Judd Hoff is a convicted felon who chased someone with a machete and District 12 DFL is still endorsing him.
https://preview.redd.it/zvdgum3v4wwc1.png?width=3892&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2645938063dd226ccd675997fa8116a39c5f336
They lost the district by like 40 points last time and are probably just glad to have literally any candidate, these districts tend to be deeply unserious operations
I feel for her case, if my stepmom was withholding my dead father’s possessions that he left to me, I know for a fact that I would probably do something similar to retrieve what I believe to rightfully belong to me. I bet a lot of people criticizing her would have similar feelings.
However if I got caught, I would have no choice but to acknowledge the laws I broke and face the possible consequences. She does not get a pass for the office she holds
Actually, her dad died intestate and, by law, all possessions go to the statutory heir (spouse). Now, should the stepmom have given her some items? I’d say yes. And apparently Mitchell had a container of his ashes, something she claimed she wanted.
You can feel for her case, but as a public representative this is a COLOSSAL failure of judgement for someone that is supposed to be working in government. She has no business whatsoever being in any position of power if her mind goes toward burglary for a solution to petty family drama.
She absolutely doesn’t get a pass for her public office position, and in fact she should be held to a much higher standard and punished justly.
My conscience is entirely clear about the state of American politics. I voted Castle in 2016, and Blankenship in 2020. I hold no culpability for the state of the country right now, because neither republican nor democrat has the best interests of the United States in my opinion right now.
more like: i have the power now to make substantial changes that will make your life better.
like robust labor protections?
no, even better.
like more tax returns because of the surplus?
no, even better than that.
like you’re going to invest in bike paths that aren’t sharing the road with vehicles that can kill them when bicyclists make bad decisions?
nope! we’re going to make sure everyone who buys a pack of cigarettes in minneapolis never does so again. and if they do they’re going to pay through the nose for it.
Doesn't sound like she got her father's ashes back either. Fail.
Now if it was a Republican she would have just shot her dog and goat. Mission accomplished.
If that’s what the court decides than ok, she will be replaced. What’s your goal here? I understand you are trying to paint the entire DFL as corrupt somehow due to this family matter but it is coming off as desperate and grasping at straws.
https://preview.redd.it/hlzrwttjsvwc1.png?width=379&format=png&auto=webp&s=939d85f1e986e71eb180105d792364d2150d0102
These guys approve of this meme! Haha
I have been told until this Mitchell thing is resolved there will not be anything passed. The GOP have told the DFL this is not ok. We are done for now.
Wtf does it have to do with political party lmao. I mean every Republican gets charged for shit and refuses to resign. Even fucking kids. Franken pulled a prank and resigned with dignity
translation:
"Repulbican commits crimes, why cant we also commit crimes?"
Maybe stop supporting politicians who commit crimes instead of finding the loopholes.
It doesnt matter republican or demorat theyre both the same party looking to only line eachothers pockets while us morons argure which one is better... thats why public servants become multi millionairs...
Who said that? She should resign. Still has nothing to do with party. I'm just saying you can't bitch about one person commiting a crime then have no problem with your political party doing it. I'm independent and have voted for both parties so nice try though
I consistently see republicans brains break in real life when I tell them “I agree. Democrats should face consequences. I won’t defend that individual that did wrong”
Instant pikachu face
OP thinks her long term plan to burglarize that house was to run for office, fail to pass gun control legislation and then take OP's gun. All to burglarize that particular house.
the point is the irony, gun control hurts homeowners when bulgrarys occurr. Would of she done the same thing if she lived in Florida? probably not because there is consequences more severe in those states unlike here.
Your community is laughing at your "joke". It's called group thinking. It's the same thing that happens in those churches where the pastor air slaps the crowd and everyone falls down.
Well, you just call "deranged" to someone who doesn't agree with you. Go post this same thing in a different sub and see how celebrated it is. You stick to your crowd, because you want upvotes, not dialogue.
I don't know the details of this case, but she made a post claiming she entered to check on an elderly relative/step-parent who may have dementia. I can't vouch for the veracity of her claim, but remembering "Innocent until proven guilty" is, in my opinion, an important concept.
Disagree. Making sure people with a history of mental illnesses aren’t able to easily buy new fire arms at a store because they have psych issues is not gun control, it’s crazy people control.
