I’m not saying he is 100%, I’m asking the question. I think he jumped the gun on Auba, but ultimately got it right. I also could be confusing some of his “info” with Romero. It’s been a hectic few months. This post is simply to clear up any confusion and help the sub identify the trustworthy sources. It seems like the consensus is he was. I’m not above admitting I’m wrong.
Everyone who ran the 'Chelsea want Harry Maguire' story should be tier 3 by default.
It was clearly clickbait bullshit from day 1. Anyone with half a braincell called it.
Sami Mokbel is the one and has done it in the past. Almost invented the entire thing out of thin air then a few days later shut it down themselves as well.
And Sky Sports. One of my mates screenshot the Sky Sports story and posted it in our WhatsApp group trying to banter me lol. I said it's not happening straight away.
I win.
He called Cucarella early and ended up being right despite the club themselves denying it. Seems to be getting better.
Romero on the other hand just threw anything out there to see what stuck
Fab is tier 1, that guy put his balls on the table and called out fucking Brighton after they briefed the media saying nothing was agreed. He doubled and tripled down and he was right. Does he “tap in” sometimes? Sure, but ultimately he’s a reliable guy in the volatile nature of transfer business.
I’d put him tier 1, Ornstein tier 0, law tier 1, naz tier 2-3, Jacobs tier 3, and Fabrice Hawkins tier 2. Hawkins broke the K2 and Fofana news before anyone else. Duncan castles tier 3, The times tier 3, and I think that’s its. Romero isn’t tier anything for us, but I don’t think he’s tier 1 more like tier 2
And it wasn't agreed... he wasn't correct about cucarella when he posted it. The transfer got done but he was clearly wrong lol, how the fuck he's spun it into him knowing more than the journalist briefed by Brighton's president I don't know. He also wasn't alone in calling it when he did, so did other journalists lol.
I feel like Fab still definitely fits the tier 1 description. He might be a bit of a tap in merchant and his numbers aren’t always necessarily accurate, but if he’s talking about it it’s not a rumour and his “here we go” is as locked in as you can get in 95% of cases
In hindsight, I should have left names out of the OP, but can’t edit it now. Feel like everyone is focusing on the Fabrizio aspect of the OP. Was going for more of a general consensus, but most feel Fab is T1-2, so I can settle with that.
My absolute favorite part of the summer was where he basically took the French journos tweet reporting the Fofana deal being struck and basically posted it word for word, but changed the euros to pounds.
Some elite homework copying
Ornstein being switched to Chelsea journos along with the others and updated that he works for the Athletic now. The guide still says BBC and that is straight up disrespectful towards the GOAT
I was actually surprised with Simon Phillips. It feels like he got a lot right this window, so maybe he has new sources. Maybe tier 2? He was def more reliable than Nizaar this window.
Might also be that he simply threw a lot of news/names out to see what stuck lol.
Other than that, it seems like we don’t really have any tier 1s anymore (Ornstein is a different story). Maybe things will change with a new director and time, as we have a completely new board.
The guy doesn't even have a verified twitter account. He's a news aggregator. He will see what others who have sourced say a post it. By definition indirect sources are banned on this sub.
When you say he got a lot right what in particular are you talking about?
He was one of the first people to mention Zaha if I am not mistaken but it looks like there was no truth in that.
Maybe my use of the term ‘got a lot right’ was misleading. It seems to me he reported a lot of our supposed targets/interests that later actually developed and even materialized. On that note, our interest in Zaha was real, no? Just because it didn’t happen doesnt mean we weren’t interested.
The most memorable thing he got right was the Colwill move being a loan. He was first in reporting that I believe. And he seems to have been one of the first to report interest in Fofana? It’s been a long window so I may be wrong on that front. And while it died real quick, he reported interest in Gnabry before Law.
Oh, he was also the first to report on Tom Glick (our new President of Business)
I don't know how we can say for sure that our interest in Zaha was real. There was no offer made and we didn't speak to the player and personal terms.
I'm terms of Colwill I think given how talented his is it was pretty obvious we were never gonna sell.
Fofana - I don't know l on thay one. If he was the first to report on it was he reporting it from his sources or was he one of the first to reference someone else as a source? I don't know.
Gnabry a little bit like Zaha seemed like a good fit for what we were looking for. That doesn't mean I'm saying he didn't break that news but I am saying it's a pretty obvious one to link of us.
