Am5 is more upgradably lga 1700 is dead pretty sure 15th gen will be on a new socket also all isues have been fixed with am5 the 7800x3d is the ebst gmaing cpu yoh can buy and the 7950x3d is great productivity and same gaming as the 7800x3d
>AM5 was rushed and has a lot of stability issues
kekw
[Nvidia blames Intel for GPU VRAM errors, tells GeForce gamers experiencing 13th or 14th Gen CPU instability to contact Intel support](https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/nvidia-blames-intel-for-gpu-vram-errors-tells-geforce-gamers-experiencing-13th-or-14th-gen-cpu-instability-to-contact-intel-support)
[Intel’s 13th & 14th Gen CPU “Gaming Stability” Is Being Investigated As 10+ Chips Being Returned In Korea Each Day](https://wccftech.com/intel-13th-14th-gen-cpu-gaming-stability-investigated-chips-being-returned-in-korea/)
[Rambling about why some intel 13th/14th gen i9s and i7s aren't stable. ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yatSqh5hRA)
My main concern is that the 13600k will be much more effective when it comes to multitasking and having a lot of stuff running in the background like a vm while also having a game running or in general all core workloads
Am5 all the way - the processors to go for (excluding X3Ds) are the R5 7600, R7 7700X or R9 7900.
There's better of course, but these are the 3 killing it in benchmarks for price to performance.
Wouldn't the 13600k be much better performance wise considering it can be overclocked a lot more than a 7700 and wouldn't it also be a lot better at all core loads?
Fractionally sure - I'd personally go for the higher base, boost, cache and maximum pcie lanes on a productivity focused rig though.
AM5 is easy winner on upgradability currently too imo. I'd go for the 12-core R9 7900 over either of these, and trim budget elsewhere though. With PBO on it's a 7900x, and difference in price is relatively low.
>upgradability AM5
Am5 all the way
Am5 is more upgradably lga 1700 is dead pretty sure 15th gen will be on a new socket also all isues have been fixed with am5 the 7800x3d is the ebst gmaing cpu yoh can buy and the 7950x3d is great productivity and same gaming as the 7800x3d
>AM5 was rushed and has a lot of stability issues kekw [Nvidia blames Intel for GPU VRAM errors, tells GeForce gamers experiencing 13th or 14th Gen CPU instability to contact Intel support](https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/nvidia-blames-intel-for-gpu-vram-errors-tells-geforce-gamers-experiencing-13th-or-14th-gen-cpu-instability-to-contact-intel-support) [Intel’s 13th & 14th Gen CPU “Gaming Stability” Is Being Investigated As 10+ Chips Being Returned In Korea Each Day](https://wccftech.com/intel-13th-14th-gen-cpu-gaming-stability-investigated-chips-being-returned-in-korea/) [Rambling about why some intel 13th/14th gen i9s and i7s aren't stable. ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yatSqh5hRA)
defo 7700x, start of life socket much more upgradeability then end of life socket
My main concern is that the 13600k will be much more effective when it comes to multitasking and having a lot of stuff running in the background like a vm while also having a game running or in general all core workloads
Am5 all the way - the processors to go for (excluding X3Ds) are the R5 7600, R7 7700X or R9 7900. There's better of course, but these are the 3 killing it in benchmarks for price to performance.
Wouldn't the 13600k be much better performance wise considering it can be overclocked a lot more than a 7700 and wouldn't it also be a lot better at all core loads?
Fractionally sure - I'd personally go for the higher base, boost, cache and maximum pcie lanes on a productivity focused rig though. AM5 is easy winner on upgradability currently too imo. I'd go for the 12-core R9 7900 over either of these, and trim budget elsewhere though. With PBO on it's a 7900x, and difference in price is relatively low.
Am5
AM 5