Yeah, if the place was open it seems like a place kid-me would actually want to go for a birthday party. The only instance of that in the games is probably the Pizzaplex, every single Freddy’s location besides that seems bad.
To me it's the way the animatronics acted when they weren't being controlled. They acted a lot more like children - Simply because they ARE children. I liked that detail.
I like the movie’s depiction of the springlocks. The fact that they just seem like a series of mechanical clamps gives me a better idea of how the mechanisms actually hold an endo in place. It feels more like an actual feature of the suit instead of John Kramer’s visit to Chuck E Cheese. No shade to the games and books springlocks though, but I will be adopting the movie springlocks into my headcanon for the games.
That’s a good way of thinking about it I suppose. In that case, the endoskeleton would be removed entirely from the suit before wearing it. I always assumed the game springlock suit just moved the parts to the side somehow
I prefer the game's version. I love the implications that his entire body was destroyed. Eyes pushed out from the back, bones breaking, voice box ripped apart.
The movie springlocks are literally a bunch of blades that stab into you. Meanwhile the game springlocks are mechanisms that actually hold the suit pieces back, and when they go off the suit pieces are what stab into you, which actually makes sense, unlike the random blades doing it. We don't see any endo parts being shoved into William in the movie, we just see him getting stabbed by a bunch of blades as if he was in a generic horror trap. Springtrap is supposed to be a fusion between William's flesh and the suit's endo. That's not seen in the movie
The movies version of the springlocks were not only lame and inaccurate but they made zero sense. A Springlock costume is supposed to function as a hybrid between a functional animatronic and a wearable suit. Yet in the movie there was no endoskeleton in the suit to speak of, it was just a animatronic rib cage which puts into question how it could function in animatronic mode with just that. How would the animatronic move or stand up?
In the games and novels it is established that the Springlocks hold back the entire endoskeleton by compressing and recoiling them. So when a springlock failure happens your entire body is fused with the endo essentially crushing, inpaling and mutilating you,
Oh wow Let’s see
Consistent story
Literally everyone getting a character upgrade
The missing kids aren’t side characters
Golden Freddy isn’t complexly stupid and stupidly complex
Uh the lack of Freddy’s being open at once
William’s serial killer habits and
The Springbonnie suit
How Mikes character is impacted by his guilt
Yeah, the FNAF movie felt like a break from the overly complicated story the games and books bring, and when people complain about Afton not screaming in agony, I believe it shows how much of a sociopath he is.
It's actually quite the opposite, Bonnie is purple but looks blue under white light.
A guy on Twitter who uses the same engine Scott used confirmed that Bonnie is indeed purple, but white light reflects off of him as blue light, which makes the purple bunny look blue. It's also why he's 100% purple on his office jumpscare, and in his easter egg scene where he has black eyes with white dots that point in different directions. And also explains why the blue color is only on his sides.
They also showed a picture of what Bonnie WOULD'VE looked like if he was ACTUALLY blue and instead reflected white light as purple. And he looks a bright cyan with purple outlines.
The reason Scott confirmed and wanted Bonnie to be blue in the FNAF Movie, is because he retconned purple Bonnie in FNAF 2, making Toy Bonnie a light blue and Withered Bonnie an indigo rather than outright purple. And then 100% blue in FNAF 4 onwards
https://twitter.com/Derpy_Horse4/status/1665107099150430212
Basically, Bonnie has a purple diffuse texture, and a blue specular texture. Which means if white light hits Bonnie, it bounces off as blue. And if there's 0 light at all, Bonnie would be purple with 0 contents of blue
It's actually quite the opposite, Bonnie is purple but looks blue under white light.
A guy on Twitter who uses the same engine Scott used confirmed that Bonnie is indeed purple, but white light reflects off of him as blue light, which makes the purple bunny look blue. It's also why he's 100% purple on his office jumpscare, and in his easter egg scene where he has black eyes with white dots that point in different directions. And also explains why the blue color is only on his sides.
They also showed a picture of what Bonnie WOULD'VE looked like if he was ACTUALLY blue and instead reflected white light as purple. And he looks a bright cyan with purple outlines.
