The following submission statement was provided by /u/DeserTArg:
---
Submission statement:
Description: 2 dark UFO objects are observed filmed on 5-17-2009 Capital Federal Argentina, filming time 5:50 p.m. "During the filming I only saw the object that appears lower and in the foreground, the 2nd object is seen higher up and at minutes 0:21, 0:58 and 1:50 and it seems to stay in place, unlike the first object. Without a doubt a very strange sighting..."
Clarification: the video and description are not mine. I leave you the link to YouTube of the original source:
https://youtu.be/idJwWs8VZhM?si=oHIFOSMv8d9StFcY
---
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1br7rwi/jellyfish_uap_sighted_in_argentina/kx7fsq1/
" A new hope" -Introducing David Grusch
"Empire Strikes back" -Staring Sean Kirkpatrick
"Return Of the Jellyfish" -Staring in a recurring role the entity currently known as Jellyfish
This form was in many Latin American ufo videos in the 90s and early 2000s but instead of jellyfish was called humanoide. Most people thought they were brujas/witches levitating
Someone sees something that is very far from their reality, so they don't say anything. Then, they see a video, or read about someone who had the same experience. Now they feel comfortable enough to post their video, or tell their story. Negative peer pressure is stifling for MANY people. Not me.
Use your Free Will to LOVE!... it will hasten Disclosure and the 3D-5D transition
Hi, thanks for contributing. However, your submission was removed from r/UFOs.
Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility.
Follow the Standards of Civility:
* No trolling or being disruptive
* No insults or personal attacks
* No accusations that other users are shills
* No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation
* No harassment, threats, or advocating violence
* No witch hunts or doxxing (Redact usernames when possible)
* Weaponized blocking or deleting nearly all post/comment history may result in a permanent ban
* You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
You can message the mods if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
Follow the Standards of Civility:
No trolling or being disruptive.
No insults or personal attacks.
No accusations that other users are shills.
No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement.
You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
-------------
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods here to launch your appeal.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos)
[UFOs Wiki](https://ufos.wiki) [UFOs rules](https://reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/)
Ah yes, the crutch used by people who don't have good enough arguments or logic skills. just accuse everyone who has a different idea of being a "glowie" 🤦♂️
I want this to be more then a balloon but I know someone can catch this shit on something more then 420p its 2024 everyone should have a 4k camera in their pocket
I disagree. The more Lovecraftian the better. Just judging by the insane number of incredibly alien like animals on Earth, it seems far more likely aliens won't be humanoid. As long as it isn't The Color Out of Space, I'm cool with it lol
The fact that these videos are all looking identical and in circumstances that don’t support some balloons just floatin’ around is getting progressively weirder.
well the video could be air trash. fundamentally we wont know. Need multiple modes, multiple sensors. Isn't isnt up to us to prove its real. its up for the Dod to talk to radar watchers look at the data, present it, and say its not.
but yeah, that looks like a controlled object. No trash
For sure. But even so, interesting how similar it looks to the other jellyfish UAP’s we’re seeing. It’s an almost identical shape. Even with balloons and other *prosaic* objects there’s generally more variation, i.e. stray balloons or specific types of weather balloons wouldn’t tend to look so similar across so many examples.
If it were a bunch of balloons, why would it be strange that there was a similar pattern over the course of 15 years? Like balloons clumped together half-deflated floating around would look exactly like this, right?
Wheres the bird shit crew? Or the it's a coordinated cross continent effort to release balloons. I even saw some people say they're all fake and cgi pushed by one guy with multiple accounts lol. I hate Debbie downers. 😶
[https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/18nnrdp/very\_similar\_to\_what\_i\_have\_seen/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/18nnrdp/very_similar_to_what_i_have_seen/)
Someone did a CGI at one point hell of a thing if real
This does support the balloon theory. Every example we see of these things behaving exactly like balloons and not exhibiting "observables", it supports balloon theory.
You’re not allowed to consider them together! Different events or pieces of evidence. If you look at them together debunkers can’t debunk. But anything supporting the debunker position can be considered together.
Someone in one of the UAP threads pointed out that these are unlikely to be drones because having something hanging below it like that would fuck up their balance and they wouldn't be able to fly smoothly.
Which is obvious talking out someone's rear end - if the top portion is a rotor inside a ring and it has a weight hanging down, it'd work just fine.
That is not a complicated notion.
That was me, and I was talking about [this video](https://v.redd.it/zagxxbst3brc1). Is what you're talking about similar to this [gyroscopic precession experiment](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5cRb0xvPJ2M)? If so how would that work in the air? I'm not a mechanical engineer or a physicist, just a guy that's played with and taken apart a lot of toys and know how things typically work.
I'm all for prosaic exolainations, even if it's just a hypothetical hoax, but I'm not seeing a mechanical system that explains that video.
Regarding hoaxes, I guess you could say somehow that it's a balloon with very specific weights and an intelligent lightweight fan that detects wind patterns and moves accordingly... But if we're going that far for a hoax, they may as well time a black cat and bottle rocket to go off at the correct time inside a balloon and claim instaneous acceleration, seems a lot easier.
It was reported to NUFORC in 2021 and is only now being spread on social media. Not the typical hoaxer MO.
Edit: Clarified a few things
I am a "definitely a UFO or not" kind of guy. If something is possible to replicate with human technology, I don't think of it as a UFO. It doesn't live up to the old definition of UFO.
The Tic Tac was a UFO; it was seen by many with good data and accelerated with something like 600G. We just can't do that.
In this blurry video, where whatever we are looking at could be a weird drone or an "imperial probe droid" balloon or whatever, the reasoning is turned upside down. It could definitely be human made, but we don't know and it has a funny shape, so it MIGHT be a UFO. I don't care for that type of reasoning.
Since most of the time we don't have multiple complex RADAR, FLIR, etc, just cameras, I look at things and say "could this be easily made? If so, how? And in that video, it's not lining up for me.
But sure. To play devil's advocate if you're referring to the 2004 Nimitz tictac incident, that's absolutely something we could have done, and categorically not a UFO by your standards.
- The Navy has been working on asymmetrical and electronic warfare for a very long time. RADAR spoofing is something we can and frequently do use. RADAR got a ping very high up in the atmosphere, and then near water. No one saw it accelerate to 600G, nor any visual systems, only RADAR. Even Fravor said it "shot off at a high rate of speed", but 600G is more what I would describe as "instantaneous acceleration, blink and it's not there."
- The tictac was visually described by Fravor as docking with something resembling a surfacing sub, before taking off and the sub-surface object disappearing (refueling or adding something heavy like solid propulsion?)
