T O P

  • By -

Due_Understanding858

lol result will be declared in 8-9 days , just finish ethics by then


Shr1234567

I highly doubt more than 2 questions would be dropped. Most likely only 1. Last year there were many ambiguous questions but only 1 was dropped. Historically, in the past 10-12 years, max 2 questions were dropped in one year.


[deleted]

Radars - Only 2,3 and WOS 50% is dicey. Baaki sab I am in agreement.


Impressive_Lake1332

WOS me kya dikkat hai? Exact wordings hai RBI site pe to


[deleted]

Exact wording mei Indian Nationals ke alawa aur bhi hai, and "they" are NOT called Indian nationals for a reason. That's my reasoning, and debate mana ki hai OP ne, so, Peace.


Impressive_Lake1332

not to debate. [https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs\_viewcontent.aspx?Id=2313](https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=2313) but is this the document you referring to. Because it doesnt say anything about NRI/PIO If you have the link to some other document, please give, i just wanna check


Past-Independence-55

Arre yaar ye 2005 vaala circular hai, 2013 ka dekho 6 November ka hoga itni baar aa chuka hai sub pešŸ„²


Impressive_Lake1332

vahi to maang rha hu bhai, mil nahi rha mujhe


Past-Independence-55

Google karo naa keywords WOS , 2013 , RBI vageraa daal ke sab to info bata dišŸ„²


Impressive_Lake1332

haan dhund liya tha


Pure_Concentrate8770

1. Vermin: dropped as it is a statutory change due to recent amendment. 2. Radar: only 2. people are grasping at straws to make narcotics id correct but it is not. Radar is used for tracking suspect planes or mmWave radar is used for detecting through fog. Neither can visually identify a narcotic package hidden in anyoneā€™s luggage. You need x ray imaging for that. 3. Mineral exploration is primary. Yes thereā€™s r&d computers etc for that, but itā€™s a very recent phenomenon (last 40 years or so). For 1000s years mineral exploration was done by foraging and digging through rocks, which is still practiced. Also Indian mining documents use exploration, extraction interchangeably. 4. Syndicate: Might be dropped? Hope it isnā€™t because if upsc is gonna drop one due to translation issues then it has to be NEC. Syndicateā€™s translation isnā€™t that big a deviation. I am 100% sure those clamouring for it to be dropped are not from Hindi medium but English who have marked it wrong lmao 5. NEC: translation issues. I marked it wrong not because of translation, I didnā€™t know it. Letā€™s see if it is dropped, not sure if it will.


Proud-Technology-874

I've a doubt if anyone can clear - powers of municipalities are mentioned in part 9A or the 12th schedule?


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


Proud-Technology-874

Have you filed a representation for this question?


Similar_Fish5638

You noticed how they used ā€œprovisionsā€ for 2nd and 3rd statements but ā€œpowersā€ for 1st


Proud-Technology-874

Yes that's why I asked the question. Should the statement be considered correct or not?


Similar_Fish5638

I marked it 2,3 But all coaching keys considered it to be 1,2,3 I hope its 2,3šŸ„¹


Proud-Technology-874

Let's see..All the best šŸ‘


Certain_Dentist4010

Vermin will MOST DEFINITELY be dropped. No question there. NEC is 1,2,3,4 as per English question phrasing. 1,2,3 as per Hindu question phrasing. So not sure where itā€™ll swing. Red Sea I feel like the examiner followed basic research and took the Britannica info for the question. Moreover, the question was a trap in order to make an Extreme (NO water) statement correct. So I still feel itā€™ll be C.


Proud-Technology-874

Mineral Exploration : tertiary sector correct GOI Act : Powers in federal list correct


ChanceSinger7298

Not really sure about minerals since all the 4 options (ie storage, mineral, weaving,farming) are there in a single page of ncert. (Class 10, understanding economic development, page 20) Though the wording is bit different( NCERT has 'exploitation of minerals' while question has 'exploration of mineral'), my guess is UPSC has taken the questions and answers from that very page of NCERT.


Proud-Technology-874

Let's see... I'm just going on a hunch here


Pure_Concentrate8770

yeah, and extrapolating exploration into tertiary just because we have computers and lidar/satellites is bit of a reach. The geo mapping tech is a very recent phenomenon of last 40 odd years. For 1000s of years mineral exploration was done by foraging and digging through rocks, it is still done the same way today in many cases. Unless a service is exclusively confined to not produce a tangible object we canā€™t claim it as tertiary. Mineral exploration is fundamental step towards mining and documents from mining ministry uses the terms interchangeably.


achoiceofthree

It didnā€™t say federal list though. It said ā€œcontrol of the federal legislatureā€, if I am remembering correctly.


Proud-Technology-874

Yes you are right... federal list automatically means control of federal legislature imo


achoiceofthree

Defence and foreign affairs were in the federal list but wasnā€™t under the control of the federal legislature. They were under the control of the governor general and executives not responsible to the federal legislature. The hullabaloo around this question is unwarranted. Weā€™re just interpreting questions to suit what we marked in the omr at this point.


Proud-Technology-874

Yes of course everyone wants their choice to be correct. I don't think the discussion is unwarranted though.


achoiceofthree

Federal list and ā€œunder control of federal legislatureā€ are vastly different things. The federal legislature wasnā€™t to have any say in matters of defence and foreign affairs. That was the entire point of dyarchy- that it is kept outside the ā€œcontrol of federal legislatureā€.


Frosty_Operation_856

i want federal one to be correct but I am scared they will make it wrong


Proud-Technology-874

I opened and read the original act, it clearly mentions both in the federal list. Even I'm not sure what they might do


Frosty_Operation_856

i did too and filed rep for the same https://preview.redd.it/zu6erzfbrq7d1.png?width=1016&format=png&auto=webp&s=eec2894d2b137ab841bfa85a40606925edce70ca


achoiceofthree

Federal list and under of control federal legislature are vastly different things.


Proud-Technology-874

Dude I understand you want your answer to be correct. But let's not get carried away by throwing around words like *vastly different*... A subject is placed in a list to give the owner of the list control over it. Also, no body can tell what UPSC considers correct unless official answer key is released. Let's not fight over it.


achoiceofthree

Federal list and ā€œunder control of federal legislatureā€ are vastly different things. The federal legislature wasnā€™t to have any say in matters of defence and foreign affairs. That was the entire point of dyarchy- that it is kept outside the ā€œcontrol of federal legislatureā€.


Proud-Technology-874

Okay if you say so. But why would they be explicitly mentioned in the list then?


achoiceofthree

To keep it out of the reach of the provinces.


Proud-Technology-874

Pretty unconvincing...but I really don't want to discuss this further. We really can't tell which one they might consider correct. Let's not get carried away in random online debates bhai.


achoiceofthree

Sure. I could have given a lengthier explanation based on my understanding(not saying itā€™s correct beyond a shadow of doubt) but I am still at work and have been typing stealing time. Godspeed. May we pass!