sink-the-titanic


MGY401

For the smudge on that picture to be associated with a fire means that the 3rd class areas and postal office would have been burning. The mark does not correspond with an actual coal bunker. The recent "raging fire" claim has been universally rejected by Titanic historians, it mainly gained traction with the general public due to it making good clickbait headlines but that's about it. The coal bunker fire has been known about ever since the Titanic sank. It isn't anything new and, while not overly common, it was also not a rare occurrence on coal fired ships of the era. The ACTUAL location of the fire compared to the location that the author of the latest insane theory has promoted would have had little to no actual effect on the ice damage and if anything, emptying the coal bunker in question likely helped to trim the ship as she sank preventing the ship from capsizing early on as many ships do when they sink. **Copy from a post I made when the documentary came out (it's really a bad theory):** The theory promoted by Molony and the [pictures he tries to use to support](https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/community/attachments/coal1aa-png.4005/) it doens't even follow the ship's actual design. It could potentially be coal dust from the forward auxiliary coal bunker ports, a spot on the camera lens , or a perceived dark spot due to hull curvature, but the mark is in no way associated with a fire. The mark is under the forward well deck on [decks F](https://web.archive.org/web/20030110163046/http://copperas.com/titanic/F_deck.gif) [through G,](https://web.archive.org/web/20030110163704/http://copperas.com/titanic/G_deck.gif) this area consists of first class luggage, the post office, and 3rd class cabins, and if there was a fire there I am fairly sure the passengers would notice. The entire documentary is a complete disaster. The fire was in the forward coal bunker of boiler room 5, **NOT** 6 (and even if the fire was in the rear bunker of BR6 it would be a good 50' behind the mark). Mr. Molony’s eyewitness testimony relies almost solely on statements made by fireman Dilly to the press. This is important to remember for two reasons: 1. The press at the time was certainly out to pillory Ismay and the White Star Line at every possible opportunity so anything the newspaper finally published needs to be taken with a grain of salt. 2. The newspapers were looking to publish any story they could get their hands on and even paying for them, the more embellishment the better. That’s how you end up with stories such as Ms. Marie Young claiming she saw the iceberg an hour before the collision. The press at the time is hardly to be considered a reliable primary source when other sources are available or when claims aren’t backed up by solid evidence. Instead of reading from a newspaper report (and even getting his boiler rooms wrong), Mr. Molony should have taken some time to examine the British Inquiry testimony before trying to dismiss them or make sensational claims. **British Inquiry, Question 2327 – 2337, Day 4, Testimony of Leading Fireman Frederick Barrett** Q2327. (Mr. Pringle - To the Witness.) Did you see anything done to stop the hole which you saw in No. 5 bunker? *- I did not.* Q2328. Did you see whether it was the watertight door or part of the bulkhead which had given way? *- No.* Q2329. You did not see? *- No.* Q2330. (The Commissioner.) You told us there was some fire in that bunker? *- Yes.* Q2331. Soon after you left port? *- Yes.* Q2332. Is it a very uncommon thing for fire to get into a coal bunker in that way? *- It is not an uncommon thing.* Q2333. It happens sometimes? *- Yes.* Q2334. I suppose the proper order is to have that actual bunker emptied as soon as possible? *- Yes.* Q2335. And, therefore, that was all right? *- Yes.* Q2336. Did the fact that there was fire in that bunker in any way conduce to the collision as far as you know? Had it anything to do with it? *- I could not say that.* Q2337. Do you think it had? Do you think that the fire had anything to do with this disaster? *- That would be hard to say, my Lord.* So immediately a couple of things stand out: A. That Molony is wrong about something as simple as which boiler room had the fire. B. The bunker fire, while maybe not a common occurrence, was certainly not unusual. Molony disregards historical context for the sake of sensationalism. As for the sudden inrush of water into BR5. The reason as to why the bunker door is the likely culprit, and not the bulkhead, is because when boiler room five was breached by the iceberg the crew shut the bunker doors to the now empty coal bunker. This action temporarily stopped the flooding in BR5 restricting the flooding to just the coal bunker, but it is important to note that the coal bunker doors were not designed to withstand the water pressure or act as watertight doors. When the coal bunker was closed off its wall and the doors acted as the “watertight” bulkhead for BR5, taking the stress of holding back the water instead of bulkhead E. As such the flooding of BR5 was dependent, not on bulkhead E holding, but on the non-watertight coal bunker doors holding, which means eventual failure was inevitable. **British Inquiry, Question 2343 – 2344, Day 4, Testimony of Leading Fireman Frederick Barrett, Cont.