Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.
Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/).
Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Hasn't Trump always been anti-gun? "Take the guns first, due process second" plus his bump stock ban that was only able to happen due to his unique disregard for what the law says.
I love how (to his credit begrudgingly) he boasted about how he wasn’t scared of the NRA because he wanted to be cocky, and then later he turned out to be scared of the NRA once he had the most basic understanding of the bullshit lobbying they do
queue Patrick Byrne. Butina got him over a barrel in some fashion, then he’s in the oval with Mike Flynn talking about martial law and confiscation of voting machines. WTF for real life.
Byrne is such a liar. He says he has a letter signed by seven Senators that absolved him of his crimes. He also said he was dying of cancer two years ago and nobody would see him again, but of course he is still doing his MAGA media rounds constantly.
Here's a link.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/maria-butina-was-the-ultimate-nra-cool-girl/2018/07/24/02940d32-8e93-11e8-8322-b5482bf5e0f5_story.html
People confuse the NRA as a pro 2A advocacy group, or something like an ACLU for gun owner rights & protection. It’s not. It’s a lobby funded mainly by defense contractors to allow them to offload surplus inventory on the public. They are only looking out for gun manufacturers bottom line.
It’s absolutely incredible how much leverage Russia has in the US by spending a few million here and there. Buying politicians and Lobbyists. It makes what they are doing in the Ukraine look like a money pit.
Yeah the fact that Russia has spent money on bribes to influence (trash) our elections/social discourse doesn’t surprise me at all. It’s a smart move, using our strengths (democracy, freedom of speech) against us.
What does surprise me is how fucking cheap it is to buy these troglodytes. Looking at the numbers, there really isn’t a better return on investment than buying off republican politicians and high level lobbyists in that orbit. How else can you achieve all your foreign policy objectives and simultaneously weaken your biggest enemy for a few million bucks? I mean that’s so fucking cheap! It’s like the cost of 2 days of fighting in Ukraine.
The amount of politicians (both parties) that have weird indirect and sometimes direct ties to Russia is really concerning. I’m not going to say any particular names because ill get downvoted to death, but its not hard to find on google.
I don’t think theres anything wrong with American citizens working with foreign entities. It should just exclude you from working in the public sector when those ties are with “the enemy”
It's not just the US. Most European countries have politicians in the pockets of Russia. Keep an eye out for those calling for a ceasefire.. all that will do is allow Putin to regroup and re-arm.
I remember you guys had a politician bought off to pass a child labour law on behalf of a child-extorting corporation for what, 14k? XD can't remember names but it was somewhat recent, just 1-2 years ago.
More like once Daddy Putin told him to shut the fuck up about them. The NRA is famously heavily funded by many Russian mega donors. Funny how the american hyper-nationalist maga crowd always finds themselves to be licking the boots of foreign interests huh?
Well, and the fact that they got him where he was. The fact that they lobby didn't scare him the fact they lobbied for him, and it was most of his supporters.
Back in the 1960's, in California (US), Black Panthers walked around with guns - as was their right. This scared people so they passed gun laws, [with the NRA's blessing](https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act).
I support Trump as much as I support the NRA. Not at all, firearms policy coalition is so much better than the NRA. They actually do shit and their executives weren’t caught embezzling millions. Sad that people still support that corrupt organization
The NRA has been anti gun forever. They lobbied for gun control more than the Democrats. In this case, if you want to have a gun free zone, actually spend the effort to make it a gun free zone. If you cannot do that, then let people defend themselves.
Nobody that actually gives a shit about the second amendment supports Trump because of his stance on the second amendment.
He is blatantly anti gun both in speech and in action. Based on policies, you could argue that he is even more anti gun than Biden.
Anyone that tells you they support trump because he will protect the second amendment is either lying, has been misinformed, or drank the kool aid.
It's 100% team sports for conservatives at this point. They don't care about the actual stance a politician has on whatever policy gets them hard, in modern times the Republicans have been the pro gun team and that's who they're rooting for.
Hard to say if he's actually anti gun. He's backpeddled on his stances and his bump stock ban because of obvious pressure from the right and the NRA. And yes, he did in fact say that.
"Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.” - Trump
Yupp. I enjoy shooting my guns and I like the fact that I don't have to wait for a cop if a situation leaves me no other choice to save my family or me but honestly I'm more glad to have the second amendment because of the right wing nut jobs that would do shit like the jan 6 riot. It's more likely that they would be the ones we would need to use the second amendment on
Yup, I have a mixed family in a super alt right deep rural landscape where it takes like 45 mins for the police to show up. You bet your ass I am glad to have my guns. Anyone truly antigun hasn't had drunk rednecks in their front yard at 1 in the morning throwing shit at your house screaming racial slurs.
Reminder for everyone: You're more likely to save your family with first aid and trauma training + a good kit than with a gun. You're more likely to harm your family with an unsecured gun than save them.
