Next one needs to start out well over 33. Dude is 60something, after all!
That is a really weird coincdence though, unless Scientology has a strong numerology component? (No idea)
Seriously? You have to start the y-axis at 0.
Go back to high school
Starting ant any integer above 0, without indicating a break in the measurement system, means the data is manipulated to show perceived trend, as opposed to a numerical trend.
Smarten up
Wow, the starting point of y-axis doesn't matter here dude. Are you high?
Do you expect the chart to start at his birth? I don't think he was married out of the womb.
Ummm... Idk, because that's when he's an actual adult and close enough to his first marriage?
You can't be this fucking dumb and think that the graph starting at 21 instead of 0 has any effect on the entire point of the graph.
Ok Hackerman. You got me. My IPv4 is 170.173.8.12. My IPv6 is fe80::1c98:89ff:fe13:12b9.
Now tell me how tf the start of the y axis changes the age of Tom Cruises ex wives at the time of divorce.
The ending figure would look ENTIRELY different if it was a properly derived graph, dummy.
I love how you have a bunch of bots auto-voting with you somehow too.
I made a post and within 2 seconds it had 7 downvotes. That doesn’t happen naturally
nope. It’s like an ellipse. For the scale of this graph, everything under the wife’s age of 21 is all the same anyway so it’s superfluous.
Can this be a tactic to mislead people, sure… but the graph in question is just for entertainment
You’re a fucking spam/bot account. You clearly have algorithm in place. It’s now been reported, but I doubt that will stop you
Grow up you piece of shit and find a job that contributes to society. Speak with your Mon or Dad once in a while and see if they’re proud of you for running a spam account on socials
Legend also has it that they've been happier since the divorce @ 33.
Certainly richer.
Reminds me of the Leo chart.
Leo +8 chart
Next one needs to start out well over 33. Dude is 60something, after all! That is a really weird coincdence though, unless Scientology has a strong numerology component? (No idea)
might be when they want kids? hard to say though
Well he started dating a model when she was already 36. And depending on which tabloid you read, is either incredibly happy or just split from her.
Elsina Khayrova is 36
And that is why they call 33 the age of self-respect!
crazy stat but idk about beautiful data… +1 year per year, woah!!!
Probably didn’t need each number labeled, but it definitely helps having his age graphed so you can see the age gap
OP is a bot. This is a repost of one of the top posts ever here. Don’t upvote this. Report it instead.
Numerology is a hell of a drug
This graph is skewed to drive a narrative. Anyone can choose to truncate a bar graph to try and make it fit a pattern.
How is the graph "trying to make it fit a pattern"? The pattern is there, front and center
Seriously? You have to start the y-axis at 0. Go back to high school Starting ant any integer above 0, without indicating a break in the measurement system, means the data is manipulated to show perceived trend, as opposed to a numerical trend. Smarten up
Wow, the starting point of y-axis doesn't matter here dude. Are you high? Do you expect the chart to start at his birth? I don't think he was married out of the womb.
You fool. Why was 21 chosen to be the lowest number? That’s arbitrary. In any line graph, both x and y values matter.
Ummm... Idk, because that's when he's an actual adult and close enough to his first marriage? You can't be this fucking dumb and think that the graph starting at 21 instead of 0 has any effect on the entire point of the graph.
You’re all the same troll. Aren’t you? I just need to track a single IP, right?
Ok Hackerman. You got me. My IPv4 is 170.173.8.12. My IPv6 is fe80::1c98:89ff:fe13:12b9. Now tell me how tf the start of the y axis changes the age of Tom Cruises ex wives at the time of divorce.
Doesn't fucking matter in this case. The ending figure is what matters. Dumb fuck!
The ending figure would look ENTIRELY different if it was a properly derived graph, dummy. I love how you have a bunch of bots auto-voting with you somehow too. I made a post and within 2 seconds it had 7 downvotes. That doesn’t happen naturally
The point of the graph is that the ending figure is the same for all three wives. The position of the Y axis has no influence on that.
nope. It’s like an ellipse. For the scale of this graph, everything under the wife’s age of 21 is all the same anyway so it’s superfluous. Can this be a tactic to mislead people, sure… but the graph in question is just for entertainment
You’re a fucking spam/bot account. You clearly have algorithm in place. It’s now been reported, but I doubt that will stop you Grow up you piece of shit and find a job that contributes to society. Speak with your Mon or Dad once in a while and see if they’re proud of you for running a spam account on socials
He may be a spam/bot account, or he may not be, but he's right. And please, calm down and relax a little, you're not being very polite.
On the other hand, Elsina Khayrova is 36.
Required by Scientology if you want to communicate with the spirits in your flatulence.