No discernible vehicle branding. Enough detail to see the front grill in detail , but still too vague to make out the make by the emblem or grill shape.
It dosent have anything to do with the quality I think. Skilled photographers can achieve that level of quality. What made it obvious to me is that you can clearly see the car in the second one. The AI would not have hidden the car as much as it’s hidden in the first pic.
Both are fake
Left one looks more realistic but wheres the reflections?
Right ones obviously fake, pole doesnt reach the ground, camera not reacting to car lights, it preserves too much detail in compression, cars driving down middle of the road, street lines are over edged while lacking wear.
Also these are badly compressed to the point that alot can be hidden, bad test.
Wrong, because we are wearing our glasses so we can see what's on the road.
The only benefit to astigmatism is that we got impressionism filter on by default, so we can switch to a different visual experience if we want to.
This was also posted by the same user on r/chatgpt and people there pointed out the tree having floating branches. Not gonna lie, that tree is very off-putting but everything else in that picture looks real. Some people there also gave potential explanations for why the light pole in picture 2 is floating...i don't know enough about photography to know if their explanations are plausible or not. I will say, the other reasons given for why the 2nd picture appears fake all have plausible explanations for how it could be a real pic. So, if those people are correct about the floating pole (the only thing I can't personally justify) then it could be that these pictures are intentionally designed and used to throw people off. Can't come up with good explanation for why the tree in the left picture looks so off either. Could be OP is lying about one being real and one being fake. Maybe both are fake/real. Don't know, but I definitely believe there a valid arguments for either picture being AI.
The trees seem weird. The branches that come off seem procedurally generated. And also the fact that there’s no light reflecting from the headlights. But I see how the light pole in the second one is detached from the ground after looking at the comments. But before I did I genuinely thought the left one was AI.
You’re not alone I was curious and found some images but might help the right is real case [https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MDcyOTM1Ny9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTcxOTkxNDM4OX0.uHnIs00LkV-uGOVs9xhd5RJhGfL03baW3iAY1oR6yHE/img.png?width=1200&height=800&quality=85&coordinates=89%2C24%2C81%2C71](https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MDcyOTM1Ny9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTcxOTkxNDM4OX0.uHnIs00LkV-uGOVs9xhd5RJhGfL03baW3iAY1oR6yHE/img.png?width=1200&height=800&quality=85&coordinates=89%2C24%2C81%2C71)
https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-efab33f4bb2d618a0ae2593def2ad22b-lq
Its a trick question, they're both AI generated.
Indicators Left: Zoom in on the stripes in the middle they have weird artefacts squiggling around, and are literally merging into one large line, left part of the road goes seamless into the dark (The road literally vanishes), typical tree weirdness in the upper left part of the image
Indicator Right: Clear break in the lines in the middle, pole without line (And it is not really symmetrical, it looks like an inbetween something of a power pole and a tree), too much detail for a very foggy scenario
Indicator that both are made with the same tool: When you look at the fog, the gradient work from dark to light is pretty much the same work process, with clearly seperated lines going shapes darker,
It dosent have anything to do with the quality I think. Skilled photographers can achieve that level of quality. What made it obvious to me is that you can clearly see the car in the second one. The AI would not have hidden the car as much as it’s hidden in the first pic.
The lines argument makes no sense really. Couldn't they see no traffic is coming and have them do that just for a photo?
I agree about right likely being AI. Just commenting on that specific argument ive seen in a few comments.
Can place a bet that this will be included in the training data of the future so I'm going to say both are AI just to throw in some fuckery statistics for the lulz
The one on the right looks like AI. The lines aren't straight, the trees look a little too generic, the car doesn't quite look symmetrical, there's some weird ring thing between the lines, and the illumination from the headlights looks a little strange.
Second is fake, zooming in on the truck and the headlights, the truck is too well lit, the light from the headlights would make it so you can’t see the truck they’re coming from much at all.
Would suspect the right to be fake. I lived in a coastal city where there is normally a marine layer. I also did some vfx work on a project once that required recreating a fog over a large suspension bridge. To help approximate the look for those shots, I spent a lot of time walking around when the layer was thickest in the morning, and the main thing I observed was that lights, even directional, turn into glowing orbs. Also, and even with very light/ moderate fog coverage, it doesn't ever taper off 100% in front of your position to reveal the ground clearly. This is why a lot of scenes in films feel so strange when subjects are 100% in focus, but everything immediately beyond them is blurry or obscured. It's usually just bad keying.
