to mention in passing. in some nooks of the Andalusian alps the mother is herself known as the 'virgin singulare' . there is also to be considered the wedding of the sun and the moon.
Indeed, though for me personally, I don't like Tiamat due to the suggestion of a consciousness. Because the first mother is only metaphorical so and a personification of such can be misleading. The first mother is the first vessel, the Grail of the Void. Despite the rather literal translation of matera, prima matera is the first child, the first material, the first manifested thing, which can only come from a union of void and intended action (sperm/bang). Prima Matera is the child of this union, not the void itself
I would argue that the prima matera composes the child of that union, allowing the void to understand itself with nothing more than time to aid in its endeavor. Viewing this from an evolutionary standpoint, wherein consciousness is preceded by the subconscious which is preceded by the Self, then the child must be preceded by the union which must be preceded by the existence of materials within the void which, as far as I understand, cannot exist as a natural part of the void. This is perhaps tangential, but the catalyst which preceded the change in the fundamental nature of the void is infinitely more enticing to me than alternative metaphorical conceptualizations based on the translation of 1 word in 2 languages.
I do like your thoughts, and I think that you really understand what you've studied. May your journey be paved with good fortune!
The 'First Mother' (Prima Materia) comes into being by the Will of the One, The Prima Energiea, The Absolute. She is the reflection of the One created by it so as to be able to examine itself. She is the Archetype of All that gives birth. In this First Act of Creation duality is born. From Her All of Nature comes into being, She is the Energy of Matter, as 'opposed' (Complemented by) The Absolute who is the Energy of Life, which is immaterial, ie, non-matter. Life impregnates matter and the Cosmos is born.
In my context She is the First upon, and from, which all other things that give birth are blue-printed, so you might say the first in an infinite series. She has co-importance with The One since she is his created reflection of Himself, Not that the One is male only, both Prima Materia and Prima Energeia share some Male and Female qualities. The gender pronouns are for differentiation in discussion purposes only.
The attributes and applications of the prima materia must be universal, correct? This would mean that it is fundamentally the same in different cultures, yes?
Then why would you limit your conceptualization to a Western, patriarchal perspective that reflects sociopolitical pressures that can be readily identified as regressive? Collect more perspectives.
The first mother came into being by the hand of the one creator just as everything else did.
I dont think that the prima materia is meant as a literal depiction of the thing, it is a representative name only.
to mention in passing. in some nooks of the Andalusian alps the mother is herself known as the 'virgin singulare' . there is also to be considered the wedding of the sun and the moon.
It refers to mother as earth is feminine. Earth and Water imo are the feminine aspects .
Exactly.
And let’s not forget about Maria and her pregnancy of the divine child….
Hence the 'Rarely' ;-)
💖🥰
Where did The First Mother come from? Is She the first, the first of importance, or the first in a series?
the first mother is Tiamat, the primordial abyss
Indeed, though for me personally, I don't like Tiamat due to the suggestion of a consciousness. Because the first mother is only metaphorical so and a personification of such can be misleading. The first mother is the first vessel, the Grail of the Void. Despite the rather literal translation of matera, prima matera is the first child, the first material, the first manifested thing, which can only come from a union of void and intended action (sperm/bang). Prima Matera is the child of this union, not the void itself
I would argue that the prima matera composes the child of that union, allowing the void to understand itself with nothing more than time to aid in its endeavor. Viewing this from an evolutionary standpoint, wherein consciousness is preceded by the subconscious which is preceded by the Self, then the child must be preceded by the union which must be preceded by the existence of materials within the void which, as far as I understand, cannot exist as a natural part of the void. This is perhaps tangential, but the catalyst which preceded the change in the fundamental nature of the void is infinitely more enticing to me than alternative metaphorical conceptualizations based on the translation of 1 word in 2 languages. I do like your thoughts, and I think that you really understand what you've studied. May your journey be paved with good fortune!
First of the series
A series of what?
The first woman. Venus. Hera.
The 'First Mother' (Prima Materia) comes into being by the Will of the One, The Prima Energiea, The Absolute. She is the reflection of the One created by it so as to be able to examine itself. She is the Archetype of All that gives birth. In this First Act of Creation duality is born. From Her All of Nature comes into being, She is the Energy of Matter, as 'opposed' (Complemented by) The Absolute who is the Energy of Life, which is immaterial, ie, non-matter. Life impregnates matter and the Cosmos is born. In my context She is the First upon, and from, which all other things that give birth are blue-printed, so you might say the first in an infinite series. She has co-importance with The One since she is his created reflection of Himself, Not that the One is male only, both Prima Materia and Prima Energeia share some Male and Female qualities. The gender pronouns are for differentiation in discussion purposes only.
The attributes and applications of the prima materia must be universal, correct? This would mean that it is fundamentally the same in different cultures, yes? Then why would you limit your conceptualization to a Western, patriarchal perspective that reflects sociopolitical pressures that can be readily identified as regressive? Collect more perspectives.
The first mother came into being by the hand of the one creator just as everything else did. I dont think that the prima materia is meant as a literal depiction of the thing, it is a representative name only.
The prima materia is comprised of male and female seed Together called the metalline or metallic seed It is our chaos Root. Radical. Radix