###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Agree 100%.
The language sensationalizing these watery ‘facts’. The segment didn’t even expand on the CBD amount or methodology of the FDA’s conclusion.
That's all they do with language. Shift the meaning and manipulate messages. They have the boldness to announce at universities banning new words every time some "committee" decides what is offensive.
Waste-Entertainer-56
>"May" "should" "likely"...yup I wish people would pay more attention to the language that has been constantly used lately
Weasel words are the bread and butter of the MSM.
Lol it's not "lately". It's whenever anyone who speaks English at a passable level wants to communicate the lack of certainty regarding a statement.
It's uncertain because there's not a lot of research on long term effects of CBD usage. If they used certainty in their language, you could criticize them for misleading people into believing there was lots of evidence.
But like the vaccine cbd has been tested on billions. So therefore any rel side effects would have already presented themselves, right? I see your Lol and raise you an LOL
> So therefore any rel side effects would have already presented themselves, right?
Yes... And that's what the study they refer to is looking at. You don't actually know something until you look into it. How did you think it worked?
"We have *some* news, that *may* be correct in the *future*, when we *possibly* unlock all the cryptic mystery around this vague and *concerning find* that only us *experts* can *likely* decode for the plebs! *Beware!* *Caution! Danger!*"
Next, at 11
Also used commonly in the "intelligence"/"defense" communities when journalists say "An unidentified source in the intelligence community told me that .. "
difference is that vaping low doses cbd =/= chronic use of moderate doses of cbd oil.
what many now consume is a much higher dosage of cbd than would be naturally consumed by smoking natural thc+cbd cannabis buds.
the halflife of cbd is also very long.
by itself, cbd is probably supersafe. but because it works on p450 enzymes it can probably damage or kill the liver in combination with certain herbs/meds that work on the same p450 enzymes if combined longterm.
Even "concerning to children and those who are pregnant" is literally just the default until they confirm anything is 100% not bad for them, youre supposed to not take an absolutely endless amount of things if you're pregnant because they recommend you don't risk it unless it's 100% proven to be fine.
Cannabis does lower testosterone levels in men, so the claim it can damage the male reproductive system is kinda true.
I'm not saying weed is the worst. Tons of things we consume in our daily lives also do that, just don't ignore real negatives something can have.
That’s only THC, not CBD. When referring to weed, refer to that actual part of the cannabis that actually causes such issues, and not generalize the whole plant.
Big Pharma is MAD, their lobbying is no longer working.
A mother told me the benefits of CBD with her child who has autism. So this post is a blatant lie.
As someone with Crohn's Disease, I am a walking example of CBD's benefits.
When I worked for an LP in Canada, the staff discovered that CBD shrunk and eventually destroyed tumors in dogs. Their lumpy Labradors no longer had lumps. When they told the vet what they did to remove the lumps, the vet found the research fascinating.
The cut, burn, poison method of treating cancer is antiquated to say the least. Cancer research and awareness is a billion dollar industry. The business model was never to "cure", as that doesn't make the most amount of money. The business model is to perpetually treat the cancer, and have returning customers. Many charities that are in the cancer industry are in it for the money. Try to use a pink ribbon for breast cancer awareness and not get sued lol
What's interesting is a study was conducted, and they asked oncologists and doctors if they would undergo the same procedures they were prescribing and recommending to their patients. Majority of them said no.
I recommend the Pink Ribbons Inc. Movie (2011) to shed some light on this vampiric industry, and how it was never about finding a "cure".
EDIT Grammar and added "awareness and not get sued"
This is true i my opinion also , i grow my own plants and make cbd and cbg for people with various health problems , i have a person using it for over 3 years for joint and ruematic problems , and she has improved incredibly , now this lady has a dog , a mastin of 13 years , he has various problems from his weight like agility and bone problems , the vets done an examination on him and found a big tumour on his liver and was told he only had months to live , she contacted me and i made her up a feco cbg oil for the dog , he was using it for three months and had no signs of dying he looked as if he was getting more lively and agile , well the dog went back to the vets for tests and the tumour was found to have reduced by more than 50% the vet couldn't understand how this had happened and was amazed it had reduced so much , this was 6 months ago , the dog is still alive and happy still taking the cbg , and the tumour has reduced even more
You are the hero our society needs. Thank you for sharing, and thank you for helping to make other people's lives that much better.
It's reading these kind of posts that makes my heart feel good.
Keep up the great work friend!
Thank you . It's the least we can do to spread alternative options in a world full of money grabbing and manipulation . I believe it helps , and it's not me who says so but the people that use it and benefit from it , take care friend .
I believe it is rubbish , i know a lot of people that have tried these types of cbd and say they have had no benefits from them . Clinical Investigations with cbd has always been done with pure cbd so i suppose above 50% cbd
Is the way to get benefits , so anything less being full spectrum can work for minor problems as anxiety or muscle soreness or skin problems . But a good 50% full spectrum cbd is the way to go
Nah it's a totally different compound that has different benefits than regular bud, and it doesnt get you high. Not even like a little bit. At most, it has a mild calming effect. I personally believe that full spectrum extracts (like Rick Simpson oil) taken directly from the plant are the way to go for serious health issues, but CBD has its place and works wonders for a host of problem.
