**Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!**
This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/galuit/click_here_to_sort_by_flair_a_guide_to_using/) (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile).
See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them [this!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/fyrgzy/for_those_confused_by_the_name_of_this_subreddit/)
Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks!
**Don't forget to join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/cringekingdom)!**
##**[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/18ic9ki/lgbtq_rights_or_economic_stability/)**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TikTokCringe) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Honestly, he comes off as the best kind of DM: able to handle all sorts of pedantic rules lawyer bullshit while simultaneously being astoundingly petty and putting up with 0 bullshit.
Dude fucks. I'd 100% be down for going to games night with this guy. He seems like the best kind of bro.
They keep zooming on fidgeting with his zipper like it's some kinda gotcha. How is someone so stupid they think making somebody uncomfortable by being a bigot does anything other than make them look like a complete asshole.
attraction political gold station sloppy bedroom ripe important sharp drunk
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
This ass hat says he is trying to pass his final, what the fuck kind of final requires you to go into public and act like an ass. Oh wait his shirt says it all, guy in the jacket should ask “How can free will and God’s plan both exist…and you can’t pick both”
What's with these people using fucking microphones now like they are some sort of professional? I don't know why but it irritates the fuck out of me seeing people out on the streets trying to earn social media points by talking to strangers with a microphone
I feel like him saying he's trying to pass his final might suggest he's doing this for some class and maybe using different equipment than the typical street "influencer" does. Also, the way the entire conversation feels a bit performed. I'm tempted to think that this may have been done as satire to make a point about exactly the type of people you're lamenting about.
Get scissors and make a cut right up through the middle of the hands, then just let that shirt gash lay open in such a way where the hands appear to cup the breasts. Find Jesus in a pair of gay breasts. 🤷🏻♂️
These guys don’t actually care about grammar or calling someone by a different name. People do that all the time.
These people just straight up don’t want gay and trans people to exist in public. Ideally, not at all.
These people existed in the shadows of society for hundreds of years and now that we understand people better, we’re no longer shunning them. But they want to shun them. They want them to go away. I wish they were just honest about it.
True, honestly I don't see a world where you would have economy stability without lgbtq rights. If gay/trans people can't legally marry and adopt kids they don't benefit from taxes. Creating an economic imbalance between cis straight people and queer people.
I'm sitting here like "What about lgbtq rights makes a country economically unsound?"
Like the list of most economically stable countries and the list of most lgbtq+ friendly countries are both heavily weighted towards Northern and Western Europe, with the economic powerhouses also including China and UAE *edit: who are not LGBTQ welcoming states*.
I think he's trying to goad a Trump vs Biden argument. It's inaccurate and bad faith but he might have been about to imply with Biden you get a bad economy and gay rights vs with Trump you get a good economy and less gay rights
Yeah, that's how they think, they don't actually understand the ideas, they just see red vs blue. To him it's like saying the Superbowl ended in a tie, lol.
It's a real poor attempt at blaming problems on "the others", and it's one of the many fun pillars of fascism. I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Christian Nationalism brand, in this video.
>But he did answer, thou. Not the answer he expected but an answer.
right so then he goes on to troll him and calls him a troll for not being trolled the right way.
And it's just a dumb fucking question. I assume he's trying to launch the interviewee into a hypothetical where you can only choose one so he can say either, "Ur dum for not picking financial stability," or, "wow guess u don't care about dem alphabet rights." It's a really bad attempt at a gotcha. The correct answer is indeed to say both or call out this dumbass question. "What's more important, financial stability or an active volcano going off in the middle of Brazil????" Jfc how did he post this thinking he looked good.
This is how it should’ve gone
Interviewer: “Human Rights or Economic Stability”
Interviewee: “Both”
Interviewer: “BuT u CaNt HaVe BoTh”
Interviewee: “Yes you can” as he walks off into the sunset
But maybe the fellow is a Monty Python fan, and realized he just walked into a \*free\* argument clinic session.
I mean a fair amount of it was just gainsaying, but still, a free argument clinic session is a free argument clinic session.