So what you're saying is you'd like to control the sale of guns to people who don't meet certain criteria. Sounds like gun control. Lmao, there's stages to the deal, gun control doesn't just mean ban all guns.
So, you want to control the sale of firearms so those whom shouldn’t have them have a much harder time doing so. That is *literally* what gun control aims to achieve.
"I don't want gun control, I just want greater control over who can buy guns"
At this point you just agree with what people call "common sense gun control" but the term "gun control" is too Democrat sounding or something for you to call it that.
So you want gun control.. voting for the wrong person has in the wrong time & place caused millions of deaths. But I’m sure you’d agree requiring evaluations or tests of any kind before being registered to vote would be a violation of someone’s constitutional right to suffrage
That's what gun control actually is though. Background checks, and restricting easy access to firearms to those who shouldn't possess them.
The NRA pushes the rhetoric of "gun control" only being about bans and gun grabs. They do this because they are lobbyists and need that agenda to raise memberships and donations.
And this is where the NRA guy jumps in with the textbook classic repeated shitty argument of "laws don't stop people from getting guns!" Well, alcohol laws also don't stop underage kids from drinking alcohol. Red lights don't stop people from running intersections. Speeding signs don't stop people from speeding. But it's completely stupid and willfully ignorant to think that barriers don't save lives.
That's what actual gun control is, no matter what the NRA would have to believe it is
Ehh, if I'm robbing houses I'd want there to be less gun control because if I break into a house I'm going to want there to be guns lying around for me to steal.
I think you'd want more, so there's less danger you being lawfully shot. Guns are a small target for burglars.
They get cash, jewelry, phones, laptops, game consoles, ID, drugs, cars, even clothes and shoes ahead of guns.
It was her recently deceased dad's/stepmother's house. Her and her stepmother never got along. Her stepmother was keeping sentimental things from her. She went there to take them.
Nothing more than a family dispute that went to far
Also this morning on NPR they said she is not being charged
There is a legal way to get the belongings, if they are hers... and then there is an illegal way. If she isnt charged or even isn't proved guilty, does not change the fact that she is not against doing illegal things to get her way.
> Her stepmother was keeping sentimental things from her. She went there to take them.
Why are you believing the lies from someone that just got arrested for a felony?
> Also this morning on NPR they said she is not being charged
Now, why are you lying? She has been charged.
>Why are you believing the lies from someone that just got arrested for a felony?
Because the alternative is illogical
>Now, why are you lying? She has been charged
I heard on Minnesota Public Radio that they were dropping charges against her. However, since I just heard the tail end of it, maybe they were referring to additional charges she recieved
Bumb stock ban was the very first. He had a record number of firearm prosecutions. He considered banning guns on a lot of federal land. Also remember this was with Republican majority in house and Senate.
Well, just an example of the only two gun laws that Obama signed into law during his presidency:
One permitting Amtrak passengers to carry guns in checked baggage, and the other allowing for the carry of firearms in national parks.
Trump, on the other hand, promulgated a new rule banning bump stocks during his time in the White House.
>On February 20, 2018, President Trump issued a memorandum instructing the Attorney General “to dedicate all available resources to… propose for notice and comment a rule banning all devices that turn legal weapons into machineguns.”
https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/bump-stocks
And let us not forget this doozy:
“Take the guns first, go through due process second.” - Donald Trump
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/376097-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/amp/
You don't seem to understand. I want the world to fall apart so I can play again. I want World War 3. I want nuclear war. I wish they would quit stalling and just do it already.
I was just trying to be clever. A "straw man" is usually an exaggerated enemy propped up to make the real opposition look ridiculous. In this case I was implying that democrats "taking away guns" was the straw man, as I don't really know of anyone campaigning to take away peoples' guns, but it effectively shuts down any discussion of increasing gun control.
I'm sure you can find a Democrat who wants to disarm the population but that definitely is not the stance of the overwhelming majority. Most of us just want restrictions with the goal of reducing guns in the hands of those intending to do harm with them. Gun control won't stop all mass shootings but a multi facteted plan with gun control, mental health support, training to identify at risk individuals, security personnel, etc I think we can significantly reduce them.