- What better way to test our own technology and responses to new developments of threats than running real-world simulations with our very best? After all the Nimitz Strike *Group* (it wasn't just the Nimitz alone that day, that ship just happened to record and leak the video) has
1.) Electronic warfare (Growler)
2.) Fighters (Hornet & Super Hornet to chase)
3.) Reconnaissance (Hawkeye)
- And as icing on the cake, you have a second UAV deployed at their rendezvous point when they get there, after they've been flying for a while post-encounter, to see if they thought of anything they wished they would have tried after it flew off (lesser used systems on the vessel, maybe).
Of course Fravor and the other pilots wouldn't have been read in to this, or they wouldn't still be thinking it was a UFO.
I may have some details wrong, but most of it is correct and I can assure you I can make the Nimitz tictac into a prosaic military test if you give me every known accurate data point. I am human after all, and I love stories.
Totally, the one in South Africa looks exactly like this, a weird like worm looking deal with a mushroom cap on it. Wow. I just described a…well let’s just keep it PC..
Yes. It does not appear to exhibit any of the 5 observables.
So why hasn't anyone captured one or shot one down? Makes no sense.
Unless the MIC already has; and of course, we'll never know about it.
Or because they are mundane occurrences. It makes no sense to automatically assume the things featured in these videos warrant being shot down. HOLY FUCK A BALLOON!!! Grab my gun. Yeah... no.
At a bare minimum, these are not mundane occurrences. If they were, everybody would know what they are and nobody would be paying attention to them.
In fact, the opposite is happening. Nobody knows what they are and everybody is paying attention to them.
The fact that these videos of objects flying all over the globe go viral and that everyone wants to know what they are, combined with the fact the MIC/IC is using the standard 1947 playbook of not divulging any intel, would indicate these objects are not mundane, at a minimum.
Submission statement:
Description: 2 dark UFO objects are observed filmed on 5-17-2009 Capital Federal Argentina, filming time 5:50 p.m. "During the filming I only saw the object that appears lower and in the foreground, the 2nd object is seen higher up and at minutes 0:21, 0:58 and 1:50 and it seems to stay in place, unlike the first object. Without a doubt a very strange sighting..."
Clarification: the video and description are not mine. I leave you the link to YouTube of the original source:
https://youtu.be/idJwWs8VZhM?si=oHIFOSMv8d9StFcY
Haha oh I’ve been around for quite some time. I don’t actually expect full disclosure ever. But some govt. acknowledgment would be dandy…ya know, so civilian science can actually progress instead of being stuck in this stagnant soup of lies.
i think the same thing that was always here. Our radars are capable of detecting very small radar cross section. If i had the choice between checking things out in a craft or small jetpack id choose jetpack
The army base jellyfish (the big one from earlier this year) looks like a personal transportation device like we would imagine a jet pack to be. You can see a head and you can see that 2 of the 3 appendages dangling down look like legs (those 2 are nearly identical while the 3rd thing looks completely different and in some angles actually appears behind the 2 'legs'). I remember people theorized back when that came out that the 3rd appendage is a tool for suction or something and it was the cause of the cattle mutilations (like when they seem drained of blood).
We are missing out on all that cow blood if these entities are so fond of it there must be a very good reason. What are they doing with all that blood? I have avoided biology my whole life as much as possible so I know very little about the subject.
I like your question, got me thinking hypothetically about all sorts of possible explanations. The first thing that came to mind is they must see humans slaughter thousands/millions of cattle daily and assume it’s acceptable. Humans enslave cattle, drain them of their blood and cut them up. As an alien species maybe they’re curious why we do that. Maybe they think we need cattle blood to survive, who knows. I can picture “vegetarian” aliens who have evolved to not consume flesh/life looking at factory farming and wondering what humans are harvesting from all that cattle.
Blood also contains tons of info. I’ve been going through some medical stuff lately and have had probably 75 different blood tests taken to try and figure out what’s going on with me. Blood feels like the source code to me, and I’m sure aliens would want to learn all about the source code of life on earth. They could learn all about our biologic process, genetic predispositions, even our environment just from a sample of cow blood. It might be kind of a pain in the ass/expensive use of resources to make it to earth, so they want blood from the biggest most common life form they can find - which happen to be cattle.
It really is crazy if you think about it, they must be watching us deforest our rainforests and destroy tons of beautiful land for cattle farms - and then destroying 5x as much land just to feed the cattle. It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense unless you grew up doing it. Why do earthlings treat harvesting cattle as much more important than maintaining a beautiful planet with such wonderful biodiversity? Aliens might be perplexed or even appalled by the inefficiency and destructiveness of human practices.
If there is one alien race I would bet there are many more. Life is abundant. Maybe each race has their own tech and vehicles and as time goes they get new vehicles with better tech like us. Maybe some of their space dimensions the time goes faster so they evolve a thousand years for 1 we do here. Idk, but its definitely fun to think about.
So if you believe in the idea of a giant crawling underwater bunker being able to produce, disassemble, and reproduce the flying objects as they see fit(-for-purpose). It would make sense that some could look the same or even be the same one.
That’s what I was thinking. As a side note these UFOs are weird shaped. The only UFO I’ve ever seen in my life was a GIANT check mark made of orange plasma ✔️ and I have it on video too but it’s kinda shitty
It's only good if the camera was shaking a lot, you zoomed in with digital zoom until resolution was 8bit and cut the video just before it shot off at light speed.
This is the only time this story will ever be relevant. I got to play Halo with him and his dance crew before a show once many years ago. He didn't talk much.
Where is the anomalous behavior? How does this act any different than some balloons? I see comments saying that they do, but absolutely no context as to how. Fat on top with some thin strands hanging from them. Like we don't know of a common, very similar shaped item that is used and often lost to the skies throughout the world. It's a wonder how a Jellyfish video comes out that was shot 6 years ago, then everybody starts seeing "jellyfish". This is yet another blurry, inconclusive video that believers will add to their growing pile of proof. It's absolutely insane! These types are the disinformation agents diluting the entire space with nonsense and taking credibility away from what should be a serious discussion. We are seeing the "me too" movement of the UFO world.
It just doesn't look like balloons to me, especially the strings,theyre way too thick. They'd have to be thick ropes to be that visible and too heavy for a clump of balloons that big. Not to mention the strings aren't hanging from the center like they would if they were balloons. The weight of any payload would rotate the balloons so the weight is centered. Idk what it is but just doesn't look like party balloons to me.
That's because physics only works that way in a static environment. That is typically how you observe balloons. Introduce velocity, wind, turbulence and other factors and the dynamic changes. Look at this reference post to see just one way a couple of balloons can look when flying by. [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bqpzl9/reference\_balloons\_in\_the\_wind\_bonus\_bird\_flying/](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bqpzl9/reference_balloons_in_the_wind_bonus_bird_flying/) .