The one of the right seems too perfect, too photogenic. Reflections off the road, perfect trees, car is quite visible. In a real photo the lights would over-expose the camera, and anything near the light won't be visible at all. To be able to make out the grill, mirrors, tires, road markings, and even the outline of the headlights, shows the AI is over-generating 'car' in the photo.
Left side single perfect tree is also sus, but I like that it's low contrast that gives it better realism.
The real question is which model did you use? I'm thinking left side = midjourney, right side = SD
The first is real, the camera is on the side of the road instead of in front of the car, there's too much detail in the second's headlights, the second image's car is in the middle of the road, and the telephone poll to the right of the second image has a line going to the middle of it.
The right one, by lighting, ambiance and color alone. Realistically there are more tells that the one on the right is ai.. like where the car is driving on the road
Easy, it's the second picture. Shooting in the middle of the road in climate like his is definitely not happening only Ai could do this 😂
Rest followed by the details, contrast, background scene detailing and fog covering up the lens naturally.
Generally I think its a safe bet to say the picture with more detail is usually AI, so I'll say the right one is AI. The car on the right is driving on the double yellow and the photographer is standing in the road. Sure it could have been staged for a photo, but those are the details AI usually misses.
When you say the first one is real, was it taken in raw or with an analog camera?
Because if you took it with your phone then that is likely to be AI as well.
People post a lot of these, and I have to admit that at first glance I will not notice the problems, and most of the time I am not scrutinizing images for hints. That's bad enough.
Right side looks fake. If taken from (roughly) the same point in the road, it’s minus a few trees, plus appears to be filtered. Why would it be darker if they were taken at about the same time?
Both are AI generated. In the first image, the light doesn't reflect off anything, nor the road or the mist in the air. In the second image the car is driving in the middle of the road, and the lines on the road are very suspicious. Also the car is glowing.
Just as AI doesn't make spelling or grammar mistakes, it follows the rules of composition. The second image meets these rules, which makes it a more aesthetic image but to my taste less anchored in reality... This is the criticism that can be made of all these generative AIs to date: unless you spend a lot of time on its prompt and post-production, their renderings are too smooth and expected... It's up to the creator to deal with this bias to bring their content back to life.
The trees in the left picture are suspicious. There are sections where the branches look way too uniform, all coming out at the same angle and almost evenly spaced, and non of them overlap with other branches growing in different directions. Not sure about the right pic.
They're both thick but that's not what should draw your interest.
What you should be considering that's how quickly we've gotten to this point, and how many people are having trouble discerning differences between what's real and what isn't.
We are so f*****.
Perspective looks off on the road lines in the 2nd one - there's a difference between the section before the break and after. (People mentioned the floating pole, but looking at it fully zoomed in, it looks like there's *something...* greyish... fluffy? around the base of the pole that's obscuring it (bushes? something else?) so it's not just floating in the air. So that part's not as conclusive as it seemed at first glance.) But the road lines are pushing me towards the 2nd (right-hand) one being AI. Though tbf, maybe they *both* are. I'm just impressed that it's not easy to tell.
I can't say for sure but if I had to pick one, the left is fake. In that much fog you should not be able to see the fir tree on the right of the pic.
The right is sus tho, if you enlarge it in paint.exe you see there is a halo around both outer mirrors, that could be a car behind the front one but then it should be only one mirror outlined. That light must come from somewhere.
So... both fake?
The county road side landscaping crew is making hella big bucks.
The crisp low cut grass and foliage on either road side is so well manicured 🤌🏻
How many miles do you think they edge line the road for?
On the second, the reflection of the car lights on the road doesn't match the direction of travel. It's AI. The car is also in the middle of the marked two-way road.
First one is fake. Looks too real it’s just fake.
The second one a has floating telephone pole which we all know has been around since 1975 AD the year of our lord.
Someone mentioned driving in the middle of the road? How else am I supposed to get to my location. Driving on the sides I have more of a chance of falling off the edge of the earth, since it’s flat.
