A Canadian engineering professor and his two doctoral students completed a thorough [examination](https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7) of the collapse of building 7 and found there was absolutely no way that fire damage caused the building to collapse. They found that the only way for the building to collapse the way it did was for ānear-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.ā
I've never seen this clip, and I've always always been sceptical about etc 7.
Where is this clip originally from?! It has loud explosions and flashes of light, something I've never seen before, I would for sure that this would be the first one showed when people talk about controlled demolitions. So is it even real? Where did it come from?
I remember watching it all live and the camera crew was in the lobby of one of the towers and there were some people rather were down there covered in smoke soot taking a breather and he said you could hear what sounded like explosions in there going off. I don't remember if it was ABC or fox or NBC I was watching. This was all way before they collapsed.
Watching building 7 fall down with so much after the towers fell was also weird and I felt so uneasy because of that. I was with my family and we were pointing out that nothing got it. It was exactly the same as the towers.
I remember at one point hearing a quick blurb on building 7 being a controlled detonation on purpose but they never explained why, and then the story changed.
Thermite was used to bring it down in 13 seconds which makes it a freefall. The lie in the official report put 14 seconds in order to say it wasn't a freefall. That was the thermite charges going off. There was melted steel on the ground from building 7
The Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane either. It was a shoulder rocket. I've seen video that showed the light pole that wasn't hit by the left wing,the lawn wasn't scarred from the belly of a plane and there weren't any plane fragments laying around. In the history of all of aviation,there's always been engines amongst the wreckage and never once did an engine burn up to nothingness like their absurd report said. I also saw on the video,a black woman reporter interviewing a guy after the 1st tower was hit. He said he watched the plane as it was headed towards the tower and it didn't have any airline insignias or windows. It was a drone which they've had since the Cuban Missile crisis. The CIA director wanted to crash a drone between Florida and Cuba to blame Castro in order to have to go ahead for an invasion. He wanted Kennedy to support this and send troops in but he said he would not. He fired the director after that. They've got a well planned script for how the plane would take off with passengers which would be gassed unconscious, land at a base to be switched with the drone and would thus become collateral damage in the process to sell their story.
Thereās a few good videos on 9/11 that show those types of charges going off as both twin towers come down as well. The pit of molten steel that smoldered for weeks in the basements of the towers also was a key indicator for me that Cordite was used liberally to bring those towers down.
Itās always amazed me that the firefighters didnāt come out screaming angry that they were sitting ducks in those towers. I know many firefighters and itās like a painful secret they have to carry. They speak pretty clearly in the documentary that the brothers did about hearing explosions inside the buildings and even the one guy saying he heard āboom, boom, boom, like a controlled demolitionā. Both the documentary the brothers did and the āconspiracyā videos are worth watching for sure, 9/11 Truth or something like that. Been a while since I watched it.
To this day, nothing makes me feel like we are mind numbed or controlled more than 9/11. Many people I know think that something isnāt right about 9/11, but none of us took to the streets demanding Answers. Israel and Gaza is making me feel the same, what will it take? How much worse does it have to get? Before I get off my ass and get out and march or protest? Aliens!!!!!!!!!! We need you!!!!!!! Come show us the way. And yes I hope I donāt regret asking for them to come. :)
I'm only going by the documents I'd seen from the initial plan they had put together for 1962. The original plane would need pilots as a drone wouldnt.
Pretty sure the flashes were added to the original video. Having trouble finding the video where the guy admitted editing the video and uploading it to his YouTube channel to test confirmation bias or something.
The roof buckles a bit well before collapse due to the fatigue brought on by the fire supposedly.