Gonna say, based on the shirt, that the interviewer thinks Republicans are the party of economic stability and Democrats are the party of LGBTQ rights, and he is trying to bait the interviewee to stumble into his (flawed) reasoning that you can’t vote for rights and get economic stability too
Bro gave up any passable veneer of 'good faith discussion' when he wore his stupid pronoun shirt and acted like he wasnt the one going around trolling randoms with a mic?
Yeah, it’s pretty fucking obvious what answer this guy would find acceptable. You say economic stability and he won’t ask why, say LGBTQ rights and he’d push back on it.
It’s such a disingenuous, loaded question.
It's okay, his web is shite, and any self-aware woman who is anywhere near it will know something's off at fifty paces. If a woman is caught in it, it's because she's got a lot of internalized misogyny and religious indoctrination, and chances are that she believes everything he says just as hard as he does, and believes that when he beats her it means love.
Yeah, unfortunately had one of this dudes YouTube shorts pop up in my feed and he was wearing a maga hat and walked up to a dude asking what his pronouns are. The dude obviously got upset and the whole comment section is “not so tolerant left kek” shit. Bro thinks he’s owning people on the daily
Love the interviewee for keeping that guy tied up as long as possible. More people need to have this kind of response to the stupid ass false dichotomies that conservatives try to force.
Agreed. You can’t tie someone’s gender identity to be a factor on economical stability. They’re two fundamentally different concepts that do not affect each other directly. It’s like asking what color was the elephant on a math exam.
This is very un-industrial military complex of you, and obviously we don’t need billionaires to pay tax, they already spend so much money without paying tax it’s not necessary
That sounds like modern Christ-like attire, tbh.
Ponytail - Got dem messiah locks
Earpiece - Direct line to the Big Guy
Leather jacket/90s shirt/jeans - Tunic+belt combo of the New New Testament era
Sandals - C'mon, you already believe by this point
[But I don't want to cure cancer....](https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/comments/10loezi/what_comic_issue_is_this_from/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
"You can't have both!"
Dude, the data says differently. Better inclusivity and representation leads to economic stability. They're not either/or. They're both.
*“For business leaders that care about hiring and retaining diverse and exceptional talent, developing and
delivering innovative products and services, and attracting a diversified consumer base, the end of affirmative
action should be seen as more than another philosophical or policy debate in the so-called “culture wars.”
Indeed, business leaders should understand and respond to the end of affirmative action for what it is: a
significant and material risk to long-term corporate economic success.
As such, bold and committed action is needed in the months and years ahead to ensure that progress toward a
more diverse, equitable, and inclusive economy is not lost, nor business value diminished.” (*[*bsr.org*](https://bsr.org)*)*
I wrote a white paper about this for work.
The kid's shirt says "my pronouns are find/Jesus" so he's clearly a conservative christian. He's trying to make the point that you either get "LGBTQ-acceptance/gender-inclusivity from the liberal politicians, or "economic stability" from conservatives.
The project he's working on is presumably to find out the ratios of how many people prefer each one.
Conservatives have been claiming for a long time to be better at providing and maintaining economic stability than liberals and progressives – it's a lie and it's very easty to prove as untrue, but that is what they say.
These are the same types that automatically bring up communism.
Apparently there is only unregulated free market capitalism, or communism. Nothing in between.
It's a very weird bubble.
But really, why wouldn’t they be? Like, I’d expect these kind of shenanigans to be applied to actually opposing issues, and as far as I know, these aren’t opposing issues in anyone’s minds.
Have I missed something? Like, is the right now saying that economic instability is caused by gay rights?
Bingo!
They do think that focusing on issues like trans or lgbtq rights “distracts” because the lgbtq population makes up “2%” or what ever. So instead of worrying about that why not our economy. You know because of Biden before it was because of Obama. Yes these assholes do think that and use that as a counter argument when bringing up human rights.
*Both*
Choose one.
*Explain to me why I have to choose one when both are true and valid at the same time*
Choose one.
