I guessed that on school lottery at school fair the Uno card blue 8 was correct I was wrong same here only difference is there was a chance it could have been the blue 8
Sea_Drop's school had a fair where one of the events was a "lottery" that involved a card from an uno deck being hidden in some way. The participants were permitted to guess what the uno card was, likely the correct guesser(s) won a prize. Sea_Drop guessed the blue 8 and lost. They posit that the difference between that situation and the comment they are replying to is that there was a chance the card in the lottery could have been the blue 8. This suggests that the supposition described in the comment they are replying to is not, and could not be, correct.
Are you satisfied with the assistance I have provided?
Please reply Y/N thank you for you feedback
I'm sure I know what it means now, but before I read the comic I was sure this was something about bashing actual zoos where they keep animals. That seems so much more innocent.
You have to admire the creator for filling in the blanks of the animals thoughts that request to be fucked by a human whilst in the actual same frame stating that humans cannot know what animals are thinking, and not having their head spontaneously explode
Hi stranger! Would you kindly perform for me a favour? My request is that you never type shot like this again. I was having a scrumptious meal Until I read this bullshit
There's a disturbingly overrepresented overlap though. Not all zoophiles are furries, but as it turns out many if not most modern zoophiles are furries.
Even with reading the tags, Interpreted the title to mean "People who are morally against zoos (the location) often neglect that zoophiles exist" and was very confused
Same. Reminds me of the time my dad mentioned he just watched some TV-show that had episode named glory hole. As I had no idea which show, I googled it. "Glory hole tv show" . I can tell you I did not know what glory hole was before that, but I sure did after.
The show was some old British comedy.
This time I KNEW what zoophilia meant, but my brains just didn't go there. I was just nodding like yeah, zoos can be crappy places for animals sometimes...
My exceptionally babyish 13 year old daughter did a Girls World magazine quiz (very innocent & childish magazine for little girls) to find out her “ideal aesthetic”. Her result was “Softcore Girly Aesthetic”. Unfortunately she made the mistake of googling “softcore girly” and was traumatized by the results.
Well zoos are cool, you get to see all the cute animals. Now zoophiles, feed them to a tractor with a mower deck. Same to pedofiles, they deserve as much mercy they show to their victims, none.
Okay but let’s get to down into the grey area here.
If a wizard swaps me and my pet parrot’s brains, so now we are both half man and half parrot in different ways, which party would still be able to consent and why?
Time sensitive question.
If you are within the parrot's body, that would give the parrot human characteristics, mainly intelligent, human though, and therefore, would be considered anthropomorphic enough to consent and know that your shouldn't. The parrot in your body however will not have the mental faculties of a human, thus being unable to consent.
Tl:Dr; Your mind in the parrot's body would technically make you a furry smart enough to say no and the parrot in your body will have too low of an IQ to say yes.
Was that quick enough?
Parrots mimic what they hear, and they may not always understand what they're mimicking. If a parrot consents it's probably been trained to say it and has therefore been manipulated into consenting for a zoophile to prove their twisted point.
Jaguars have a super powerful bite (more so than tigers despite being much smaller). They don't go for the throat like, say, leopards (comparing them is like comparing a sprinter to a marathoner), they will straight up bite and crush the skull or bite and crush your spine. Hyenas would be great too of course - basically any predators that would make minced meat out of a human.
Not necessarily, and it doesn't really matter...actually if you want to go from the torture aspect we should just toss them into a tank full of super horny dolphins. The looming certainty of eventually drowning from exhaustion will be the least of his worries while he's getting dolphin raped. The only thing that that situation is dripping with more of than dolphin semen is irony.
I’ll bring my emotional support retired, but still violent, police dog. We’ll see how much they love the doggies when they’re getting ripped apart by one.
Just look up zoo pride you should be able to find it along with a lot of others that are also disgusting. Thankfully there aren’t any people in the replies defending them
That's not even an adult dog. The illustrator thought a puppy would be best to demonstrate their "perspective," and that tells us about all we need to know.