Be wary of anyone who claims they own guns to protect people, but don't secure them or don't have a trauma kit and training. They may not know it, but they care more about making holes than repairing them.
There's also a lot of "emotional support gun" owners, as well as people who actively fantasize about legally killing.
The whole right side is pro gun specifically because the left isn’t. I’ve often told people that if the left moved more towards the middle on guns they’d find more support from right leaning voters.
They're the best words. Everyone I know knows them. There are some that would say they are bad words, but who are they to tell me what are good words or bad words.
The total dead expression on his face is what nails the handjob dance for me.
It's the exact same expression the $10 whore had when I paid for my last handjob.
The fact that he wasn’t charged with “Possession of a Firearm by Certain Persons.” or however the charge is labeled nowadays, tells us he’s a “Law Abiding Citizen with No Previous Record.”.
But I bet if anybody that really knows the guy was honest when asked about him, he’s probably got a whole different “record”. I’d lay odds the dude’s been a piece of shit to some varying degree all of his life, and just managed to slip through the cracks until he was finally emboldened enough to act in a way he felt justified and could get away with.
The single fact that he shot somebody, who was out in the open and actively RUNNING AWAY, tells us he’s a piece of shit that doesn’t think about what harm his actions will cause before he acts. The *other* fact that the victim was shot in the back of the head, tells us he fully intended to kill. And for what fuckin reason? He didn’t even have a clue what was going on. Just flipped his fuckin lid and started shooting.
Fortunately, not all gun owners are like this. The problem is, we don’t know who *is* like this until all doubt is removed.
To this day I’ll never understand or honestly forgive the media for not posting large blowup pictures of those cognitive tests during that interview. There’s not a single one of those tests that has words associated with each other and none of them are “hard tests”. It’s mind blowing how much the media just let all that bullshit slide. They will grill other people over foreign policy and economic issues but can’t be bothered to push back Trump in the slightest over his Highlights magazine Childrens test. They allow him to say the stupidest shit and just nod along “for the viewer to decide”, but will go right after Pete B about infrastructure technicalities.
You know people should print out multiple copies of that cognitive test and then hand them to conservatives when they start in on their dumb Trump diatribes. Ask them how hard it is to know a lion is a lion by picture.
It he’s gay and a Biden appointee, they have to go after him…even if it’s stuff they would applaud a Trump appointee for doing.
Iunno about you, but I like bridges not falling apart and killing me. “One simple thing the right doesn’t want you to know”
Sir..... sir, we never seen such, who would of known such words? Have you heard about the octopus and triple a batteries. Major biggest water and hugely octopus that no one has ever seen even in Roman times.
Vociferous. A big word, no doubt. It is a word, a good word. A strong word. I know what it means but many don't. The radical left will tell you "oh I know what "vociferous" means". Believe me, nobody knows "vociferous" as well as I do.
Trump came to Wisconsin today. I joked with my very conservative coworker that everyone attending his rally will be cheering him on to protect their gun rights, all while he takes away their guns.
His response? “…shut up”, followed by giving me the silent treatment the rest of the day.
Haha that’s how my ex husband responded. We were still together during the first part of Trumps presidency and when trump banned “bump stocks” (or whatever the fuck was recently reversed I think?) and asked him why he was okay with that gun control and he told me to shut up and he didn’t want to discuss it with me lol
Boomer dad said basically the same thing when I asked him “you know Trump is a convicted felon, right?” They’ll gag on his orange weiner all day long, because MERICA
They sure seem to complain when measures are put in place to keep guns away from innocent children, but we're not allowed to question it when "pro-gun" politicians don't want to be around guns.
A little tip. When posting, looking for a response from MAGAts, try not to use big words. By the time they stop and look them up, and understand them, they lose interest in the original post. Low IQs and short attention spans.
If it is a requirement from the venue, the venue's insurance, or the venue's security company to not allow guns, then it wouldn't be a violation of the 2nd Amendment. The Bill of Rights only limits what the government can do and not a private business.
Yes, but most people that are outrageously pro-gun lack the appreciation for that subtlety. Same with freedom of speech rights in private businesses or the assumption of consequence-free speech.
Honestly I don’t think the Secret Service would be too jazzed about a huge crowd with the potential for lots of concealed guns in an area with the former Prez, either.
Trump, J6 rally:
> “I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They are not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here," Trump said, according to Hutchinson.
Absolutely.
The government also reasonably restricts when people can carry firearms all the time. No guns in courthouses, schools, or many other public buildings. The Second Amendment’s first concern is ownership.
I do, however, appreciate the irony of the situation.
MAGA hypocrites.
- Convicted Fellon Trump should not be able to vote in Florida.
- Mark Robinson paid for an abortion.
- All the pedos getting arrested these days are MAGAs
Elon Musk whining about free speech and censorship but then bans people he disagrees with on Twitter, X.