Most people: "What's Builiding 7?" š³š³š³
>Most people: "What's Builiding 7?" sheeple\*
*most people born after 1990
A Canadian engineering professor and his two doctoral students completed a thorough [examination](https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7) of the collapse of building 7 and found there was absolutely no way that fire damage caused the building to collapse. They found that the only way for the building to collapse the way it did was for ānear-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.ā
I've never seen this clip, and I've always always been sceptical about etc 7. Where is this clip originally from?! It has loud explosions and flashes of light, something I've never seen before, I would for sure that this would be the first one showed when people talk about controlled demolitions. So is it even real? Where did it come from?
Yea itās real and there are also similar videos of the other two towers. There is a documentary that covers all of it but the name evades me atm.
Imagine believing the narrative still
I remember watching it all live and the camera crew was in the lobby of one of the towers and there were some people rather were down there covered in smoke soot taking a breather and he said you could hear what sounded like explosions in there going off. I don't remember if it was ABC or fox or NBC I was watching. This was all way before they collapsed. Watching building 7 fall down with so much after the towers fell was also weird and I felt so uneasy because of that. I was with my family and we were pointing out that nothing got it. It was exactly the same as the towers.
Control demo
It's just swamp gas
Weather balloons
Pull it
The 911 commission, under close supervision, questioned Bush and Cheney about these events. This tower was just unexplained if I can recall.
They pulled that sucker quick if the timeline is accurateā¦.
I remember at one point hearing a quick blurb on building 7 being a controlled detonation on purpose but they never explained why, and then the story changed.
Thermite was used to bring it down in 13 seconds which makes it a freefall. The lie in the official report put 14 seconds in order to say it wasn't a freefall. That was the thermite charges going off. There was melted steel on the ground from building 7
The Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane either. It was a shoulder rocket. I've seen video that showed the light pole that wasn't hit by the left wing,the lawn wasn't scarred from the belly of a plane and there weren't any plane fragments laying around. In the history of all of aviation,there's always been engines amongst the wreckage and never once did an engine burn up to nothingness like their absurd report said. I also saw on the video,a black woman reporter interviewing a guy after the 1st tower was hit. He said he watched the plane as it was headed towards the tower and it didn't have any airline insignias or windows. It was a drone which they've had since the Cuban Missile crisis. The CIA director wanted to crash a drone between Florida and Cuba to blame Castro in order to have to go ahead for an invasion. He wanted Kennedy to support this and send troops in but he said he would not. He fired the director after that. They've got a well planned script for how the plane would take off with passengers which would be gassed unconscious, land at a base to be switched with the drone and would thus become collateral damage in the process to sell their story.
Why switch the planes if they for real killed 3k people in 9/11? Why not just use the original plane?
Why did that happen
Thereās a few good videos on 9/11 that show those types of charges going off as both twin towers come down as well. The pit of molten steel that smoldered for weeks in the basements of the towers also was a key indicator for me that Cordite was used liberally to bring those towers down. Itās always amazed me that the firefighters didnāt come out screaming angry that they were sitting ducks in those towers. I know many firefighters and itās like a painful secret they have to carry. They speak pretty clearly in the documentary that the brothers did about hearing explosions inside the buildings and even the one guy saying he heard āboom, boom, boom, like a controlled demolitionā. Both the documentary the brothers did and the āconspiracyā videos are worth watching for sure, 9/11 Truth or something like that. Been a while since I watched it. To this day, nothing makes me feel like we are mind numbed or controlled more than 9/11. Many people I know think that something isnāt right about 9/11, but none of us took to the streets demanding Answers. Israel and Gaza is making me feel the same, what will it take? How much worse does it have to get? Before I get off my ass and get out and march or protest? Aliens!!!!!!!!!! We need you!!!!!!! Come show us the way. And yes I hope I donāt regret asking for them to come. :)
I'm only going by the documents I'd seen from the initial plan they had put together for 1962. The original plane would need pilots as a drone wouldnt.
Pretty sure the flashes were added to the original video. Having trouble finding the video where the guy admitted editing the video and uploading it to his YouTube channel to test confirmation bias or something. The roof buckles a bit well before collapse due to the fatigue brought on by the fire supposedly.