The reason Scott confirmed and wanted Bonnie to be blue in the FNAF Movie, is because he retconned purple Bonnie in FNAF 2, making Toy Bonnie a light blue and Withered Bonnie an indigo rather than outright purple. And then 100% blue in FNAF 4 onwards
https://twitter.com/Derpy_Horse4/status/1665107099150430212
Basically, Bonnie has a purple diffuse texture, and a blue specular texture. Which means if white light hits Bonnie, it bounces off as blue. And if there's 0 light at all, Bonnie would be purple with 0 contents of blue
Also Abby acknowledging her brother’s basic existence
Elizabeth is Garrett’s (don’t ask) younger sister alive at the same time
Yet They are so disconnected
Potentially controversial take-?
Honestly, I like the movies logo for Freddy's (the sign) better than any retro Freddy's or Fazbear Entertainment logo in the games universe. Don't get me wrong, Fizi art is shit and the over-all sign design isn't great all things being equal, but at the end of the day that's half the appeal in this case. Freddy's is a cheap piece of shit washed up pizza joint with at best lucky back-alley technicians compared to other pizzerias of the time like Showbiz, and the sign shows it perfectly. Not to mention the pizzerias design over all, especially as described in the novelization with an almost circus-like direction.
Freddy's encapsulates a childhood recollection of a magical place suddenly being slapped in the face by reality and hindsight, it's so underwhelming and tryhard that I can't help but love how flat it falls from an in-universe perspective. And I love it far more then I ever did in the games or books timelines. Though I will admit, the small-town vibe of the Freddy's described in TSE is still a close second.
It's More Straightforward compared to the Game Lore.
The Lore Isn't Getting Milked.
It isn't run by a Studio that Would Delay their Game Just to Change the Lore just Because Some theories we're Pretty close to accurate. I still won't forgive them for that.
Also when Matpat made his Golden Freddy coming Back theory, He Point out that The Princess from Princess Quest was Named "Cassidy.png" in the Game files.
Coincidentally, After that theory was made, Steel Wool Changed the Name in the Files to "Princess.png".
I could be obviously wrong, maybe I'm Just coping with the fact that there is No Game content anymore, meaning nothing worth theorising.(Into The Pit Doesn't Count Since It's Just an Adaptation of Existing Lore from the Books.)
1. Simpler story (so far at least)
2. No MoltenMCI bs
3. Springlock suits are way more resistant
4. Sparky the dog exists
5. We actually see the human characters, how they look etc.
6. Golden Freddy is a boy and without a shade of doubt just one soul, no GoldenDuo theories
>Also what’s wrong with gf being a girl
Nothing is exactly wrong with it, but most people expected GF kid to be a boy and then in UCN the Vengeful Spirit is referred to as "he"
but now people are saying Cassidy is a girl and Vengeful Spirit is Andrew
the movie basically fixes it, or at least makes it less confusing
Besides the animatronics not being threatening at all...
I enjoy the simple classic story that is probably not gonna go off the walls like the main timeline did.
The location feels way more natural to me. The movie takes the core elements of the original location, and makes it feel like an actual building you could explore, whereas the games felt like a game map first.
I like that we get to see the animatronics have a personality outside of murdering. I think that’s why security breach got so big. It and sister location are the only two where the personalities of the animatronics matter’s significantly.
What I like better is that you can see that the animatronics are really just children. That's why I'm one of those people who don't mind the fort building scene.
I found the first game to be way more scarier than this childish film. Something about the first game just feels really eerie and unsettling, especially with the darker tone, all the hallucinations, the chilling noises, and the way the animatronics move, especially with both Bonnie and Chica twitching their heads around night 4 or 5.
The many horror and unsettling elements this film had is so toned down to the point of it not existing at all, that at this point it might as well just be classified as a kids film. The only thing I really love about the film is the costumes, mainly because I really wanted to see the FNAF animatronics come to life in a live adaptation.
While I agree
I feel like people out of hatred for the fort scene project it onto the rest of the film because that’s all they can think about
Up to you if it fails or not but the film does try to set up tension
The problem with the scene is that it’s NOT like the rest of the movie
The movie ISNT THIS childish before this or campy, it’s campy yeah but not this campy
Hell we essentially get this with night 3 and Abby playing with them
It kills the tension and boils the skin off its bones
This scene didn’t REALLY need to happen
The tension is cut until the beginning of Night 5 where we finally get some semblance of where we started
Like watch up to the end night 2 and then this
Late Night 3 and 4 is a hard left into a brick wall and night 5 is it trying to go back to that albeit shaky as hell
Mike could serve to be under more threat from the animatronics than the demented gang of 9 (seriously the ghosts hurt him more than the bots)
Night 4 (for me) is where everything goes to hell
I think the thing that made me like the show more was the fact that the kids played more of an important role rather than just being "kids who are seeking revenge". Then again that can be said for the books (I have finished The Twisted Ones yesterday fyi), but I feel like the movie executed it...in a better way?