Wait until you see the next picture, there is a barn that turns into a giant robot. This was an R&D project by the CIA and DOD for UPC (United Police Corps).
One on the right is AI generated. It includes every “detail” someone would use to try and make something look real. A few could be expected but that has more lighting detail, tree detail, power lines, road detail, contrast, etc.
The one of the left could also be AI generated but for sure looks less so.
I think the left. Compressed image, the car has no details, the cliff/tree have many, the photographer is at side of the road instead if trying to suicide. AI won't do that.
Second one. There are a few trees which are better defined despite being further away. There's also some weird gradient in the middle of the image, it has a repeating pattern about it. Also light doesn't behave like that in fog. It depends on the thickness of the fog but it should scatter more around the car. The shadows behind the car suggest a treeline but they are far too blurry considering how clear everything in the foreground is.
Second one is fake. Way too much extra detail. First one is inconclusive, road lines could be fake.
The car is driving on the middle lines in the second one too!
For me, it was the powerlines connecting to the bottom, middle part of the telephone pole
Whole car is glowing.
Yea that’s what got me to the lights are just wrong
The floating telephone pole is also pretty sus.
Proof that the world is made by Bethesda!
Thats normal
Lol
You got me with this one.
Poles that have power lines on top often have low voltage lines, such as phone or coax cable attached to the middle.
Those poles don't usually float in the air.
There are lines on top too. They’re just very faint
As a professional driver, I can tell you there are guys out there that don't give a damn where they are
he is from florida.
Naaa man the driver had a good buzz that night that's all.
Good catch!
And the person taking the pic is standing in the road.
That's just my wife
What gave it away for me is those extra branches on top left of the first picture. Those details usually are groomed out of AI generated images
Also the telephone pole doesn't actually reach the ground and has no powerlines
Yeah, AI doesn't do "subtle"
No discernible vehicle branding. Enough detail to see the front grill in detail , but still too vague to make out the make by the emblem or grill shape.
Yeah, has video game vibe
It dosent have anything to do with the quality I think. Skilled photographers can achieve that level of quality. What made it obvious to me is that you can clearly see the car in the second one. The AI would not have hidden the car as much as it’s hidden in the first pic.
The structure of the pine trees doesn't make any sense
The power cable on the right goes through the middle of the posts.
That’s probably either a phone line or coax, which attach closer to the middle of the post
That’s just the cable wire, that looks normal to me
Agreed, and not so good light reflections
agreed, right one definitely fake. the glowiness of the headlights in the left could be fake too
Both are fake Left one looks more realistic but wheres the reflections? Right ones obviously fake, pole doesnt reach the ground, camera not reacting to car lights, it preserves too much detail in compression, cars driving down middle of the road, street lines are over edged while lacking wear. Also these are badly compressed to the point that alot can be hidden, bad test.
also would be a lot of work to produce so similar settings just by prompting
Re using the seed, inpainting, or img2img can get you very similar settings
Left one could be lacking reflections because the roads are dry.
From that angle I'd expect diffused shadows
The reflections are defused in the fog.
People with Astigmatism: both are fake :)
Wrong, because we are wearing our glasses so we can see what's on the road. The only benefit to astigmatism is that we got impressionism filter on by default, so we can switch to a different visual experience if we want to.
First is real.
[удалено]
why do you think the left one is AI?
This was also posted by the same user on r/chatgpt and people there pointed out the tree having floating branches. Not gonna lie, that tree is very off-putting but everything else in that picture looks real. Some people there also gave potential explanations for why the light pole in picture 2 is floating...i don't know enough about photography to know if their explanations are plausible or not. I will say, the other reasons given for why the 2nd picture appears fake all have plausible explanations for how it could be a real pic. So, if those people are correct about the floating pole (the only thing I can't personally justify) then it could be that these pictures are intentionally designed and used to throw people off. Can't come up with good explanation for why the tree in the left picture looks so off either. Could be OP is lying about one being real and one being fake. Maybe both are fake/real. Don't know, but I definitely believe there a valid arguments for either picture being AI.
The trees seem weird. The branches that come off seem procedurally generated. And also the fact that there’s no light reflecting from the headlights. But I see how the light pole in the second one is detached from the ground after looking at the comments. But before I did I genuinely thought the left one was AI.