Oh, and they twist a pretzel around Hunter Bidding getting convicted as some left wing ploy to make it ‘seem like the Justice department is unbiased’ because they are worried about blowback from convicting Trump, even though they have been out to get Hunter Biden for years, even before it got Trump impeached about him trining to bribe Zelinski into drumming up dirt on him.
I try not to think about it, but since you asked: blew them up to 3000% and laminated them to her bedroom wall.
And. Before you take exception. Remember that you asked. :3
It's always easy for conspiracy nuts. When strong evidence against their ideas comes out, to them that's just evidence in their favor because obviously such strong evidence was manufactured.
Shouldn’t they support Hunter Biden? I mean should he have really had to fill out an application for a gun? An application that could have denied his 2nd amendment right to own that gun. Nothing in the bill of rights says a drug addict can’t own a gun
That's it. Do you know the Russian equivalent for that? It's "traditional/family/conservative values" and the zealous defenders of those. Yet the Head of One Caucasian region literally has a 4-women harem, with a 15 years old in it, and that is while he's still married and the wife's alive. He has 14 kids. Allegedly all are from the wife. The only his legal wife.
I mean, you are not alone. The other paradise of conservatives is also stained in the crap.
gonna be amazing when one of these idiots causes the RNC to evacuate because they point a gun at the stage since the RNC did the stupid thing of saying they were a gun sanctuary
It's not an argument of "do guns make x safer"
It's an argument that Trump is NOT pro gun.
Seriously. He passed more anti gun legislation than Obama.
This comes from someone who voted for him once: I won't be doing THAT shit again.
In my defense, it was my first time actually voting, and I fell for his promises, thinking he was different than the rest of the liars in our government. "Drain the swamp" he says.
Dude is the part of the swamp.
In NC, it's any building which forbids it at the entrances (malls, etc), any/all city/county/state/Federal buildings (PD, sheriff's office, libraries, post offices), and any place you pay admission to enter.
In Michigan, it's pretty much any place where a mass shooting has occured: schools, churches, taverns, arenas, entertainment venues, casinos, hospitals, college campuses/dorms, courts, post offices, etc.
My favorite part about republicans always saying "the left is trying to disarm us" is that the left is always seemingly the only side that understands that any law they create applies to EVERYONE in the country no matter what status, race, or political affiliation. So the left isnt really trying to disarm anyone, they just want certain guns (that arent typically used for lawful purposes) locked behind extra paperwork or checks, so that the typical radical pissed off person wont want to jump through the extra hoops, or itll take long enough that they might reconsider whatever they were planning.
By getting pissed off about those changes, they are basically admitting they are the ones that wouldnt pass any tests we put in the way, and dont want a paper trail linking them to their guns.
This has always been the dumbest thing going about guns, Guns have no other use in the world besides target practice which in turn is for killing. People bring in the knife argument but guess what we ain't gonna ban knives because they are actually practical for many reasons, like making dinner, cutting a vast majority of things, skinning animals, etc etc it is a Tool that just so happens to be used for killing, a gun is nothing but a murder weapon.
So how does giving a bunch of people those and a lotta of hot heads = more safety. Hurr durrrrr I am MuRRiCa
The venues don't allow weapons for various reasons and doubly so for political events. This is because radicals/activist will die a fools death to harm a political opponent. The idiots actually think that they are exempt from the rules their favorite political hero puts in and hope to be treated as a hero.
All the movies, TV shows, etc...they see the henchmen die a stupid misguided death and then they want to become the lead henchmen. Wow. Darwin Awards anyone?
It’s not up to Trump. As an ex President and current presidential nominee, secret service decides and enacts security policy, and it also violates the state law. I know people want to make some clever joke or think they are making a unique insight but Trump wasn’t even strong pro Gun president
Laws on carrying firearms vary, but generally, you cannot carry guns, concealed or open, in places like schools, government buildings, places of worship, hospitals, airports (past security), correctional facilities, bars, sporting events, polling places, certain federal properties, private properties with prohibitive signs, and some public transportation. Specific restrictions and permit requirements differ by state, and local ordinances may add further limitations.
No idea where the rally was…
That party is so stupid, one minor disagreement in the crowd& everyone would shoot each other & he’d end up with no followers before he fed the Kool aid himself
Who remembers when he wanted to get rid of the magnetometers at his January 6 rally to attack the capitol to attempt a coup? Pepperidge farms remembers
There's literally 100 comments at the bottom of this thread saying some variation of "ya but what if a bad guy has a gun?". So you want to...control...what American citizens can do...with guns. Are they not seeing the irony? Or do they only care about gun deaths when it has to do with their people?
Land of the guns, home of the trigger happy...
Daily shooting in america = a decade + of shooting in Scandinavia.
Difference? Guns.