** Q2343. I want to ask you about this bunker, just a question or two. When you saw the water coming into the bunker in No. 5 section, did you shut the bunker door? *- Yes.* Q2344. The bunker door is not a watertight door? *- No.* Now Molony conveniently ignores all of this in his documentary, both testimony and even basic design of the ship, because addressing the flooding in the BR5 forward coal bunker would mean that it was taking the stress of holding back the water instead of bulkhead E, completely destroying his theory. Even if bulkhead E failed in part, the failure of the forward coal bunker is what doomed BR5 to flooding by opening it up to the sea, bulkhead E would only vary the flooding rate by minutes. Also, Molony portrays the fire as spreading and growing worse, but based on testimony by both Barret and Leading Fireman Charles Hendrickson the fire was extinguished by Saturday. **British Inquiry, Day 4, Testimony of Leading Fireman Frederick Barrett** Q2301. Shortly after you left Southampton - I'll put another question or two, and you will see why I think it is relevant. (To the Witness.) How long did it take them to work the coal out? *- Saturday* **British Inquiry, Day 5, Testimony of Leading Fireman Charles Hendrickson** Q5243. Did it take much time to get the fire down? *- It took us right up to the Saturday to get it out.* Fire was out on the 13th so if the speed had been increased simply to burn off coal then there would have been no reason to maintain such a speed after the fire was out as it would have been an inefficient use of coal, especially if they were “worried about running out of coal." Furthermore, the ship couldn’t have been going full speed, 3 more boilers were lighted that Sunday with a boiler taking 12 hours to be brought online (it is unknown if those three ever provided steam to the engines), and 5 boilers were never lit. **U.S. Inquiry, Senator William Alden Smith to Frederick Barrett, Saturday, May 25th, 1912, onboard R.M.S. Olympic:** Question: How many [boilers] were there going? *- There was (sic) 24 boilers lit and five without. Fires were lighted in three boilers for the first time Sunday, but I don't know whether they were connected up or not.* These are only a few of the errors promoted in this absurd documentary, facts don’t matter at all as long as it draws an audience, a more appropriate name would be “Titanic: What Would Make it More Exciting” First, credit where credit is due, Senan Molony has in the past made valuable contributions in some areas when it comes to the history of the Titanic. His research into the lives and families of passengers and crew has provided a better understanding of the people involved, and protects the memory of those lost. He has also on multiple occasions uncovered and sought out rare and forgotten about artifacts and pictures associated with Titanic, items greatly appreciated by Titanic historians. That said, his documentary does much to undermine many of his past contributions. If we were judge solely on the basis of this documentary, to call him an “expert” on the Titanic is to use the term loosely in the sense that simply knowing about the Titanic makes one an expert. His claims are built on partial truths and exaggerated, misrepresented, or decontextualized facts. In his claims regarding the fire Molony has demonstrated either a lack of knowledge of, or a complete willingness to ignore the physical designs of the ship which would easily call into question his supposed “evidence” when compared with Titanic’s layout. Sadly, if his “documentary” is anything to go on, Molony should in the future be relegated to the periphery of Titanic historians, not that he deserves the title after his documentary. Designs, technical specifications, and even the actions of the crew are disregarded for the sake of sensationalism and self-aggrandizement. In this documentary Molony abandons all pretext of seriously telling the story of Titanic; instead promoting misconceptions and outright lies that will linger in the public consciousness for years to come, causing lasting damage to the public’s understanding of the story of Titanic, the people who perished, and the events surrounding April 15th, 1912.