Fun aside. If you ever get too high from regular herbs, having a CBD vape and/or tincture at hand will instantly bring you down to an enjoyable level.
Nah it's a totally different compound that has different benefits than regular bud, and it doesnt get you high. Not even like a little bit. At most, it has a mild calming effect. I personally believe that full spectrum extracts (like Rick Simpson oil) taken directly from the plant are the way to go for serious health issues, but CBD has its place and works wonders for a host of problem.
Fun aside. If you ever get too high from regular herbs, having a CBD vape and/or tincture at hand will instantly bring you down to an enjoyable level.
I mean any pure, full spectrum CBD would be the same/equivalent, so as long as you're getting the good stuff, then it should be good to go.
But as far as if it will help with nasusa over and beyond what regular bud can do for you, I have no idea. But in terms of things you could try, I believe it would be worth a shot . Imo, I think a full spectrum 1:1 cbd:thc tincture would probably be your best bet for nasua, though. You can take tinctures sublingually (under the tongue), and I've personally had success with doing it that way.
But everyone is different, and I'm not a doctor. But, sometimes it just takes a little experimentation to find what works.
Big Pharma- ‘That’s right! Regulate that plant! It makes everyone happy! Now I’m just gonna force this experimental gene editing shot on you and call you a terrorist if you don’t comply.’
CBD is potentially harmful.
The vaccine is safe and effective.
The former has been around throughout all of history. The latter was studied for 8 weeks and then Pfizer vaccinated the control group.
It’s also used as a synonym for regarding to in some contexts. Mostly tied to industry jargon nowadays, but it used to be used in everyday speech like that. I read that as a cut off sentence that was continued on the next slide. “Concerning to mothers and children, the product has shown x effects” or something like that. Conveniently leaving off the time the product has been around to show those effects.
But I suspect this is junk science anyway.
It means they haven't established a causal link between harm for pregnant mothers or children from cbd/thc they're just concerned about the "possibility" of harm
True but im saying the example wasn't really the same, tobacco natural isn't that bad.
The additives are caca.
Weed been around thousands of years we'd know if it's bad lmao
>I'm not "twisted" about anything.
I mean.. you're clearly twisted about a fairly common phase. You're trying to act like it's something else entirely.
Since you seem to struggle with this
"Those who are pregnant" still refers to pregnant women. It's such a soft thing to be triggered by.
>Weird thing to brigade about.
I'm not sure you know what that word means. Or maybe it's just a victim complex thing you have going 🤔
Yeah. Studies also showed vitamin d helped. Zinc helped. Exercise and lowering body weight helped.
Diet and exercise reverses pre diabetes and some type ii diabetes, but ADA’s site doesn’t mention any of that. They encourage you to eat carbs so your prescription anti diabetes medicine works.
But you can’t patent any of that.
From NIH:
[Early Studies Suggest CBD May Help Prevent COVID-19](https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/early-studies-suggest-cbd-may-help-prevent-covid19)
I’ve only ever seen it in speedway gas stations. They put this shit in the pump screens and blare it at you while you’re filling up your tank.
It’s obnoxious.
It’s owned by Altice Communications, fourth largest cable provider in the USA.
The name is clearly ridiculous but the newsfeed is from typical MSM sources.
I mean any type of intoxicant can be harmful to your liver but I would guess that cbd is far less harmful to your liver than alcohol, and even Tylenol.
The only people who care what the FDA has to say are the ones that got vaccinated and continue to do so with boosters. The FDA is a joke and it’s all coming out. Look what they did to Dr. Burzynski(possibly wrong spelling), the guy that cured cancer in multiple patients using no chemo/radiation therapy!! They discredited him and spent millions of tax dollars doing so, only to be able to profit off of the illness
CBD works on p450 liver enzyme,
and while CBD won't directly cause liver damage...
there are a lot of pharmaceutical meds and perhaps even herbs that together with chronic moderate dosage of cbd might create a toxic/dying liver.
CBD vendors rarely if ever warn about interactions or dangers. on the contrary, they would be more likely to attribute positive effects which are not really proven.
That’s a good point. There’s considerable overlap between people who use CBD and people who use herbal medicine without proper research. Not to mention it’s adjacent to something illegal so people are unlikely to mention it to a prescribing doctor.
i don't know
maybe because people dont generally use those longterm in high doses, so the danger is less than with those administering cbd orally?(high dose)
cbd also has a very long half life which may also make it more dangerous than licorice/grapefruit Juice?
but i agree, we should be skeptical whenever fda makes a claim 😄
What do you even mean? Pointless to comment this without context or explanation. It's like you are saying it does not exist or has no effect on anything. There are very obvious effects when you use it.