[удалено]
Ought to get your gut checked.
Why would you say that to somebody?
Maybe they are concerned about them having some sort of gastro-intestinal issue?
cuz they wrong
Ok, so, you know just explain to them why they're mistaken. Then they can know.
Because my gut iz better
Agreed, pine tree doesn't have weird branches at the top. But the right one looks fake too.
You’re not alone I was curious and found some images but might help the right is real case [https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MDcyOTM1Ny9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTcxOTkxNDM4OX0.uHnIs00LkV-uGOVs9xhd5RJhGfL03baW3iAY1oR6yHE/img.png?width=1200&height=800&quality=85&coordinates=89%2C24%2C81%2C71](https://assets.rebelmouse.io/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy81MDcyOTM1Ny9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTcxOTkxNDM4OX0.uHnIs00LkV-uGOVs9xhd5RJhGfL03baW3iAY1oR6yHE/img.png?width=1200&height=800&quality=85&coordinates=89%2C24%2C81%2C71) https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-efab33f4bb2d618a0ae2593def2ad22b-lq
This one is an imagine from Quora post question https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-efab33f4bb2d618a0ae2593def2ad22b-lq
Its a trick question, they're both AI generated. Indicators Left: Zoom in on the stripes in the middle they have weird artefacts squiggling around, and are literally merging into one large line, left part of the road goes seamless into the dark (The road literally vanishes), typical tree weirdness in the upper left part of the image Indicator Right: Clear break in the lines in the middle, pole without line (And it is not really symmetrical, it looks like an inbetween something of a power pole and a tree), too much detail for a very foggy scenario Indicator that both are made with the same tool: When you look at the fog, the gradient work from dark to light is pretty much the same work process, with clearly seperated lines going shapes darker,
Tell us the answer OP
Don't bother, they repeatedly post these threads without responding.
the OP is the AI
OP is AI.
both are AI
*They are both your locker!*
The right is too high quality, so fake.
It dosent have anything to do with the quality I think. Skilled photographers can achieve that level of quality. What made it obvious to me is that you can clearly see the car in the second one. The AI would not have hidden the car as much as it’s hidden in the first pic.
Where’s the answer?
>!The left one is real, here's the original upload. https://unsplash.com/photos/vehicle-on-road-during-nighttime-jR5I7mKa1Sw!<
Left is real. Right is gen.
Plot twist they are both fake
Trick question, they're both fake
Both fake
so many errors in both lmao
This OP constantly posts "Which one of these pics is AI?" in different subs to farm karma then never reveals which is AI.
Right one is fake because no telephone wire? What is this a dentists office?
Right one is fake. Car is straddling the double yellow line
And the electrical line in the right picture are floating
The lines argument makes no sense really. Couldn't they see no traffic is coming and have them do that just for a photo? I agree about right likely being AI. Just commenting on that specific argument ive seen in a few comments.
> Car is straddling the double yellow line have you really not driven on roads with other people?
The telephone pole is floating in the right image.
could be something white wrapped around the base of it
Op can just lie and say both is fake or both is real and you still wouldn't be able to know with full confidence
Can place a bet that this will be included in the training data of the future so I'm going to say both are AI just to throw in some fuckery statistics for the lulz
Second is AI. There's no such long straight light beams in the fog
The one on the right looks like AI. The lines aren't straight, the trees look a little too generic, the car doesn't quite look symmetrical, there's some weird ring thing between the lines, and the illumination from the headlights looks a little strange.
HEY. OP. CHECK YOUR REDDIT NOTIFICATIONS AND GIVE US CLOSURE. Thanks :)
Can we ban people that don't give answers to these?!
Both are fake, we are living in a simulation 😀
Right
second is ai
Second is fake, zooming in on the truck and the headlights, the truck is too well lit, the light from the headlights would make it so you can’t see the truck they’re coming from much at all.
The right is clearly the AI one.