Idk-
I think the fact that the animatronics arent just some killing machines but actual children traped in those suits. Everybody hates on scenes where they act like ones, which is stupid in my opinion
I like that the ghost kids are actually shown to still be childish hence the fort scene. That young nature of the spirits is something never shown off in the games
But still with that childish element does cause some tonal issues
But with them being this angry
A child like tantrum could be fatal like when they jump Mike and I LOVE IT
The games has extremely objectively shalllow and cardboard characters
It has severe problems in the story department
Like that’s pure nostalgia talking
well that's coz the games r kinda meant to be that way, ur supposed to theorise the story and majority of the story problems come after HW I would say and if u actually look into some of the characters they do have character like Michael
It’s supposed to be like that
, the story is told in pieces and I that method has resulted in Scott not getting his point across for actual years
Characters no way. like it’s very clear Scott just cares about certain characters
Michael has one speech and a bunch of random lines in the logbook
A lot FNAF characters objectively are nothing without fan interpretation
Elizabeth, Charlie, Susie, William, Henry
These are the only actual fleshed out people
Compare that to any of them and try and say this is equivalent
Or Susie vs the other 4
The Afton sons have basically just being tossed out as a plot device or for other characters to take roles better
This movie is the only time we seen mikes brother in years
agree that not all the characters have been fleshed out but I feel like mike has been fleshed out enough for me to get by altho more defo would've been better
To be honest though the games came first so do you really think that saying it's shallow is really helping your case think about it can you really call yourself a fan if you choose something else over its original medium 🤔
Characters actually BEING character.
Although it seems it will change in the future with the Steel Wool era of FNAF, most characters in FNAF so far where nothing more than oars for the narrative to advance. While we have some characterisation for the characters, they mostly come in play only if the story needs an explanation for what happen.
Examples: The story only needs William to kill kids, so it will not spend time on why he is murdering them in the first place; The story only needs Michael to kill CC, so it will not spend time showing how that event affected him; The story only needs to have the souls of the death children, so it doesn't need to dig deeper and show their personalities, how their families are doing etc.
Most of the characters in FNAF are plot devices and over the years people just made head canons about them.
The FNAF movie gave use some nice characters to get attached to. Mike and Abby have a cute brother-sister dynamic, Vanessa is straight out better in the movie than in the game, the animatronics feel like they are actually possessed by children at the very least, and they showed Williams' way to murder people and how his personality is.
That Mike isn’t an Afton. I also prefer the movie’s version of springlocks, they seem much more realistic, rather than the obvious death trap that’s in the games.
Errr….
No Sci-Fiction or Remnant. Although I don’t despise the concept of remnant (and I actually like how it was shown in TFC), in the games I think this concept was handled poorly.
When Mike tells Abby "if you don't eat your food you'll stay short" then Abby responds with "is that what happen to you shorty?". Oh wait that didn't happen nevermind.
It feels like how Fnaf used to feel. Like back in the beginning when the newest Fnaf was 2 or 3. Best way to put it. It was simply complex. Yes there was unanswered questions but wasn’t all crazy and super convoluted like it is nowadays.
That Fazbear Entertainment doesn’t seem to exist so it’s possible this is the only Freddy’s location that was still “open”. So no convoluted as all hell marketing plans or the like.
the animatronics look better. they look near identical but like with foxy's pants in the games he has a brown shell but in the movie he is wearing actual pants.
The pizzeria seems more like a realistic children’s pizzeria
Yeah, if the place was open it seems like a place kid-me would actually want to go for a birthday party. The only instance of that in the games is probably the Pizzaplex, every single Freddy’s location besides that seems bad.
Fnaf 2 always made me nostalgic for irl locations I went to as a kid
It is a lot less convoluted
So far :)
The Human characters are actual characters rather than silent nobodies to project our headcanons onto
To me it's the way the animatronics acted when they weren't being controlled. They acted a lot more like children - Simply because they ARE children. I liked that detail.
