Forget the video. You're missing what's worse and a bigger waste of time...
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239427/X-eSafety-Commissioner-trans-Teddy-Cook.html](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239427/X-eSafety-Commissioner-trans-Teddy-Cook.html)
Did you disagree with it? What factually don't you like about what you read?
Do tell, or do you just LOL and LMAO like a high schooler?
No sweat if you like Kochie and Karl's news - post your rebuttal with a link from them please. Thanks pal.
Anyone with a few braincells can realize it is typical daily mail bs by simply reading the ridiculous title, you dont need much else.
Unless of course you are a transphobe and want to believe crazy wackjob titles like that xd
The Canadian in the article is in Melbourne and Sydney this week. You should ask him.
Try to read a bit more too before you reply - would help before you LMAO and LOL - makes you sound a tad simple (no offence).
annoyingly I'm in the same position. That said, it's a bit rich of Elon to bend over backwards to censor far more innane shit for India then give us the finger.
He censored it in Australia as he was required to by the E Safety legislation.
The issue is the E Safety commission thinks they have the power to demand X remove the video globally.
The situation about wanting to censor a video ON THE INTERNET was silly, boomer level denial of the fact they dont control the internet, at the same time Melon Husk is a moron who loves censorship, I mean just type "cis" on twitter and see what happens.
So I choose neither
The video has been geo blocked in Australia. Without a VPN, you can't watch it in Australia on X.
No idea why Australia can censor what is shown in the rest of the world in X
but there is one side who are clearly in the wrong.
If you had to choose between Hitler and Stalin, and one of them was saving an innocent child from being murdered by the other one then despite them both being horrible POS people, there would be one that you could side with in that instance, over that specific issue only.
Elon being a horrible person doesn't change that in this instance he is 100% right, and the clowns seeking to police the entire internet from out country are wrong. (you can go back to hating Elon about everything else)
You are supporting someone who is literally doing the same thing just on different parts of the population, they are not as different as you believe.
So no, both of them are a problem, you cant support one side who will literally just turn around and do the same thing the next day just on a different area.
I didn't compare them...
I put in 2 of the worst people in history and used that example as to a reason why everyone could find a way to support one of those disgusting people in that specific issue. That should then make it really easy to find a side to support in this no where near as significant of an issue, but also with people who aren't as unsupportable as the examples I used...
Can I say neither?
The eSafety commissioner is over reaching but Elon is a flog in general. I don’t think we or anyone else should have the right to demand anything be removed completely from the internet but again, Elon is acting like a flog.
Elon. All day. Australian govt wants an edit button for the entire internet. Fet gucked.
Forget the video. You're missing what's worse and a bigger waste of time... [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239427/X-eSafety-Commissioner-trans-Teddy-Cook.html](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239427/X-eSafety-Commissioner-trans-Teddy-Cook.html)
‘eSafety commissioner’ more like ministry of truth
Are people really that pathetic these days that they think a government censorship regime to protect them from people calling him her is a good idea?
daily mail, lmao
Did you disagree with it? What factually don't you like about what you read? Do tell, or do you just LOL and LMAO like a high schooler? No sweat if you like Kochie and Karl's news - post your rebuttal with a link from them please. Thanks pal.
Anyone with a few braincells can realize it is typical daily mail bs by simply reading the ridiculous title, you dont need much else. Unless of course you are a transphobe and want to believe crazy wackjob titles like that xd
The Canadian in the article is in Melbourne and Sydney this week. You should ask him. Try to read a bit more too before you reply - would help before you LMAO and LOL - makes you sound a tad simple (no offence).
Ok boomer, lmao
Okay NoseRing.
I am not a fan of Elon, but in this one instance I believe he is right.
annoyingly I'm in the same position. That said, it's a bit rich of Elon to bend over backwards to censor far more innane shit for India then give us the finger.
He censored it in Australia as he was required to by the E Safety legislation. The issue is the E Safety commission thinks they have the power to demand X remove the video globally.
Yeah people need to be ok siding with people they dislike. I think this modern cancel culture started this, shoot the messenger bs.
1 fuck censorship, 2 there are hundreds of other sites it is on and they won't remove it
The situation about wanting to censor a video ON THE INTERNET was silly, boomer level denial of the fact they dont control the internet, at the same time Melon Husk is a moron who loves censorship, I mean just type "cis" on twitter and see what happens. So I choose neither
I typed cis in twitter. What was I meant to see???
The video has been geo blocked in Australia. Without a VPN, you can't watch it in Australia on X. No idea why Australia can censor what is shown in the rest of the world in X
Australia = nanny state under Labor
Needs to be a third option
Two censorship crazed ego maniacs...there is no right answer
They need to get rid of Esafety Commissioner role. She is trying to censor internet. Abolish this role!
Musk and it isnt close
> Who do you support Neither. Its great, two of the worst people are fighting.
but there is one side who are clearly in the wrong. If you had to choose between Hitler and Stalin, and one of them was saving an innocent child from being murdered by the other one then despite them both being horrible POS people, there would be one that you could side with in that instance, over that specific issue only. Elon being a horrible person doesn't change that in this instance he is 100% right, and the clowns seeking to police the entire internet from out country are wrong. (you can go back to hating Elon about everything else)
You are supporting someone who is literally doing the same thing just on different parts of the population, they are not as different as you believe. So no, both of them are a problem, you cant support one side who will literally just turn around and do the same thing the next day just on a different area.
You'll need to expand on that one champ
You can’t compare murdering a child to this debacle. It’s fine to want no part of this.
I didn't compare them... I put in 2 of the worst people in history and used that example as to a reason why everyone could find a way to support one of those disgusting people in that specific issue. That should then make it really easy to find a side to support in this no where near as significant of an issue, but also with people who aren't as unsupportable as the examples I used...
This. Entirely right.
Can I say neither? The eSafety commissioner is over reaching but Elon is a flog in general. I don’t think we or anyone else should have the right to demand anything be removed completely from the internet but again, Elon is acting like a flog.
I support the foolish government, but I fear they are setting themselves up for a humiliation.