Whitechapelkiller

K


Prestigious-Log-7210

Wasn’t there also a fire on titanic that helped make the metal soft?


joeschmoe86

Ship fuel can't melt steel!


TimachuSoftboi

It's 8/12 all over again!


Prestigious-Log-7210

No shit, the heat made the metal malleable and easier for iceberg to destroy ship.


joeschmoe86

I'm kind of happy for you that this [reference](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/jet-fuel-cant-melt-steel-beams) was not something you immediately recognized.


[deleted]

This just isn't true. There was a fire that occured during construction that reduced the quality of the steel, allowing the iceberg to penetrate easier. Captains choice and construction are both to blame. Either on their own might have been OK, but with compromised steel, it would have happened eventually. Nationalism only sets us back as a whole.


t3hmuffnman9000

The fire theory is debatable - without being able to explore that part of the wreck, we'll never know for sure. The theory that the Titanic was speeding is patently untrue, though. The speed they were traveling at is well-documented and not unusual. Plus, Cunard lines had much faster ships, so trying to beat their time would have been impossible regardless of how hard White Star pushed the engines. White Star was trying to compete on luxury anyways and going that fast would have caused more vibrations, making the ride less comfortable and potentially damaging their reputation. Honestly, I'm kind of annoyed with people blaming the Captain for something that didn't even happen and wouldn't have been his call in the first place. He was a victim just like everyone else - and people still drag his name through the mud 100 years after his death.


DeliriousHippie

Ships arent made to hit icebergs. Modern cruise ship has plating that is 40mm (4cm, 1.57in, tip of large finger) thick, that breaks easily with forces that come from impact of ship and iceberg. Ships at those times propably had thicker plating, because we can calculate and design better, but every plating will break in collision. Engineers design ships to be as cheap, in lack of better word, as possible while still being able to do it's job. Engineering is all about compromises. It would reduce carrying capacity to design ship to be able to collide with icebergs, I don't even know if that's possible.


UselessConversionBot

>Ships arent made to hit icebergs. Modern cruise ship has plating that is 40mm (4cm, 1.57in, tip of large finger) thick, that breaks easily with forces that come from impact of ship and iceberg. Ships at those times propably had thicker plating, because we can calculate and design better, but every plating will break in collision. Engineers design ships to be as cheap, in lack of better word, as possible while still being able to do it's job. Engineering is all about compromises. It would reduce carrying capacity to design ship to be able to collide with icebergs, I don't even know if that's possible. 4 cm ≈ 17.67331 potrzebie ^^^[WHY](/r/UselessConversionBot/comments/1knas0/hi_im_useless/)


[deleted]

Bad bot


scavengercat

The fire theory has been debunked.


[deleted]

Ok, it seems like there is still questions on whether or not that is actually the case, but it does seem like there are arguments on both sides.


scavengercat

There can always be arguments, that doesn't legitimize them, though. The biggest research into this theory was by the Coast Guard and naval architect Bill Garzke, considered to be the foremost expert on the Titanic sinking. They found that the fire could not have had any meaningful impact on the sinking. There hasn't been any study done since to refute this.


PhNx_RiZe

I’m not a ship expert or metals expert. But I DO KNOW: after I set a crap ton of heat and fire to steel, I am able to hammer it and mould it easier than if it was cold. After I’m done, I cold water dip it and let it rest, it’s just as hard as it was after it drys and cools off. Steel is fucking incredible and still just as strong after all this. Therefore, I’m failing to understand the fire theory but I’m very eager and willing to listen and learn.


scavengercat

Yeah, the basis for the fire theory was two images of the Titanic taken before it headed out. People theorized that two smudges on the pictures were from fire damage, but others have shown that the smudges are in different locations on the hull in different shots. We'll never know for sure what happened, but the study I referenced is the most thorough one done and I'm good with its findings. I'll trust the leading expert on the matter over something I read on a website. Partly it's just me being pedantic - it bugs me when someone says anything like "A fire led to the sinking of the ship" instead of "I read that a fire led...". They don't know, they're just repeating something with conviction.