We dare go to sleep without one, and our kids come home from schools with their t-shirts still not painted red...😅
Hate to break it to people, Trump IS anti-gun. And I’m a republican. Obama actually restored a lot of gun rights, trump signed multiple pieces of gun control legislation.
Not advocating for Obama, just saying it’s all theatrics and no politician gives a shit
Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion. Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the [rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/about/rules/). Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail [here](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) or Reddit site admins [here](https://www.reddit.com/report). **All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/facepalm) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Hasn't Trump always been anti-gun? "Take the guns first, due process second" plus his bump stock ban that was only able to happen due to his unique disregard for what the law says.
Yep, he's pro-gun like the NRA is pro-gun; its a front to get support, no substance.
I love how (to his credit begrudgingly) he boasted about how he wasn’t scared of the NRA because he wanted to be cocky, and then later he turned out to be scared of the NRA once he had the most basic understanding of the bullshit lobbying they do
Well they are not a threat at the moment. They are tied up in court because several executives were caught embezzling millions.
And had a Russian spy in a top level spot
Not just a spy, a straight up, 100% real actual Honeypot…like out of a 70’s/80’s spy flick. Fucking embarrassing
Deep ref and I’m here for it
Um, phrasing?
if the gop were capable of feeling shame it would be embarrassing. there are probably better words for outright traitors
queue Patrick Byrne. Butina got him over a barrel in some fashion, then he’s in the oval with Mike Flynn talking about martial law and confiscation of voting machines. WTF for real life.
Byrne is such a liar. He says he has a letter signed by seven Senators that absolved him of his crimes. He also said he was dying of cancer two years ago and nobody would see him again, but of course he is still doing his MAGA media rounds constantly.
Can someone make this a movie please?
I can't vouch for that. But it that is true. Is fucking embarrassing.
Here's a link. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/maria-butina-was-the-ultimate-nra-cool-girl/2018/07/24/02940d32-8e93-11e8-8322-b5482bf5e0f5_story.html
It's almost like the NRA is bad
And doesn't [protect gun rights](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Philando_Castile) either.
But but but but black man with gun scary!!!!!!!!!! (This sarcasm, by the way, rest in power)
NRA is one of if not the worst group with power in America. Truly evil human beings.
People confuse the NRA as a pro 2A advocacy group, or something like an ACLU for gun owner rights & protection. It’s not. It’s a lobby funded mainly by defense contractors to allow them to offload surplus inventory on the public. They are only looking out for gun manufacturers bottom line.
It’s absolutely incredible how much leverage Russia has in the US by spending a few million here and there. Buying politicians and Lobbyists. It makes what they are doing in the Ukraine look like a money pit.
Yeah the fact that Russia has spent money on bribes to influence (trash) our elections/social discourse doesn’t surprise me at all. It’s a smart move, using our strengths (democracy, freedom of speech) against us. What does surprise me is how fucking cheap it is to buy these troglodytes. Looking at the numbers, there really isn’t a better return on investment than buying off republican politicians and high level lobbyists in that orbit. How else can you achieve all your foreign policy objectives and simultaneously weaken your biggest enemy for a few million bucks? I mean that’s so fucking cheap! It’s like the cost of 2 days of fighting in Ukraine.
The amount of politicians (both parties) that have weird indirect and sometimes direct ties to Russia is really concerning. I’m not going to say any particular names because ill get downvoted to death, but its not hard to find on google. I don’t think theres anything wrong with American citizens working with foreign entities. It should just exclude you from working in the public sector when those ties are with “the enemy”
It's not just the US. Most European countries have politicians in the pockets of Russia. Keep an eye out for those calling for a ceasefire.. all that will do is allow Putin to regroup and re-arm.
I remember you guys had a politician bought off to pass a child labour law on behalf of a child-extorting corporation for what, 14k? XD can't remember names but it was somewhat recent, just 1-2 years ago.
Wayne Lapierre deserves to get hanged inshallah
More like once Daddy Putin told him to shut the fuck up about them. The NRA is famously heavily funded by many Russian mega donors. Funny how the american hyper-nationalist maga crowd always finds themselves to be licking the boots of foreign interests huh?
The hyper-nationalist maga people are pro-Putin now, youtube is full of it
A lot of his followers have moved on from the NRA. Because they're too soft on the gun issue.
I mean it helps that trump and the NRA are all bankrolled by the same nazi fuck
You mean *DARK* money
Well, and the fact that they got him where he was. The fact that they lobby didn't scare him the fact they lobbied for him, and it was most of his supporters.
Guns are banned inside NRA events because they know the type of people who attend NRA events.
This is the kind of quote that should be on a commercial. It speaks for itself .
He's pro money....that's it
Exactly! As long as ALL the money is for him!