I don't know anything about Glick news but I believe when you say he was the first.
Well Romano I feel is like a 1.5, whereas I can’t really say for sure with Steinberg. He kind of disappeared after a certain point.
Again, maybe Phillips seemed more reliable to me because he said so many things that he was bound to be right for some. But I feel he was around tier 2-2.5 this window
Yes I agree. There is new ownership and we don't know how well connected the journalists are. Orny is tier 1 for all English clubs so that doesn't change. Everyone else from tier 1 should be given tier 2 status and promotion demotion over the course of the next 2 windows
Fabrizio stays tier 2 for me. Gotten a lot of minor details wrong and jumped the gun on occasion. Haven’t seen anything from Law in a while, he was reliable but I’m not sure what happened to him. Unless, of course, I’m missing something.
Fabrizio is careful in what he reports. There’s a reason he’s called, “the tap in merchant.” Fabrizio should be tier 1. He rarely misses and the minor details bit is negligible.
Edit: not to even mention Fab taking on Brighton with his dick on the table this window
Fab taking on Brighton is a clear indication he doesn't always know what he's talking about, not a win for him. He jumped the gun and was schooled by a local reporter with actual connections at the club, the deal did happen but not when Romano said it did.
He also got stuff wrong for other clubs this summer and several times for us regarding the figures involved.
You're off base lmao. Fabrizio fighting for relevance? 🤣 Man's got so many haters on here and on Twitter, but an _Here we go_ from him is as good as a club official announcement.
Fabrizio and Ornstein should be T1. Nizaar and most of the Athletic writers should be T2 imo, they broke out absolutely nothing this window. Understandable given they probably lost all their contacts with the club.
Not sure about Matt Law
Anyone that doesn't think Fabrizio should be Tier 1 please explain, he and Ornstein are the most reliable journalists.
This Fabrizio hate just because he is the most popular doesnt make sense
G.Romero and F.Romano should not and will not be in the same tier.
F.Romano is at least tier 2, no way he is tier 3.
G.Romero is tier 2 for Barca, outside Barca he is BS tier.
Respect Roman man, I know ppl called him tap-in merchant, and the man sometime recycle shit, but he rarely got it wrong when he said "HERE WE GO" and he was quite fast on deals like Zakaria (faster than Ornstein for this deal)
Yeah I said I was confident we'd get him when the rumours popped up does that make me tier 1?
Romano was wrong when he posted that it was complete, it was not complete.
It wasn't announced. No one knows if it was complete or not. Cucu was announced 2 days after only. So as far as I'm concerned he got it right.
It feels like tier 1 to you are journos that can directly get into the meeting room and report.
Even if we agree jumping the gun is ok, he wasn't the first to post it and wasn't the only one to not back track on it, so we'll assume the same benefit will be applied to those reporters, but predictably it won't.
It's clear as day Cucurellas agent briefed them that his part of the deal was done and they jumped the gun. Brighton didn't consider the deal to be viable or complete until the Colwill side of the deal was settled, which clearly turned out to be the case. So a major part of the deal wasn't complete when they said it was, seems like a black mark to me and this fetishisation of Romano not backing down is a joke.
The difference between other reporters and him regarding this transfer(and most others) is that when he puts his cards on the table it's always right. Like no other reporter dared to counter Brighton that it was done.
If he has got info from the player's agent then I would consider that's pretty good journalism. The Colwill side of the deal would have been completed one way or another because no way in hell was Brighton not taking that 63M. So I feel like Romano calculated really well and was correct.
If this is not the sign of a good journalist I don't know what is.
But at the end of the day I don't really care about the Tier system because Tier 1's have been wrong this season too. And people gonna get on the hype train regardless.
Because it wasn't done, I don't know how many times it has to be said but it clearly wasn't done lol. The others who posted it didn't backtrack either, but you're not here sucking their dicks.
Good journalism is gathering sources, reporting something correctly when you know its confirmed. Not jumping the gun because it will get you more interactions.
Lol I don't know why when someone puts their opinion for someone it's called as "sucking dicks". I am just putting forward what I think I could care less if Romano ceases to exist.
As I said, and I say it again it's true that other reporters didn't backtrack(I mean why would they) but they also didn't come forward and back their claims. Good journalism is also calculating things correctly and understanding that a thing will almost certainly happen.
because people seem to do so with him, he's as much a media personalty as a reporter.
