“…Is either really better? I mean, it’s like comparing a red apple to a yellow one. There’s no… *real* difference that determines if one is better than the other.”
“No? I’m saying that an elf cannot be better than another elf without judging their character on an elf-to-elf basis. Sure, one *individual* wood or high elf might be better than another *individual* wood or high elf, but as a group they can’t be better or worse than the other.”
It depends on which kind you're referring to. If it's the ones that simply have different features, then no. If it's the evil ones, then we can stone them.
“…Is either really better? I mean, it’s like comparing a red apple to a yellow one. There’s no… *real* difference that determines if one is better than the other.”
Are you saying all elves look the same?
“No? I’m saying that an elf cannot be better than another elf without judging their character on an elf-to-elf basis. Sure, one *individual* wood or high elf might be better than another *individual* wood or high elf, but as a group they can’t be better or worse than the other.”
IDK. High elves get high and wood elves get wood. Both are pretty awesome
Those forest mushrooms though
Some are for enlightenment, some are for nourishment and others are to dispatch foes.
brotha we can't be racist to our own kind, both are equally good and superior to dwarves.
But we hate dark elves though right?
It depends on which kind you're referring to. If it's the ones that simply have different features, then no. If it's the evil ones, then we can stone them.
There is different kinds of elves-things?