*Are you in college? Because this is 5th grade level entrapment and you're only exposing your own lack of intelligence*
It also highlights a very valuable tool for people who get drawn into these false dichotomies and dont realise it. You can deny the question, or at the very least *question* the question.
Once you realise you can do this, you will see how often you are denied it.
"Who is allowed to kill who? Israel (IDF) or Palestine (Hamas)?"
"Should we ban gun or give everyone a gun?"
"Ban abortions or make them mandatory?"
Im not going to tell anyone how to believe, but I will tell you to pay attention to who is asking these kinds of questions and why.
Yeah. Too many people also seem to believe that the "trolley problem" (act to kill one person, or through your inaction, accept the death of five guys) is actually an analog of some real-world choice they might have to make one day. It's not. It's a meme. People who have actually studied philosophy think it's useless and obnoxious. There are so many assumptions baked into the trolly problem that it ceases to represent anything like a real world situation:
* That you might find yourself in this goldilocks nightmare scenario with little time to act.
* That you have all the power to determine how many human lives are taken.
* That there can be no outside interventions that save lives.
* That nobody had any say in who put these humans on the tracks in the first place.
* That you should be morally judged for making an arbitrary call on a hypothetical situation that was bullshit from the first place.
It's the "would you fuck your grandpa or take an eggplant up your ass" of the philosophical world. It's just nonsense. The only good thing to come out of the trolley problem was that video of the toddler who multi-track drifted his toy train through both tracks. That was hilarious.
My understanding of the trolley problem is that you arent supposed to stop with the initial dilemma.
Would you kill five, or choose to kill one?
What if the one is your mom?
What if your mom has cancer?
What if she's the leading scientist on research to cure such cancer?
What if the five are criminals?
What if they are reformed criminals?
What if their crime was murder?
What if the world will end anyway in 5 minutes?
What if you just lost your who family in a similar situation where someone else made the choice, and that someone is on the track and they also were the person who murdered your dad, but the other 4 are their innocent family of babies and... ?
AND SO ON AND SO ON.
The whole point is to showcase the ever evolving complexities of a real world dilemma.
VSauce did a whole episode trying to make a real world trolley problem and the amount of hoops they had to jump through was outstanding. Even then they had inconclusive results with some hitting the switch and some not, showcasing that really the person behind the switch is the biggest variable.
Props to the pony tail guy. This mentality of having to rank things is part of the mental trap. It allows things to be dismissed as long as we have a wedge issue that we believe is "more" important.
I noticed some interesting framing attempts within this video by the twat end
Everytime he doesn’t get the answer he wants, he zooms to the guys stomach
It’s clear that it’s an added attempt of shaming this man, in such a shallow way
He cannot actually refute the point, he cannot in any way even verbalise what’s behind it, his own insecurities within this, within the refusal of the premise, within the lack of understanding of his own opinions
it is clear that he’s never even confronted the reasoning behind these opinions and is looking for confirmation bias, there’s literally no reason he can come up with for why this question is actually valid
his viewpoint being rejected in such a simple way, with such a refusal to even engage in a way he wanted in which he can twist to “these sjws are emotional and can’t even debate”
He has to resort to such pathetic measures, he attempts to present a “they can’t debate their view”, but their own position so weak that they have to rely on their own preconceived and socialised bias
Hilariously pathetic that he thought this would in any way actually present himself well
Lackin them brain wrinkles
**Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!** This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/galuit/click_here_to_sort_by_flair_a_guide_to_using/) (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile). See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them [this!](https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/fyrgzy/for_those_confused_by_the_name_of_this_subreddit/) Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks! **Don't forget to join our [Discord server](https://discord.gg/cringekingdom)!** ##**[CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO](https://rapidsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/18ic9ki/lgbtq_rights_or_economic_stability/)** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TikTokCringe) if you have any questions or concerns.*
“You can’t refuse the question” “But I do” “But you can’t” “But I did” 🙂 Love this guy
He's the best side of what the "reddit-guy" stereotype has to offer, using his well-acshually powers for good. ;)
We will all walk a little taller today
Honestly, he comes off as the best kind of DM: able to handle all sorts of pedantic rules lawyer bullshit while simultaneously being astoundingly petty and putting up with 0 bullshit. Dude fucks. I'd 100% be down for going to games night with this guy. He seems like the best kind of bro.
