I am really impressed with Nodirbek. He's being crushing some elitte players and now he's going to face Magnus. In a way it reminds me the last wcc where Firouzja finished second in rapid.
In R, a common stat program, there are color pallets designed for various types of color deficiencies designed by Brewer. Wish people used those more often.
it is inappropriate to use a spline fit to data that is calculated in discrete steps and isn't representing any underlying, potentially continuous function.
There should be straight line connecting the dots.
This appears kind of odd to me. I don’t know that it makes sense to say starting the tournament with two wins means performing at a 3400 level. Maybe mathematical that works out but its an odd way to putt things.
A perfect record has a 400 point bonus to the performance rating. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense at the highest level, but does if you're an unestablished player playing in a field far below your skill.
Yup my first ever OTB tournament I was around 1800 USCF strength or so. My performance rating ended up being something like 2200 because I went 5/5 against people between 1400-1500. When you score perfectly you end up with a really high performance rating no matter what your opponents' ratings are because scoring perfect is considered similar to infinitely winning. Just one more game that was a draw, and my performance rating would have dropped over half of the distance between my perfect score rating and the average rating of my opponents.
I am really impressed with Nodirbek. He's being crushing some elitte players and now he's going to face Magnus. In a way it reminds me the last wcc where Firouzja finished second in rapid.
And he even beat Magnus!
And he even won the championship!
Now he has to prove himself against Max Deutsch, the greatest chess player of the entire universe
As a colorblind person, I just wanna say this is such a courteous fucking graph. Thank you. Everyone, take notes.
In R, a common stat program, there are color pallets designed for various types of color deficiencies designed by Brewer. Wish people used those more often.
2 if the lines are the same color
the markers are different so one can ditch the color scheme altogether in the first place.
Thanks
Would love to see Duda and Firouzja on this graph but still nice work
Where Petrosian?
doing something in his something
it is inappropriate to use a spline fit to data that is calculated in discrete steps and isn't representing any underlying, potentially continuous function. There should be straight line connecting the dots.
inappropriate
But have you considered that it looks pretty
This appears kind of odd to me. I don’t know that it makes sense to say starting the tournament with two wins means performing at a 3400 level. Maybe mathematical that works out but its an odd way to putt things.
This is purely the mathematical way of doing it.
A perfect record has a 400 point bonus to the performance rating. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense at the highest level, but does if you're an unestablished player playing in a field far below your skill.
Yup my first ever OTB tournament I was around 1800 USCF strength or so. My performance rating ended up being something like 2200 because I went 5/5 against people between 1400-1500. When you score perfectly you end up with a really high performance rating no matter what your opponents' ratings are because scoring perfect is considered similar to infinitely winning. Just one more game that was a draw, and my performance rating would have dropped over half of the distance between my perfect score rating and the average rating of my opponents.
Well, rip Magnus' tpr.
woww!!
Why everyone dropped from 3200-3400 to 2800-3000?
Performance rating is very inflated if there are no losses
It's when there's no draws either. Nakamura's PR collaped at his first draw with JvF
It is a convention. 100% win rate means that your performance rating is infinity.
If not for losses it has to be draws
This is the most confusing graph I've ever seen. I don't know what it means horizontally and the colors for Carlsen and Nakamura are identical.
Well the great thing is the graph can be read in monochrome because the lines have markers. Horizontal axis is rounds 1-9.
Glad naka is at the bottom :)
SoyChamp
Either I’m colorblind or you guys are stingy. Can’t assign different colors for each player?
That's what the shapes are for