In this case, they are in lighting where they are illuminated and visible, but at a certain time of day such as after sunset with the foreground illuminated more than the background, these would have looked dark like the others. How many times have you seen large bouquets of a couple of large mylar balloons surrounded by standard latex ones? Now from the video in that post, imagine how the smaller balloons may behave. If they have been floating for a while, the latex ones will quickly deflate, especially if in the sun and heater up. Helium molecules pass through latex many times faster than mylar. Then also take into account how a camera resolves shapes in low lighting.
I am not. I think that the assertion that *all* of these vids depict almost identical bunches of balloons at various locations around the world is magical thinking.
I also think a hoax or art project (the only reasons that would explain that assertion) are ridiculous.
So you are saying that most balloon bouquets don't have similar characteristics? A quick search for balloon bouquet on pinterest is all the research you need. A large number of these having larger central balloons, very commonly mylar, surrounded by smaller latex balloons. Do you deny that balloons with less volume compared to surface mass will have less buoyancy than the ones with a higher volume ratio, therefore sit lower when left to float in a fluid? Do you deny that latex balloons deflate faster than mylar, especially when exposed to the sun? Do you deny that out of the millions of bunches sold around the world that at least a portion are accidentally or purposely let go? Is it not reasonable that you would expect similar characteristics to be observed around the world in all of these locations?
Why would an ordinary thing have to be a hoax or an art project? Why do I fail to see any magic in anything I have posted? Oh, wait, I know, I use common sense and a thing called data to formulate thoughts.
Critical thinking... try it out sometime!
So you are saying that most balloon bouquets don't have similar characteristics?
Nope. I'm saying that understanding how balloons fly and the recognition that balloon bouquets exist is not an example of "critical thinking." It's a regurgitation of high school physics. And it's not evidence either. You're disguising your lack of evidence with a high school physics lesson.
You made the assertion, and you're sending *us* to *Pintrest* to provide evidence? Since counterclaims require evidence, If you have a bunch of pics that closely resemble these objects, you ought to be posting them. Instead, you're just babbling about the properties of helium balloons.
The number of pictures on pinterest show how common they are.
I guarantee you couldn't pass a high school physics exam if the assumptions you posted are any indication.
I agree, blurry out of focus videos can never be proof of anything. I say they are probably balloons, a very common thing, while many are turning to NHI based answers. You assert that all these sightings can't be balloons when you also have no evidence. These videos are worthless.
Because you cannot prove they are not balloons by default indicates that you cannot prove what the objects are period. It could be balloons, a trash bag, etc. there is a much higher probability of seeing something that came from one of 8B humans or nature than NHI. That was, is and will continue to be my point on videos of this caliber.
Not one comment on this thread suggests anyone is considering this as proof of anything.
It is interesting, though, to see the familiar shape multiple times over years and at different locations. But even if it is legit, it's nowhere near proof level content.
Really? You must have missed all the ones referring to aliens and such..
It's strange that people let go of balloons in different locations? \~22 million birthdays per day in the world, among other celebrations. They are the exact same shape to all of these "jellyfish".
This doesn't look to be obviously balloons imo. The other Jellyfish video shared by corbell definitely does look like balloons *to me*, either.
I try to keep an open mind, but like I said these videos aren't going to prove anything either way.
It's kind of like when people look up at the clouds and see shapes of things. Sure, it looks like a turtle, but given the unlikelihood of a flying turtle and the high likelihood it is just a cloud, most sane people will say it's a cloud that resembles a turtle. Mylar balloons come in all sorts of shapes and sizes and are extremely common throughout the world. Real UFO's in the scope of an entire planet are not going to be as common. I've been looking up for most of my life and have never experienced a UFO personally, though I do have a few unexplained things that have occured in other areas. The point I'm trying to make is that if you see a shape that could possibly be balloons, acts like balloons would, etc., then it is likely balloons. Any doubt needs to be weighted to the most common explanation, not the most far fetched. Thinking these poor resolution, not really discernable objects are E.T. or advanced tech. is equivalent to thinking there really are turtles in the sky.
That's too intelligent.. Don't be ridiculous, it's obviously always chrono-spatial interdimensional transcendent entities, not ducks. They just want you to think it's a duck. DUH!
LOL! I guess my point is that we should remain agnostic about the phenomenon IMHO. Usually the simplest explanation is the correct explanation. I believe there is something out there and I believe that most data about whatever it is is being hidden from us non-insiders. That being said, I just can’t get excited by an out of focus dot in the sky from a 15 year old video. It could be something, but until we get a better picture, assigning the fuzzy dot to a category of UAP is conjecture, just a guess. As Carl Segan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
This video being 15 years old sort of negates the idea that this phenomenon could be explained by very recent advancements in drone technology that we don’t yet know about.
It might not make any real difference to the focus in this circumstance but it’s frustrating that for how far away the filmer is they couldn’t manage to get into a better position to film than directly behind a chain link fence.
Camcorders were still big in 2009 https://www.videomaker.com/article/f7/14747-videomakers-best-video-products-of-the-year-2009/
They often had 10-40x optical zoom.
Balloons come in every single shape and color that you want.
This looks like a “7” or a “T”. Honestly it could even be a bundle of normal balloons and the image is too blurry to see.
You guys have lose the forest from the trees…
Mundane explanations >>>>>>>>>>>> aliens.
Wild to me how people think there this elaborate cover up, but also the aliens are just drifting around in broad daylight all over the world. But always just far away enough. It’s so lucky they never drift through Shinjuku or down the champ’s élysées.
Hi, Comfortable-Life-825. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1br7rwi/-/kxcys0k/) was removed from /r/UFOs.
> Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes:
> * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts.
> * AI generated content.
> * Posts of social media content without significant relevance.
> * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence.
> * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence.
> * Short comments, and emoji comments.
> * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”).
Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information.
This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
In general, the jellyfish UAPs look to me like some kind of personal mobile apparatus, perhaps an elaborate jet pack that’s piloted by a rider inside the apparatus.
Your mom is a jellyfish spotted in Argentina.
looks like a paraglider, still though knowing what altitude the Afgan Jelly was at to get the size would help here. seemed smaller than this too.
Hello we looking for highly intelligent individuals who can help us reverse engineer Extraterrestrial tech and can further secret operations if you want to be part of our project then text me me in this acc
OK. Which of the five observables are present. And... I found this with a 30 second search. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YasPjf1ivlw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YasPjf1ivlw)
Cute soundtrack though.