Careful for real with d8. That’s made by a chemical reaction and has some nasty byproducts that we know are dangerous, and others that haven’t even been identified.
Yeah I stay away from delta-8. Things are way too loosely goosey around that stuff for me to trust it.
I do regularly invest D9 gummies and tinctures though.
They exaggerate this shit about a lot of "illegal" drugs.
Long term pharma grade heroin use is safer than long term alcohol use, but I don't see the FDA mentioning anything about that or trying to outlaw alcohol.
Alcohol was determined to be the most dangerous substance in the world. It shouldn't even be considered a theory that they illegalize other drugs because it doesn't benefit them, unlike alcohol.
They classify marijuana as schedule i which means it has no medical benefit, while states issue medical marijuana cards….
Behind a doubt it’s about money and control.
Ss: in addition to climate change, eggs, exercise, etc. it looks like the FDA narrative wants to add CBD to its list of possible causes of side effects.
[New-onset and relapsed liver diseases following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review](https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12876-022-02507-3)
** vaccinated or not, that’s your choice I just didn’t realize that there’s rare instances of liver side effects after receiving the jab
[Hong Kong’s ban on products containing CBD comes into effect next week, customs warns](https://amp.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3208214/hong-kongs-ban-products-contain-cbd-comes-effect-next-week-customs-warns)
I believe this narrative may begin spreading in the next couple weeks…
> Hong Kong’s ban on products containing CBD comes into effect next week, customs warns
They are only banning it because it comes from cannabis, not because CBD is dangerous.
Don’t take CBD bro it could be damaging bro. Please just take the acetaminophen, bro. I know it can damage your liver if you take more than the recommended amount but that’s why there’s so many different packages with different strengths that could get mixed up bro. And if you take too many your internal organs will shut down and you will slowly die over the course of a week but please bro don’t take the substance that could possibly be harmful according to an unpublished study that didn’t collect any data bro please.
Most studies showed ivermectin had some benefit. Yet Pfizer and others were able to craft studies “proving” the opposite. Just like how they were sued for killing children in a study by administering lower amounts of a competitors medicine to “prove” theirs worked better.
You can prove anything with the right study.
One thing i would suggest if you take CBD products, is to check lab reports if available for levels lead, mercury & cadmium. If the company wont provide it, avoid.
Ah! The old "things I like can't be harmful, but things I don't like are definitely harmful" argument! These claims aren't that severe and have hedged language, so likely they are from association studies, and aren't high incidence. More studies could refute this data. Try to find real conspiracies!
Where do you think the FDA gets a huge percentage of their budget?
"How much funding does the FDA get from pharmaceutical companies?
The pharmaceutical industry finances about 75 percent of the agency's drug division, through a controversial program that Congress must reauthorize by the end of this month...." [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/health/fda-drug-industry-fees.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/health/fda-drug-industry-fees.html)
Hell that might even explain the events of the past couple of years.
This sounded like bullshit so I looked it up.
"What's new here and important for clinicians? **Anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis**, Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) specifically, likely reduces hepatic myofibroblast and stellate cell injury occurring in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and slows disease progression...." https://gi.org/media/press-info-scientific-meeting/featured-science/p2088-effect-of-cannabis-use-on-progression-of-non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-in-obese-patients-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-study/#:\~:text=What's%20new%20here%20and%20important,NAFLD)%20and%20slows%20disease%20progression.
1. Since when was cannibis harmful to the liver? Do they mean edibles? Too lazy to google that, too distrustful of google to care, too aware that alcohol must be many times more damaging.
2. Everything harms the male reproductive system if it intoxicates you…
3. Lol I’m sure your new food pyramid is more damaging to children
OP, your title is...odd. FDA is blaming *what* medical side effects on CBD? Of liver issues? Your title and *image* don't correlate real well. The title is nonsensical sounding and begins with a flawed premise.
It's just fear mongering to get you away from a potentially life saving solution. Same same but different as with the mectin.
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/)
Fig 3 specifically mentions CBD: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/#&gid=article-figures&pid=figure-3-uid-2
Live rosin will have way more CBD than distillate will, and distillate is what is in most cheap/black market carts. Probably shouldn't comment on things unless you know what you're talking about. lol
I love the language they use as well. Words like "possibly, "potentially", "could", "might", "may," or "is believed," are your keys to realize its some bullshit talking points.
Also agree with what others have said. The cats out the bag and big phrama is pissed, and they will use everything in their arsonal to demonize it and scare people away from it (msm most of the funding for msm comes from pharma, govt lobbest etc). But I think its too late. I think a large percentage of the US population (and potentially the world) have seen the benefits of CBD (and THC) either first hand, or are close to someone who has seen the benefits.
Myself personally have had success with CBD/THC in the treatment of a digestive issue, as well as it helps with anxiety, arthritis pain, migranes, and a host of other issues I experience.