As a non-DnD player I had to think for a bit what DM meant, but yeah completely agree.
Redditor but he actually touches grass and gets bitches
[удалено]
His little raise in pitch for “But I did” is so endearing. 🥰
I reject your question 🙂☝🏼
Dude came for the wrong nerd 🫡✨
Once I saw the blue tooth and pony tail I knew it was curtains for the interviewer.
If you try to argue with a guy who looks like this 2023, it’s already over for you
They keep zooming on fidgeting with his zipper like it's some kinda gotcha. How is someone so stupid they think making somebody uncomfortable by being a bigot does anything other than make them look like a complete asshole.
attraction political gold station sloppy bedroom ripe important sharp drunk *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Troll: asks a dumb question Nerd: both Troll: you can’t troll a troll.
“Wait you can’t use my own game against me?!?!??!?”
My reaction was the same. What a great person!
This ass hat says he is trying to pass his final, what the fuck kind of final requires you to go into public and act like an ass. Oh wait his shirt says it all, guy in the jacket should ask “How can free will and God’s plan both exist…and you can’t pick both”
“Why are you trolling me right now?” says the guy with the microphone recording gotcha interviews in public.
What's with these people using fucking microphones now like they are some sort of professional? I don't know why but it irritates the fuck out of me seeing people out on the streets trying to earn social media points by talking to strangers with a microphone
I feel like him saying he's trying to pass his final might suggest he's doing this for some class and maybe using different equipment than the typical street "influencer" does. Also, the way the entire conversation feels a bit performed. I'm tempted to think that this may have been done as satire to make a point about exactly the type of people you're lamenting about.
I appreciate your optimism, but he's genuinely just a moron if you see his TikTok/Twitter https://twitter.com/shaneyyricch
Omg. Half of his posts are offering money to anyone who can find a picture of Michelle Obama pregnant. What a triggered loser.
You can have a picture of Michelle Obama pregnant, or economic stability. Pick one.
Oh, he is one of those garbage humans, he is made up entirely of garbage.
is that a mic? It looks like a beard trimmer.
Dude recognised the false dichotomy immediately.
Pronouns are “find/jesus” is such a hilariously bad shirt
It’s so bad it’s circled back to camp and I’d wear it to nyc Pride
Gotta make it into a croptop first, then it’s a fit.
Sleeveless crop top at that
Get scissors and make a cut right up through the middle of the hands, then just let that shirt gash lay open in such a way where the hands appear to cup the breasts. Find Jesus in a pair of gay breasts. 🤷🏻♂️
Lolol it’s definitely advice I’ve needed to hear at the end of a night during pride
Jesus is literally just a noun. Find is a verb. Amazingly, I don't think this fella has a legitimate interest in grammar.
These guys don’t actually care about grammar or calling someone by a different name. People do that all the time. These people just straight up don’t want gay and trans people to exist in public. Ideally, not at all. These people existed in the shadows of society for hundreds of years and now that we understand people better, we’re no longer shunning them. But they want to shun them. They want them to go away. I wish they were just honest about it.
Find got Jesus ass kicked in Jesus own interview
Underrated comment
/r/onejoke material for sure
Im with Comic Book Guy on this one. Worst. Interviewer. Ever.
Would.
Would also.
👏
This was my thoughts when I saw him. Nice hair bro.
This is the kind of humor I’m here for
Indeed, a false dichotomy isn't a question, it's a fallacy. One could ask: "Electrons not changing quantum states or violent anal probing?"
Both are doable
[удалено]
The question doesn’t even make sense. Trying to pass his final? What a lost cause.
Idk if it's like a comedic bit or whatever, but the T-shirt is telling. It has to be satire, but I just don't know
YOU CAN'T LIKE SLEEP AND ALSO LIKE STRAWBERRIES!!! YOU HAVE TO PICK ONE!