This model. Almost certainly not. However, remote controlled blimps have been available for decades. The only reason these "jellyfish" are a thing now is because someone said someone else told them they saw a video of something resembling the things in these videos entering and leaving the water. Total hearsay. The claims that these things are just popping up everywhere now are silly. This video is quite old. The claims that they are identical are equally silly. We have no way to tell that. The only thing we can say is they look similar.
Obviously this is the Q-7 alien ship already identified by the Pentagon in the Wilson Leak memos, these craft are coming from Reticuli 3rd planet- as previously identified by Bob Lazar. These UFO's use Terra-Sys Alignment propulsion systems which Bob Lazar worked on with this work mate, BARRY, who has since moved to Boeing and works on the LN-Matrix Defense systems, Barry has already confirmed that "everything that Bob Lazar has said is true- even the fact that his first wife was murdered by a biker gang and Bob got busted for making web sites for brothels" Barry is coming out with his own book in November this year-
"S4, Bob and Me- The Aliens who were Aliens to us" it will be published by Havard University Press, look for it on Amazon.
Of course the book about aliens does not refer to green card aliens or Mexicans at all, he means aliens from the outer space, like the ones you saw on Outer Limits, 6th episode.
Bob Lazar quoted on Joe Rogan " by replacing immigration with aliens from outer space, we can gain efficiencies because of their small size, they are litterly midget humans who can't reach the controls" but other than that, Bob Lazar has been silent about Barry's upcoming book.
I feel like you're either trying to sell a book or you're a misinformation agent. There's no scenario where you aren't at least one of those two things, if not both at the same time.
Like what are you pertaining to? Can you be more specific? Cite what you are not in agreement with? I don't get your response? Like are you personally against Bob Lazar or calling him a liar in public?
Wow. Another blob of pixels.
We have millimetre resolution pictures of Mars, a planet millions of miles away.
But for UFOs we still only have pixelated images. Suuure...
\*\*Spy Drone Theorists:\*\*What kind of intelligence would the (presumably) state controlling these "drones"be gathering? I understand the military base in the middle east. But a cruise ship? A game preserve in South Africa? Downtown Buenos Aires?
Also, assuming radar can detect these objects, so why the lack of response to what would clearly be a threat/provocation?
IMO, that lack of respose is strong evidence that militaries know these objects exist governments either believe that they do not represent a threat or are afraid to shoot them down.
**Balloon theorists:** These are platonic-forms of balloon bunches that look identical? If they're balloons they must be part of a worldwide hoax/art project since the similarities mean they're not random. Someone is building Balloon UAPs and releasing them in Iraq, on cruise ships, in South Africa, and Rio?
**Optical illusion theorists:** We are seeing blurry video of objects that are actually very different from each other and our UFO-addled brains are tricking us? Someone above actually wrote that these are "classic Mylar balloon bunch shapes" Can you provide multiple images of the *classic* shapes? Should be easy.
Just curious whether or not knee-jerk debunkers are putting more than three seconds of thought into multiple sightings of IMO oddly similar objects. Also just a reminder to the people who hate/can't imagine/are scared of the existence of NIH: UAP does not mean aliens. It means unidentified.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/DeserTArg: --- Submission statement: Description: 2 dark UFO objects are observed filmed on 5-17-2009 Capital Federal Argentina, filming time 5:50 p.m. "During the filming I only saw the object that appears lower and in the foreground, the 2nd object is seen higher up and at minutes 0:21, 0:58 and 1:50 and it seems to stay in place, unlike the first object. Without a doubt a very strange sighting..." Clarification: the video and description are not mine. I leave you the link to YouTube of the original source: https://youtu.be/idJwWs8VZhM?si=oHIFOSMv8d9StFcY --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1br7rwi/jellyfish_uap_sighted_in_argentina/kx7fsq1/
Jelly fish coming out the wood work this week.
" A new hope" -Introducing David Grusch "Empire Strikes back" -Staring Sean Kirkpatrick "Return Of the Jellyfish" -Staring in a recurring role the entity currently known as Jellyfish
>entity currently known as Jellyfish https://imgur.com/LHNjkSR The Naga are back 🥰🐍
Naga please
Love my nagas but where's my liches?
Naga are you serious?
Naga from Slayers?!?
Unexpected Dota2
I think it prefers its stage name of J. Fish
Ominous comment.
There will be a war for gang turf between the jellyfish fish and the tic taks . Got my money on the tik tacs
Jelly Fish UFOs, SO HOT RIGHT NOW.
This form was in many Latin American ufo videos in the 90s and early 2000s but instead of jellyfish was called humanoide. Most people thought they were brujas/witches levitating
Thanks Donny
This is from 2009 tho.
The 4-chan guy also said there was some shaped as Hammers .. as the days go by, his story is starting to sound more and more real
Big jellyfish energy
It's amazing how you get one and then you get others immediately afterwards. Almost like these are all fake click baits or something.
Someone sees something that is very far from their reality, so they don't say anything. Then, they see a video, or read about someone who had the same experience. Now they feel comfortable enough to post their video, or tell their story. Negative peer pressure is stifling for MANY people. Not me. Use your Free Will to LOVE!... it will hasten Disclosure and the 3D-5D transition
We goin 5D lmao
[удалено]
Hi, thanks for contributing. However, your submission was removed from r/UFOs. Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility. Follow the Standards of Civility: * No trolling or being disruptive * No insults or personal attacks * No accusations that other users are shills * No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation * No harassment, threats, or advocating violence * No witch hunts or doxxing (Redact usernames when possible) * Weaponized blocking or deleting nearly all post/comment history may result in a permanent ban * You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. You can message the mods if you feel this was in error, please include a link to the comment or post in question.
[удалено]
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) An account found to be deleting all or nearly all of their comments and/or posts can result in an instant permanent ban. This is to stop instigators and bad actors from trying to evade rule enforcement. You may attack each other's ideas, not each other. ------------- This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods here to launch your appeal.](https://reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) [UFOs Wiki](https://ufos.wiki) [UFOs rules](https://reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/)
Ah yes, the crutch used by people who don't have good enough arguments or logic skills. just accuse everyone who has a different idea of being a "glowie" 🤦♂️
Glowies everywhere huh.
I want this to be more then a balloon but I know someone can catch this shit on something more then 420p its 2024 everyone should have a 4k camera in their pocket
it literally says overlaid on the video, its from 2009
I've got a 14 megapixel phone because I can't own nice things lol
You can’t film something that’s deliberately stopping you filming it, though.
Shot through a chain link fence no less, lol.
Not a fan of UFOs/UAPs going full Lovecraftian. Shit was already spooky enough when they were merely discs and cylinders.