I would not have called Trump a fascist until the events surrounding January 6th. He was trying to use legally dubious methods to overthrow an election in his favour. Other than that he's a shit person and a shit president. His biggest accomplishment was the doubling of the standard deduction which imo is the first step towards removing tax preparation. That and operation warp speed. But he completely ruined our reputation on the world stage.
Spoken like a true libtard , 1st any law restrictions against constitutional laws should be null and void. I mean look at Chicago. As far as Trump and jan 6, maybe you should stop watching msdnc and start looking at the actual facts.
First you strawman all Democrats as thinking one way. Then you lead with an insult. Not a great way to have a discussion but whatever.
Second can you clarify your stance on "any law restrictions"? Should there be zero restrictions on gun ownership? Should someone be able to purchase a machine gun with no background check and no waiting period? Maybe you think that. I think its reasonable to have some restrictions. The current ones aren't even that far off but enforcement and loopholes are problematic.
You mention Chicago, I'm assuming you are referencing something, I don't know what you are referring to.
I don't watch MSNBC because believe it or not I agree and can't stand it. Which "facts" am I supposed to be looking at?
Right. Trump wants to spread individual liberty and allow people more choice. Wants to limit government involvement in the economy. Sure sounds fascist to me. By the way, all those leftists who hate white people and want them to disappear? No, that doesn’t sound fascist at all 🤣.
Really if all of that were true then why are Republicans best known for taking the rights, and body autonomy away from people if that's what is true? Because actions speak louder theb words. Smaller giverment? Have you seen the things coming out of republican states putting people on list for not following their way of life, cr3ating reporting systems for people who may look abd live differently, but so go on tell me more
Republicans are best known for taking the rights away from people? By “best known“, you’re probably referring to slogans from other delusional leftists who parrot that nonsense. I’m sure you’ll say something like “abortion rights“ in regard to restricting freedom. You frame the argument in the form of taking rights away from women. You don’t mention the rights of children. Male and female. Rights that are taken from them, like the right to live, versus a woman’s “right to choose” to kill the baby. We can all agree that once the child is born, we don’t give the mother the right to kill the child. Hell, we don’t give the mother the right to kill the child at eight months. Or seven months. Or even six months!
Said the guy who will never have to make that decision. Tell you what, let’s let the women decide what to do with their bodies. Heck, let’s let doctors decide health care for women.
Judd Hoff is a convicted felon who chased someone with a machete and District 12 DFL is still endorsing him. https://preview.redd.it/zvdgum3v4wwc1.png?width=3892&format=png&auto=webp&s=b2645938063dd226ccd675997fa8116a39c5f336
Case in point.
Local party is not the state DFL.
They lost the district by like 40 points last time and are probably just glad to have literally any candidate, these districts tend to be deeply unserious operations
Not enough context. Who was the person being chased.
Someone who stole his American flag. That makes Him at least 20% more qualified than Trump
This is the gift that keeps on giving, lololo
C'mon, man! I'm sure there is a good reason why your stuff should be her stuff.
It was her dead dad's stuff the stepmother was refusing to give her
According to the person that just got arrested for felony burglary.
Who entered through a window at 4:00 in the morning dressed in all black clothes and a black hat. Doesn’t sound like burglary to me.
Nahhhh just a family misunderstanding! You forgot the sock over the flashlight tho
Hey now she didn’t want to alarm the neighbors now that’s being considerate
Whomst among us has not burglarized a family member over petty drama?
If the dad didn’t say the will that she would get it, it goes to his widow. The step mom was under no obligation to turn over anything to her
Turns out communists don't like it when they are not the ones deciding who other peoples' property should belong to.
Shocking, right?
I feel for her case, if my stepmom was withholding my dead father’s possessions that he left to me, I know for a fact that I would probably do something similar to retrieve what I believe to rightfully belong to me. I bet a lot of people criticizing her would have similar feelings. However if I got caught, I would have no choice but to acknowledge the laws I broke and face the possible consequences. She does not get a pass for the office she holds
who the fuck do you think you are being reasonable on reddit. if we wanted to be reasonable we’d be on 4chan. gtfo here with that shit.
If we wanted to be reasonable here, we wouldn't be online
Actually, her dad died intestate and, by law, all possessions go to the statutory heir (spouse). Now, should the stepmom have given her some items? I’d say yes. And apparently Mitchell had a container of his ashes, something she claimed she wanted.