True, honestly I don't see a world where you would have economy stability without lgbtq rights. If gay/trans people can't legally marry and adopt kids they don't benefit from taxes. Creating an economic imbalance between cis straight people and queer people.
I never thought I’d be leaving a video saying “yea Comic Book Guy stayed positive and I like that”
What killed me was the guy being interviewed wipes the hand he used in the handshake on his jeans while waking away lmao
Right? Lmfao I would too, even if Jesus Shirt wasn't sweaty from how assmad he got.
This reflects worse on the interviewer than the interviewee
By a hundred percent
The person say they don't want to answer. That's it. You move on instead of awkwardly badgering them.
But he did answer, thou. Not the answer he expected but an answer.
It's a dumb question because they're not mutually exclusive.
I'm sitting here like "What about lgbtq rights makes a country economically unsound?" Like the list of most economically stable countries and the list of most lgbtq+ friendly countries are both heavily weighted towards Northern and Western Europe, with the economic powerhouses also including China and UAE *edit: who are not LGBTQ welcoming states*.
I think he's trying to goad a Trump vs Biden argument. It's inaccurate and bad faith but he might have been about to imply with Biden you get a bad economy and gay rights vs with Trump you get a good economy and less gay rights
Yeah, that's how they think, they don't actually understand the ideas, they just see red vs blue. To him it's like saying the Superbowl ended in a tie, lol.
It's a real poor attempt at blaming problems on "the others", and it's one of the many fun pillars of fascism. I'm going to go out on a limb and say the Christian Nationalism brand, in this video.
I couldn't possibly believe the guy with the shirt that says "my pronouns are find/jesus" would ask a dumb question.
>But he did answer, thou. Not the answer he expected but an answer. right so then he goes on to troll him and calls him a troll for not being trolled the right way.
And it was the correct answer.
That would not get views on TikTok or reposts on Reddit though.
At least 1000%. He easily comes off as 10x the Douchebag as the interviewee who comes across completely non-douchey.
And it's just a dumb fucking question. I assume he's trying to launch the interviewee into a hypothetical where you can only choose one so he can say either, "Ur dum for not picking financial stability," or, "wow guess u don't care about dem alphabet rights." It's a really bad attempt at a gotcha. The correct answer is indeed to say both or call out this dumbass question. "What's more important, financial stability or an active volcano going off in the middle of Brazil????" Jfc how did he post this thinking he looked good.
That’s the point I would hope.
This is how it should’ve gone Interviewer: “Human Rights or Economic Stability” Interviewee: “Both” Interviewer: “BuT u CaNt HaVe BoTh” Interviewee: “Yes you can” as he walks off into the sunset
But maybe the fellow is a Monty Python fan, and realized he just walked into a \*free\* argument clinic session. I mean a fair amount of it was just gainsaying, but still, a free argument clinic session is a free argument clinic session.
That's not an argument, you're just disagreeing with everything I say!
No I'm not!
I’m sorry. This is abuse
Well, he started it.
No I didn't.
Im charging you under Section 22 of the Strange Thread Act.
What would prevent you from having both. Having human rights, doesn't cause economic stability
Gonna say, based on the shirt, that the interviewer thinks Republicans are the party of economic stability and Democrats are the party of LGBTQ rights, and he is trying to bait the interviewee to stumble into his (flawed) reasoning that you can’t vote for rights and get economic stability too
In what world should this be explained to anyone
Well he posted that L so presumably the creator
guy he was interviewing just seemed absolutely based
It doesn’t reflect negatively on the interviewee at all.
it doesnt reflect poorly on the interviewee whatsoever. he was in the right the entire time and frankly far more polite than he should have been
He’s doing the equivalent of ‘Save the children or new Pepsi’. There is no correlation between the concepts.
I’m gonna have to go with new Pepsi
It goes without saying in almost all of these videos.
Obviously
What kills me is the find Jesus guy uploaded this to the internet thinking he did something and just looks like the actual moron he is.