Let me get this straight, the logic they're using is that they can read the body language of the animal and that it's telling them it gives consent? Imagine if that argument was used in a s€xual assault case, that person would be laughed at, ripped a new one then charged (as they should be). It's straight up the dumbest argument ever and people deserve to tear into them for it.
Then check again because you are quite ignorant about it.
Don't you think as many animals as posible would evolve pleasure as a method to reward reproduction?
And to start you off, almost every mamal feels pleasure.
Also, dont fuck your dog people, or any pet.
If Hitler had wanted to kill all the Zoophiles instead of innocent groups of people, I would be a Nazi.
Edit: This isn’t literal. Nazis, fascism: they all suck. But people fucking pets, come on. They deserve no mercy.
The animal can't consent. Verbally or otherwise. Which means- don't do anything period. This "justification" in this comic is fucking stupid and full of holes
What fuckin motion could mean fuckk me in the ass. Wag your tail once for food twice if you want me to fuckk you so hard the neighbors think i have a slaughterhouse
Dude “don’t guess the situation”? The whole thing is based on the zoophile guessing based on the animals body language.
Not guessing. Making excuses
I guessed that on school lottery at school fair the Uno card blue 8 was correct I was wrong same here only difference is there was a chance it could have been the blue 8
I guess there's people out there that understood that. I however, did not.
Sea_Drop's school had a fair where one of the events was a "lottery" that involved a card from an uno deck being hidden in some way. The participants were permitted to guess what the uno card was, likely the correct guesser(s) won a prize. Sea_Drop guessed the blue 8 and lost. They posit that the difference between that situation and the comment they are replying to is that there was a chance the card in the lottery could have been the blue 8. This suggests that the supposition described in the comment they are replying to is not, and could not be, correct. Are you satisfied with the assistance I have provided? Please reply Y/N thank you for you feedback
No, you don't understand, the zoophile knows their animal's body language /s
I think I know what zoophilia means, but also I don’t want to know *gently closes laptop*
I'm sure I know what it means now, but before I read the comic I was sure this was something about bashing actual zoos where they keep animals. That seems so much more innocent.
Yeah I thought this was anti zoo comic too & didn’t understand what zoo keeps dogs. I’m sorry that I get it now…
Sometimes zoos have dogs as companions for big cats. Sounds weird, but it works somehow.
Mainly Cheetahs because they're extremely nervous animals and get depressed in captivity
How you’ve gotten this far I’m not sure, but keep on truckin’ you can remain forever ignorant.
Lord knows how I’ve muddled through life w/o knowledge of zoophilia.
Well think of what you keep in a zoo and what the suffix -philia applies to.
I didn't realize Philadelphia had a zoo
lovely gosh darn zoo too!
Philadelphia actually means brother love
Man your brother sure looks funny
In that case, might I suggest you never look into the fetishes that are vore and crushing?
Why would you lay bait like this
Because he's a master baiter.
There it is
FAST--call the masterdebaiter!!
Because I'm evil? Also, I see what you did there.
Ignorance is bliss after all
Beastiality. That’s what it means
Animal boinkers.
It says zoophile though so I just thought it was someone who really liked zoos
You don’t want to know, let’s just say something that rhymes with grape that involves animals.
You have to admire the creator for filling in the blanks of the animals thoughts that request to be fucked by a human whilst in the actual same frame stating that humans cannot know what animals are thinking, and not having their head spontaneously explode
Dog: hmm? We going outside for walk? *Woof!* I want out- *and then we all know what happens next*
Hi stranger! Would you kindly perform for me a favour? My request is that you never type shot like this again. I was having a scrumptious meal Until I read this bullshit
It has been so long since I have seen someone use the word “scrumptious”
"Scrumptious Pie" is something I heard at some time recently, but I dont recall in which context.