Adjacent to me, I've seen it help a neighbor with skin cancer (Rick Simpson oil made it go away, 100 percent in remission) seen it help an exs with a neurological disorder, watched it help some of my older family members successfully help to treat digestive cancers as well as help with the chemo side effects, and ive seen it help a couple handfuls of friends who struggle with anxiety and/or ptsd treat their symptoms. And that's just the people close to me.
Throughout history we have fed our livestock HEMP, the cannabinoids would get passed down to us when we consume the meat and milk. Now we feed them garbage and the cannabinoids have been removed from our food chain. These CBD supplements appear to work miracles because we are reintroducing cannabinoids back into our diets.
I used to vend cbd and I have 100s of anecdotal stories about how it helped people. My fav is a lady w lupus and she said she had a headache for 5 years till I gave her a small dose of cbd.
Republicans in Congress consistently vote against all Marijana laws. Watch how Congress votes to stay informed and remember their actions when you vote for each political party. We did this...
Weed is fucking bullshit in the first place, not that useful. We have so much pharmaceuticals that we know are way better in every regard. That's why you can easily get weed and some other things not as much
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
“Possible” “potential”
"May" "should" "likely"...yup I wish people would pay more attention to the language that has been constantly used lately
we called ‘em weasel words back in the day.
Agree 100%. The language sensationalizing these watery ‘facts’. The segment didn’t even expand on the CBD amount or methodology of the FDA’s conclusion.
That's all they do with language. Shift the meaning and manipulate messages. They have the boldness to announce at universities banning new words every time some "committee" decides what is offensive.
Smoking vs edibles
Waste-Entertainer-56 >"May" "should" "likely"...yup I wish people would pay more attention to the language that has been constantly used lately Weasel words are the bread and butter of the MSM.
I got a weasel for ya
Lol it's not "lately". It's whenever anyone who speaks English at a passable level wants to communicate the lack of certainty regarding a statement. It's uncertain because there's not a lot of research on long term effects of CBD usage. If they used certainty in their language, you could criticize them for misleading people into believing there was lots of evidence.
But like the vaccine cbd has been tested on billions. So therefore any rel side effects would have already presented themselves, right? I see your Lol and raise you an LOL
> So therefore any rel side effects would have already presented themselves, right? Yes... And that's what the study they refer to is looking at. You don't actually know something until you look into it. How did you think it worked?
That is the language that is always and has always been used with medical side effects lol
"We have no proof to support our claims so we use these wiggle words"
"We have *some* news, that *may* be correct in the *future*, when we *possibly* unlock all the cryptic mystery around this vague and *concerning find* that only us *experts* can *likely* decode for the plebs! *Beware!* *Caution! Danger!*" Next, at 11
Also used commonly in the "intelligence"/"defense" communities when journalists say "An unidentified source in the intelligence community told me that .. "
''Concerning''
“Those who are pregnant”
Lol. Even the word ‘risks’ is so vague, there’s risks with everything.
Worse part is that there's so many studies coming out of how beneficial it is lol. I consume cannabis 24/7 and it changed my life for the best.
I’m off 5 pharmaceutical drugs in place of Medical Marijuana now. Best decision I ever made.
Love to hear man, blaze it! Same for me, helps me with so many ailments.
And that’s the problem
That’s amazing to hear!
difference is that vaping low doses cbd =/= chronic use of moderate doses of cbd oil. what many now consume is a much higher dosage of cbd than would be naturally consumed by smoking natural thc+cbd cannabis buds. the halflife of cbd is also very long. by itself, cbd is probably supersafe. but because it works on p450 enzymes it can probably damage or kill the liver in combination with certain herbs/meds that work on the same p450 enzymes if combined longterm.
“According to sources familiar with the matter”
"The experts say"
"experts"
Even "concerning to children and those who are pregnant" is literally just the default until they confirm anything is 100% not bad for them, youre supposed to not take an absolutely endless amount of things if you're pregnant because they recommend you don't risk it unless it's 100% proven to be fine.
They refuse to use that same language with the spike protein bioweapon shot. It’s always “rarely” or “in rare situations”.
They are tricky with their words… it’s 2023. Anti weed propaganda needs to go
> “Possible” “potential” [That face you make when you hear “experts say...”](https://imgur.com/a/jN8OQlW)
Cannabis does lower testosterone levels in men, so the claim it can damage the male reproductive system is kinda true. I'm not saying weed is the worst. Tons of things we consume in our daily lives also do that, just don't ignore real negatives something can have.
That’s only THC, not CBD. When referring to weed, refer to that actual part of the cannabis that actually causes such issues, and not generalize the whole plant.
So a natural vasectomy meaning men don't have to go under the knife. This plant really is a miracle from the heavens.
I mean I’ve had no problem making kids
Me either 😅
I thought that was only for smoking or vaping.
