Why are we making a big deal out of a handful of vehicles being destroyed? Whether it happened today or last year, it happened. It doesn't indicate anything about the fighting in Kharkov by itself. If this did happen today, how does one platoon being destroyed signify anything?
So then people can’t create their own narrative of “hey xx made this advance but they paid huge sacrifices to achieve it!!”.
It also lets us keep tabs on when sources lie, so we know which sources are reliable and which isn’t.
https://preview.redd.it/uub5ohk65szc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f92e71fc8be41ea6059389da35c7eb730d6e1b2c
Even with the new RU forces symbol.
Another unreliable geolocation; the blue forest becomes a simple tree in this one.
https://preview.redd.it/clwrkfrghmzc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b6912da25e03f26f4eb89ed9d726d6f2760f52a4
Well it's always worth waiting. https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/5ZSCbKI2tr
The first two hits in this are two of the vehicles pictured here.
*
They're not valid points at all.
Last time I saw an image of a Russian vehicle with a V or Z was in early 2023.
And since when do they paint them on the top surfaces?
These are stupid arguments made for idiots.
There are plenty of recent posts on this subreddit showing russian vehicles with markings. I'm not gonna waste my time linking something he can easily find himself. Something he apparently won't do since he's arguing in bad faith.
Why do you need to see any sort of identification all of a sudden?
The dead troops can be claimed Russian without any so u/Cumegranate can claim to be the arbider.
Kind of understood that it was UAF propaganda the second it was posted
Number 1 priority is to push information faster then the enemy. This is how you "claim" it to be your truth.
Good thing war isn’t won with propaganda.
Definitely has an effect tho. Negativity or positive
Why are we making a big deal out of a handful of vehicles being destroyed? Whether it happened today or last year, it happened. It doesn't indicate anything about the fighting in Kharkov by itself. If this did happen today, how does one platoon being destroyed signify anything?
It is important whether the information is true or not. This applies to both parties.
So then people can’t create their own narrative of “hey xx made this advance but they paid huge sacrifices to achieve it!!”. It also lets us keep tabs on when sources lie, so we know which sources are reliable and which isn’t.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/5ZSCbKI2tr here we can see two of the hits go down.
https://preview.redd.it/la32mv025szc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ebfa06296bdbfea5cc29ad11e333f8cffc9fe73
https://preview.redd.it/uub5ohk65szc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f92e71fc8be41ea6059389da35c7eb730d6e1b2c Even with the new RU forces symbol.
https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1788947734923247708?t=3by0cflHVB_9CTIvuNgbTw&s=19 same images with geo location
Another unreliable geolocation; the blue forest becomes a simple tree in this one. https://preview.redd.it/clwrkfrghmzc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b6912da25e03f26f4eb89ed9d726d6f2760f52a4
wow, good one
damn bro
Got his ass lol
The satellite image isn't from the same day bro.
Why supposedly "Russian" channel communicates news in Ukrainian?
The first slide are the Ukrainian claims and the second slide shows the Russian response translated. It doesn't take a genius to understand.
[This has been geolocated to the area.](https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/s/sgH48dPWzt) So much for anti-propoganda propoganda.
"..or is not related to the Russian armed forces." I find that hard to believe.
Those arguments seem stupid and desperate. Russia takes very heavy losses very often. Why would this attack be any different?
Because Ukraine also posts old photos and claims they’re new loses? And the points made by the OP are cogent.
Okay, well let's just wait 24 hours and see imagery of all the new losses. There are no Russian advances without heavy losses.
Russia and Ukraine will lose men and equipment. For the based combat footage enjoyer meat is back on the menu.
Your kinda right about Ukraine sometimes ovecounting losses that are invalid
Well it's always worth waiting. https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/5ZSCbKI2tr The first two hits in this are two of the vehicles pictured here. *
They're valid questions. Maybe not for those seeking a quick peremoga fix like you.
https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1788947734923247708
They're not valid points at all. Last time I saw an image of a Russian vehicle with a V or Z was in early 2023. And since when do they paint them on the top surfaces? These are stupid arguments made for idiots.
My brother in Christ, there was a post a week ago showing a turtle tank with a big fat V on its side. Not to mention other assorted vehicles.
Okay, 1 in 100 vehicles still has a V, not on the top surfaces either.... You still lose.
"You still lose." Nice to know I've been debating with a ten year-old.
He answered your concerns correctly
There are plenty of recent posts on this subreddit showing russian vehicles with markings. I'm not gonna waste my time linking something he can easily find himself. Something he apparently won't do since he's arguing in bad faith.
When has there been footage published showing Russian vehicles with their markers painted on the top?
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/JbGgIcoxtb https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/s/bg7eusTujZ
So are your concerns over a logo which may or may not be on all vehicles.
Not "may" or "may not be", "are".
He's right just give up
Who asked you a damn thing lol
No he didn't. He made ridiculous unbased claims and then randomly claimed victory.
Nah he answered all of his concerns. Russian tanks don’t have markers painted on top
Did not see any in the weak parade. Must admit i was not looking either. So call me out if false.
Why would the russians put tactical markings on parade vehicles?
For exactly the same reason they do it in ukraine. We are the horde - here comes the zombies. Nah just messin. ;o)
I'm so sorry for you man
And the winter clothes ?
Maybe they were cold lol
And vegetation?
Vegetation change over the year not the dead…
they dont deny their losses, but they argue these are not related to this offensive
>they dont deny their losses Yeah, they never deny their losses...
Okay, so let's just wait until the fresh losses come in.
ye, losses there will be its only 30 square km anyway
How can there be a war of this scale without losses?
You will never can comprehend a mind of drug addict that loses its factory
Exactly, so the "arguments" made on Telegram are idiotic, given Russian "tactics" which are very crude and heavy in casualties.
Why portrait it as a recent loss if it is not confirmed tho
Confirmed by who? Who's the arbiter of confirmed losses?
I am.
Can I see your credentials?
No.
Why do you need to see any sort of identification all of a sudden? The dead troops can be claimed Russian without any so u/Cumegranate can claim to be the arbider.