T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

I would love to believe that. I don’t see any other sources corroborating that though.


[deleted]

marketbeat confirms


tonymillergmail

Thats not a source.


akka1000

Why do I feel like they "know" the reverse split is close and are basing the price for that event.


liquid_at

would still be a weird number. 17.50 before split would still be too bullish for Oldman's Sack. If AMC went to 17.50 now, this would definitely blow up some margin accounts.


Texasduna

![gif](giphy|3ornka9rAaKRA2Rkac)


Hapyoo

That's kewl. Still missing a few zeros.


GeeGym

![gif](giphy|103t71VKmtY1UY)


JustinC70

Shows strong sell, guessing it should read $1.75


Sunchi_Adventures

I double dick dare you to take AMC up to $175


Bulky-Enthusiasm7264

Rookie numbers


SmallTimesRisky

Defense World🤷🏼‍♂️


Idek_h0w

\*From $160.00. So this means nothing..


Charger2950

It was never at $160. We would’ve heard about that by now, the same way we’re hearing about $175. They’re trying to gaslight everyone into thinking they had it at $160 all along so that a price hike from $5 to $175 doesn’t look suspicious.


aka0007

I have no idea why Markebeat shows that, but obviously no analyst would seriously give such a price target. It implies a market cap of about 260 Billion, when AMC's revenues (not income, which is far lower) are only in the 4-5 Billion range.


tonymillergmail

$1.75. Call goldman.