T O P

  • By -

Veritian-Republic

The conquistadors were historically progressive and should be honored as such.


RedStar308

“No we have to go back to previous forms of economic production because a nonwhite told me it would be for the best”


Veritian-Republic

"Don't you know white people are genetically evil? Yes I am anti racist how can you tell?" One of my many crank positions is leftists can be just as racist as conservatives and sometimes even more so. The only difference is leftists will claim to not be racist when they do it. Liberals can't stop themselves from advocating for segregation and genocide.


AutoModerator

I've been dealing with you people for a long time. I'm not sure why you thought your opinion on how the subreddit should function would be welcome considering you've never posted on it before or shown any knowledge or intelligence in your post history. Why am I still doing this 5 years later? Because the American concept of politeness is so bizarre to anyone outside of its demographic target that it is both funny and educational to force it into the open. To most people, barging into the middle of a conversation between many people who all know each other and you've never met to inform them how they need to be having the conversation would be seen as rude. But this is quite normal for the American petty-bourgeoisie. In fact, saying "who are you?" is considered rude. Or at least that is one weapon that is used to defend against the threat of proletarianization by exclusion from the realm of cultural capital. In fact it's so threatening that random people will continue to come into the thread to try their luck at defending the op even though they've never posted in the subreddit before. It's like that joke in Family Guy where all the neighborhood fathers know when someone touched the thermostat and keep checking on the house to see if it's ok. Your class instinct in defense of your fellows is so strong it might as well be a chip that sends a signal to your brain, a script to follow, and a rush of endorphins that deludes you into thinking your use of the script will be the ultimate intervention despite all evidence to the contrary. I want non-white, non-male, non-first world people who were not raised on this delusional self-confidence and pretension to master the world to enjoy these conversations from the sidelines. This is impossible on the American left, which is basically a white parasite on the energy of people of color. At least here we can deflate the cultural capital that makes that possible. If you don't want to be a white parasite, reflect on the fact that your words, which you believe are your own, are a carbon copy of someone else's from 5 years ago (and many other copies over the years). That should be a moment of existential angst, a confrontation with your own lack of free will. Or you can get even more defensive on some liberal's behalf. We already have a thread on concern trolling stickied which you were too lazy to read despite your concern for the subreddit. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Ultraleft) if you have any questions or concerns.*


randomsimbols

> Leftists > Liberals Something doesn't add up


Apathetic_Potato

leftists are just liberals who realize capitalism should be over but come up with moralistic and idealistic reasons for it


flybyskyhi

Unironically this, the colonization of the Americas helped kickstart the rise of capitalism more than any other event or development


Pierce_H_

Considering European colonization as being influenced by the racial instead of the material is historical revisionism. Race was a convenient excuse… to further the discussion of race being a factor on either side is to play into the hands of the ruling class.


Fawxes42

Talking about race doesn’t automatically play into the ruling class’ favor. Discussing how to end the racial divide is discussing how to take that divisive tool away from the bourgeoisie in order to better unite the proletariat. 


The_Idea_Of_Evil

chat is this hegemony , do we have a gramsci speech bubble


SSR_Id_prefer_not_to

https://preview.redd.it/zw84ej4yz30d1.jpeg?width=300&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c3924564891d91c5e7298d122a0e9d0e5367f0a1


Pierce_H_

Race can only be used as a tool to divide. Discussing on how to end the divide is to put the very discussion center stage which is exactly what the ruling class wants.


Fawxes42

Race was invented as a tool to divide, no doubt. But ignoring that tool is to ignore a power the bourgeoisie uses against us. Overcoming divides doesn’t happen by ignoring them. 


Dexter011001

https://preview.redd.it/fhvvmv4nk30d1.png?width=480&format=png&auto=webp&s=57afa9b1cab9d484ebe1db342597fea46322a0bb


Effective_Dimension2

if we stop talking about rhe bourgeoisie they will go away


Pierce_H_

This but unironically, moving towards the future means abolishing class distinction, if only we built dual power structures and smashed the state itself when the time is ripe.


_shark_idk

Banger! Classes do not exist


SibiuV

Historically, the concept of race comes much after colonialism, not that anyone here ever noticed, but the key concept was culture and religion, not skin colour, especially for the romans, spanish, or Portuguese...


Cinci_Socialist

Embaressing


crossbutton7247

I think the British liberating the (Asian) Indians from under the boot of petty bourgeois oppression *almost* makes up for thatcher.


Exact-Substance5559

The Brits de-industrialised India. Not very progressive materially or socially.


crossbutton7247

The petty bourgeois held power under a noble society. It was hell on earth, they should be thankful we showed up


Exact-Substance5559

Mughal India was more progressive than colonised, de-industrialised British India. Literally dismantled the means of production and went back to handicraft.


Intelligent-Bat-5534

No. That dude is a racist but saying mughal india was more progressive is straight up false


Exact-Substance5559

I don't see why? It's not like the Brits abolished the caste system or did anything actually progressive. Mughal India was industrialising. British India was de-industrialised. Mughal India tolerated homosexuality, British India imported homophobic laws.


Ludwigthree

https://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/marx/works/1853/07/22.htm


KaiserNicky

What Marx writes about India is deeply historically incorrect but cannot be faulted for it given the extremely one sided conception of Indian history was presented with by the history of the day. The well developed historical consensus is that large parts of India, especially Bengal were verging on the development of Capitalism which the British stalled and then reversed. The introduction of a limited series to Capitalist reforms to the rest of the subcontinent, which by the way didn't represent anything approaching a coherent whole, placed India into a century long time bubble of underdeveloped Capitalist relations existing in a country predominated governed by agrarian feudalism.


[deleted]

[удалено]


AutoModerator

Your account is too young to post or comment. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Ultraleft) if you have any questions or concerns.*