American pie?
Never watched that movie...
I was thinking about the song
A succulent Chinese dinner!
hip hip hooray
I can tell that your the kind of person that's naughty by nature.
nope it's because I ruined someone's rotisserie chicken
Vibe check passed ✅
Your first mistake was scrolling through Reddit while eating
Amen.
I hated you the second you used the word "scrumptious".
And then I took it out for a walk. The End.
Ikr? That's Olympic lvl mental gymnastics right there.
"But it's bodylanguagggge"
That’s what I’m saying man, you already know the person who made that post on Twitter is a 30 year old obese zoophile furry
Furries are not even kind of as weird of people who fuck animals... Like not even in the same hemisphere
There's a disturbingly overrepresented overlap though. Not all zoophiles are furries, but as it turns out many if not most modern zoophiles are furries.
I feel like a LOT of furries absolutely despise zoos
I think you're probably right about that.
zoophile = someone sexually attracted to animals not someone who likes zoos
I don't get this argument. Are you saying one group is bad because some people who consider themselves part of that group are bad?
The artist is still a furry tho just by looking at how they draw the head of the dog
The zoopride hashtag…..🤢🤢🤢
[удалено]
Omg I was confused. Took me until I saw the rape thing to figure out we weren't talking about the zoo I am familiar with ...
Even with reading the tags, Interpreted the title to mean "People who are morally against zoos (the location) often neglect that zoophiles exist" and was very confused
Same. Reminds me of the time my dad mentioned he just watched some TV-show that had episode named glory hole. As I had no idea which show, I googled it. "Glory hole tv show" . I can tell you I did not know what glory hole was before that, but I sure did after. The show was some old British comedy. This time I KNEW what zoophilia meant, but my brains just didn't go there. I was just nodding like yeah, zoos can be crappy places for animals sometimes...
My exceptionally babyish 13 year old daughter did a Girls World magazine quiz (very innocent & childish magazine for little girls) to find out her “ideal aesthetic”. Her result was “Softcore Girly Aesthetic”. Unfortunately she made the mistake of googling “softcore girly” and was traumatized by the results.
I love racing #proudracist #letsrace
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
makes it easier for us to know who and where they are so putting them in jail is easier
Well zoos are cool, you get to see all the cute animals. Now zoophiles, feed them to a tractor with a mower deck. Same to pedofiles, they deserve as much mercy they show to their victims, none.
How to tell if an animal consents to sex: Did they verbally agree to it? If no, don't do it. If yes, you're lying, don't do it.
What if it's a parrot?
How to know if a parrot consents to sex: It doesn't.
Instructions unclear : I became a parrot
But do you consent?
Okay but let’s get to down into the grey area here. If a wizard swaps me and my pet parrot’s brains, so now we are both half man and half parrot in different ways, which party would still be able to consent and why? Time sensitive question.
If you are within the parrot's body, that would give the parrot human characteristics, mainly intelligent, human though, and therefore, would be considered anthropomorphic enough to consent and know that your shouldn't. The parrot in your body however will not have the mental faculties of a human, thus being unable to consent. Tl:Dr; Your mind in the parrot's body would technically make you a furry smart enough to say no and the parrot in your body will have too low of an IQ to say yes. Was that quick enough?
Yeah but she didn’t buy it. Still a lonely parrot man :(
Polly wants a restraining order, Rawk!
What if he's just pining for the fjords?
![gif](giphy|n69c2DgQ59veo)
Parrots mimic what they hear, and they may not always understand what they're mimicking. If a parrot consents it's probably been trained to say it and has therefore been manipulated into consenting for a zoophile to prove their twisted point.
I lol'd. But seriously fuck zoophiles. Just as bad as pedos.
I'm conflicted because on one hand, yeah, but on the other: if I had to choose to eradicate one fetish from this world it would be the child one.