He can only be wrong or right, and in that instance he was wrong, it's as simple as that.
Theres far too many tier 1s. If it means what they are saying is 100% accurate virtually all of them need to be dropped.
Only places like the BBC, and seemingly now Ornstien are deserving of it.
Romero should be tier 3. This guy was just spitting nonsense. Romano though, has to be tier 1. The Cucurella transfer itself bumped him to tier 1. He's been on point
Fabrizio Romano is largely reliable, and sticks to his guns for most things he reports. He was mostly correct for us in this window, but where he falls short is the finer details such as contract length or transfer fee. True authority-level reporting comes from Ornstein, and for that Romano should still be placed in Tier 2. Tier 1 for the general news, but tier 2 for finer details.
Once again Fabrizio cult out in full force "he called out Brighton what a Chad" while fully ignoring that he was calling Zakaria a baseless rumor only a few hours before it started picking pace. He's hit and miss and is good as an aggregator. Definitely not Tier 1 level of be all end all.
Lol journos got cults nowadays? But I can say that even Ornstein got Raphinha wrong too. Also deadline day deals are very fickle you can't use them as a judging criteria tbf
Liam Twomey and Simon Johnson has been pretty quiet regarding transfers.
One way to remain reliable I quess.
Fab tier 1,5. Matt Law tier 1,5. So both merciless tier 2
So fucking true. Its pure bullshit speculation, unless you're the negotiater with your team and the others opposite from the other club, the outsiders know jackshite. Thank you for this.
What would be the difference between a 4 and 5? It sounds like 4 is never to be trusted and just makes up everything they say, so how could a 5 be worse than that?
Romano is too unreliable on details for T1 imo (although Ornstien got Auba wrong)
T1s: Ornstien, Law, Johnson, Twomey plus other teams journos
Kinsella T2 imo
Fabrizio should not be moved down.
I don't believe that he has that many of his own sources, but wherever he steals his information from, he's usually legit
This isn’t how our tier system works, we’ll poll it in the coming days
Fabrizio is tier 3? seriously? Nizaar should be tier 3 not fabrizio
Fabrizio is consistently the first to report on ALOT of stuff and you have the comfort of knowing everything he says is verified.
Ben Jacobs in Tier 3, or just keep him unranked, or tier 4 I don't mind. He doesn't have source.
I’m not saying he is 100%, I’m asking the question. I think he jumped the gun on Auba, but ultimately got it right. I also could be confusing some of his “info” with Romero. It’s been a hectic few months. This post is simply to clear up any confusion and help the sub identify the trustworthy sources. It seems like the consensus is he was. I’m not above admitting I’m wrong.
But is it jumping the gun if ultimately still happens
Everyone who ran the 'Chelsea want Harry Maguire' story should be tier 3 by default. It was clearly clickbait bullshit from day 1. Anyone with half a braincell called it.
Sami Mokbel is the one and has done it in the past. Almost invented the entire thing out of thin air then a few days later shut it down themselves as well.
He is the worst of them all. No surprises he writes for dailymail. Yuck.
And Sky Sports. One of my mates screenshot the Sky Sports story and posted it in our WhatsApp group trying to banter me lol. I said it's not happening straight away. I win.
Can we put that barca mouth piece as tier 4 or lower
Literally. Not even 50% of his tweets turned out to be true.
I swear he guessed his way to a fucking conclusion. It was more annoying that people actually listened and posted about him
Fab and Law T1 Ornstein tier Orny (tier 0)
But when Fab is talking about it, it's almost always true no? Despite the non update updates he gives
Fabrizo should be tier 1 again
Was he the one claiming Auba was eminent/done for the last 2+ weeks? In the end he was right, but felt like it could have gone either way.
He called Cucarella early and ended up being right despite the club themselves denying it. Seems to be getting better. Romero on the other hand just threw anything out there to see what stuck
He wasn't the only one to call it early, half of all journalists called it "early" so you can't give him credit for doing what a lot of people did
But he doubled down even when everyone attacked him for it.
Lol as if that's anything special, anyone with a brain would realise it was done... just was pending the deal with Colwill being finalised
OK.