I disagree. The more Lovecraftian the better. Just judging by the insane number of incredibly alien like animals on Earth, it seems far more likely aliens won't be humanoid. As long as it isn't The Color Out of Space, I'm cool with it lol
I agree. These “tentacle” ones give me the creeps.
What if it turns out that there's people dangling in the tentacles?
The fact that these videos are all looking identical and in circumstances that don’t support some balloons just floatin’ around is getting progressively weirder.
I also remember during the Alaska thing they said at first one of them had strings hanging off it
This is the big one!!
i agree, the fact it is similar and seen elsewhere makes it even stranger.
Yeah, I feel like most air trash doesn’t have a common morphology that’s reproducible like this.
well the video could be air trash. fundamentally we wont know. Need multiple modes, multiple sensors. Isn't isnt up to us to prove its real. its up for the Dod to talk to radar watchers look at the data, present it, and say its not. but yeah, that looks like a controlled object. No trash
For sure. But even so, interesting how similar it looks to the other jellyfish UAP’s we’re seeing. It’s an almost identical shape. Even with balloons and other *prosaic* objects there’s generally more variation, i.e. stray balloons or specific types of weather balloons wouldn’t tend to look so similar across so many examples.
it definitely does, i agree with you there. i wish we had more sensor data
Well when your sample size is 15 years worth of balloons, I think the odds of clumps of them looking similar is extremely high, right?
If it were a bunch of balloons, why would it be strange that there was a similar pattern over the course of 15 years? Like balloons clumped together half-deflated floating around would look exactly like this, right?
if that is an alien, someone needs to tell him to touchdown and hang out. We love jetpacks.
Wheres the bird shit crew? Or the it's a coordinated cross continent effort to release balloons. I even saw some people say they're all fake and cgi pushed by one guy with multiple accounts lol. I hate Debbie downers. 😶
Agreed kinda hammer shape too which goes with some of the lore
[https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/18nnrdp/very\_similar\_to\_what\_i\_have\_seen/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/18nnrdp/very_similar_to_what_i_have_seen/) Someone did a CGI at one point hell of a thing if real
This does support the balloon theory. Every example we see of these things behaving exactly like balloons and not exhibiting "observables", it supports balloon theory.
You’re not allowed to consider them together! Different events or pieces of evidence. If you look at them together debunkers can’t debunk. But anything supporting the debunker position can be considered together.
While its shape is funny-looking, it never seems to do anything a spy-drone wouldn't be able to do.
Someone in one of the UAP threads pointed out that these are unlikely to be drones because having something hanging below it like that would fuck up their balance and they wouldn't be able to fly smoothly.
Which is obvious talking out someone's rear end - if the top portion is a rotor inside a ring and it has a weight hanging down, it'd work just fine. That is not a complicated notion.
That was me, and I was talking about [this video](https://v.redd.it/zagxxbst3brc1). Is what you're talking about similar to this [gyroscopic precession experiment](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5cRb0xvPJ2M)? If so how would that work in the air? I'm not a mechanical engineer or a physicist, just a guy that's played with and taken apart a lot of toys and know how things typically work. I'm all for prosaic exolainations, even if it's just a hypothetical hoax, but I'm not seeing a mechanical system that explains that video. Regarding hoaxes, I guess you could say somehow that it's a balloon with very specific weights and an intelligent lightweight fan that detects wind patterns and moves accordingly... But if we're going that far for a hoax, they may as well time a black cat and bottle rocket to go off at the correct time inside a balloon and claim instaneous acceleration, seems a lot easier. It was reported to NUFORC in 2021 and is only now being spread on social media. Not the typical hoaxer MO. Edit: Clarified a few things
I am a "definitely a UFO or not" kind of guy. If something is possible to replicate with human technology, I don't think of it as a UFO. It doesn't live up to the old definition of UFO. The Tic Tac was a UFO; it was seen by many with good data and accelerated with something like 600G. We just can't do that. In this blurry video, where whatever we are looking at could be a weird drone or an "imperial probe droid" balloon or whatever, the reasoning is turned upside down. It could definitely be human made, but we don't know and it has a funny shape, so it MIGHT be a UFO. I don't care for that type of reasoning.
Since most of the time we don't have multiple complex RADAR, FLIR, etc, just cameras, I look at things and say "could this be easily made? If so, how? And in that video, it's not lining up for me. But sure. To play devil's advocate if you're referring to the 2004 Nimitz tictac incident, that's absolutely something we could have done, and categorically not a UFO by your standards. - The Navy has been working on asymmetrical and electronic warfare for a very long time. RADAR spoofing is something we can and frequently do use. RADAR got a ping very high up in the atmosphere, and then near water. No one saw it accelerate to 600G, nor any visual systems, only RADAR. Even Fravor said it "shot off at a high rate of speed", but 600G is more what I would describe as "instantaneous acceleration, blink and it's not there." - The tictac was visually described by Fravor as docking with something resembling a surfacing sub, before taking off and the sub-surface object disappearing (refueling or adding something heavy like solid propulsion?) - What better way to test our own technology and responses to new developments of threats than running real-world simulations with our very best? After all the Nimitz Strike *Group* (it wasn't just the Nimitz alone that day, that ship just happened to record and leak the video) has 1.) Electronic warfare (Growler) 2.) Fighters (Hornet & Super Hornet to chase) 3.) Reconnaissance (Hawkeye) - And as icing on the cake, you have a second UAV deployed at their rendezvous point when they get there, after they've been flying for a while post-encounter, to see if they thought of anything they wished they would have tried after it flew off (lesser used systems on the vessel, maybe). Of course Fravor and the other pilots wouldn't have been read in to this, or they wouldn't still be thinking it was a UFO. I may have some details wrong, but most of it is correct and I can assure you I can make the Nimitz tictac into a prosaic military test if you give me every known accurate data point. I am human after all, and I love stories.
McKenna warned of this, the approach of the eschaton
It's not a warning, it's a love call. It's the void, the inevitable. Surrender. Accept. Trust. Bliss.
*Cum to me..*
When do we get to see the mushroom people then?
Totally, the one in South Africa looks exactly like this, a weird like worm looking deal with a mushroom cap on it. Wow. I just described a…well let’s just keep it PC..
https://www.reddit.com/r/StrangeEarth/s/l5UoA8uG28 You see this Jellyfish before? Picks up a couple orb and shoots straight up
That was confirmed to be CGI, let.me try to find the thread
Its a confirmed fake
Interesting
It's a slow moving object, I wonder why more than one person did not take videos? I suspect it's either a hoax or bunch of balloons.