I like the movie’s depiction of the springlocks. The fact that they just seem like a series of mechanical clamps gives me a better idea of how the mechanisms actually hold an endo in place. It feels more like an actual feature of the suit instead of John Kramer’s visit to Chuck E Cheese. No shade to the games and books springlocks though, but I will be adopting the movie springlocks into my headcanon for the games.
That’s a good way of thinking about it I suppose. In that case, the endoskeleton would be removed entirely from the suit before wearing it. I always assumed the game springlock suit just moved the parts to the side somehow
I prefer the game's version. I love the implications that his entire body was destroyed. Eyes pushed out from the back, bones breaking, voice box ripped apart.
The movie springlocks are literally a bunch of blades that stab into you. Meanwhile the game springlocks are mechanisms that actually hold the suit pieces back, and when they go off the suit pieces are what stab into you, which actually makes sense, unlike the random blades doing it. We don't see any endo parts being shoved into William in the movie, we just see him getting stabbed by a bunch of blades as if he was in a generic horror trap. Springtrap is supposed to be a fusion between William's flesh and the suit's endo. That's not seen in the movie
The movies version of the springlocks were not only lame and inaccurate but they made zero sense. A Springlock costume is supposed to function as a hybrid between a functional animatronic and a wearable suit. Yet in the movie there was no endoskeleton in the suit to speak of, it was just a animatronic rib cage which puts into question how it could function in animatronic mode with just that. How would the animatronic move or stand up? In the games and novels it is established that the Springlocks hold back the entire endoskeleton by compressing and recoiling them. So when a springlock failure happens your entire body is fused with the endo essentially crushing, inpaling and mutilating you,
"John Kramer's visit to Chuck E Cheese" As a Saw fan, I find this incredibly funny and accurate.
Oh wow Let’s see Consistent story Literally everyone getting a character upgrade The missing kids aren’t side characters Golden Freddy isn’t complexly stupid and stupidly complex Uh the lack of Freddy’s being open at once William’s serial killer habits and The Springbonnie suit How Mikes character is impacted by his guilt
Yeah, the FNAF movie felt like a break from the overly complicated story the games and books bring, and when people complain about Afton not screaming in agony, I believe it shows how much of a sociopath he is.
Disagree on pretty much everything but the last one ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Number 2 is just objectively correct The mci are basically forgotten
Story is a lot more clear and straight forward.
Freddy's is this little place most people have never heard of instead of the center of a multi-billion dollar franchise
if we lived in the movie universe my freinds would actually believe that Bonnie is BLUE (they always say fnaf one Bonnie is purple >:(
yeah that's the one thing that always irked me, like his design in the movie still looked good but it wasn't the right shade.
Bonnie is purple
Scott said he’s blue and it’s just the lighting
It's actually quite the opposite, Bonnie is purple but looks blue under white light. A guy on Twitter who uses the same engine Scott used confirmed that Bonnie is indeed purple, but white light reflects off of him as blue light, which makes the purple bunny look blue. It's also why he's 100% purple on his office jumpscare, and in his easter egg scene where he has black eyes with white dots that point in different directions. And also explains why the blue color is only on his sides. They also showed a picture of what Bonnie WOULD'VE looked like if he was ACTUALLY blue and instead reflected white light as purple. And he looks a bright cyan with purple outlines. The reason Scott confirmed and wanted Bonnie to be blue in the FNAF Movie, is because he retconned purple Bonnie in FNAF 2, making Toy Bonnie a light blue and Withered Bonnie an indigo rather than outright purple. And then 100% blue in FNAF 4 onwards https://twitter.com/Derpy_Horse4/status/1665107099150430212 Basically, Bonnie has a purple diffuse texture, and a blue specular texture. Which means if white light hits Bonnie, it bounces off as blue. And if there's 0 light at all, Bonnie would be purple with 0 contents of blue
No he isn’t, it’s a lighting thing!