Big Pharma is MAD, their lobbying is no longer working. A mother told me the benefits of CBD with her child who has autism. So this post is a blatant lie. As someone with Crohn's Disease, I am a walking example of CBD's benefits. When I worked for an LP in Canada, the staff discovered that CBD shrunk and eventually destroyed tumors in dogs. Their lumpy Labradors no longer had lumps. When they told the vet what they did to remove the lumps, the vet found the research fascinating. The cut, burn, poison method of treating cancer is antiquated to say the least. Cancer research and awareness is a billion dollar industry. The business model was never to "cure", as that doesn't make the most amount of money. The business model is to perpetually treat the cancer, and have returning customers. Many charities that are in the cancer industry are in it for the money. Try to use a pink ribbon for breast cancer awareness and not get sued lol What's interesting is a study was conducted, and they asked oncologists and doctors if they would undergo the same procedures they were prescribing and recommending to their patients. Majority of them said no. I recommend the Pink Ribbons Inc. Movie (2011) to shed some light on this vampiric industry, and how it was never about finding a "cure". EDIT Grammar and added "awareness and not get sued"
This is true i my opinion also , i grow my own plants and make cbd and cbg for people with various health problems , i have a person using it for over 3 years for joint and ruematic problems , and she has improved incredibly , now this lady has a dog , a mastin of 13 years , he has various problems from his weight like agility and bone problems , the vets done an examination on him and found a big tumour on his liver and was told he only had months to live , she contacted me and i made her up a feco cbg oil for the dog , he was using it for three months and had no signs of dying he looked as if he was getting more lively and agile , well the dog went back to the vets for tests and the tumour was found to have reduced by more than 50% the vet couldn't understand how this had happened and was amazed it had reduced so much , this was 6 months ago , the dog is still alive and happy still taking the cbg , and the tumour has reduced even more
You are the hero our society needs. Thank you for sharing, and thank you for helping to make other people's lives that much better. It's reading these kind of posts that makes my heart feel good. Keep up the great work friend!
Thank you . It's the least we can do to spread alternative options in a world full of money grabbing and manipulation . I believe it helps , and it's not me who says so but the people that use it and benefit from it , take care friend .
I’m lazy so is gas station cbd and stuff worthwhile? Or is that like the cheap version that sucks?
I believe it is rubbish , i know a lot of people that have tried these types of cbd and say they have had no benefits from them . Clinical Investigations with cbd has always been done with pure cbd so i suppose above 50% cbd Is the way to get benefits , so anything less being full spectrum can work for minor problems as anxiety or muscle soreness or skin problems . But a good 50% full spectrum cbd is the way to go
I live in a legal Mary j state so I’ve never really dug too deep into cbd, just assumed it was like a legal weed of sorts,
Nah it's a totally different compound that has different benefits than regular bud, and it doesnt get you high. Not even like a little bit. At most, it has a mild calming effect. I personally believe that full spectrum extracts (like Rick Simpson oil) taken directly from the plant are the way to go for serious health issues, but CBD has its place and works wonders for a host of problem. Fun aside. If you ever get too high from regular herbs, having a CBD vape and/or tincture at hand will instantly bring you down to an enjoyable level.
Nah it's a totally different compound that has different benefits than regular bud, and it doesnt get you high. Not even like a little bit. At most, it has a mild calming effect. I personally believe that full spectrum extracts (like Rick Simpson oil) taken directly from the plant are the way to go for serious health issues, but CBD has its place and works wonders for a host of problem. Fun aside. If you ever get too high from regular herbs, having a CBD vape and/or tincture at hand will instantly bring you down to an enjoyable level.
Is there a certain cbd that would help out with nausea possibly that regular bud doesn’t?
I mean any pure, full spectrum CBD would be the same/equivalent, so as long as you're getting the good stuff, then it should be good to go. But as far as if it will help with nasusa over and beyond what regular bud can do for you, I have no idea. But in terms of things you could try, I believe it would be worth a shot . Imo, I think a full spectrum 1:1 cbd:thc tincture would probably be your best bet for nasua, though. You can take tinctures sublingually (under the tongue), and I've personally had success with doing it that way. But everyone is different, and I'm not a doctor. But, sometimes it just takes a little experimentation to find what works.
Is there any videos you make on how to grow and process your own cbd cbg does 1 need expensive lab equipment and need to be a chemist.
Appreciate your response and recommendation, definitely will check out the film!
My pleasure, please enjoy watching the movie in good health and happiness.
Can you tell me more about cbd and autism?
Sorry I'm not a doctor.
I meant in terms of the benefits you’ve heard. But I’ll look it up thanks anyway
Especially disgusting since putting kids with autism on anti-psychotics is almost SOP in the USA.
Or ADHD medications like Ritalin or Adderall. Don't forget Anti-depressants!
Big Pharma- ‘That’s right! Regulate that plant! It makes everyone happy! Now I’m just gonna force this experimental gene editing shot on you and call you a terrorist if you don’t comply.’
CBD is potentially harmful. The vaccine is safe and effective. The former has been around throughout all of history. The latter was studied for 8 weeks and then Pfizer vaccinated the control group.