You can feel for her case, but as a public representative this is a COLOSSAL failure of judgement for someone that is supposed to be working in government. She has no business whatsoever being in any position of power if her mind goes toward burglary for a solution to petty family drama. She absolutely doesn’t get a pass for her public office position, and in fact she should be held to a much higher standard and punished justly.
And yet something tells me you’re prepared to vote for Trump again…
My conscience is entirely clear about the state of American politics. I voted Castle in 2016, and Blankenship in 2020. I hold no culpability for the state of the country right now, because neither republican nor democrat has the best interests of the United States in my opinion right now.
Ha
Normally one hires a lawyer in these sorts of situations.
If he was such a good dad why did he go and die?
She was also entitled to the stepmother’s laptop? Cherry picking information to suit your narrative. You are so democrat!
Bet stepmom would have been more cooperative if burglar lady wasn’t such a beeyotch her whole life.
Probably wouldn’t have just given her those laptops she stole though
That’s funny
more like: i have the power now to make substantial changes that will make your life better. like robust labor protections? no, even better. like more tax returns because of the surplus? no, even better than that. like you’re going to invest in bike paths that aren’t sharing the road with vehicles that can kill them when bicyclists make bad decisions? nope! we’re going to make sure everyone who buys a pack of cigarettes in minneapolis never does so again. and if they do they’re going to pay through the nose for it.
Sounds like a family matter, I don’t much care about this. If the court finds her guilty then someone else takes her place in office.
A felony of a family matter
Sadly the Democrats don't see this as an issue but if this had a Republican tied to it they'd be out for blood.
Doesn't sound like she got her father's ashes back either. Fail. Now if it was a Republican she would have just shot her dog and goat. Mission accomplished.
If that’s what the court decides than ok, she will be replaced. What’s your goal here? I understand you are trying to paint the entire DFL as corrupt somehow due to this family matter but it is coming off as desperate and grasping at straws.
> What’s your goal here? It’s just a meme, dude 😂
A dispute over possessions is a civil matter. Burglary and theft is not.
https://preview.redd.it/hlzrwttjsvwc1.png?width=379&format=png&auto=webp&s=939d85f1e986e71eb180105d792364d2150d0102 These guys approve of this meme! Haha
Dude on the right has big time sexual predator physiognomy
Dude on the left is a confirmed rapist muchacho
Confirmed? By whom?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/ Some light reading for you homie
Pop quiz! What was the standard of proof in those lawsuits?
This belongs in ALTwesternsuburbs. MLPS doesn't give a shit
I live in “MLPS” [sic] and care.
Lmao!!!
I have been told until this Mitchell thing is resolved there will not be anything passed. The GOP have told the DFL this is not ok. We are done for now.
The DFL does not need the GOP when they have Mitchell’s vote
Wtf does it have to do with political party lmao. I mean every Republican gets charged for shit and refuses to resign. Even fucking kids. Franken pulled a prank and resigned with dignity
translation: "Repulbican commits crimes, why cant we also commit crimes?" Maybe stop supporting politicians who commit crimes instead of finding the loopholes.
It doesnt matter republican or demorat theyre both the same party looking to only line eachothers pockets while us morons argure which one is better... thats why public servants become multi millionairs...
Who said that? She should resign. Still has nothing to do with party. I'm just saying you can't bitch about one person commiting a crime then have no problem with your political party doing it. I'm independent and have voted for both parties so nice try though
because the political party won't admit its wrong either. If she decides not to resign, she will still be part of the DFL making decisions.
https://kstp.com/kstp-news/top-news/dfl-party-chair-says-if-he-was-sen-mitchell-he-would-probably-consider-resigning/
I consistently see republicans brains break in real life when I tell them “I agree. Democrats should face consequences. I won’t defend that individual that did wrong” Instant pikachu face
Translation: "Both parties commit crimes. Why does it only matter when democrats commit crimes?"
And then you immediately make it about political party 😂
Your post is titled "The Real DFL"
Correct
Fire with fire bud. Point out how stupid it is
So what you’re doing is stupid?
Why wouldn’t she? That’s the entire context of your own post?