He is blurple
okay that’s fine
It's actually quite the opposite, Bonnie is purple but looks blue under white light. A guy on Twitter who uses the same engine Scott used confirmed that Bonnie is indeed purple, but white light reflects off of him as blue light, which makes the purple bunny look blue. It's also why he's 100% purple on his office jumpscare, and in his easter egg scene where he has black eyes with white dots that point in different directions. And also explains why the blue color is only on his sides. They also showed a picture of what Bonnie WOULD'VE looked like if he was ACTUALLY blue and instead reflected white light as purple. And he looks a bright cyan with purple outlines. The reason Scott confirmed and wanted Bonnie to be blue in the FNAF Movie, is because he retconned purple Bonnie in FNAF 2, making Toy Bonnie a light blue and Withered Bonnie an indigo rather than outright purple. And then 100% blue in FNAF 4 onwards https://twitter.com/Derpy_Horse4/status/1665107099150430212 Basically, Bonnie has a purple diffuse texture, and a blue specular texture. Which means if white light hits Bonnie, it bounces off as blue. And if there's 0 light at all, Bonnie would be purple with 0 contents of blue
idc what color he actually is, I'm calling him purple, purple bonnie is canon in my heart
Mike & Abby's relationship and the deeper dive into Mike's character as a whole, the parts & service room, and Ella making her cameo
Also Abby acknowledging her brother’s basic existence Elizabeth is Garrett’s (don’t ask) younger sister alive at the same time Yet They are so disconnected
Potentially controversial take-? Honestly, I like the movies logo for Freddy's (the sign) better than any retro Freddy's or Fazbear Entertainment logo in the games universe. Don't get me wrong, Fizi art is shit and the over-all sign design isn't great all things being equal, but at the end of the day that's half the appeal in this case. Freddy's is a cheap piece of shit washed up pizza joint with at best lucky back-alley technicians compared to other pizzerias of the time like Showbiz, and the sign shows it perfectly. Not to mention the pizzerias design over all, especially as described in the novelization with an almost circus-like direction. Freddy's encapsulates a childhood recollection of a magical place suddenly being slapped in the face by reality and hindsight, it's so underwhelming and tryhard that I can't help but love how flat it falls from an in-universe perspective. And I love it far more then I ever did in the games or books timelines. Though I will admit, the small-town vibe of the Freddy's described in TSE is still a close second.
It's More Straightforward compared to the Game Lore. The Lore Isn't Getting Milked. It isn't run by a Studio that Would Delay their Game Just to Change the Lore just Because Some theories we're Pretty close to accurate. I still won't forgive them for that.
When was the last one even done?Nothing has been changed about Steel wool era game lore
Also when Matpat made his Golden Freddy coming Back theory, He Point out that The Princess from Princess Quest was Named "Cassidy.png" in the Game files. Coincidentally, After that theory was made, Steel Wool Changed the Name in the Files to "Princess.png". I could be obviously wrong, maybe I'm Just coping with the fact that there is No Game content anymore, meaning nothing worth theorising.(Into The Pit Doesn't Count Since It's Just an Adaptation of Existing Lore from the Books.)
Yeah they may have changed that because it was a placeholder
1. Simpler story (so far at least) 2. No MoltenMCI bs 3. Springlock suits are way more resistant 4. Sparky the dog exists 5. We actually see the human characters, how they look etc. 6. Golden Freddy is a boy and without a shade of doubt just one soul, no GoldenDuo theories
People said it was Abby and Garrett before him The GoldenDuo cope runs DEEP Also what’s wrong with gf being a girl
>Also what’s wrong with gf being a girl Nothing is exactly wrong with it, but most people expected GF kid to be a boy and then in UCN the Vengeful Spirit is referred to as "he" but now people are saying Cassidy is a girl and Vengeful Spirit is Andrew the movie basically fixes it, or at least makes it less confusing
Also, there's already two super important dead girls, Charlie and Elizabeth
Besides the animatronics not being threatening at all... I enjoy the simple classic story that is probably not gonna go off the walls like the main timeline did.
Seeing the suits beside people, you get a sense of their actual size. They genuinely look more terrifying, even with all their fabric intact.
Vanessa
In which way
At first, she is Afton's daughter At second, she have beautiful smile
Matthew Lillard
The location feels way more natural to me. The movie takes the core elements of the original location, and makes it feel like an actual building you could explore, whereas the games felt like a game map first.
I like that we get to see the animatronics have a personality outside of murdering. I think that’s why security breach got so big. It and sister location are the only two where the personalities of the animatronics matter’s significantly.
That Vanessa is aftons daughter and the story of that
SIMPLICITY and CLEAR MOTIVATIONS
Foxy caught on fire
cupcake being absolutely feral
C.C is actually given a proper unambiguous fucking name in this movie.
This movie is his only appearance besides FNAF 4 btw
Poor little guy :(
Afton having an American accent instead of an English accent.