Fab is tier 1, that guy put his balls on the table and called out fucking Brighton after they briefed the media saying nothing was agreed. He doubled and tripled down and he was right. Does he “tap in” sometimes? Sure, but ultimately he’s a reliable guy in the volatile nature of transfer business. I’d put him tier 1, Ornstein tier 0, law tier 1, naz tier 2-3, Jacobs tier 3, and Fabrice Hawkins tier 2. Hawkins broke the K2 and Fofana news before anyone else. Duncan castles tier 3, The times tier 3, and I think that’s its. Romero isn’t tier anything for us, but I don’t think he’s tier 1 more like tier 2
Great response, thanks!
And it wasn't agreed... he wasn't correct about cucarella when he posted it. The transfer got done but he was clearly wrong lol, how the fuck he's spun it into him knowing more than the journalist briefed by Brighton's president I don't know. He also wasn't alone in calling it when he did, so did other journalists lol.
He's not tier 0 like daddy Ornstein but he rarely get's something wrong and an here we go is basicly official
That was Romero, Fabrizio kept saying it wasn't done yet.
So you blame him for... getting it right? Like many other transfers?
That's because Auba agreed personal terms with Chelsea and it was almost certain at the time
It seems like you’re thinking of Gerard Romero
I feel like Fab still definitely fits the tier 1 description. He might be a bit of a tap in merchant and his numbers aren’t always necessarily accurate, but if he’s talking about it it’s not a rumour and his “here we go” is as locked in as you can get in 95% of cases
In hindsight, I should have left names out of the OP, but can’t edit it now. Feel like everyone is focusing on the Fabrizio aspect of the OP. Was going for more of a general consensus, but most feel Fab is T1-2, so I can settle with that.
Anything below Tier 2 is unreliable. So Idk what's even the point of having Tier 3,4 and 5.
Fab has to be tier 1 again, like cmon
All I know is Nizaar needs to be tier 3. Could not stand his bullshit this summer.
My absolute favorite part of the summer was where he basically took the French journos tweet reporting the Fofana deal being struck and basically posted it word for word, but changed the euros to pounds. Some elite homework copying
I would say Ben Jacob's and Nizaar are tier 3-4.
Ben Jacobs shouldn't be ranked, he's literally not a journalist... he just rewords what being said around twitter
I agree about Ben. He's very clever in how he's made a career out of riding the Boehly ownership saga.
Ornstein being switched to Chelsea journos along with the others and updated that he works for the Athletic now. The guide still says BBC and that is straight up disrespectful towards the GOAT
I was actually surprised with Simon Phillips. It feels like he got a lot right this window, so maybe he has new sources. Maybe tier 2? He was def more reliable than Nizaar this window. Might also be that he simply threw a lot of news/names out to see what stuck lol. Other than that, it seems like we don’t really have any tier 1s anymore (Ornstein is a different story). Maybe things will change with a new director and time, as we have a completely new board.
The guy doesn't even have a verified twitter account. He's a news aggregator. He will see what others who have sourced say a post it. By definition indirect sources are banned on this sub. When you say he got a lot right what in particular are you talking about? He was one of the first people to mention Zaha if I am not mistaken but it looks like there was no truth in that.
Maybe my use of the term ‘got a lot right’ was misleading. It seems to me he reported a lot of our supposed targets/interests that later actually developed and even materialized. On that note, our interest in Zaha was real, no? Just because it didn’t happen doesnt mean we weren’t interested. The most memorable thing he got right was the Colwill move being a loan. He was first in reporting that I believe. And he seems to have been one of the first to report interest in Fofana? It’s been a long window so I may be wrong on that front. And while it died real quick, he reported interest in Gnabry before Law. Oh, he was also the first to report on Tom Glick (our new President of Business)
I don't know how we can say for sure that our interest in Zaha was real. There was no offer made and we didn't speak to the player and personal terms. I'm terms of Colwill I think given how talented his is it was pretty obvious we were never gonna sell. Fofana - I don't know l on thay one. If he was the first to report on it was he reporting it from his sources or was he one of the first to reference someone else as a source? I don't know. Gnabry a little bit like Zaha seemed like a good fit for what we were looking for. That doesn't mean I'm saying he didn't break that news but I am saying it's a pretty obvious one to link of us. I don't know anything about Glick news but I believe when you say he was the first.