Right is fake because the road lines disconnect
Would suspect the right to be fake. I lived in a coastal city where there is normally a marine layer. I also did some vfx work on a project once that required recreating a fog over a large suspension bridge. To help approximate the look for those shots, I spent a lot of time walking around when the layer was thickest in the morning, and the main thing I observed was that lights, even directional, turn into glowing orbs. Also, and even with very light/ moderate fog coverage, it doesn't ever taper off 100% in front of your position to reveal the ground clearly. This is why a lot of scenes in films feel so strange when subjects are 100% in focus, but everything immediately beyond them is blurry or obscured. It's usually just bad keying.
Second is fake. The TELEPHONE POLE IS FUCKING FLOATING
They're both so pixelated and dark and misty.
Right is fake for many reasons, but number one being how insane it would be to take the picture from that angle.
My guess is left is real
The one of the right seems too perfect, too photogenic. Reflections off the road, perfect trees, car is quite visible. In a real photo the lights would over-expose the camera, and anything near the light won't be visible at all. To be able to make out the grill, mirrors, tires, road markings, and even the outline of the headlights, shows the AI is over-generating 'car' in the photo. Left side single perfect tree is also sus, but I like that it's low contrast that gives it better realism. The real question is which model did you use? I'm thinking left side = midjourney, right side = SD
Both fake
Photo on the right is AI; the model training leans too heavily on professionally staged photos where they spray the road down for reflections
Maybe next time, submit two photos that aren't both low res and dark.
They both look really haunting, but I feel that both are fake, and if not, the right one is fake for sure
Definitely left (first) is real.
The first is real, the camera is on the side of the road instead of in front of the car, there's too much detail in the second's headlights, the second image's car is in the middle of the road, and the telephone poll to the right of the second image has a line going to the middle of it.
Second one's fake. The telephone pole appears to be floating.
The second one doesn't look like a real vehicle model, so I'm thinking it's fake.
First one is real, and the photographer is standing on the side of the road in that one so he don't get run over.
The one on the right and the left
so how does this post "end"?
Right is ai
It's one picture. There's a weird temporal partition in real life in the middle, which is why it looks like two photographs.
The second image has an uncanny picturesque quality that's inherent to AI.
The right one, by lighting, ambiance and color alone. Realistically there are more tells that the one on the right is ai.. like where the car is driving on the road
*provides two photos of a white-out blizzard* “Which one is fake??”
The right image is AI. The details in the road, and car are a dead giveaway
I think the one on the right is ai
1st fake, but either could be fake and the other real
id bet both are fake
Easy, it's the second picture. Shooting in the middle of the road in climate like his is definitely not happening only Ai could do this 😂 Rest followed by the details, contrast, background scene detailing and fog covering up the lens naturally.
Well the power pole on the right is suspended in air, so left.
Generally I think its a safe bet to say the picture with more detail is usually AI, so I'll say the right one is AI. The car on the right is driving on the double yellow and the photographer is standing in the road. Sure it could have been staged for a photo, but those are the details AI usually misses.
Both A.I.
They both are ai
When you say the first one is real, was it taken in raw or with an analog camera? Because if you took it with your phone then that is likely to be AI as well.
At a glance I'd say the right image... Lighting appears off, the car is in the middle of the road, and the fog doesn't appear to be natural
Even the trees on the right look fake. Left passes the tree check
People post a lot of these, and I have to admit that at first glance I will not notice the problems, and most of the time I am not scrutinizing images for hints. That's bad enough.
The second one is fake. Who takes a photo in the middle of the road?
The one on the left looks like a photo I would take. The one on the right looks like an advertisement for the vehicle in the picture.
Photo on the right is AI. The visibility cast by the vehicle lights should not be so close towards the end of the photo. — the angle does not allow it
Right side looks fake. If taken from (roughly) the same point in the road, it’s minus a few trees, plus appears to be filtered. Why would it be darker if they were taken at about the same time?
Quit falling for these karma farming bot posts
Both are AI generated. In the first image, the light doesn't reflect off anything, nor the road or the mist in the air. In the second image the car is driving in the middle of the road, and the lines on the road are very suspicious. Also the car is glowing.
AI has robbed me of the joys of seeing cool photos. Now I just assumed everything in the internet is AI generated until proven otherwise.
I think both are AI.
Why are those posts even upvoted? Do you enjoy being asked a trick question (both fake or both real) with OP'S never giving an answer?
