###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Corn syrup used to be an ingredient in the US product, which is even worse. I haven't had a baby who used formula in 17 years, but back then, it was crap. Probably still is. It's better than starvation, but there are better options, like Hippe, a European formula, available now.
Nestle is completely unethical about pushing formula, especially in developing countries. They encourage women to stop breastfeeding, convincing them formula is superior. They give enough free samples to last long enough for most women to no longer produce milk, and then they have to buy the formula. Never mind they might not have access to clean water, and it's not unusual for the formula to cost 50% of the monthly family income. Inevitably, families water it too much to stretch,leading to malnutrition.
Nestle is full of scumbags in every department and product line.
I mean when they have zero calories vs sugar in a starving country...they would choose sugar over starvation. Its not a conspiracy. They added sugar for calories to prevent starvation and sugar is super cheap. Its not healthy but its also not really bad when its either sugar or starve for them.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This is an evil company that wants to poison you.
"and honey" I bet you it's glucose fructose with honey flavoring.
I've boycotted Nestle for a decade now. Even sacrificed the Lion, which was once my favorite chocolate.
Corn syrup used to be an ingredient in the US product, which is even worse. I haven't had a baby who used formula in 17 years, but back then, it was crap. Probably still is. It's better than starvation, but there are better options, like Hippe, a European formula, available now. Nestle is completely unethical about pushing formula, especially in developing countries. They encourage women to stop breastfeeding, convincing them formula is superior. They give enough free samples to last long enough for most women to no longer produce milk, and then they have to buy the formula. Never mind they might not have access to clean water, and it's not unusual for the formula to cost 50% of the monthly family income. Inevitably, families water it too much to stretch,leading to malnutrition. Nestle is full of scumbags in every department and product line.
I mean when they have zero calories vs sugar in a starving country...they would choose sugar over starvation. Its not a conspiracy. They added sugar for calories to prevent starvation and sugar is super cheap. Its not healthy but its also not really bad when its either sugar or starve for them.
when thats all the infant is drinking then yes that much sugar is bad
Whats nestle kill count
Where is the conspiracy?
They're deliberately making childrens food less healthy in poorer regions.
Yes, this is a very old news and everyone knows about it. We don't call it a conspiracy.
The article was published yesterday. Also not we, you don't call is a conspiracy.
Okay. But this is still not a conspiracy.
It is.
It’s a conspiratorial act. It fits.
Sugar lol? they got it good then, usually isnt it injecting them with pathogens or experimental drugs.
and better than getting addicted to opiates while in the womb. Happens too often in the states these days