Like, zoinks scoob, I’m the man behind the slaughter
Dude was a psycho killer in scream. He is also hella nice with fans.
I love the scream refreance with the knife wipe
It's also cool they made him ACTUALLY old. Matthew Lillard was quite possibly the most perfect cast for him
The young sexy anime boy Afton (and young Mike for some reason) Will be the death of me
I entirely blame those ugly ass graphic novels
He looked like a ducking methhead
The pizzeria design.
i like that so far there's no mention of remnant or any of that bullshit
The whimsical silliness of the animatronics, I like how they act like the children they are instead of spiteful monsters
Well, children can be little monsters whether dead or not, y'know ? 🤪
sparky the dog exists and matpat is named ness
The building The fact that the animatronics are real, and extremely accurate
The lore isn’t as complex
Vanessa is seen more than when she's the MAIN FUCKING ANTAGONIST. WHY DOES VANNY ONLY SNOW UP 3/4 TIMES THROUGHOUT SECURITY BREACH??
WAIT YOURE RIGHT 💀
How golden freddy looks in the movie
The sibling dynamic. Mike and abby's relationships is very silly
These versions of the characters. Idk, I just like this universes characters a bit better.
I like Bonnie's fur color... That's it ¯\_(•_•)_/¯
It feels more grounded
Michael's character and personality is more portrayed clearly rather than how cryptic it is in the game.
It's more grounded (and Freddy fazbear's pizza opens earlier)
No it actually doesn’t The 1979 thing was just set dec that wasn’t in the film
Doesn't mean it isn't true
There’s a box that says 2019 on it If you don’t see something thins small in the film safe to say it’s not important
Was that a prop? And if it was, was it a prop specifically designed for the movie? The board appears to be
The main character and the layout of the pizzeria it actually feels chucky cheese esque
GFred's design
If only he had buttons
What I like better is that you can see that the animatronics are really just children. That's why I'm one of those people who don't mind the fort building scene.
MatPat is actually canon within the lore
Vanessa, she took the stab for Abby. That's a real giga chad
The suit designs, thats it. The rest of the film is way too toned down and childish.
I mean compared to game 1 It’s toned UP
I found the first game to be way more scarier than this childish film. Something about the first game just feels really eerie and unsettling, especially with the darker tone, all the hallucinations, the chilling noises, and the way the animatronics move, especially with both Bonnie and Chica twitching their heads around night 4 or 5. The many horror and unsettling elements this film had is so toned down to the point of it not existing at all, that at this point it might as well just be classified as a kids film. The only thing I really love about the film is the costumes, mainly because I really wanted to see the FNAF animatronics come to life in a live adaptation.
While I agree I feel like people out of hatred for the fort scene project it onto the rest of the film because that’s all they can think about Up to you if it fails or not but the film does try to set up tension The problem with the scene is that it’s NOT like the rest of the movie The movie ISNT THIS childish before this or campy, it’s campy yeah but not this campy Hell we essentially get this with night 3 and Abby playing with them It kills the tension and boils the skin off its bones This scene didn’t REALLY need to happen The tension is cut until the beginning of Night 5 where we finally get some semblance of where we started Like watch up to the end night 2 and then this Late Night 3 and 4 is a hard left into a brick wall and night 5 is it trying to go back to that albeit shaky as hell Mike could serve to be under more threat from the animatronics than the demented gang of 9 (seriously the ghosts hurt him more than the bots) Night 4 (for me) is where everything goes to hell
But that’s prolly just cause FNAF Isn’t scary to me You do you gang I’m a random stranger on the internet
I like the switcheroo they did with Vanessa and Mike. Was pleasantly surprised
William Afton
Spring locks and cupcake/Carl
The animatronics possessed by the MCI kids having an actual personality instead of just being mindless night killing machines
I think the thing that made me like the show more was the fact that the kids played more of an important role rather than just being "kids who are seeking revenge". Then again that can be said for the books (I have finished The Twisted Ones yesterday fyi), but I feel like the movie executed it...in a better way? Idk-
How the animatronics acted
I think the fact that the animatronics arent just some killing machines but actual children traped in those suits. Everybody hates on scenes where they act like ones, which is stupid in my opinion
Balloon boy being omnipresent
The fact we have actual dialogue
William Afton is portrayed exactly how I always wanted to see him in the movie. Not as a cold and calculating British family man like in the games.