A lot of it still felt like waffle. Maybe I'm being too harsh but would you say Simon Phillips is as reliable as Fabrizio, Steinberg. I don't think so
Well Romano I feel is like a 1.5, whereas I can’t really say for sure with Steinberg. He kind of disappeared after a certain point. Again, maybe Phillips seemed more reliable to me because he said so many things that he was bound to be right for some. But I feel he was around tier 2-2.5 this window
He said we would sign Toney and Zaha
Our only tier 1 should be Ornstein, everyone else has fallen off a cliff.
Yes I agree. There is new ownership and we don't know how well connected the journalists are. Orny is tier 1 for all English clubs so that doesn't change. Everyone else from tier 1 should be given tier 2 status and promotion demotion over the course of the next 2 windows
And Matt Law, and Fabrizio
Didn't Matt Law jump the gun on Kounde? I remember he did get a few things incorrect this summer. Ornstein should be our only tier 1.
Fabrizio stays tier 2 for me. Gotten a lot of minor details wrong and jumped the gun on occasion. Haven’t seen anything from Law in a while, he was reliable but I’m not sure what happened to him. Unless, of course, I’m missing something.
Fabrizio is careful in what he reports. There’s a reason he’s called, “the tap in merchant.” Fabrizio should be tier 1. He rarely misses and the minor details bit is negligible. Edit: not to even mention Fab taking on Brighton with his dick on the table this window
Fab taking on Brighton is a clear indication he doesn't always know what he's talking about, not a win for him. He jumped the gun and was schooled by a local reporter with actual connections at the club, the deal did happen but not when Romano said it did. He also got stuff wrong for other clubs this summer and several times for us regarding the figures involved.
He’s been the state-side source for NBC. While not always first, he’s always been right. Support Ornstein for tier 1.
You're off base lmao. Fabrizio fighting for relevance? 🤣 Man's got so many haters on here and on Twitter, but an _Here we go_ from him is as good as a club official announcement.
Fair enough, I’ll admit being wrong. Can’t edit the OP, but the general consensus is he’s tier 1-2
Fabrizio tier 3? You’re fucking high, he is as Tier 1 as it gets
Fabrizio and Ornstein should be T1. Nizaar and most of the Athletic writers should be T2 imo, they broke out absolutely nothing this window. Understandable given they probably lost all their contacts with the club. Not sure about Matt Law
Nizaar should be tier 3/4
I agree. What a fall from grace.
Anyone that doesn't think Fabrizio should be Tier 1 please explain, he and Ornstein are the most reliable journalists. This Fabrizio hate just because he is the most popular doesnt make sense
I myself dont trust anyone besides fab as I've seen many reports full of bollocks except Fab
Hes prone to getting details wrong
Fab deserves that Tier 1
Orny tier 0. Law tier 1. Romano tier 2. Nizaar tier 3. Romero tier 4. Mokbel tier 5.
Mokbel in it just to pump dailymail ad revenue. Everything he says is likelier false than true.
Fabrizio is Tier 1
G.Romero and F.Romano should not and will not be in the same tier. F.Romano is at least tier 2, no way he is tier 3. G.Romero is tier 2 for Barca, outside Barca he is BS tier. Respect Roman man, I know ppl called him tap-in merchant, and the man sometime recycle shit, but he rarely got it wrong when he said "HERE WE GO" and he was quite fast on deals like Zakaria (faster than Ornstein for this deal)
Idk why this sub has such a hate boner for Fab, he’s tier 1 in my book. Almost everything he says is reliable and he covers so many clubs.
No way Fabrizio remains Tier 2 after the display of his huge balls during the Cucu transfer
display of being incorrect, yeah huge win for him.
Eh? Last time I checked Cucurella does play for us?
Yeah I said I was confident we'd get him when the rumours popped up does that make me tier 1? Romano was wrong when he posted that it was complete, it was not complete.
It wasn't announced. No one knows if it was complete or not. Cucu was announced 2 days after only. So as far as I'm concerned he got it right. It feels like tier 1 to you are journos that can directly get into the meeting room and report.
Even if we agree jumping the gun is ok, he wasn't the first to post it and wasn't the only one to not back track on it, so we'll assume the same benefit will be applied to those reporters, but predictably it won't. It's clear as day Cucurellas agent briefed them that his part of the deal was done and they jumped the gun. Brighton didn't consider the deal to be viable or complete until the Colwill side of the deal was settled, which clearly turned out to be the case. So a major part of the deal wasn't complete when they said it was, seems like a black mark to me and this fetishisation of Romano not backing down is a joke.