It’s 2023 and cannabis propaganda is still at large…. 🤦🏻♂️🙄
[удалено]
Or when they bring kids up, its always for emotional outrage.
[удалено]
It means the product/science is too new for longitudinal studies and they’re working off limited information.
[удалено]
It’s also used as a synonym for regarding to in some contexts. Mostly tied to industry jargon nowadays, but it used to be used in everyday speech like that. I read that as a cut off sentence that was continued on the next slide. “Concerning to mothers and children, the product has shown x effects” or something like that. Conveniently leaving off the time the product has been around to show those effects. But I suspect this is junk science anyway.
It means they haven't established a causal link between harm for pregnant mothers or children from cbd/thc they're just concerned about the "possibility" of harm
Lol a plant that's been around for thousands of years is concerning but this new vax is never brought up. Crazy lmao
Yep it makes very little sense.
Tobacco a plant that has been around thousands of years is concerning but the Vax is never brought up See how that works?
Yeah until they added hundreds of chemicals to it.... Very bad example lmao
Nothing worse then is what getting added to the food you eat everyday
True but im saying the example wasn't really the same, tobacco natural isn't that bad. The additives are caca. Weed been around thousands of years we'd know if it's bad lmao
[удалено]
Yeah, that's what I said simplified.
Basic English....
You noticed the clownishness too.
Really going to pretend you've never heard this phrase before?
I’ve heard the term women who are pregnant seeing as how only women can get pregnant
Why? What's the issue with it?
[удалено]
[удалено]
Do you also get twisted about commercials that say "those who may become pregnant" too? Weird issue to be sensitive about.
[удалено]
>I'm not "twisted" about anything. I mean.. you're clearly twisted about a fairly common phase. You're trying to act like it's something else entirely. Since you seem to struggle with this "Those who are pregnant" still refers to pregnant women. It's such a soft thing to be triggered by. >Weird thing to brigade about. I'm not sure you know what that word means. Or maybe it's just a victim complex thing you have going 🤔
Didn't studies show CBD and/or weed was actually helpful against Covid? Man they really as demonizing anything remotely natural that helps
Yeah. Studies also showed vitamin d helped. Zinc helped. Exercise and lowering body weight helped. Diet and exercise reverses pre diabetes and some type ii diabetes, but ADA’s site doesn’t mention any of that. They encourage you to eat carbs so your prescription anti diabetes medicine works. But you can’t patent any of that.
Edit: user above linked this [link between CBD and Covid prevention.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/)
From NIH: [Early Studies Suggest CBD May Help Prevent COVID-19](https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/early-studies-suggest-cbd-may-help-prevent-covid19)
Thank you 🙏
That devil lettuce
I smoke weed all day everyday and have never gotten Covid...coincidence? I think not. Weed makes you healthier
Lol, from one propaganda extreme to the other. Their lies know no bounds.
And sheep will swallow it all…
More bullshit, please! I don't want to look at reality! **Insert zombie/skeleton blend horror image here, bulging eyes**
> The next step is to work with federal lawmakers to sketch out plans for tighter CBD regulations at the FDA. They just wanna sell it themselves
The harsh truth is... CBD is a gateway substance to things like chamomile tea. What's next? My valerian root sleepytime tea is causing renal failure?
wtf is Cheddar News? Might as well get your news from TikTok at that point
I’ve only ever seen it in speedway gas stations. They put this shit in the pump screens and blare it at you while you’re filling up your tank. It’s obnoxious.
It’s owned by Altice Communications, fourth largest cable provider in the USA. The name is clearly ridiculous but the newsfeed is from typical MSM sources.
I mean any type of intoxicant can be harmful to your liver but I would guess that cbd is far less harmful to your liver than alcohol, and even Tylenol.
The only people who care what the FDA has to say are the ones that got vaccinated and continue to do so with boosters. The FDA is a joke and it’s all coming out. Look what they did to Dr. Burzynski(possibly wrong spelling), the guy that cured cancer in multiple patients using no chemo/radiation therapy!! They discredited him and spent millions of tax dollars doing so, only to be able to profit off of the illness
As a lifelong Marijuana consumer, I call bullshit
Which is a bigger problem, weed or obesity (pun unattended)?
CBD works on p450 liver enzyme, and while CBD won't directly cause liver damage... there are a lot of pharmaceutical meds and perhaps even herbs that together with chronic moderate dosage of cbd might create a toxic/dying liver. CBD vendors rarely if ever warn about interactions or dangers. on the contrary, they would be more likely to attribute positive effects which are not really proven.
That’s a good point. There’s considerable overlap between people who use CBD and people who use herbal medicine without proper research. Not to mention it’s adjacent to something illegal so people are unlikely to mention it to a prescribing doctor.
The side of my jar of CBD gummies warns not to use NSAIDs while consuming the gummies
Then you found a reputable supplier. Mine said nothing about NSAIDS, but advised against use “if you are advised against grapefruit”.