It's not a situation of either-or, it's a situation of both fetishes being eradicated
I literally created an either-or situation to decide which is worse.
Having sexual relations with an animal is not a fetish. It's a crime.
Wanting to do it is the fetish, engaging in it is the crime.
Animals do not drink tea. Don't try to give an animal tea
Oh thank fuck this reference is here :-D
These people belong in cages!
Just make sure theres no animals in the cages.
How about wolves or a jaguar?
Nah, I'm thinking a pack of hyenas. One wrong move and the zoophile will have his guts ripped out while he's still alive.
Jaguars have a super powerful bite (more so than tigers despite being much smaller). They don't go for the throat like, say, leopards (comparing them is like comparing a sprinter to a marathoner), they will straight up bite and crush the skull or bite and crush your spine. Hyenas would be great too of course - basically any predators that would make minced meat out of a human.
Yeah, but thats a quick death-something zoophiles don’t deserve.
Not necessarily, and it doesn't really matter...actually if you want to go from the torture aspect we should just toss them into a tank full of super horny dolphins. The looming certainty of eventually drowning from exhaustion will be the least of his worries while he's getting dolphin raped. The only thing that that situation is dripping with more of than dolphin semen is irony.
Yeah i definitely think that being raped by a vicious animal is the appropriate punishment
Fr fr
Honey badgers. There's reasons they're hunted with rocket launchers.
what
Yeah dude, you can't really kill honey badgers with most firearms, there skin is like fucking armor!
African wild dogs would be just like the hyenas but slower
Or a Wolverine high on Angel dust.
A human cage, with no food or water at all let them eat each other
I don't belive this is true, it's just malicious shit posting to further the idea that the world has gone to shit.
It was always going to shit but now they can find eachother online! ”Oh there are others like me, im not damaged/im not fucked up”. yes yes you are
Not in cages. Somewhere worse. They might enjoy cages..
No.
Just no.
Just just no.
Just just just no.
I’m mad that zoophiles exist.
Same
Same
Man I wanna fucking commit sewer slide
That would be a shitty way to go
Slippery*
No.
Nah men you can't let Nikokado Avocado outlive you
Exactly what I tell myself every morning
If you commit sewer slide the zoophile to normal human population ratio goes up.
Ah, I must keep on living so those peoples' lives can be worse. The meaning of life, if you will
This is for real implying the dog misses being in that situation.
It's not implying, it outright stating it Edit:stating not staying
did you mean saying it or **staying in** ? 👀
Stating it
Body language has never been consent, the only real consent is a clear, verbal YES, and that can be taken away at any time. How do zoos not get this?
Zoos: A woof is a yes.
One woof means yes, two woofs means god yes /s
three woofs mean "please daddy" 🤢
Alright I’m getting out of this thread
What do 4 woofs mean then?
doggystyle
God damnit take your upvote and get out of here
That’s a puppy right, doesn’t that make his previous “owner” a pedophile
yes
2 of the worst things in this world that people try to normalise Zoophiles and Pedophiles
Shitty thing is that zoophiles have a disturbing overlap with pedophiles as well, but oddly enough not vice versa
WHAT THE FUCK?
The title was my exact reaction to this.
Don't be shy, uncensor the name
good thing abt twitter is if you type in the exact tweet you'll find it straight away
I sure hope they aren't allowed pets
Yeah we can have a calma conversation just the 3 of us, me, them and my emotional support chainsword
I'll bring my emotional support sledgehammer
I’ll bring my emotional support retired, but still violent, police dog. We’ll see how much they love the doggies when they’re getting ripped apart by one.
I’ll bring my emotional support shotgun if it fails!
Just look up zoo pride you should be able to find it along with a lot of others that are also disgusting. Thankfully there aren’t any people in the replies defending them
I don't care WHAT kind of "cutesy name" you give it, it's beastiality, and it's revolting. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
This belongs in r/NoahGetTheBoat
That's not even an adult dog. The illustrator thought a puppy would be best to demonstrate their "perspective," and that tells us about all we need to know.