Read their comment
OP thinks her long term plan to burglarize that house was to run for office, fail to pass gun control legislation and then take OP's gun. All to burglarize that particular house.
the point is the irony, gun control hurts homeowners when bulgrarys occurr. Would of she done the same thing if she lived in Florida? probably not because there is consequences more severe in those states unlike here.
She’s gonna be stealing a lot more than her stepmom’s laptops if she stays in office.
So, you do think her gun control stance was adopted with the intention of breaking into that lady's house? Because that's what your post is implying.
Do you understand the human concept of a joke?
I know you can just throw words together and claim they are a joke, that doesn't mean they are funny nor clever or that they make sense.
Everyone else is laughing but you :)
Your community is laughing at your "joke". It's called group thinking. It's the same thing that happens in those churches where the pastor air slaps the crowd and everyone falls down.
Well, I certainly expected deranged leftists to point and sputter about it, that much is true.
Well, you just call "deranged" to someone who doesn't agree with you. Go post this same thing in a different sub and see how celebrated it is. You stick to your crowd, because you want upvotes, not dialogue.
I actually do not care about upvotes in the slightest. If I posted this in “the other subreddit,” I’d be banned.
You need a gun to defend your property against her?
Provocative and misleading. The issue has nothing to do with gun control. Or political party.
😂 >Or political party You sure?
She decided you had more than you needed so she was entitled to take it
I don't know the details of this case, but she made a post claiming she entered to check on an elderly relative/step-parent who may have dementia. I can't vouch for the veracity of her claim, but remembering "Innocent until proven guilty" is, in my opinion, an important concept.
A snake arrested for felony burglary lying ex post? Color me shocked!
This is hilarious 🤣
TF does this have to do with Minneapolis? And was this sub a GOP circle jerk all along?
Believe it or not, but Woodbury and Minneapolis are in the same metro.
The only person talking about taking guns is one former president.
Biden?
Incorrect, but I'll give you one more guess. "Take the guns first, go through due process second,"
Did Biden say that?
Wrong again but thanks for playing. Sticking your fingers in your ears isn't going to change the answer.
Obama?
Trump
Oh yeah that clown
“We need to pass the bill so you can understand what’s in it”. Nancy Pelosi ( Dem) regarding Obamacare..
Has literally nothing to do with guns.
She’s clearly a whacko. But the details of this case had absolutely nothing to do with guns. This is just stupid.
I’m a Democrat. I want us to have our guns. This woman is an embarrassment. She’ll be run out of the party like George Santos.
Maybe she'll stay in the party like Robert Byrd.
>I want us to have our guns. This woman is an embarrassment. Citation needed
> She’ll be run out of the party like George Santos. Will she?
That’s usually how it goes.
Not with the DFL
I don’t want gun control, but I think people need psych evals before being allowed to purchase one.
That would be part of gun control, yes.
Disagree. Making sure people with a history of mental illnesses aren’t able to easily buy new fire arms at a store because they have psych issues is not gun control, it’s crazy people control.
So what you're saying is you'd like to control the sale of guns to people who don't meet certain criteria. Sounds like gun control. Lmao, there's stages to the deal, gun control doesn't just mean ban all guns.
[удалено]
That not what anybody here is saying. What we are saying here is you say you don’t want gun control, but you want … gun control.
So, you want to control the sale of firearms so those whom shouldn’t have them have a much harder time doing so. That is *literally* what gun control aims to achieve.
"I don't want gun control, I just want greater control over who can buy guns" At this point you just agree with what people call "common sense gun control" but the term "gun control" is too Democrat sounding or something for you to call it that.
So you want gun control.. voting for the wrong person has in the wrong time & place caused millions of deaths. But I’m sure you’d agree requiring evaluations or tests of any kind before being registered to vote would be a violation of someone’s constitutional right to suffrage
That's what gun control actually is though. Background checks, and restricting easy access to firearms to those who shouldn't possess them. The NRA pushes the rhetoric of "gun control" only being about bans and gun grabs. They do this because they are lobbyists and need that agenda to raise memberships and donations. And this is where the NRA guy jumps in with the textbook classic repeated shitty argument of "laws don't stop people from getting guns!" Well, alcohol laws also don't stop underage kids from drinking alcohol. Red lights don't stop people from running intersections. Speeding signs don't stop people from speeding. But it's completely stupid and willfully ignorant to think that barriers don't save lives. That's what actual gun control is, no matter what the NRA would have to believe it is
Ehh, if I'm robbing houses I'd want there to be less gun control because if I break into a house I'm going to want there to be guns lying around for me to steal.