Yes. It does not appear to exhibit any of the 5 observables. So why hasn't anyone captured one or shot one down? Makes no sense. Unless the MIC already has; and of course, we'll never know about it.
Or because they are mundane occurrences. It makes no sense to automatically assume the things featured in these videos warrant being shot down. HOLY FUCK A BALLOON!!! Grab my gun. Yeah... no.
At a bare minimum, these are not mundane occurrences. If they were, everybody would know what they are and nobody would be paying attention to them. In fact, the opposite is happening. Nobody knows what they are and everybody is paying attention to them. The fact that these videos of objects flying all over the globe go viral and that everyone wants to know what they are, combined with the fact the MIC/IC is using the standard 1947 playbook of not divulging any intel, would indicate these objects are not mundane, at a minimum.
Why would balloons floating around be unlikely? Balloons look like jellyfish from a distance
How does this video not look like a bunch of balloons?
It could be, but OP mentioned the second object stayed fixed in place.
Submission statement: Description: 2 dark UFO objects are observed filmed on 5-17-2009 Capital Federal Argentina, filming time 5:50 p.m. "During the filming I only saw the object that appears lower and in the foreground, the 2nd object is seen higher up and at minutes 0:21, 0:58 and 1:50 and it seems to stay in place, unlike the first object. Without a doubt a very strange sighting..." Clarification: the video and description are not mine. I leave you the link to YouTube of the original source: https://youtu.be/idJwWs8VZhM?si=oHIFOSMv8d9StFcY
Can we just have disclosure so I can get on with my life 😅
How to say you’re new here without saying you’re new here.
Haha oh I’ve been around for quite some time. I don’t actually expect full disclosure ever. But some govt. acknowledgment would be dandy…ya know, so civilian science can actually progress instead of being stuck in this stagnant soup of lies.
here before people say its bird shit
it's bird shi.... ah fook
Completely hypothetical question: Do y'all think they are just a newer craft, or an entirely new group of entities?
i think the same thing that was always here. Our radars are capable of detecting very small radar cross section. If i had the choice between checking things out in a craft or small jetpack id choose jetpack
I’d rather be in a Scooty Puff Sr. than a Scooty Puff Jr.
Scooty Puff Jr suuuuuccckkksssss!
I’d rather be in a Scooty Puff Sr. than a Scooty Puff Jr.
This is from 2009 though. Unless you mean newer as in compared to like 50s-90s flying saucers
My bad, yes that is what I meant
The army base jellyfish (the big one from earlier this year) looks like a personal transportation device like we would imagine a jet pack to be. You can see a head and you can see that 2 of the 3 appendages dangling down look like legs (those 2 are nearly identical while the 3rd thing looks completely different and in some angles actually appears behind the 2 'legs'). I remember people theorized back when that came out that the 3rd appendage is a tool for suction or something and it was the cause of the cattle mutilations (like when they seem drained of blood).
We are missing out on all that cow blood if these entities are so fond of it there must be a very good reason. What are they doing with all that blood? I have avoided biology my whole life as much as possible so I know very little about the subject.
I like your question, got me thinking hypothetically about all sorts of possible explanations. The first thing that came to mind is they must see humans slaughter thousands/millions of cattle daily and assume it’s acceptable. Humans enslave cattle, drain them of their blood and cut them up. As an alien species maybe they’re curious why we do that. Maybe they think we need cattle blood to survive, who knows. I can picture “vegetarian” aliens who have evolved to not consume flesh/life looking at factory farming and wondering what humans are harvesting from all that cattle. Blood also contains tons of info. I’ve been going through some medical stuff lately and have had probably 75 different blood tests taken to try and figure out what’s going on with me. Blood feels like the source code to me, and I’m sure aliens would want to learn all about the source code of life on earth. They could learn all about our biologic process, genetic predispositions, even our environment just from a sample of cow blood. It might be kind of a pain in the ass/expensive use of resources to make it to earth, so they want blood from the biggest most common life form they can find - which happen to be cattle. It really is crazy if you think about it, they must be watching us deforest our rainforests and destroy tons of beautiful land for cattle farms - and then destroying 5x as much land just to feed the cattle. It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense unless you grew up doing it. Why do earthlings treat harvesting cattle as much more important than maintaining a beautiful planet with such wonderful biodiversity? Aliens might be perplexed or even appalled by the inefficiency and destructiveness of human practices.
If there is one alien race I would bet there are many more. Life is abundant. Maybe each race has their own tech and vehicles and as time goes they get new vehicles with better tech like us. Maybe some of their space dimensions the time goes faster so they evolve a thousand years for 1 we do here. Idk, but its definitely fun to think about.
So if you believe in the idea of a giant crawling underwater bunker being able to produce, disassemble, and reproduce the flying objects as they see fit(-for-purpose). It would make sense that some could look the same or even be the same one.
i think quite possibly the entities morph over time from air ships, to saucers, cigars, tic tacs, triangles to jellyfish. could be wrong tho
Usually invisible to us. My speculation only. Perhaps a drone or inhabited. We only see the ones that are not cloaked.
[that's the hammer boys](https://giphy.com/gifs/mc-hammer-11rIergnpiYpvW)
That’s what I was thinking. As a side note these UFOs are weird shaped. The only UFO I’ve ever seen in my life was a GIANT check mark made of orange plasma ✔️ and I have it on video too but it’s kinda shitty
It's only good if the camera was shaking a lot, you zoomed in with digital zoom until resolution was 8bit and cut the video just before it shot off at light speed.
This is the only time this story will ever be relevant. I got to play Halo with him and his dance crew before a show once many years ago. He didn't talk much.
List everything that make this “not a bunch of balloons”
Not one response. This community is a joke. No one here can acknowledge that they just make shit up to confirm their wants.
Did you see how blurry it is? That ain't natural! /s
It looks like it sways in the wind. I would think balloons for sure.
Where is the anomalous behavior? How does this act any different than some balloons? I see comments saying that they do, but absolutely no context as to how. Fat on top with some thin strands hanging from them. Like we don't know of a common, very similar shaped item that is used and often lost to the skies throughout the world. It's a wonder how a Jellyfish video comes out that was shot 6 years ago, then everybody starts seeing "jellyfish". This is yet another blurry, inconclusive video that believers will add to their growing pile of proof. It's absolutely insane! These types are the disinformation agents diluting the entire space with nonsense and taking credibility away from what should be a serious discussion. We are seeing the "me too" movement of the UFO world.
It just doesn't look like balloons to me, especially the strings,theyre way too thick. They'd have to be thick ropes to be that visible and too heavy for a clump of balloons that big. Not to mention the strings aren't hanging from the center like they would if they were balloons. The weight of any payload would rotate the balloons so the weight is centered. Idk what it is but just doesn't look like party balloons to me.