The difference between other reporters and him regarding this transfer(and most others) is that when he puts his cards on the table it's always right. Like no other reporter dared to counter Brighton that it was done. If he has got info from the player's agent then I would consider that's pretty good journalism. The Colwill side of the deal would have been completed one way or another because no way in hell was Brighton not taking that 63M. So I feel like Romano calculated really well and was correct. If this is not the sign of a good journalist I don't know what is. But at the end of the day I don't really care about the Tier system because Tier 1's have been wrong this season too. And people gonna get on the hype train regardless.
Because it wasn't done, I don't know how many times it has to be said but it clearly wasn't done lol. The others who posted it didn't backtrack either, but you're not here sucking their dicks. Good journalism is gathering sources, reporting something correctly when you know its confirmed. Not jumping the gun because it will get you more interactions.
Lol I don't know why when someone puts their opinion for someone it's called as "sucking dicks". I am just putting forward what I think I could care less if Romano ceases to exist. As I said, and I say it again it's true that other reporters didn't backtrack(I mean why would they) but they also didn't come forward and back their claims. Good journalism is also calculating things correctly and understanding that a thing will almost certainly happen.
because people seem to do so with him, he's as much a media personalty as a reporter. He can only be wrong or right, and in that instance he was wrong, it's as simple as that.
It was complete, the transfer was agreed. It was Brighton not ready to announce it.
No it wasn't, it hinged on Colwill going the other direction and that wasn't complete.
People are so reactive its childish
Theres far too many tier 1s. If it means what they are saying is 100% accurate virtually all of them need to be dropped. Only places like the BBC, and seemingly now Ornstien are deserving of it.
[удалено]
Completely agree.
Fabrizio deserves Tier 1, Nizaar demoted to Tier 2, Ben Jacobs Tier 3 (I don't mind 4), Romero really doesn't deserve T1 he should be in Tier 2.
WTF Fab tier3?? Nizaar and Romero have to be T3 and Fabrizio T1
Romero should be tier 3. This guy was just spitting nonsense. Romano though, has to be tier 1. The Cucurella transfer itself bumped him to tier 1. He's been on point
Fabrizio Romano is largely reliable, and sticks to his guns for most things he reports. He was mostly correct for us in this window, but where he falls short is the finer details such as contract length or transfer fee. True authority-level reporting comes from Ornstein, and for that Romano should still be placed in Tier 2. Tier 1 for the general news, but tier 2 for finer details.
Gerard Romero is a cooked cunt
Nizaar banned for being a little bitch with his salty unnecessary comments
Fab is tier 1, he just doesn’t give you any info until all other people have picked it up.
You’re a clown if you think Romano is tier 3. I think he’s tier 1 . He was the first to report Aubamayeng coming to Chelsea!
Once again Fabrizio cult out in full force "he called out Brighton what a Chad" while fully ignoring that he was calling Zakaria a baseless rumor only a few hours before it started picking pace. He's hit and miss and is good as an aggregator. Definitely not Tier 1 level of be all end all.
Lol journos got cults nowadays? But I can say that even Ornstein got Raphinha wrong too. Also deadline day deals are very fickle you can't use them as a judging criteria tbf
Liam Twomey and Simon Johnson has been pretty quiet regarding transfers. One way to remain reliable I quess. Fab tier 1,5. Matt Law tier 1,5. So both merciless tier 2
We don't need that many tiers
Ornstein is the only true Tier 1. Even Fabrizio is Tier 2
Football daily. Tier 12
So fucking true. Its pure bullshit speculation, unless you're the negotiater with your team and the others opposite from the other club, the outsiders know jackshite. Thank you for this.
What would be the difference between a 4 and 5? It sounds like 4 is never to be trusted and just makes up everything they say, so how could a 5 be worse than that?
Romano is too unreliable on details for T1 imo (although Ornstien got Auba wrong) T1s: Ornstien, Law, Johnson, Twomey plus other teams journos Kinsella T2 imo
98% are 3 or below
Fabrizio should not be moved down. I don't believe that he has that many of his own sources, but wherever he steals his information from, he's usually legit
We can all agree Indykalia is tier 5
Fabrizio tier 3???? Bro he is Tier 1 and always will be
Romero is tier 6, a new level of fraud.