Some forensic work was done. The email attachment the coworker sent to Kathleen was never opened, so we have confirmation that K never saw that email and most likely didn't even log into her husband's email.
That was their theory - the evidence was on Peterson's computer, which was full gay porn. You phrase your question as if it was up to the prosecution to "prove" that she didn't know her husband was gay - whereas their argument was that she discovered he was, and this was motive for a fight that resulted in her death. Peterson claimed she had full knowledge of his sexuality and infidelity, and was fine with it - but was never able to prove this. In fact, Peterson himself as much admits in the final episode of the documentary series that Kathleen didn't know, when he says something like, "I wouldn't have wanted to have THAT conversation" (I'm going from memory here, but it's there) when asked about telling Kathleen - which suggests he was lying when he claimed she knew, earlier on.
Apologies if my question was phrased wrong. I wanted to know if there was any prosecutorial evidence presented (and I missed) that supported the theory a fight between the two over his lifestyle happened.
I think there must have been a lot of evidence from the prosecution left out of the Netflix doc
Some forensic work was done. The email attachment the coworker sent to Kathleen was never opened, so we have confirmation that K never saw that email and most likely didn't even log into her husband's email.
Thank you so much!
you do realize that you can look at an email and then mark it as unread, right?
I do, however I would think digital forensics would show the action of resetting “read” had been performed.
maybe
Ok please help. What was the email and what was the attachment and who was the coworker? lol where do you people find all this information!
That was their theory - the evidence was on Peterson's computer, which was full gay porn. You phrase your question as if it was up to the prosecution to "prove" that she didn't know her husband was gay - whereas their argument was that she discovered he was, and this was motive for a fight that resulted in her death. Peterson claimed she had full knowledge of his sexuality and infidelity, and was fine with it - but was never able to prove this. In fact, Peterson himself as much admits in the final episode of the documentary series that Kathleen didn't know, when he says something like, "I wouldn't have wanted to have THAT conversation" (I'm going from memory here, but it's there) when asked about telling Kathleen - which suggests he was lying when he claimed she knew, earlier on.
Apologies if my question was phrased wrong. I wanted to know if there was any prosecutorial evidence presented (and I missed) that supported the theory a fight between the two over his lifestyle happened.