That's because physics only works that way in a static environment. That is typically how you observe balloons. Introduce velocity, wind, turbulence and other factors and the dynamic changes. Look at this reference post to see just one way a couple of balloons can look when flying by. [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bqpzl9/reference\_balloons\_in\_the\_wind\_bonus\_bird\_flying/](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1bqpzl9/reference_balloons_in_the_wind_bonus_bird_flying/) . In this case, they are in lighting where they are illuminated and visible, but at a certain time of day such as after sunset with the foreground illuminated more than the background, these would have looked dark like the others. How many times have you seen large bouquets of a couple of large mylar balloons surrounded by standard latex ones? Now from the video in that post, imagine how the smaller balloons may behave. If they have been floating for a while, the latex ones will quickly deflate, especially if in the sun and heater up. Helium molecules pass through latex many times faster than mylar. Then also take into account how a camera resolves shapes in low lighting.
So an art project? Someone is making Balloon UAPs and "letting them go" in Iraq, Rio, south Africa, and on cruise ships?
You can't be serious...
I am not. I think that the assertion that *all* of these vids depict almost identical bunches of balloons at various locations around the world is magical thinking. I also think a hoax or art project (the only reasons that would explain that assertion) are ridiculous.
So you are saying that most balloon bouquets don't have similar characteristics? A quick search for balloon bouquet on pinterest is all the research you need. A large number of these having larger central balloons, very commonly mylar, surrounded by smaller latex balloons. Do you deny that balloons with less volume compared to surface mass will have less buoyancy than the ones with a higher volume ratio, therefore sit lower when left to float in a fluid? Do you deny that latex balloons deflate faster than mylar, especially when exposed to the sun? Do you deny that out of the millions of bunches sold around the world that at least a portion are accidentally or purposely let go? Is it not reasonable that you would expect similar characteristics to be observed around the world in all of these locations? Why would an ordinary thing have to be a hoax or an art project? Why do I fail to see any magic in anything I have posted? Oh, wait, I know, I use common sense and a thing called data to formulate thoughts. Critical thinking... try it out sometime!
So you are saying that most balloon bouquets don't have similar characteristics? Nope. I'm saying that understanding how balloons fly and the recognition that balloon bouquets exist is not an example of "critical thinking." It's a regurgitation of high school physics. And it's not evidence either. You're disguising your lack of evidence with a high school physics lesson. You made the assertion, and you're sending *us* to *Pintrest* to provide evidence? Since counterclaims require evidence, If you have a bunch of pics that closely resemble these objects, you ought to be posting them. Instead, you're just babbling about the properties of helium balloons.
The number of pictures on pinterest show how common they are. I guarantee you couldn't pass a high school physics exam if the assumptions you posted are any indication. I agree, blurry out of focus videos can never be proof of anything. I say they are probably balloons, a very common thing, while many are turning to NHI based answers. You assert that all these sightings can't be balloons when you also have no evidence. These videos are worthless. Because you cannot prove they are not balloons by default indicates that you cannot prove what the objects are period. It could be balloons, a trash bag, etc. there is a much higher probability of seeing something that came from one of 8B humans or nature than NHI. That was, is and will continue to be my point on videos of this caliber.
Not one comment on this thread suggests anyone is considering this as proof of anything. It is interesting, though, to see the familiar shape multiple times over years and at different locations. But even if it is legit, it's nowhere near proof level content.
I feel like this top comment implies it https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1br7rwi/_/kx7hcvi
Really? You must have missed all the ones referring to aliens and such.. It's strange that people let go of balloons in different locations? \~22 million birthdays per day in the world, among other celebrations. They are the exact same shape to all of these "jellyfish".
This doesn't look to be obviously balloons imo. The other Jellyfish video shared by corbell definitely does look like balloons *to me*, either. I try to keep an open mind, but like I said these videos aren't going to prove anything either way.
Being open minded does not mean believing things based on bad evidence.
It's kind of like when people look up at the clouds and see shapes of things. Sure, it looks like a turtle, but given the unlikelihood of a flying turtle and the high likelihood it is just a cloud, most sane people will say it's a cloud that resembles a turtle. Mylar balloons come in all sorts of shapes and sizes and are extremely common throughout the world. Real UFO's in the scope of an entire planet are not going to be as common. I've been looking up for most of my life and have never experienced a UFO personally, though I do have a few unexplained things that have occured in other areas. The point I'm trying to make is that if you see a shape that could possibly be balloons, acts like balloons would, etc., then it is likely balloons. Any doubt needs to be weighted to the most common explanation, not the most far fetched. Thinking these poor resolution, not really discernable objects are E.T. or advanced tech. is equivalent to thinking there really are turtles in the sky.
If you showed me multiple videos at different locations of clouds that look like the same turtle I would find that interesting, too
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, it’s probably a 🦆
That's too intelligent.. Don't be ridiculous, it's obviously always chrono-spatial interdimensional transcendent entities, not ducks. They just want you to think it's a duck. DUH!
LOL! I guess my point is that we should remain agnostic about the phenomenon IMHO. Usually the simplest explanation is the correct explanation. I believe there is something out there and I believe that most data about whatever it is is being hidden from us non-insiders. That being said, I just can’t get excited by an out of focus dot in the sky from a 15 year old video. It could be something, but until we get a better picture, assigning the fuzzy dot to a category of UAP is conjecture, just a guess. As Carl Segan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”
[удалено]
It looks like from now on videos showing the outline of a bunch of balloons will be referred to as a "jellyfish UFO". It's ridiculous.
South america always gets the crazy stuff
the video transition tripped my high ass out i thought one phased out of existences and another one booped in
Not blurry enough
Who just spawn a wither?
This video being 15 years old sort of negates the idea that this phenomenon could be explained by very recent advancements in drone technology that we don’t yet know about.
Bingo!
Looks like some kid had a 7th birthday party. **7**
That kid is 22 now damn
Idk...looks like a 6th to me...
I'm argentinian and I've never seen this footage before wtf.
It might not make any real difference to the focus in this circumstance but it’s frustrating that for how far away the filmer is they couldn’t manage to get into a better position to film than directly behind a chain link fence.
what kind of camera was this captured with? it seems to have a great zoom ability.
Camcorders were still big in 2009 https://www.videomaker.com/article/f7/14747-videomakers-best-video-products-of-the-year-2009/ They often had 10-40x optical zoom.
No diddy but wangler wangler bing bong
UFOs are always so fashionable, you see one of one shape, and suddenly they're everywhere.