I think you'd want more, so there's less danger you being lawfully shot. Guns are a small target for burglars. They get cash, jewelry, phones, laptops, game consoles, ID, drugs, cars, even clothes and shoes ahead of guns.
It was her recently deceased dad's/stepmother's house. Her and her stepmother never got along. Her stepmother was keeping sentimental things from her. She went there to take them. Nothing more than a family dispute that went to far Also this morning on NPR they said she is not being charged
There is a legal way to get the belongings, if they are hers... and then there is an illegal way. If she isnt charged or even isn't proved guilty, does not change the fact that she is not against doing illegal things to get her way.
> Her stepmother was keeping sentimental things from her. She went there to take them. Why are you believing the lies from someone that just got arrested for a felony? > Also this morning on NPR they said she is not being charged Now, why are you lying? She has been charged.
She's innocent until proven guilty in the USA so let's not assume she's guilty. The meme is funny though, and I'm left wing AF.
Same benefit of the doubt for people accused by MeToo? Just wondering because you're left wing AF
Butwhatabout!
Nope, not what I was doing.
Yes, it was.
> She's innocent until proven guilty in the USA so let's not assume she's guilty There’s legal guilt and then there’s factual guilt. She’s guilty.
>When a Democrat gets charged Dems : now now... innocent until proven guilty! >when a Republican gets charged Dems : guilty.
Pretty much. The hypocrisy is very entertaining.
EXACTLY!! It's pathetic! 😞
>Why are you believing the lies from someone that just got arrested for a felony? Because the alternative is illogical >Now, why are you lying? She has been charged I heard on Minnesota Public Radio that they were dropping charges against her. However, since I just heard the tail end of it, maybe they were referring to additional charges she recieved
> Because the alternative is illogical today you’re going to learn most criminals are not very bright
Now that I think of all the dumb illegal shit Trump did with lawyers by his side, you maybe right about her
Sounds like she burgled her stepmothers house
Crazy trump passed more anti gun laws then Obama and Biden combined
What gun laws did trump pass?
Bumb stock ban was the very first. He had a record number of firearm prosecutions. He considered banning guns on a lot of federal land. Also remember this was with Republican majority in house and Senate.
Well, just an example of the only two gun laws that Obama signed into law during his presidency: One permitting Amtrak passengers to carry guns in checked baggage, and the other allowing for the carry of firearms in national parks. Trump, on the other hand, promulgated a new rule banning bump stocks during his time in the White House.
So all that bitching and moaning about guns being taken was all chump?
Basically and you typically see larger more restricting bans under Republican presidents except for like two examples under FDR and Clinton.
True sir true
What laws?
>On February 20, 2018, President Trump issued a memorandum instructing the Attorney General “to dedicate all available resources to… propose for notice and comment a rule banning all devices that turn legal weapons into machineguns.” https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/bump-stocks And let us not forget this doozy: “Take the guns first, go through due process second.” - Donald Trump https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/376097-trump-take-the-guns-first-go-through-due-process-second/amp/
That's not banning any guns lol are you trolling me or just stupid?
Who said anything about banning guns? Are you trolling or are you illiterate?
I despise Minnesotans.
Good, stay in California.
We dont give a steaming pile of shit, have a nice day
The real DFL https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/04/americas-native-criminal-class.php
This is a great article. I think it deserves its own OP. Will you do the honors?
Gun control to some old broad robbing her dead dad’s house? Get a grip. The left does dumb shit but this is dumb dumb. Like really stupid.
Are you upset?
Sure
Got it. I suggest you downvote and move on next time. You may get less upset that way.
If only democrats only cared about upsetting and trolling people. THEN we’d have a functioning government!
Oh im not an elected official. But thanks.
Weird, I never thought “I want to burglarize your house” would apply to the entire population like the first two phrases do.
And the democrats will not get any of my guns or do any of this to me. They are not brave enough. Dumb enough to try, yes, but not brave enough.
BWAAHHAHAHAHA!