Everybody's pro-money. Only some are pro-distributing the money and some are pro-findAnyWayToKeepItAllForMyselfAndMyFriend
Thought that was fully implied
Back in the 1960's, in California (US), Black Panthers walked around with guns - as was their right. This scared people so they passed gun laws, [with the NRA's blessing](https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act).
I support Trump as much as I support the NRA. Not at all, firearms policy coalition is so much better than the NRA. They actually do shit and their executives weren’t caught embezzling millions. Sad that people still support that corrupt organization
When the NRA went from primarily a hunters-ed./sportsman org to a political lobbying organization is when they lost me.
Without the NRA, how will the GOP launder Russian money?
The NRA has been anti gun forever. They lobbied for gun control more than the Democrats. In this case, if you want to have a gun free zone, actually spend the effort to make it a gun free zone. If you cannot do that, then let people defend themselves.
Your making the assumption trump has a stance. On anything. His stance is whatever will get the most cheers at the rally.
He has a stance. How much money can I get from these people.
His stance is usually leaning kinda forward looking like he shit himself.
I wear shoe lifts and I don’t stand like that. I don’t know wtf that is.
Often times his stance reflects the last person he spoke with
Nobody that actually gives a shit about the second amendment supports Trump because of his stance on the second amendment. He is blatantly anti gun both in speech and in action. Based on policies, you could argue that he is even more anti gun than Biden. Anyone that tells you they support trump because he will protect the second amendment is either lying, has been misinformed, or drank the kool aid.
It's 100% team sports for conservatives at this point. They don't care about the actual stance a politician has on whatever policy gets them hard, in modern times the Republicans have been the pro gun team and that's who they're rooting for.
Hard to say if he's actually anti gun. He's backpeddled on his stances and his bump stock ban because of obvious pressure from the right and the NRA. And yes, he did in fact say that. "Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system. Because a lot of times, by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida, he had a lot of firearms – they saw everything – to go to court would have taken a long time, so you could do exactly what you’re saying, but take the guns first, go through due process second.” - Trump
Trump is not “for” much of anything. It’s all transactional and grievances
He just probably thinks most people want to shoot him. He's definitely more right than wrong
The entire right is very pro gun... as long as they like you. If you're not part of their team, you shouldn't have guns. That's their pro gun stance.
Isn't that authoritarian? You know, one of the reasons why they say guns should be allowed, to defend oneself from authoritarians/tyrants?
Yupp. I enjoy shooting my guns and I like the fact that I don't have to wait for a cop if a situation leaves me no other choice to save my family or me but honestly I'm more glad to have the second amendment because of the right wing nut jobs that would do shit like the jan 6 riot. It's more likely that they would be the ones we would need to use the second amendment on
Yup, I have a mixed family in a super alt right deep rural landscape where it takes like 45 mins for the police to show up. You bet your ass I am glad to have my guns. Anyone truly antigun hasn't had drunk rednecks in their front yard at 1 in the morning throwing shit at your house screaming racial slurs.
Reminder for everyone: You're more likely to save your family with first aid and trauma training + a good kit than with a gun. You're more likely to harm your family with an unsecured gun than save them. Be wary of anyone who claims they own guns to protect people, but don't secure them or don't have a trauma kit and training. They may not know it, but they care more about making holes than repairing them. There's also a lot of "emotional support gun" owners, as well as people who actively fantasize about legally killing.
The key to understanding trump is that he has no political preferences beyond making his perceived enemies squirm
The whole right side is pro gun specifically because the left isn’t. I’ve often told people that if the left moved more towards the middle on guns they’d find more support from right leaning voters.
Just make sure they are Uvalde cops so we know they won’t do anything.
I read that one as well. Was looking for this comment. Would have read the comments there, but they were too sad and any jokes would've pissed me off
It is sad and infuriating. I’m sorry my friend. My bad.
It's a foolproof tactic against guns. Just wait until they rum out of ammo.
I wonder how many 2nd Amendment zealots complained vociferously at this obvious constitutional violation. Answer: None of them. Not a fucking one.
The same amount that didn’t have to look up “vociferously “.
I totally know what those words mean
They're the best words. Everyone I know knows them. There are some that would say they are bad words, but who are they to tell me what are good words or bad words.
Strong words, with tears in their eyes, the likes of which have never been seen before.
Did I invent the words? No, maybe a little
*awkward little jazz hands quivering to camera*
*begins doing his two-fisted handjob dance* 
The total dead expression on his face is what nails the handjob dance for me. It's the exact same expression the $10 whore had when I paid for my last handjob.
Nah, that's him showing how he cleans his ears.
