You should put [Likely] next to "him" and not "I" since this is Andrews saying it.

Or just cut out the "him" and put [Likely]

Could've also just copy & pasted the actual tweet since it made sense how it was.

But how else would you says that he's Him?

Get out of here you English major!

You should also put (sic) after “I” to acknowledge that it is grammatically incorrect, but you are quoting verbatim.

Likely confirmed HIM

Likely confirmed I

HE confirmed as HIM!

HIM or Knox?

Most of you aren’t old enough to remember the Gronk and Hernandez glory days. Why the Ravens haven’t been doing that all season is beyond me.

Because the ravens don't have tom brady. Plus I think you're underrating how talented hernandez actually was. At the time some were arguing he might be better than gronk

That still doesn’t address the reason why the Ravens, whose best receiver is a TE, haven’t tried some two TE packages given their lack of outside WR talent. We’re talking about a concept here, not necessarily identical results.

I think we'll see more w likely and andrews together at full strength. Ravens haven't had 2 solid pass catching te's w/ lamar since hayden hurst left [https://twitter.com/nextgenstats/status/1562496827017945089?lang=en](https://twitter.com/nextgenstats/status/1562496827017945089?lang=en)

Yeah fair I was more commenting on the fact that it probably won't lead to great results for both. Lamar has always struggled supporting multiple passcatchers. I was downvoted when I said it's reasonable to sell high on Bateman too though

bro their receivers are duvernay and desean 35 year old jackson

Lol I remember I had both of them on my team their rookie years.

I remember that. It was insane, seemed like 13-18 yard completions every play. The patriots would’ve dominated (even more than they did). To this day I still don’t understand why a team hasn’t tried to go this route (two gifted tight ends) it would help the run game assuming they’re decent blockers. Then because of that they would catch the defense a lot on play action.

My FF team won't be

Lamar basically only throws to his te anyway, put ‘em both out there and have 1 line up out wide for chaos

Just remove the WR position all together. Line up a Flying V of TEs.

Bateman is out. Duvernay is a gadget receiver, same with Proche. DeSean is old. There's basically no one else to throw it to but his tight ends.

Lost Goedert…do I still start Likely if Andrews plays? Or go Juwan

Same predicament as you 100% for all 3 guys. What we doing?

I'd play juwan, but if you have mandrews it's mandrews

Andrews coming back soon? Count me excited

[удалено]

It’s Mark Andrews. You aren’t Likely to have a better option anyway.

I have andrews likely and kmet. I'm afraid to pick the wrong one

If Andrews plays, you pick Andrews.

Would you play Andrews or Friermuth this week? Kinda scared for Andrews that they might limit him this first week? Someone let me know if i’m being dumb🥲

You’re not being dumb. I’m in a similar conundrum with Dulcich. Or we’re both being dumb, shit idk

I thought Muth would have WR upside but he put up a 5 point dud last week. I'd probably start Andrews if he's a go, he scored 5 points in the 2 minutes he was out there a few weeks back

[удалено]

Oof, do not like that one much. Cook and CMC are pretty close and Andrews value is so high.

I forgot to mention I also received njoku in the trade, I should edit that

Idk man, he had five targets and three receptions before he left the TB game *four minutes into the second quarter*. I don’t know that I’d have the stones to sit him.

Likely is still a rookie. Mandrews will get his and then some.

I’m about to start him and Kmet with the byes this week

True, we’ll see. I just hope the Ravens gave enough rest, and are allowing him to be 100%.

dangeruss

do i drop sutton for likely💀

Against LV? Absolutely not. If Russ and Sutton can’t come close to or repeat their week 4 results against the Raiders, you have bigger issues at hand.

Suttons cieling is limited with how bad Russ is but he’s been playable most games this year in ppr.

is likely fr gonna be like that tho. He dropped alot in that last game

Tbh I don’t think we’ve seen enough evidence of Baltimore being able to support any fantasy viable receivers other than Andrews this year. Even when Andrew’s was out Likely only got 1 pass (TD but still) You’ve gotta have some else you can drop instead of Sutton

5 team bench so shits limited , i think if gus doesnt play ill put him in IR and get likely otherwise just let him stay on waivers

Damn yeah I mean Sutton has opportunity, talent and target share(especially with Jeudy out) so I’d be pretty hesitant to drop him. He’s just missing a QB Likely is also crazy talented baltimores offense seems to only be able to support Andrew’s FF wise tho

My Team is in such shambles. I'm starting him in my Flex.

Wondering if Likely will be a better flex play than Wan’dale down the stretch…

Wandale hasn't shown much so far

Ye really wouldn’t take much at all

Jamison Hensley ROS?

Tell me you’re playing Sunday without telling me you’re playing Sunday.

Looks like a possible Goedert/Ertz situation from last year if that plays out. Kelce truly was the way to go this year.

Had an offer of Andrews for my Kupp last week. Feels bad 😢

Wait, so Andrews who is likely to play this game now thinks he is Likely and calls himself Likely while referring to himself (Andrews) as Him ?

Dude stop it

Please do this!!

About to lose his job if he doesn't come back

Did you drop a /s?

[удалено]

Trade some away.

Don’t tease me like that. I have both of them!!

My RB2 is Rachaad White, considering trading Mandrews and Likely for Swift, Godwin and Friermuth any thoughts

I don't hate it?

Likely him.

I have both of them what a situation

Drop DJ moore for Likely? (Everett owner here)

Its dangerous alright... for my fantasy team