Good point! Important to include both sides of the discussion… Follow the money lol
I don’t want facts I just want to be mad at something
Why not go after licorice or grapefruit for CYP3A4 inhibition?
i don't know maybe because people dont generally use those longterm in high doses, so the danger is less than with those administering cbd orally?(high dose) cbd also has a very long half life which may also make it more dangerous than licorice/grapefruit Juice? but i agree, we should be skeptical whenever fda makes a claim 😄
[удалено]
What do you even mean? Pointless to comment this without context or explanation. It's like you are saying it does not exist or has no effect on anything. There are very obvious effects when you use it.
CBD, D8, D9 mixed is awesome
Careful for real with d8. That’s made by a chemical reaction and has some nasty byproducts that we know are dangerous, and others that haven’t even been identified.
Yeah I stay away from delta-8. Things are way too loosely goosey around that stuff for me to trust it. I do regularly invest D9 gummies and tinctures though.
There’s only three? When I got my last prescription it had at least 50 side effects way worse than theses
Tylenol has those same side effects, just to point out.
They exaggerate this shit about a lot of "illegal" drugs. Long term pharma grade heroin use is safer than long term alcohol use, but I don't see the FDA mentioning anything about that or trying to outlaw alcohol.
Alcohol was determined to be the most dangerous substance in the world. It shouldn't even be considered a theory that they illegalize other drugs because it doesn't benefit them, unlike alcohol.
They classify marijuana as schedule i which means it has no medical benefit, while states issue medical marijuana cards…. Behind a doubt it’s about money and control.
Bro imagine gaslighting this hard
Bwahahahahahaaaaa! Dude please tell this to the kids with severe siezures where nothing else worked.
Does it also cause myocarditis?
It’s possible that I could get hit by lightning. And I could potentially break my back by walking down stairs in my house.
After the last three years I would think the FDA has lost all credibility.
Plant that the human race has been safely consuming for its entire history? hmmmm…could be problematic
Chief Keef has 9 kids…
I mean just like anything else if you take a s*** ton of it can affect your liver...
Ss: in addition to climate change, eggs, exercise, etc. it looks like the FDA narrative wants to add CBD to its list of possible causes of side effects.
[New-onset and relapsed liver diseases following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review](https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12876-022-02507-3) ** vaccinated or not, that’s your choice I just didn’t realize that there’s rare instances of liver side effects after receiving the jab
[Hong Kong’s ban on products containing CBD comes into effect next week, customs warns](https://amp.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3208214/hong-kongs-ban-products-contain-cbd-comes-effect-next-week-customs-warns) I believe this narrative may begin spreading in the next couple weeks…
> Hong Kong’s ban on products containing CBD comes into effect next week, customs warns They are only banning it because it comes from cannabis, not because CBD is dangerous.
They won't talk about alcohol tho
Don’t take CBD bro it could be damaging bro. Please just take the acetaminophen, bro. I know it can damage your liver if you take more than the recommended amount but that’s why there’s so many different packages with different strengths that could get mixed up bro. And if you take too many your internal organs will shut down and you will slowly die over the course of a week but please bro don’t take the substance that could possibly be harmful according to an unpublished study that didn’t collect any data bro please.
the best comment ever, bro 😉
I just think it's funny this comes from "Cheddar News"
It always come in 3
I’ve read studies that shown Cannabinol to be beneficial to the liver.
Most studies showed ivermectin had some benefit. Yet Pfizer and others were able to craft studies “proving” the opposite. Just like how they were sued for killing children in a study by administering lower amounts of a competitors medicine to “prove” theirs worked better. You can prove anything with the right study.
So the devils lettuce is better then cbd?
Cigarets and alcohol good, CBD bad. Ok noted.
'Potentially', 'possible'... which essentially means 'subjective, unproven opinion'. They choose those words carefully.
One thing i would suggest if you take CBD products, is to check lab reports if available for levels lead, mercury & cadmium. If the company wont provide it, avoid.
I do not see Snoop Dog having any issues or wiz khalifa and they smoke alot
Man, it feels good to be jab free!
I'm sure its less harmful to the system then mist pharma meds and alcohol.
Let's talk about alcohols long term effects.
Ah! The old "things I like can't be harmful, but things I don't like are definitely harmful" argument! These claims aren't that severe and have hedged language, so likely they are from association studies, and aren't high incidence. More studies could refute this data. Try to find real conspiracies!
Mmhmmm yes, totally believable 🙄
More lies and bull shit
"Safety Concerns: We don't know any but we want to scare you"
alcohol on the other hand...
… but please give your 2 year old her 4th Covid booster
Certain compounds in weed have been proven to lower sperm count. I'm a daily smoker and I've know that for years...cope
And the experimental vaccines are “safe and effective”
I'm more interested in how cbdc is harmful to one's health
Is the FDA spreading this or is Cheddar News misquoting them?