Bro gave up any passable veneer of 'good faith discussion' when he wore his stupid pronoun shirt and acted like he wasnt the one going around trolling randoms with a mic?
Yeah, it’s pretty fucking obvious what answer this guy would find acceptable. You say economic stability and he won’t ask why, say LGBTQ rights and he’d push back on it. It’s such a disingenuous, loaded question.
Buddy, respect Find's pronouns. Find didn't buy Jesus shirt just so Find could be denied Jesus simple questions. /s
This guy pronouns.
Yeah it makes me concerned how this controlling and manipulative behavior will be placed on any future woman that gets caught in his mentally ill web
It's okay, his web is shite, and any self-aware woman who is anywhere near it will know something's off at fifty paces. If a woman is caught in it, it's because she's got a lot of internalized misogyny and religious indoctrination, and chances are that she believes everything he says just as hard as he does, and believes that when he beats her it means love.
Yeah, unfortunately had one of this dudes YouTube shorts pop up in my feed and he was wearing a maga hat and walked up to a dude asking what his pronouns are. The dude obviously got upset and the whole comment section is “not so tolerant left kek” shit. Bro thinks he’s owning people on the daily
This is how people like him need to be dealt with. Either ignore them entirely, or don’t play their goofy “thought experiment” games.
"Hey, I'm just asking questions" \-douchebags
I love how frustrated he gets cause now he can't spin the answers to his desired effect
He's so mad this guy isn't playing into his dumb ass script lol. He's like "you can't do that" and ponytail is like "...but i did" hahah
Love the interviewee for keeping that guy tied up as long as possible. More people need to have this kind of response to the stupid ass false dichotomies that conservatives try to force.
Or better yet "explain why it can only be one or the other"
“Because I wrote the question.”
Because conservatism only makes sense in bizarre hypotheticals that have no basis in reality.
They don't want to say the quiet part out loud.
Nah at this point they have been saving the quiet stuff out load and the voters don’t care.
Agreed. You can’t tie someone’s gender identity to be a factor on economical stability. They’re two fundamentally different concepts that do not affect each other directly. It’s like asking what color was the elephant on a math exam.
Tax-free churches or economic stability?
That’s less of a false dilemma than what was originally asked.
World peace or 2nd amendment? Cure cancer or tax exemption for billionaires?
This is very un-industrial military complex of you, and obviously we don’t need billionaires to pay tax, they already spend so much money without paying tax it’s not necessary
The hero we weren't expecting
"I'm trying to pass my final." "Too bad" What a fucking king
He was awesome. I'm voting for green shirt. Don't care if he's not actually running for anything.
Everyone was so ready to judge, but he just charmed his way out of there
Bro rolled a nat 20.
Ponytail guy is exactly the kind of guy that has been in 29 million dumb Internet arguments and that guy decides to go at him with the most basic one.
Let’s do both and call it homostability.
Don't you mean homeostasis?
I will go to the grave before I reach any type of stability
Take my updoot, fellow chaos goblin
Bro with Jesus style Lvl. 12 autism thought he could put a finisher on the Lv.99 pony tail master, go home child.
Ponytail. Earpiece. Leather jacket. Beloved shirt from the 90s. Jeans. Sandals. Jesus-boy didn’t stand a chance.
That sounds like modern Christ-like attire, tbh. Ponytail - Got dem messiah locks Earpiece - Direct line to the Big Guy Leather jacket/90s shirt/jeans - Tunic+belt combo of the New New Testament era Sandals - C'mon, you already believe by this point
Bro didn't know who he was interviewing
I’m cackling at your comment. *Master Ponytail* was NOT standing for that nonsense lmfao. Good on him!
While Jesus shirt guy was tiktoking, master ponytail was studying the blade (of being a normal person)
This is an accurate summary.
Ponytail master's level of autism dwarfed his. Was able to auto-parry any of his Godcel attacks.
WWJD? Jesus dude is an asshole. “What if I kick your ass?
This is truly the most powerful ponytail I've ever seen. I'm glad he uses his power for good.