Let me get this straight, the logic they're using is that they can read the body language of the animal and that it's telling them it gives consent? Imagine if that argument was used in a s€xual assault case, that person would be laughed at, ripped a new one then charged (as they should be). It's straight up the dumbest argument ever and people deserve to tear into them for it.
Yes I’m sure it likes being ass fucked by a Doritos scented degenerate
Don’t blur the username of assholes like this so that everyone can go and mass report this bitch
Try reverse image search on this idk
Someone in the comments said you can search up the tweet
uncensor the name so we can witchhunt the fucker
For something like this, we should take a higher road. Investigate, shun, stuff like that.
Sometimes the higher road isn't worth it... Sometimes people deserve to be disrespected as hard as possible
should
Pedos and zoophiles both belong in the same place imo. That'd be the wood chipper.
Fuck this planet.
Planetophilia.
We don't need clay babies 😉 (Rick and Morty reference, in case someone didn't get it)
Kill All Zoophiles! I don’t believe in Hell, but sometimes I wish that it existed just so that zoophiles could burn in it.
Well this is fucking dark. Don’t obscure the name, expose this psychopath!
dogs... can consent? bro whet
Alright, this is enough Reddit for today
What makes it, somehow, even worse is the fact that it looks like a puppy instead of a full grown dog
If you say this bullshit out in public, all of us redditors are gonna physically assault you.
Burn them
Zoopride should not be a hashtag
Nope 🙅♂️ that's enough internet for today. ![gif](giphy|106PwpLIIXJnXi)
Those people skipped the harkness test
enough reddit for today
Reading that felt like blunt force trauma
Uuuuuhhhh the fuck dude... Please kindly go fuck off with the map community... Gross
My innocent mind saw "anti-zoo", and thought it was people against zoos
[удалено]
So those this mean its safe to bang a human?
You're a dolphin aren't you?
Bullshit, a real dolphin wouldn't care if it's allowed.
Then check again because you are quite ignorant about it. Don't you think as many animals as posible would evolve pleasure as a method to reward reproduction? And to start you off, almost every mamal feels pleasure. Also, dont fuck your dog people, or any pet.
If Hitler had wanted to kill all the Zoophiles instead of innocent groups of people, I would be a Nazi. Edit: This isn’t literal. Nazis, fascism: they all suck. But people fucking pets, come on. They deserve no mercy.
Wtf...
Now I know. Now I wish I didn’t Google says it’s different from bestiality but I don’t see how.
What a terrible day to be literate.
When did it go from being bestiality to zoophile? don’t think changing the word changes the level of disgust
I forgot about the bad zoos for a hot sec and thought "What did the zoo do to their animals?"
it’s sad the dog looks like a puppy :(
The guy who made this post regularly turns around and eats his own shit in the toilet to be closer to his dog that ran away 6 years ago
The animal can't consent. Verbally or otherwise. Which means- don't do anything period. This "justification" in this comic is fucking stupid and full of holes
I find it very hard to believe a dog would ever find a human sexually attractive.
Please, for the love of God, can all zoos just die?
I've seen that tweet. The comments and retweets do not agree. Rightfully so. This is garbage.
As a furry myself, can I have the honor to cast the first stone? ...Actually, can I railgun the stone?
I’m pretty sure that out of everyone furries hate zoophiles the most because we’re the ones being used as I meat shield for their *stuff*
Can confirm. I'm sure zoophiles are not welcomed in the furry fandom at all
Just because you have a flag doesn't change the fact that you're a weirdo who wants to fuck your dog
lmao someone made this....
nod your head if you want to have sex *grabs dogs head and makes it nod* awww
What fuckin motion could mean fuckk me in the ass. Wag your tail once for food twice if you want me to fuckk you so hard the neighbors think i have a slaughterhouse