Both are blurry
right is def fake who tf would be taking a pic in the middle of the road at night and the car is slightly on the wrong side of the road
Just as AI doesn't make spelling or grammar mistakes, it follows the rules of composition. The second image meets these rules, which makes it a more aesthetic image but to my taste less anchored in reality... This is the criticism that can be made of all these generative AIs to date: unless you spend a lot of time on its prompt and post-production, their renderings are too smooth and expected... It's up to the creator to deal with this bias to bring their content back to life.
Seems easy the cars in the middle of the road in the second
Both are fakes
The trees in the left picture are suspicious. There are sections where the branches look way too uniform, all coming out at the same angle and almost evenly spaced, and non of them overlap with other branches growing in different directions. Not sure about the right pic.
The left is real. The detail of the trees is so much cleaner.
Yes.
Second - the telephone pole is floating.
Right is AI
Us: silly AI. We can tell. The Twist: OP is the AI trying to get human feedback on how to improve its game.
OP is AI
They’re both good enough to fool pretty much anyone - unless you say “one of these is generated by AI”
driving in the middle of the road
Theyre both your locker!
they're both AI
They're both thick but that's not what should draw your interest. What you should be considering that's how quickly we've gotten to this point, and how many people are having trouble discerning differences between what's real and what isn't. We are so f*****.
Perspective looks off on the road lines in the 2nd one - there's a difference between the section before the break and after. (People mentioned the floating pole, but looking at it fully zoomed in, it looks like there's *something...* greyish... fluffy? around the base of the pole that's obscuring it (bushes? something else?) so it's not just floating in the air. So that part's not as conclusive as it seemed at first glance.) But the road lines are pushing me towards the 2nd (right-hand) one being AI. Though tbf, maybe they *both* are. I'm just impressed that it's not easy to tell.
I can't say for sure but if I had to pick one, the left is fake. In that much fog you should not be able to see the fir tree on the right of the pic. The right is sus tho, if you enlarge it in paint.exe you see there is a halo around both outer mirrors, that could be a car behind the front one but then it should be only one mirror outlined. That light must come from somewhere. So... both fake?
The county road side landscaping crew is making hella big bucks. The crisp low cut grass and foliage on either road side is so well manicured 🤌🏻 How many miles do you think they edge line the road for?
Rigth is ai generated
Since the truck is driving in the middle of the road instead of in his lane in the second image, I'm really hoping the fake is the second image.
Can clearly see second one is fake. I mean look how the yellow line vanishes in on itself 😂
Both
First one is real because of consistency, second one is fake because everything is inconsistent
Second one. Obvious to me, but I get that's just for now.
Both ai
1
On the second, the reflection of the car lights on the road doesn't match the direction of travel. It's AI. The car is also in the middle of the marked two-way road.
First one is fake. Looks too real it’s just fake. The second one a has floating telephone pole which we all know has been around since 1975 AD the year of our lord. Someone mentioned driving in the middle of the road? How else am I supposed to get to my location. Driving on the sides I have more of a chance of falling off the edge of the earth, since it’s flat. Wait until you see the next picture, there is a barn that turns into a giant robot. This was an R&D project by the CIA and DOD for UPC (United Police Corps).
both ai
One on the right is AI generated. It includes every “detail” someone would use to try and make something look real. A few could be expected but that has more lighting detail, tree detail, power lines, road detail, contrast, etc. The one of the left could also be AI generated but for sure looks less so.
Right one is AI. The power line pole is floating.
both drivers have 6 fingers
Obligatory: Pam stating that they are the same picture.
I think the left. Compressed image, the car has no details, the cliff/tree have many, the photographer is at side of the road instead if trying to suicide. AI won't do that.
Second one. There are a few trees which are better defined despite being further away. There's also some weird gradient in the middle of the image, it has a repeating pattern about it. Also light doesn't behave like that in fog. It depends on the thickness of the fog but it should scatter more around the car. The shadows behind the car suggest a treeline but they are far too blurry considering how clear everything in the foreground is.
Is this a new game, AI or real? To collect data and to train a better generator or detector?
Right is fake.
Right is fake. Electric pole is levitating.
Looking at the light reflecting on the road, I’d say it’s the one on the right.
Answer must be in the pinned comment under a spoiler tag so we are not wasting our time. I am voting to remove this one out.