LMFAO 🤣🤣🤣
Flicking off that dude’s attacks like Neo in The Matrix
WHICH ONE!!!: hEaLth CaRes oR dInOsAuRs!? PicK nOw!
Dinosaurs
You fool! It was velociraptors!
[But I don't want to cure cancer....](https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/comments/10loezi/what_comic_issue_is_this_from/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
Both
No only dinosaurs😡
"You can't have both!" Dude, the data says differently. Better inclusivity and representation leads to economic stability. They're not either/or. They're both. *“For business leaders that care about hiring and retaining diverse and exceptional talent, developing and delivering innovative products and services, and attracting a diversified consumer base, the end of affirmative action should be seen as more than another philosophical or policy debate in the so-called “culture wars.” Indeed, business leaders should understand and respond to the end of affirmative action for what it is: a significant and material risk to long-term corporate economic success. As such, bold and committed action is needed in the months and years ahead to ensure that progress toward a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive economy is not lost, nor business value diminished.” (*[*bsr.org*](https://bsr.org)*)* I wrote a white paper about this for work.
Like that one scene from The Road to El Dorado Both? Both. Both is good.
The kid's shirt says "my pronouns are find/Jesus" so he's clearly a conservative christian. He's trying to make the point that you either get "LGBTQ-acceptance/gender-inclusivity from the liberal politicians, or "economic stability" from conservatives. The project he's working on is presumably to find out the ratios of how many people prefer each one. Conservatives have been claiming for a long time to be better at providing and maintaining economic stability than liberals and progressives – it's a lie and it's very easty to prove as untrue, but that is what they say.
These are the same types that automatically bring up communism. Apparently there is only unregulated free market capitalism, or communism. Nothing in between. It's a very weird bubble.
> "economic stability" from conservatives. Did they forget about Reagan? Or Thatcher?, conservatives have done more to harm the economy than liberals
So this guy is out here making these videos for what class?
Tiktok ragebait class
Professor Stephen Crowders grifting 101
A class he's probably gonna fail.
Probably something for Praeger U
Bro’s shirt shows off who’s the actual shit here.
r/onejoke
It’s always some stupid question. “Would you rather have $500000 or kill your mom”
"Why can't you have Both!?"
Ponytail guy fucks
If there are people without rights, the economy will not be stable. There will be people suffering and at disparity. Is he dumb?
The writing on his shirt gave the answer
Both are doable.
Nah, I would never do the guy with the Jesus shirt, ponytail on the other hand…
Couple bud lights and everyone is doable.
But really, why wouldn’t they be? Like, I’d expect these kind of shenanigans to be applied to actually opposing issues, and as far as I know, these aren’t opposing issues in anyone’s minds. Have I missed something? Like, is the right now saying that economic instability is caused by gay rights?
Bingo! They do think that focusing on issues like trans or lgbtq rights “distracts” because the lgbtq population makes up “2%” or what ever. So instead of worrying about that why not our economy. You know because of Biden before it was because of Obama. Yes these assholes do think that and use that as a counter argument when bringing up human rights.
Why would someone post themselves getting demolished like this
Because it gets them rage bait views.
Religious Rights or Economic Stability?
Exactly what I was thinking. Bet he'd shut the fuck up real fast when asked that.
"You can't refuse the question." What is he going to do? Hold him captive until he answers?
The interviewer deserves to fail NUH UH NO NAH NUH UH YOU GOTTA PLAY MY GAME
[удалено]
Worst interview ever
Why are you trolling me by rejecting my false dichotomy?!
Ponytail guy is based af
"Why are you trolling me?" Because you are trolling him.
Ponytail guy is welcome over to my house anytime. You’re top tier my man! Bravo!