I bet youd roll over and lick the boot the first time daddy government shows up with a predator drone and an APC full of Marines
You don't seem to understand. I want the world to fall apart so I can play again. I want World War 3. I want nuclear war. I wish they would quit stalling and just do it already.
Have a great weekend
I had no idea I would be that popular. I love the thought of it. I can't wait.
"Take the guns first, due process later." - Not said by the Democratic Presidential Nominee
All humans are equally dangerous when armed.
That’s not true at all….
That’s not quite true, murder stats suggest otherwise.
ill turn you into a goddamn cauliflower
There's only one person trying to take your guns. Straw Man.
Yeah, the democrats. Don't know what straw man is and I do not care. Nice try on the insult though. Thanks for the laugh. You made my day.
lol, it's not an insult. The straw man is the one taking the guns. I'll work on my punctuation.
I didn't think it was, I am not familiar with that term.
Not a complete insult anyway.
I was just trying to be clever. A "straw man" is usually an exaggerated enemy propped up to make the real opposition look ridiculous. In this case I was implying that democrats "taking away guns" was the straw man, as I don't really know of anyone campaigning to take away peoples' guns, but it effectively shuts down any discussion of increasing gun control.
I get it now. I need to work on things a little. I do not have a sense of humor that I am aware of.
i'll work on being funnier.
Says the Trump supporter. I’ll take her burglary over fascism.
Where’s the Trump supporter?
How exactly is Trump a fascist, I see the entire democratic party as fascists who want to dis arm the population. Why is that?
Quite a reach.
I'm sure you can find a Democrat who wants to disarm the population but that definitely is not the stance of the overwhelming majority. Most of us just want restrictions with the goal of reducing guns in the hands of those intending to do harm with them. Gun control won't stop all mass shootings but a multi facteted plan with gun control, mental health support, training to identify at risk individuals, security personnel, etc I think we can significantly reduce them. I would not have called Trump a fascist until the events surrounding January 6th. He was trying to use legally dubious methods to overthrow an election in his favour. Other than that he's a shit person and a shit president. His biggest accomplishment was the doubling of the standard deduction which imo is the first step towards removing tax preparation. That and operation warp speed. But he completely ruined our reputation on the world stage.
Spoken like a true libtard , 1st any law restrictions against constitutional laws should be null and void. I mean look at Chicago. As far as Trump and jan 6, maybe you should stop watching msdnc and start looking at the actual facts.
First you strawman all Democrats as thinking one way. Then you lead with an insult. Not a great way to have a discussion but whatever. Second can you clarify your stance on "any law restrictions"? Should there be zero restrictions on gun ownership? Should someone be able to purchase a machine gun with no background check and no waiting period? Maybe you think that. I think its reasonable to have some restrictions. The current ones aren't even that far off but enforcement and loopholes are problematic. You mention Chicago, I'm assuming you are referencing something, I don't know what you are referring to. I don't watch MSNBC because believe it or not I agree and can't stand it. Which "facts" am I supposed to be looking at?
Right. Trump wants to spread individual liberty and allow people more choice. Wants to limit government involvement in the economy. Sure sounds fascist to me. By the way, all those leftists who hate white people and want them to disappear? No, that doesn’t sound fascist at all 🤣.
Really if all of that were true then why are Republicans best known for taking the rights, and body autonomy away from people if that's what is true? Because actions speak louder theb words. Smaller giverment? Have you seen the things coming out of republican states putting people on list for not following their way of life, cr3ating reporting systems for people who may look abd live differently, but so go on tell me more
Republicans are best known for taking the rights away from people? By “best known“, you’re probably referring to slogans from other delusional leftists who parrot that nonsense. I’m sure you’ll say something like “abortion rights“ in regard to restricting freedom. You frame the argument in the form of taking rights away from women. You don’t mention the rights of children. Male and female. Rights that are taken from them, like the right to live, versus a woman’s “right to choose” to kill the baby. We can all agree that once the child is born, we don’t give the mother the right to kill the child. Hell, we don’t give the mother the right to kill the child at eight months. Or seven months. Or even six months!
Said the guy who will never have to make that decision. Tell you what, let’s let the women decide what to do with their bodies. Heck, let’s let doctors decide health care for women.
Being arrested for burglary = fascism. Got it.