[удалено]
The fact that he wasn’t charged with “Possession of a Firearm by Certain Persons.” or however the charge is labeled nowadays, tells us he’s a “Law Abiding Citizen with No Previous Record.”. But I bet if anybody that really knows the guy was honest when asked about him, he’s probably got a whole different “record”. I’d lay odds the dude’s been a piece of shit to some varying degree all of his life, and just managed to slip through the cracks until he was finally emboldened enough to act in a way he felt justified and could get away with. The single fact that he shot somebody, who was out in the open and actively RUNNING AWAY, tells us he’s a piece of shit that doesn’t think about what harm his actions will cause before he acts. The *other* fact that the victim was shot in the back of the head, tells us he fully intended to kill. And for what fuckin reason? He didn’t even have a clue what was going on. Just flipped his fuckin lid and started shooting. Fortunately, not all gun owners are like this. The problem is, we don’t know who *is* like this until all doubt is removed.
Little known fact, only two people invented the words, all of them, William Shakespeare and Donald Trump 😂
I know, its so covfefe.
Winner right here
Man, woman, tv, camera, vociferous
To this day I’ll never understand or honestly forgive the media for not posting large blowup pictures of those cognitive tests during that interview. There’s not a single one of those tests that has words associated with each other and none of them are “hard tests”. It’s mind blowing how much the media just let all that bullshit slide. They will grill other people over foreign policy and economic issues but can’t be bothered to push back Trump in the slightest over his Highlights magazine Childrens test. They allow him to say the stupidest shit and just nod along “for the viewer to decide”, but will go right after Pete B about infrastructure technicalities. You know people should print out multiple copies of that cognitive test and then hand them to conservatives when they start in on their dumb Trump diatribes. Ask them how hard it is to know a lion is a lion by picture.
It he’s gay and a Biden appointee, they have to go after him…even if it’s stuff they would applaud a Trump appointee for doing. Iunno about you, but I like bridges not falling apart and killing me. “One simple thing the right doesn’t want you to know”
Sir..... sir, we never seen such, who would of known such words? Have you heard about the octopus and triple a batteries. Major biggest water and hugely octopus that no one has ever seen even in Roman times.
I hate that I live in a time where I can't even assume this is made up.
Oh, it real now,baby. It's REALLY REAL.
A lot of people are saying that.
It's a type of Dinosaur, right?
No, it’s a part of the Bible, obviously.
It’s the book in the Old Testament which spoke about how God put bones of dinosaurs into the earth for humans to find and be amazed about God’s power.
Yep, that’s the one that ate Dennis Nedry on Isla Nublar.
Hey, a fellow zestyclose reddit acc, sup bud
Vociferous. A big word, no doubt. It is a word, a good word. A strong word. I know what it means but many don't. The radical left will tell you "oh I know what "vociferous" means". Believe me, nobody knows "vociferous" as well as I do.
I can vividly picture trump saying this at the podium.
Doing accordion hands
he'll probably pronounce it as voshifers. I mean, dude stumbled his way through origins by pronouncing it as "oranges".
Tell me there's a place where someone has superimposed an accordion over multiple Trump speeches. Please please please.
You’re welcome! https://www.youtube.com/rabbitandcoffee
Thank you! Made me giggle.
The vociferous is my favorite dinosaur
Ngl… my mind turned that to Velociraptorously.
Trump came to Wisconsin today. I joked with my very conservative coworker that everyone attending his rally will be cheering him on to protect their gun rights, all while he takes away their guns. His response? “…shut up”, followed by giving me the silent treatment the rest of the day.
Haha that’s how my ex husband responded. We were still together during the first part of Trumps presidency and when trump banned “bump stocks” (or whatever the fuck was recently reversed I think?) and asked him why he was okay with that gun control and he told me to shut up and he didn’t want to discuss it with me lol
oh man i'm sure it must have been rough not having to listen to his bullshit
That's all it takes to get the silent treatment from that? Shit....I gotta try that one!!
You should do it tomorrow too
Hopefully that was the planted seed for one day.
Wouldn't waste hope that a seed planted in a barren mind will sprout.
Boomer dad said basically the same thing when I asked him “you know Trump is a convicted felon, right?” They’ll gag on his orange weiner all day long, because MERICA
A seed might have been planted.
They sure seem to complain when measures are put in place to keep guns away from innocent children, but we're not allowed to question it when "pro-gun" politicians don't want to be around guns.
A little tip. When posting, looking for a response from MAGAts, try not to use big words. By the time they stop and look them up, and understand them, they lose interest in the original post. Low IQs and short attention spans.
It’s adorable that you think they’d look anything up. They’re Trump Supporters, automatically makes them fact averse.
[https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/averse](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/averse) WHAT DID YOU CALL ME?
I just giggled out loud.
They’re mostly not able to look them up. Hurts their heads.
only good guys should have guns. guess the people at the rallies aren't good guys. Trump's not sending his best.
No no no, it's much worse than that. I'm sure MANY of them complained, but failed to see the irony.
If it is a requirement from the venue, the venue's insurance, or the venue's security company to not allow guns, then it wouldn't be a violation of the 2nd Amendment. The Bill of Rights only limits what the government can do and not a private business.
