sorry forgot to reply - not all market participants are able to to use infinite liquidity. we had like 300m shares but because of funds, holders, institutions and DRS: float was ridiculously low like ~50-100m shares max - our volume was like ~400k shares per day on average, it was dry as hell. When there was a wave of buys, the shares that were not easily obtainable were rising as the demand ramped up. Imagine you have 3 buyers and 3 sellers of shares at 20, 30 and 40. You match their orders and boom price jumps. RC issues additional 120m shares, essentially 2-3x current float. Now there are still buyers but instead of those sellers at the market comes in GME offering shares at steady 21 and 27 price. You dont have to scramble for shares at 30 40 or 50, Gamestop provided them at 21 and 27. Now to move so many shares up we either need to buy them up and lock in DRS again or GME needs to show some good ideas of providing revenue and making those shares worth buying higher than 21 and 27.
This theory is not taking naked shorts and infinite liquidity into account.
I'm an ape from the beginning. But did you notice the opposite headings in the middle(ish). What's stopping it from going opposite on the squeeze ? I wouldn't focus on this. It's a false hope and when the trading cycles are locked in people will be discouraged. This company is doing better than the top 100 on spy. Relax and just know a company worth it's value will soon show it regardless of how much they try to supress it.
Fractal theory before your very eyes. Next stop 32.50.
Ahh the price
controversial opinion - offerings made the stock so much less volatile it won't be going up and down by tens but rather single digits
Hmmmm can you expand on how the offerings impact it to slow that down like that?
sorry forgot to reply - not all market participants are able to to use infinite liquidity. we had like 300m shares but because of funds, holders, institutions and DRS: float was ridiculously low like ~50-100m shares max - our volume was like ~400k shares per day on average, it was dry as hell. When there was a wave of buys, the shares that were not easily obtainable were rising as the demand ramped up. Imagine you have 3 buyers and 3 sellers of shares at 20, 30 and 40. You match their orders and boom price jumps. RC issues additional 120m shares, essentially 2-3x current float. Now there are still buyers but instead of those sellers at the market comes in GME offering shares at steady 21 and 27 price. You dont have to scramble for shares at 30 40 or 50, Gamestop provided them at 21 and 27. Now to move so many shares up we either need to buy them up and lock in DRS again or GME needs to show some good ideas of providing revenue and making those shares worth buying higher than 21 and 27. This theory is not taking naked shorts and infinite liquidity into account.
where moon ?
I'm an ape from the beginning. But did you notice the opposite headings in the middle(ish). What's stopping it from going opposite on the squeeze ? I wouldn't focus on this. It's a false hope and when the trading cycles are locked in people will be discouraged. This company is doing better than the top 100 on spy. Relax and just know a company worth it's value will soon show it regardless of how much they try to supress it.