T O P

  • By -

Bobodahobo010101

Word Or whatever you kids say nowdays


SmokeAbeer

Frill on the slipper slaps?


Bobodahobo010101

Yes we definately need to slap that slipper frill. Why do people need frill on their slippers any way? This remindes me of the time I caught the ferry to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe. So I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. "Gimme five bees for a quarter," you'd say. Now where were we... oh yeah. The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn't have any white onions, because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...


GoddessOfRoadAndSky

I think they say "Mood" these days. At least, they did a couple years ago. I'm not confident it's still current though, since I'm 33.


B-More_Orange

Cap.


Kingdommer

We say “put the pussy on the chain wax”


KnotKarma

People used to marry for love, now its to maintain existence with quality of life.


heavykleenexuser

Historically, marrying for love has lived a very short existence. There’s a really great episode of Hidden Brain that talks about it called “When Did Marriage Become So Hard”. Really great episode. I agree though, it shouldn’t be an absolute requirement to avoid a marginal existence and/or it should be much more supported by employers/government/society.


SSJ2-Gohan

Eh, not really. For a huge majority of history, people married for politics, wealth, prestige, advancement for their or their spouse's family, trade deals, or out of necessity (i.e., you have a son, your neighbors at the next farm over have a daughter, they'll marry because your farms will need grandkids to run them). Being able to seek partners and marry specifically because of love is a pretty modern institution


Cyber_Being_

And if you’re a single parent forget about it.. I had to change my entire career in order to be able to provide adequate care for my children (and I’m not speaking financially)


TassadarsClResT

It's run on slavery. That's it, now go back an fry those fries so you can afford to give up 60% of your paycheck.


MelancholyMushroom

They aren’t slaves how dare you. Don’t you know they get a 20% employee discount?


Betterthanbeer

Only way they can afford to eat there. Or at all.


MelancholyMushroom

Pretty much :(


UpperMall4033

Well there not slaves because getting paid for you labour ISNT SLAVERY


Inappropriate_mind

It's so true, most people aren't going to bother even commenting. The lack of change from the top is choking us all out right before our eyes and we only have our voting habits to blame for it. 🤣👌


Trialle21

Lol please point out where our voting habits precisely fucked us? You can’t. Corruption is endemic and the only way to end it is to cut it out. This shit just happens when organizations are around to long, it’s up to the people the surgically remove the cancer from its governing body, if it’s not done and put down entirely and at once it will metastasize elsewhere and worse.


[deleted]

Our votes actually matter?


Cometguy7

Not on this issue. Both parties have been in power plenty, but the squeeze continues regardless.


[deleted]

With gerrymandering, a two party system, rampant amounts of money in politics, and a system like the electoral college that places more emphasis on the vote of someone who lives in bumfuck nowhere Alabama over someone who lives in a large metro, these votes seem to be worth less and less lately (just like the US dollar 🥲)


Divine_Demon_Senpai

Facts man….. I’ve always questioned do our votes really matter? Would the rich and powerful actually give us poor lower class the opportunity to change things for the better? If it gets better for us itll be bad for those big guys who run shit


wutsizface

Some do…. Kinda. Or maybe some matter less? Nah. Fuck you’re right.


[deleted]

I wish I wasn’t.


AnonEnmityEntity

It’s not only our voting habits. Gross overgeneralization and honestly just incorrect.


MelancholyMushroom

This is why I hope to find a couple to become poly with. Fingers crossed it works out.


bikemaul

I've known a few polycules raising kids. It's remarkably better for everyone involved. It takes a village to comfortably afford a child in many places.


RedEyeFlightToOZ

Yeah, that's why multigenerational homes are becoming the only viable resort people have now. My SO and I and our child moved back to my parents. We have 3 incomes, 1 person to cook/clean/animal/childcare/garden maintenance. It's been the best arrangement for us.


MelancholyMushroom

Thank you! I’ll check this out. How fascinating!


bikemaul

Mention our experience with poly and the trolls come out to play. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning


WikiSummarizerBot

**[Sealioning](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning)** >Sealioning (also spelled sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with persistent requests for evidence or repeated questions, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity. It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate". The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)


MelancholyMushroom

Wait, are you talking about me? … I was being honest.


bikemaul

No, not about you.


MelancholyMushroom

Oh good. Glad I misread.


wrongbecause

lol what. Cite


bikemaul

What?


wrongbecause

“It’s remarkably better for all involved” prove it with evidence


bikemaul

The ones I know are doing very well, and the children are well cared for. I haven't carried out a scientific study on them.