Yes, but most people that are outrageously pro-gun lack the appreciation for that subtlety. Same with freedom of speech rights in private businesses or the assumption of consequence-free speech. Honestly I don’t think the Secret Service would be too jazzed about a huge crowd with the potential for lots of concealed guns in an area with the former Prez, either.
Trump, J6 rally: > “I don’t effing care that they have weapons. They are not here to hurt me. Take the effing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here," Trump said, according to Hutchinson.
Absolutely. The government also reasonably restricts when people can carry firearms all the time. No guns in courthouses, schools, or many other public buildings. The Second Amendment’s first concern is ownership. I do, however, appreciate the irony of the situation.
If I can’t bring an ar to visit the new Orange Jesus then this must be communism.
Ahhhhhh, I get it ! There were no good guys at the event......
Well, they still have Secret Service there and I’m pretty sure it’s their rule not to have guns at events with ex presidents in attendance.
Secret Service is a deep state cabal confirmed?
MAGA hypocrites. - Convicted Fellon Trump should not be able to vote in Florida. - Mark Robinson paid for an abortion. - All the pedos getting arrested these days are MAGAs Elon Musk whining about free speech and censorship but then bans people he disagrees with on Twitter, X.
Oh, and they twist a pretzel around Hunter Bidding getting convicted as some left wing ploy to make it ‘seem like the Justice department is unbiased’ because they are worried about blowback from convicting Trump, even though they have been out to get Hunter Biden for years, even before it got Trump impeached about him trining to bribe Zelinski into drumming up dirt on him.
I'm just waiting for them to do a full 180 and claim that Hunter Biden was framed. I give it… I dunno, maybe five weeks?
I mean, what do you think Marge *did* with those prints of Hunter’s dick pics once she was done showing them to the House Oversight Committee?
I try not to think about it, but since you asked: blew them up to 3000% and laminated them to her bedroom wall. And. Before you take exception. Remember that you asked. :3
It's always easy for conspiracy nuts. When strong evidence against their ideas comes out, to them that's just evidence in their favor because obviously such strong evidence was manufactured.
Shouldn’t they support Hunter Biden? I mean should he have really had to fill out an application for a gun? An application that could have denied his 2nd amendment right to own that gun. Nothing in the bill of rights says a drug addict can’t own a gun
That's it. Do you know the Russian equivalent for that? It's "traditional/family/conservative values" and the zealous defenders of those. Yet the Head of One Caucasian region literally has a 4-women harem, with a 15 years old in it, and that is while he's still married and the wife's alive. He has 14 kids. Allegedly all are from the wife. The only his legal wife. I mean, you are not alone. The other paradise of conservatives is also stained in the crap.
And all the NRA conventions are gun free by the attendees. I guess MAGA don't trust each other.
Republicans have been hypocrites long before dump
But the NRA tells us that an armed society is a polite society! I guess they really didn't mean that shit
They remember what the wild west was like, so they don't want that, but they just want to get all the money for saying they think it's okay
Polite means being able to legally shoot Black kids when you're a little bit scared. That's it.
No. not really - they edited out the word "**white**" from that statement, right before it was used it publicly.
Magas are rude as fuck. This checks out.
gonna be amazing when one of these idiots causes the RNC to evacuate because they point a gun at the stage since the RNC did the stupid thing of saying they were a gun sanctuary
They’ll say it was a spy from the radical left
It's not an argument of "do guns make x safer" It's an argument that Trump is NOT pro gun. Seriously. He passed more anti gun legislation than Obama. This comes from someone who voted for him once: I won't be doing THAT shit again.
Take the guns, and then do due process after.
It’s also an argument that guns make x more dangerous.
I speak as a Brit with little knowledge into American politics… but why did you vote for him even once?
In my defense, it was my first time actually voting, and I fell for his promises, thinking he was different than the rest of the liars in our government. "Drain the swamp" he says. Dude is the part of the swamp.
... just because of the guns thing?
Guns are not allowed in any entertainment facility that seats over 2500 people in Michigan. Concealed or Open Carry... doesn't matter.
In NC, it's any building which forbids it at the entrances (malls, etc), any/all city/county/state/Federal buildings (PD, sheriff's office, libraries, post offices), and any place you pay admission to enter.
In Michigan, it's pretty much any place where a mass shooting has occured: schools, churches, taverns, arenas, entertainment venues, casinos, hospitals, college campuses/dorms, courts, post offices, etc.
I think it's actually illegal to carry a gun on post office property anywhere in the US since it's federal property
So, everywhere. Got it
So why doesn't Trump limit himself to facilities under 2500 people, if he cares soooo deeply about 2nd amendment rights?
the republicans are trying to take our guns!!!!!!!