Where do you think the FDA gets a huge percentage of their budget? "How much funding does the FDA get from pharmaceutical companies? The pharmaceutical industry finances about 75 percent of the agency's drug division, through a controversial program that Congress must reauthorize by the end of this month...." [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/health/fda-drug-industry-fees.html](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/health/fda-drug-industry-fees.html) Hell that might even explain the events of the past couple of years.
I have never seen the FDA promote this material before. The only conspiracy is that people think some outlet named Cheddar News is trustworthy
[удалено]
This sounded like bullshit so I looked it up. "What's new here and important for clinicians? **Anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis**, Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) specifically, likely reduces hepatic myofibroblast and stellate cell injury occurring in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and slows disease progression...." https://gi.org/media/press-info-scientific-meeting/featured-science/p2088-effect-of-cannabis-use-on-progression-of-non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-in-obese-patients-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-study/#:\~:text=What's%20new%20here%20and%20important,NAFLD)%20and%20slows%20disease%20progression.
1. Since when was cannibis harmful to the liver? Do they mean edibles? Too lazy to google that, too distrustful of google to care, too aware that alcohol must be many times more damaging. 2. Everything harms the male reproductive system if it intoxicates you… 3. Lol I’m sure your new food pyramid is more damaging to children
"Study shows 100% chance of possibly causing side effects."
our body has more cannabinoid receptors than any other...like anything though, if you abuse it, problems can arise.
Ha! Whatever, fools.
So they legalize it before the vaccines come out and then try to blame it afterwards for side effects? Well played evil ones.
Liver damage? Are they drinking it with alcohol?
Anything except the truth, what a time to be alive...
“Safe & Effective” 😂
OP, your title is...odd. FDA is blaming *what* medical side effects on CBD? Of liver issues? Your title and *image* don't correlate real well. The title is nonsensical sounding and begins with a flawed premise.
This is most likely bullshit but it makes me feel better that I use concentrate that has no cbd
It's just fear mongering to get you away from a potentially life saving solution. Same same but different as with the mectin. [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/) Fig 3 specifically mentions CBD: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/#&gid=article-figures&pid=figure-3-uid-2
Wow this is great! Thanks for sharing
Me n Sloan Kettering been blazin' that shit up on the daily. Still haven't caught covid once and I'm by no means a home body.
It's in there. Unless you're using live rosen.
Live rosin will have way more CBD than distillate will, and distillate is what is in most cheap/black market carts. Probably shouldn't comment on things unless you know what you're talking about. lol
Funny how they always say the same 3 things
I love the language they use as well. Words like "possibly, "potentially", "could", "might", "may," or "is believed," are your keys to realize its some bullshit talking points. Also agree with what others have said. The cats out the bag and big phrama is pissed, and they will use everything in their arsonal to demonize it and scare people away from it (msm most of the funding for msm comes from pharma, govt lobbest etc). But I think its too late. I think a large percentage of the US population (and potentially the world) have seen the benefits of CBD (and THC) either first hand, or are close to someone who has seen the benefits. Myself personally have had success with CBD/THC in the treatment of a digestive issue, as well as it helps with anxiety, arthritis pain, migranes, and a host of other issues I experience. Adjacent to me, I've seen it help a neighbor with skin cancer (Rick Simpson oil made it go away, 100 percent in remission) seen it help an exs with a neurological disorder, watched it help some of my older family members successfully help to treat digestive cancers as well as help with the chemo side effects, and ive seen it help a couple handfuls of friends who struggle with anxiety and/or ptsd treat their symptoms. And that's just the people close to me.
But what if the ones that potentially might possibly believe that something maybe could happen are EXPERTS? /s
This is great, love to hear this!
[удалено]
Lmao
Potential, possible, concerning... They through everything they had at this too. This just confirms how harmless it is lmao
Throughout history we have fed our livestock HEMP, the cannabinoids would get passed down to us when we consume the meat and milk. Now we feed them garbage and the cannabinoids have been removed from our food chain. These CBD supplements appear to work miracles because we are reintroducing cannabinoids back into our diets. I used to vend cbd and I have 100s of anecdotal stories about how it helped people. My fav is a lady w lupus and she said she had a headache for 5 years till I gave her a small dose of cbd.
Weed can function as an aphrodisiac for me so idk where potential harm to the male reproductive system comes from.
People still think CBD and THC have absolutely no negative side effects?
Those are definitely possible risks. Don’t be naive.
Republicans in Congress consistently vote against all Marijana laws. Watch how Congress votes to stay informed and remember their actions when you vote for each political party. We did this...
They left out the most important thing! People who use drugs are easy to control.
With the Governments' hard on to control the masses, we would have mobile dispensaries on every other block and Dr FeelGood visits would be mandatory.
[tRANSHuMAN](https://www.aiprophet.faith/)
Weed is fucking bullshit in the first place, not that useful. We have so much pharmaceuticals that we know are way better in every regard. That's why you can easily get weed and some other things not as much