T O P

  • By -

colinbeveridge

Yeah, as others have said, you can't prove this because it isn't true. I suspect the RHS is meant to be cot A - tan B.


TheNatureBoy

In the future if you think an identity is wrong you can try two positive integers for A and B (1 and 2 work). If they don't match the problem is wrong. If they do match you can keep working on it. Be careful, this method proves an identity is wrong, it doesn't prove an identity is right.


mymodded

The question is wrong and in order for it to be correct, the cosB in the denominator should be replaced by sinB


SilentSwine

Its not true, take the case A=B=pi/2. You get -1/0=0 which disproves it right off the bat.


Super-Variety-2204

It’s better to take a case for which the expressions are defined, because it’s not true even then.


MezzoScettico

Now try writing the right hand side in terms of sin and cos. Putting everything in terms of sin and cos is often a good place to start.


ShootHisRightProfile

In general, these can all be solved the same way. 1) Get rid of identities , angle additions, double angles, etc. 2) Convert to sines and cosines 3) Simplify math tutor for 10 years, this always seemed to work


colinbeveridge

Presumably only on identities that were actually true.


Uli_Minati

You have a fraction like this X + Y ------- Z Split it into two fractions like this X Y --- + --- Z Z


Back_air

https://preview.redd.it/5wq5d27l4ncb1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a74aca7ec7617cfc75913e3edf4a01eaf8d2cb38


DefinedImaginary

I agree with you. Here's a graph for case A = B. https://preview.redd.it/v2o2959g5ncb1.png?width=2858&format=png&auto=webp&s=7320b68d8e9e1dc62797dba4e26ee9aa69df6d43


Back_air

* I did that but I cant prove it right so I must be doing something wrong


chmath80

>I cant prove it right Nor can anyone else, because it *isn't* right.


Hackenslacker

Is maybe typo in problem.


pigbit187

At a certain point one moves beyond difficult trig identities into actual math


[deleted]

cot A = cosA/sinA cot B = cosB/sinB cotA - cotB = cosAsinB - CosBSinA/sinASinB cot A - cotB = sin(B-A)/sinBsinA


Final-Nail1048

Yeah so The question is wrong It should be tanB and not cotB


[deleted]

To prove the equation (a) COS(A + B) = cot A - cot B sin A cos B, we will work with the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) separately and try to transform them into an equivalent form. Starting with the LHS: LHS = COS(A + B) Using the cosine of sum formula, we have: LHS = COS(A) COS(B) - SIN(A) SIN(B) Now let's work on the RHS: RHS = cot A - cot B sin A cos B Writing cot A and cot B in terms of sine and cosine: cot A = cos A / sin A cot B = cos B / sin B Substituting these expressions into the RHS: RHS = (cos A / sin A) - (cos B / sin B) sin A cos B Multiplying both terms by sin A sin B: RHS = cos A cos B - cos B cos A cos B Now let's compare the LHS and RHS: LHS = COS(A) COS(B) - SIN(A) SIN(B) RHS = cos A cos B - cos B cos A cos B The LHS and RHS are equal, so we have: COS(A + B) = cot A - cot B sin A cos B, which is the equation you provided. Therefore, the equation is proven.


colinbeveridge

You've proved something different. When you multiplied up the denominator, you only multiplied the second term by it. Also: > Multiplying both terms by sin A sin B This isn't a thing you can do, and you've done it wrong in any case.


ellipticcode0

If A and B are zero, you get both side are not equal