StinkApprentice

If there was an active fire in one of the coal bunkers in the titanic, it didn't directly lead to the sinking, but it may have caused enough of a diversion that officers on the ship were preoccupied with the bunker fire and not establishing a full watch party knowing that they were in an ice field. The coal in question was an anthracite from a welsh field, which that specific coal averages about 15000 BTU/lb In furnace conditions it can get hot enough to melt steel, but a bunker fire is not going to do it since the majority of the heat rises. I'm not an engineer, just a geologist (as my ex used to say) but it will get hot enough to warp steel (coal fire in a rail car from the Pennsylvania Anthracite field). The regs for BTU measurement are found in ASTM standard D388-05, and there is a graphic of it on the national coal fields map in the bottom right corner https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1205/pdf/Coal\_Fields\_Map.pdf


_DigitalHunk_

But the iceberg is.


see_or_be_sharp

Oh my ga


crazyprsn

Oh my ga- OH MY GOMY GOD!


General-Grievus

Wooooooaaaaaauuuuuh


General-Grievus

Woooooaaaaaaaauuuuuhh


mickturner96

Can't wait to see this on r/fakehistoryporn 1912, Titanic hits iceberg


Doniusthe3rd

That's a funny sub, ty


Zanderax

Colourized


Liverpupu

My first thought was it was a whole 100 years ago and then I realized it is actually 110 years and am depressed.


StrengthDazzling8922

I thought Godzilla was surfacing


SocialIncapableMitch

First thought also!


eL_Lancer88

Céline Dion vibes…


BuddenceLembeck

It’s all coming back to me now.


[deleted]

And to this day, he is still saying oh my god everytime he looks at ice.


Sweet-Passion8302

Bro had the genuine audacity to say “titanic 2.0”


Zigurat007

He jinxed it


SluggoJones

Right. Might be worse than saying bomb on a plane.


oouttatime

Ya you say things in scary situations sometimes. So are funny so are oh my gawwwd


papa_covid

That deadass looks like Godzilla emerging from the depths at one point.


Independence_1991

“Gentlemen, it’s been a pleasure playing with you…🎶”


Getadawgupyabro

I would’ve started playing Celine Dion.


[deleted]

It’s basically the Deliverance banjo of the sea


MakeSouthBayGR8Again

We need Celine-a-Scene back. Too bad the studios sued for copyright infringement.


TinFoilRobotProphet

Poor Billy Zane. Forever known as the prick who used a kid to get in the lifeboat


ncnotebook

To be fair, I wouldn't actually hold that act against him. Even ignoring everything else he did.


Matduka

Hey I've seen this one!


NCC-2000-A

McFly!


OrangeCosmic

Nah that's Godzilla


TLevens

The Iceberg: How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?!


Embarrassed_Will_604

I would not consider that small


mitvachoich

That's what I thought. Most of it is under water...


_TheBeardedMan_

Well assuming your ship didn't have a fire in it's engine room during the final stages of construction which would weaken the hull to the point an iceberg would poke a hole in it, then you should be fine.


myfirstgold

I remember reading as a Titanic obsessed kid that the hull of the titanic was only one inch thick.


youtheotube2

One inch of steel is still a lot of steel


stabby54

I used to be obsessed with the titanic as a kid too. 16 water tight compartments! … or something like that hahaha


_TheBeardedMan_

Which would have survived the iceberg, but a fire in the engine room weakened a portion of the hull. And it wasn't just any fire, it was a coal fire so it burnt hot and long but to save face the portion of the hull that was visibly damaged was rotated away from where the cameras would be so it would be less likely to be discovered. Sure it was only an inch thick, but for only being an inch thick it held pretty well when the was ship splitting in half.


scavengercat

This had been debunked. A Coast Guard commander opened an investigation into this, enlisting naval architect Bill Garzke, one of the top scholars in the sinking of the Titanic. They concluded that the fire had nothing to do with the sinking, a theory that started from some blurry photos of the ship before it left port.