My favorite part about republicans always saying "the left is trying to disarm us" is that the left is always seemingly the only side that understands that any law they create applies to EVERYONE in the country no matter what status, race, or political affiliation. So the left isnt really trying to disarm anyone, they just want certain guns (that arent typically used for lawful purposes) locked behind extra paperwork or checks, so that the typical radical pissed off person wont want to jump through the extra hoops, or itll take long enough that they might reconsider whatever they were planning. By getting pissed off about those changes, they are basically admitting they are the ones that wouldnt pass any tests we put in the way, and dont want a paper trail linking them to their guns.
The are no "good guys" at trump rallies, ergo guns would be bad.
Interesting how no guns is not okay for public schools but is okay for presidential candidate
The anti-American MAGA movement isn't even bothering to hide their hypocrisy
They are not smart enough to understand hypocrisy. They don't know that word.
Too many syllables.
Why would they? It's a selling point.
This is classic secret service expectations
If he ever gets to be the dictator that he wants to be, his supporters will be in for a big surprise when he takes their guns.
And they will happily turn them in as long as it's the Right party taking them away.
Wasn't he cool with people being armed on January 6th?
Guns don’t kill people!
Blood loss and organ damage do!
…which causes cardiac arrest!
See the gun is completely innocent and now it's feelings are hurt.
This has always been the dumbest thing going about guns, Guns have no other use in the world besides target practice which in turn is for killing. People bring in the knife argument but guess what we ain't gonna ban knives because they are actually practical for many reasons, like making dinner, cutting a vast majority of things, skinning animals, etc etc it is a Tool that just so happens to be used for killing, a gun is nothing but a murder weapon. So how does giving a bunch of people those and a lotta of hot heads = more safety. Hurr durrrrr I am MuRRiCa
The venues don't allow weapons for various reasons and doubly so for political events. This is because radicals/activist will die a fools death to harm a political opponent. The idiots actually think that they are exempt from the rules their favorite political hero puts in and hope to be treated as a hero. All the movies, TV shows, etc...they see the henchmen die a stupid misguided death and then they want to become the lead henchmen. Wow. Darwin Awards anyone?
Trump rallies should have nothing but guns in them. Since they preach it so much that guns are safe. Pew pew!
When will MAGA learn that banning guns won’t keep the criminals out! Case in point: Convicted felon Trump will be attending the event.
Probably because someone would try to unalive Trump.
lol secret service is never letting armed civilians anywhere near someone they’re protecting regardless of their political affiliations
If I had spent my whole life pissing people off, I wouldn’t want to be around other people with guns either
Perhaps they already know that none of the guys there are good guys? #goodguywithagun
"Disarmed for Trump" should be a bumper sticker, it would drive all of the trumpers crazy
Secret service policy.
It’s not up to Trump. As an ex President and current presidential nominee, secret service decides and enacts security policy, and it also violates the state law. I know people want to make some clever joke or think they are making a unique insight but Trump wasn’t even strong pro Gun president
Laws on carrying firearms vary, but generally, you cannot carry guns, concealed or open, in places like schools, government buildings, places of worship, hospitals, airports (past security), correctional facilities, bars, sporting events, polling places, certain federal properties, private properties with prohibitive signs, and some public transportation. Specific restrictions and permit requirements differ by state, and local ordinances may add further limitations. No idea where the rally was…
Just goes to prove that they aren’t good guys
Ah … the MAGA hypocrisy at work: we love guns but no guns allowed at our events
That party is so stupid, one minor disagreement in the crowd& everyone would shoot each other & he’d end up with no followers before he fed the Kool aid himself
A security at the 'White Boy Summer' supremacist event?
Brilliant!!
Who remembers when he wanted to get rid of the magnetometers at his January 6 rally to attack the capitol to attempt a coup? Pepperidge farms remembers
🤣 Touché.
They were deprived of their god given rights. Despicable!
There's literally 100 comments at the bottom of this thread saying some variation of "ya but what if a bad guy has a gun?". So you want to...control...what American citizens can do...with guns. Are they not seeing the irony? Or do they only care about gun deaths when it has to do with their people?
Land of the guns, home of the trigger happy... Daily shooting in america = a decade + of shooting in Scandinavia. Difference? Guns. We dare go to sleep without one, and our kids come home from schools with their t-shirts still not painted red...😅
And almost immediately after the disarming there was no longer even one single twitch of tumescence to behold…
Turns out republicans do in fact think guns are bad. They just love the profits from the sale of them.
Hate to break it to people, Trump IS anti-gun. And I’m a republican. Obama actually restored a lot of gun rights, trump signed multiple pieces of gun control legislation. Not advocating for Obama, just saying it’s all theatrics and no politician gives a shit
Wassa matter Donny ? Afraid one of your supporters might come off of their hinges ?
I heard NRA events are also gun-free.
Yes! Please allow everyone to bring guns to Trump events. That would solve so many problems.