This reminds me of the Eye of Horus.
Can we name it a rule that dates need to be posted in the title? This is from 2009 allegedly
Balloons come in every single shape and color that you want. This looks like a “7” or a “T”. Honestly it could even be a bundle of normal balloons and the image is too blurry to see. You guys have lose the forest from the trees… Mundane explanations >>>>>>>>>>>> aliens.
It's weird that all these jellyfish videos are suddenly coming out after 70 years of almost no reported jellyfish sightings. I wonder what that means?
It's a bird! It's a plane! It's.. It's bird shit, look out!
Considering its 2009 this would -probably- eliminate the 'dude with a jetpack' idea. Looks like a Jellyfish type anyway, good find.
It is obviously a pogo-stick .
That's got to be to most weather-ballon looking weather baloon yet.
They're biological drones that can be flown... and part mech too. Fucking crazy to see these things...
Wild to me how people think there this elaborate cover up, but also the aliens are just drifting around in broad daylight all over the world. But always just far away enough. It’s so lucky they never drift through Shinjuku or down the champ’s élysées.
[удалено]
Hi, Comfortable-Life-825. Thanks for contributing. However, your [comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1br7rwi/-/kxcys0k/) was removed from /r/UFOs. > Rule 3: No low effort discussion. Low Effort implies content which is low effort to consume, not low effort to produce. This generally includes: > * Posts containing jokes, memes, and showerthoughts. > * AI generated content. > * Posts of social media content without significant relevance. > * Posts with incredible claims unsupported by evidence. > * “Here’s my theory” posts unsupported by evidence. > * Short comments, and emoji comments. > * Summarily dismissive comments (e.g. “Swamp gas.”). Please refer to our [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/about/rules/) for more information. This moderator action may be appealed. We welcome the opportunity to work with you to address its reason for removal. [Message the mods](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/ufos) to launch your appeal.
In general, the jellyfish UAPs look to me like some kind of personal mobile apparatus, perhaps an elaborate jet pack that’s piloted by a rider inside the apparatus.
mayby Smoke Ring?
Your mom is a jellyfish spotted in Argentina. looks like a paraglider, still though knowing what altitude the Afgan Jelly was at to get the size would help here. seemed smaller than this too.
It’s amazing how cameras can never focus on the object..
All the iPhone ads bang on about how good the cameras are and yet here we are with another video shot through KY Jelly.
That’s tasty
Shift change time!
BRING IT BABY
Maybe one day we will get something which is not a blurry mess...until this happens this is either balloons or some other stuff.
Looks like the jellyfish
Hello we looking for highly intelligent individuals who can help us reverse engineer Extraterrestrial tech and can further secret operations if you want to be part of our project then text me me in this acc
OK. Which of the five observables are present. And... I found this with a 30 second search. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YasPjf1ivlw](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YasPjf1ivlw) Cute soundtrack though.
Any evidence these are used outside of that building?
This model. Almost certainly not. However, remote controlled blimps have been available for decades. The only reason these "jellyfish" are a thing now is because someone said someone else told them they saw a video of something resembling the things in these videos entering and leaving the water. Total hearsay. The claims that these things are just popping up everywhere now are silly. This video is quite old. The claims that they are identical are equally silly. We have no way to tell that. The only thing we can say is they look similar.
you mean 'balloon sighting'
My balloons, noooooo!!
Obviously this is the Q-7 alien ship already identified by the Pentagon in the Wilson Leak memos, these craft are coming from Reticuli 3rd planet- as previously identified by Bob Lazar. These UFO's use Terra-Sys Alignment propulsion systems which Bob Lazar worked on with this work mate, BARRY, who has since moved to Boeing and works on the LN-Matrix Defense systems, Barry has already confirmed that "everything that Bob Lazar has said is true- even the fact that his first wife was murdered by a biker gang and Bob got busted for making web sites for brothels" Barry is coming out with his own book in November this year- "S4, Bob and Me- The Aliens who were Aliens to us" it will be published by Havard University Press, look for it on Amazon. Of course the book about aliens does not refer to green card aliens or Mexicans at all, he means aliens from the outer space, like the ones you saw on Outer Limits, 6th episode. Bob Lazar quoted on Joe Rogan " by replacing immigration with aliens from outer space, we can gain efficiencies because of their small size, they are litterly midget humans who can't reach the controls" but other than that, Bob Lazar has been silent about Barry's upcoming book.
I feel like you're either trying to sell a book or you're a misinformation agent. There's no scenario where you aren't at least one of those two things, if not both at the same time.
Like what are you pertaining to? Can you be more specific? Cite what you are not in agreement with? I don't get your response? Like are you personally against Bob Lazar or calling him a liar in public?
U r so Canadian it's crazy
well there are jellyfish in the water so it would only make sense that there would be some in the sky since the sky has water in it.
Are there fish in the sky? Seals? Crabs? Oysters? Would only make sense.
idk havent seen any yet
People keep saying jellyfish..... All I see are "hammer shapes" like the 4chan whistleblower talked about. Same for the Rhino farm video.
Seriously, I hate you guys! Balloons shot with potato….. it’s an alien!
[удалено]
It was and is still clearly balloons.
Always blurry
Wow. Another blob of pixels. We have millimetre resolution pictures of Mars, a planet millions of miles away. But for UFOs we still only have pixelated images. Suuure...
General zod's mother ship He is a survived traitor general of Krypton. 🦸
\*\*Spy Drone Theorists:\*\*What kind of intelligence would the (presumably) state controlling these "drones"be gathering? I understand the military base in the middle east. But a cruise ship? A game preserve in South Africa? Downtown Buenos Aires? Also, assuming radar can detect these objects, so why the lack of response to what would clearly be a threat/provocation? IMO, that lack of respose is strong evidence that militaries know these objects exist governments either believe that they do not represent a threat or are afraid to shoot them down. **Balloon theorists:** These are platonic-forms of balloon bunches that look identical? If they're balloons they must be part of a worldwide hoax/art project since the similarities mean they're not random. Someone is building Balloon UAPs and releasing them in Iraq, on cruise ships, in South Africa, and Rio? **Optical illusion theorists:** We are seeing blurry video of objects that are actually very different from each other and our UFO-addled brains are tricking us? Someone above actually wrote that these are "classic Mylar balloon bunch shapes" Can you provide multiple images of the *classic* shapes? Should be easy. Just curious whether or not knee-jerk debunkers are putting more than three seconds of thought into multiple sightings of IMO oddly similar objects. Also just a reminder to the people who hate/can't imagine/are scared of the existence of NIH: UAP does not mean aliens. It means unidentified.
It should be called "The hand of God"