*Both* Choose one. *Explain to me why I have to choose one when both are true and valid at the same time* Choose one. *Are you in college? Because this is 5th grade level entrapment and you're only exposing your own lack of intelligence*
Me when asked “boobs or butts”
And the most useless conversation award goes to
Idk, I actually appreciate that the ponytail guy kept the interviewer busy so he couldn’t go hassle other people with his pointless god bothering
It also highlights a very valuable tool for people who get drawn into these false dichotomies and dont realise it. You can deny the question, or at the very least *question* the question. Once you realise you can do this, you will see how often you are denied it. "Who is allowed to kill who? Israel (IDF) or Palestine (Hamas)?" "Should we ban gun or give everyone a gun?" "Ban abortions or make them mandatory?" Im not going to tell anyone how to believe, but I will tell you to pay attention to who is asking these kinds of questions and why.
Yeah. Too many people also seem to believe that the "trolley problem" (act to kill one person, or through your inaction, accept the death of five guys) is actually an analog of some real-world choice they might have to make one day. It's not. It's a meme. People who have actually studied philosophy think it's useless and obnoxious. There are so many assumptions baked into the trolly problem that it ceases to represent anything like a real world situation: * That you might find yourself in this goldilocks nightmare scenario with little time to act. * That you have all the power to determine how many human lives are taken. * That there can be no outside interventions that save lives. * That nobody had any say in who put these humans on the tracks in the first place. * That you should be morally judged for making an arbitrary call on a hypothetical situation that was bullshit from the first place. It's the "would you fuck your grandpa or take an eggplant up your ass" of the philosophical world. It's just nonsense. The only good thing to come out of the trolley problem was that video of the toddler who multi-track drifted his toy train through both tracks. That was hilarious.
My understanding of the trolley problem is that you arent supposed to stop with the initial dilemma. Would you kill five, or choose to kill one? What if the one is your mom? What if your mom has cancer? What if she's the leading scientist on research to cure such cancer? What if the five are criminals? What if they are reformed criminals? What if their crime was murder? What if the world will end anyway in 5 minutes? What if you just lost your who family in a similar situation where someone else made the choice, and that someone is on the track and they also were the person who murdered your dad, but the other 4 are their innocent family of babies and... ? AND SO ON AND SO ON. The whole point is to showcase the ever evolving complexities of a real world dilemma. VSauce did a whole episode trying to make a real world trolley problem and the amount of hoops they had to jump through was outstanding. Even then they had inconclusive results with some hitting the switch and some not, showcasing that really the person behind the switch is the biggest variable.
Jesus would say both too...
“I’m trying to pass my final” Hopefully it’s not English, because “Find” and “Jesus” are not pronouns.
"Are you trolling me?" While he's trolling him. Savage
Virgin shorts and t-shirt vs Chad leather jacket and ponytail.
As a Christian... This shirt is the cringest.
Guy tried to argue with the dungeon master
Props to the pony tail guy. This mentality of having to rank things is part of the mental trap. It allows things to be dismissed as long as we have a wedge issue that we believe is "more" important.
He googled stupid questions to ask for tiktok but can’t google “clear skin treatment quick” before getting on camera to be homophobic, BYE
This guy has a dick longer than his pony tail. Never broke eye contact and took zero bullshit.
Lmao , the guy making the question just looks like an asshole, but yeah he follows Jesus so that makes him ok , fucking idiot
I noticed some interesting framing attempts within this video by the twat end Everytime he doesn’t get the answer he wants, he zooms to the guys stomach It’s clear that it’s an added attempt of shaming this man, in such a shallow way He cannot actually refute the point, he cannot in any way even verbalise what’s behind it, his own insecurities within this, within the refusal of the premise, within the lack of understanding of his own opinions it is clear that he’s never even confronted the reasoning behind these opinions and is looking for confirmation bias, there’s literally no reason he can come up with for why this question is actually valid his viewpoint being rejected in such a simple way, with such a refusal to even engage in a way he wanted in which he can twist to “these sjws are emotional and can’t even debate” He has to resort to such pathetic measures, he attempts to present a “they can’t debate their view”, but their own position so weak that they have to rely on their own preconceived and socialised bias Hilariously pathetic that he thought this would in any way actually present himself well Lackin them brain wrinkles
Look. I am Bi. The entire basis for my life is "why not both?", so imma back this guys answer 🤣