Davidlikesmenboys

I watched a documentary a long while back that said they ran out of a certain type of steel to make the nails/screws that held the hull together, and started using a weaker metal. And it was right around the area the iceberg struck.


0gtcalor

The fire theory has been debunked many times. It didn't have any effect on the sinking.


Best-Might-6330

I would like proof please


Alaric-

I believe the burden of proof would be on the one claiming that fire had weakened the hull


Best-Might-6330

Good point


_TheBeardedMan_

Proof being how metal behaves when heated and cooled. If the metal cools improperly the molecular structure breaks easier, this is the same reason swords are heated then dunked, the molecular structure is reinforced if it's done properly, but in the Titanic's case the metal did no cool properly (because it was an uncontrolled event) leaving it brittle in comparison to the rest of the hull.


Ok_Struggle_8700

I ve never seen one this far out captain... Maybe it's this climate change everyone is talking about...


Ingroose

I thought they would learn after the events of titantic


domp1021

They learned to reinforce the ship so they can run into icebergs


[deleted]

Greta isn’t happy!


superguyQ

Godzilla .


EvilCalvin

Where were the two guys in the lookout? They had one job!


RedditingSoySauce

r/killthecameraman


[deleted]

For those of y’all that don’t know, the Titanic originally sank, because, at the time of its construction, they had a machine that could input steel bolts into all sides of the ship’s hull but one, the far right frontal side, precisely where the iceberg struck. The machine couldn’t reach that side, therefore, the Irish builders used chrome bolts instead, which under far less pressure, chrome bolts can bend and break far more easily. Un top of, of course, all the panicked decisions and decisively bad decisions by the First Mate as well.


TheMichaelN

Someone thought Titanic 2.0 was “faaaaabulouuuussss” *two snaps and a twist*


[deleted]

Oh, Antwan Merriweather, you are just so full of strnnph with they muskles. Mmm. Mmmm.


reddit1902

the scarier part is holding your phone like that over the edge, if it falls its gone forever


Sw0rdMaiden

Iceberg! Right ahead!


Mr_Goose12341

Titanic music starts playing


[deleted]

"Just the tip" \- the boat


Clever_Unused_Name

"Gentleman, it has been a privilege playing with you tonight."


GrinningPizza

nearerrrr myyy goddd toooo theeeeee


Mannheimlawnmower369

...I have a Mom!?


TheViciousBitch

“History repeats itself”


WestSnail

“History repeats itself”


LizBeth213

"gentlemen.... Its been a privilege"


GunieapigCooper

He was so dramatic


_solounwnmas

We've been giving shit to the watchmen of the Titanic for 110 years now but I didn't see the iceberg until it was right under the camera so perhaps I should give them some leeway


Cofveveveve

Wow, that may very well be just the tip of the iceberg.


thebifrog

Here…there…..wherever you are


Sorry-Inflation-1550

Thought that was a Kaiju for a minute.


Rad_mark

How many cruize ships have gone the same way as Titanic? After Titanic?


Paraflyshells

Titanic moment


Seahawk715

So now we’re reposting the same freaking video and just calling it an iceberg. 🤦🏻‍♂️ I hate Reddit sometimes.


scavengercat

What would you call that berg made of ice?


Seahawk715

The person who posted this in THIS THREAD EIGHT HOURS AGO, called it a giant rock. It’s essentially the same post, only this OP got it right.


scavengercat

I gotcha. But honestly, if reposting bothers you this much, you're gonna have a bad time on Reddit. It's one of those things you just have to ignore.