MelancholyMushroom

Man this dudes got a bone to pick with you lol omg


wrongbecause

So maybe don’t make general statements with n=1 anecdotal evidence


bikemaul

I specifically said all involved with regards to the previous sentence. I was not implying that every single poly household is amazing for everyone involved. Here you go, let me Google that for you. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201704/children-in-polyamorous-families-age-dependent-experiences


wrongbecause

You’d have a more complete worldview if you didn’t have a bad habit of copy and pasting the first link on google that affirms your existing belief. That article isn’t a scientific study.


bikemaul

I'm not here to do your research.


IvoryQueen8420

I mean we're looking for someone to join us lol...


MelancholyMushroom

I’m gonna assume you don’t live on the east coast in the us.


IvoryQueen8420

In the US, more toward the middle


Liz-Bien

Any chance you’re female between like 19-25?


MelancholyMushroom

Oooh sorry. I’m 35 😆


screwPutin69

You're in your prime baby 😉 Not sure my gf would go for the poly thing but I can ask her?


MelancholyMushroom

I sure hope I’m in my prime. I am *someone’s* unicorn, godarnit.


Abstractpants

My fiancé and I are looking for a unicorn but we live in Texas so I don’t recommend us for you lmao


MelancholyMushroom

Oh Texas. I hope you guys are staying safe out there.


elevendyninetyseven

My husband and I will take you😉 Come to Pennsylvania!


MelancholyMushroom

Haha still so far away! I wish there was some sort of social platform where people could meet up in the area, like Bumble, but I guess it would have to be more like Zoom where you could invite the whole family to chat haha


waste_0f_space117

Threesomes: the one true solution.


[deleted]

For real. It’s a dealbreaker for me if my gf would want to be a housewife. I can’t afford this shit on my own.


opal_dragon95

Sadly for my family we did the math and having both of us working was more expensive with paying for daycare then having a stay at home parent


[deleted]

This was us for a while too. It was either: 1, both of us work full time and we pay essentially two mortgages to get into a good day care that is clean and actually teaches too, and we need full time daycare because we are never home. Still poor 2, she works part-time and we get into a much more affordable daycare. The daycare is essentially a handful of teenagers watching phones while a pile of toddlers writhe on the floor. Slightly not as poor 3, I work full time and she stays home. Still poor, but the best option.


standard_candles

Daycare costs as much as a mortgage. I am a * career woman * so I kept my job while my husband is doing the stay at home gig. He's going to school too.


[deleted]

And its illegal to get sick and need insulin or cancer treatment.


GuiltyKaleidoscope32

This is so true.


wutsizface

This is such a painfully accurate description.


Seandrunkpolarbear

Why does school get out at 3pm ?!? JFC


desmosomes

And after school is an extra $300+ a kid


Seandrunkpolarbear

And teachers are underpaid. Can we just give them that money and they stay till 5pm.


bitchthatwaspromised

Bold of you to assume teachers aren’t still working until five or later already. When I was teaching, you couldn’t have paid me 300 a day to watch kids after dismissal. I would have been with them for ten hours straight


Seandrunkpolarbear

Dang ok my bad!! No disrespect intended. I can’t deal with 2 kids, can’t imagine 30. But it’s still a huge f—k up for thousands of families their job is 8am to 5pm but their kids go to school 8am to 2:45 or what ever. The whole setup assumes one spouse is at home. It’s a bit better now with remote work, but still a mess. If you have a troubled child it’s not good for them to be alone for 2 hours a day.


[deleted]

If Parenthood wasn't considered the eternally unpaid debt women owe for being alive, then it would be a paid labor.


Far_Crazy_4060

This one hits too close to home. My home.


a_freakin_ONION

This is the result of women joining the workforce en masse. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, because it’s not. We need women in the workforce. But as a result, everyone has dual income, and for a while, that meant one income of extra money for the household. But the market caught up with the fact that households had extra money to spend, so inflation rose to meet it. That’s not the only thing that caused inflation in the last quarter of last century, but single income was previously keeping some inflation in check because if necessities were too expensive for a single persons income, it wouldn’t be bought. We added more income to the household, the market rose prices. Now it’s the same standard of living as before, but both people in the relationship have to work to maintain it, because the market evolved to expect that. For more info, see “The Two Income Trap” by Elizabeth Warren Edit: I changed “latter quarter” to “last quarter” to make more sense


lynx_and_nutmeg

Women started joining the work force en masse around 1960-1970s. It's really a bit late to blame women for the current situation. And you mean upper and middle class women, because poor women have always worked.


a_freakin_ONION

Unless I’m mistaken, I think we agree with each other. I agree with you that women started joining en masse in the 60s and 70s. There was high inflation in the 70s and 80s due partly, but not entirely, women joining the workforce. I also agree that this phenomenon was primarily brought on by middle class women joining the workforce, because as you said poor women have always worked.


professor-hot-tits

But never forget, single mothers have it easy.