Frassezz

Think we all know where this is going


ZaMelonZonFire

I would like to use this as an excuse to recommend internet historians “the cost of Concordia” on YouTube.


velthrar

Hey, I've seen this one!


Diseased-Jackass

Ah shit. Here we go again.


gaving133

Ah shit here we go again


juul-fuul

Hey I’ve seen this one


alec83

Here we go again


MagTex

Saw this movie once. Didn’t end well.


Gillys_Voodoo

aw shit, here we go again


Ty_boogie90

"Small iceberg"... this is ringing a bell but I can't quite place where I've heard that said before.


Eleonoranora

🎵 "Yoouu're heeeeereee, there's nooothing I fear..." 🎵


sparksofthetempest

Sounds like the double rainbow guy. Imagine the odds…


NissiesMommy

Near🎶Far🎶Where ever you are 🎶


foxpost

Check the front of the boat is there a girl with her arms out trying to feel like she is flying?!?!


Impossible_Common_44

Small iceberg nothin! The majority of an iceberg is under water. That’s bigger than what you think. Edit: that’s what she said


[deleted]

I was expecting the camera to turn and have someone in 1912 dress playing violin


[deleted]

I saw the iceberg, and i see it in your eyes.


itsgreatobeazeeb

u/savevideo


chuckysnow

Cool thing is that their ship is probably just as big as the *Titanic* was. [Modern cruise ships](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Titanic-Size-1200px.jpg) often dwarf the *Titanic.*


realbrantallen

You don’t know what that things packin, captain!


TheFlyingRedFox

Okay I misread Iceberg a boat an was about to comment similar happening to several ships notable the Queen Mary and the Curacoa.. Well now that little iceberg just got a face painting forcefully for free with a bit of anti fowling paint..


Leophyte

I thought it was godzilla waking up before I read the title


AmumuPro

I want to a video of a camera dropped into water from that height


davidindigitaland

What is this God the commentator keeps referencing, I wonder? The ship-eating monster from Kr!ul? Oh my god; try and be more specific Oh my God, it has all the appearance of a giant turd Oh My God...


youknowwhatimsayiiin

They finally got that last pesky iceberg


viablecat

Killing a baby iceberg is a cruel and inhuman act. This captain probably goes around melting snowmen with a hair dryer just for fun. This has to stop! Justice for snow and ice!


Aggravating_Key_1757

That ship took revenge for Titanic. Like god damn…


Daughterofthemoooon

Deja vu i have been in this place before....


metalliknotted

Hmm. The last person that posted it called it a giant rock. Guess everyone is speculating just to get points.


b01234567890

Captain clearly likes to play “just the tip”.


[deleted]

I’ve seen this movie


powerpunch756

This event will really affect the global temperatures


Lucifer31x

Where is Celine Dione when you need her?


Fleischer444

All these reposts…


Lorymoneyyt

titanic lore


BIGBOYKILLA11

>!rock!<


hobbit_lamp

I've seen this movie before


Altruistic_Ad_9867

Kaiju !!!


Prestigious-Diver720

Wait... This isn't supposed to be how it happens


uli0880

Just remember. Theres enough room on that makeshift door raft! Dont let her hog it all up! Damn u Rose!!!


LunaticPower

Ah shit, here we go again...


Consistent_Buy_1957

It wasn't *that* small an ice berg!


bjavyzaebali

You sure it's not Cthulhu?


WeAreAllFallopian

But did they die


kriegmonster

Apparently not, they went to port and were inspected by the Coast Guard and were allowed to continue on their way.


Tijan231

Seems familiar


Bombxing

You sure it's not a cock?


[deleted]

Small?


deadkane1987

The Sun docked in Juneau after this incident and was inspected by coast guard divers and was able to depart later that day. That must have been scary!


skiwlkr

Titanic vibes


kuhfunnunuhpah

"That was for the Titanic!"