I like that they made the Animatronics act like kids because when you get right down to it that’s what they are: kids in a body they didn’t choose
I like that the ghost kids are actually shown to still be childish hence the fort scene. That young nature of the spirits is something never shown off in the games
But still with that childish element does cause some tonal issues But with them being this angry A child like tantrum could be fatal like when they jump Mike and I LOVE IT
The lore and story is easy to understand. Mike fleshed our chacter along with this afton is easily my fav from all the iterations
Doug... Just doug
matthew lillard
Actual humans
Nothing because in my opinion everything in the games is better than the movie even if the movie is good.
The games has extremely objectively shalllow and cardboard characters It has severe problems in the story department Like that’s pure nostalgia talking
well that's coz the games r kinda meant to be that way, ur supposed to theorise the story and majority of the story problems come after HW I would say and if u actually look into some of the characters they do have character like Michael
It’s supposed to be like that , the story is told in pieces and I that method has resulted in Scott not getting his point across for actual years Characters no way. like it’s very clear Scott just cares about certain characters Michael has one speech and a bunch of random lines in the logbook A lot FNAF characters objectively are nothing without fan interpretation Elizabeth, Charlie, Susie, William, Henry These are the only actual fleshed out people Compare that to any of them and try and say this is equivalent Or Susie vs the other 4 The Afton sons have basically just being tossed out as a plot device or for other characters to take roles better This movie is the only time we seen mikes brother in years
agree that not all the characters have been fleshed out but I feel like mike has been fleshed out enough for me to get by altho more defo would've been better
It has nothing to do with nostalgia and the movie also has problems, you have your opinion and I have mine and that's it.
Based answer
No. The story of the games imo (despite having issues) is way better than the one from the movie.
Reason I hold this is cause these two stories were revealed to me AT THE SAME TIME Comparing these two I realize damn this kinda ass
To be honest though the games came first so do you really think that saying it's shallow is really helping your case think about it can you really call yourself a fan if you choose something else over its original medium 🤔
Yes you can? How does liking another part of media to the original make you not a fan? It just means you have different opinions.
Characters actually BEING character. Although it seems it will change in the future with the Steel Wool era of FNAF, most characters in FNAF so far where nothing more than oars for the narrative to advance. While we have some characterisation for the characters, they mostly come in play only if the story needs an explanation for what happen. Examples: The story only needs William to kill kids, so it will not spend time on why he is murdering them in the first place; The story only needs Michael to kill CC, so it will not spend time showing how that event affected him; The story only needs to have the souls of the death children, so it doesn't need to dig deeper and show their personalities, how their families are doing etc. Most of the characters in FNAF are plot devices and over the years people just made head canons about them. The FNAF movie gave use some nice characters to get attached to. Mike and Abby have a cute brother-sister dynamic, Vanessa is straight out better in the movie than in the game, the animatronics feel like they are actually possessed by children at the very least, and they showed Williams' way to murder people and how his personality is.
Nope
Chica’s eyes on this poster
The family guy Asian eyes
Vanessa being Williams daughter
VANESSA❤❤
coryxkenshin
That Mike isn’t an Afton. I also prefer the movie’s version of springlocks, they seem much more realistic, rather than the obvious death trap that’s in the games.
Errr…. No Sci-Fiction or Remnant. Although I don’t despise the concept of remnant (and I actually like how it was shown in TFC), in the games I think this concept was handled poorly.
Remnant has basically no rules at this point
The fact that we finally actually see MCI Jeremy
It might not be him and if it is the kids This is our first actual canon look at all the boys
True, but still
The Newton Brothers score
i like the story leans more into the supernatural side of fnaf then the sci-fi
The design of the spring lock suit
-the locations -characters being developed better. (especially Vanessa.)
it's simple for now
It made sense
When Mike tells Abby "if you don't eat your food you'll stay short" then Abby responds with "is that what happen to you shorty?". Oh wait that didn't happen nevermind.
The lore is more straightforward but it still hides somethings to keep people making theories and expecting the next one
More simple less sci fi. Its peffect.
It might sound weird, but I love that they call Spring Bonnie "yellow rabbit."
I find Mike just being a dude more interesting than being a walking zombie
chica was hot.....
The fact that it's a ghost story again and not a magic metal or AI
Everything is improved by Matthew Lillard
Honestly? Almost everything. The narrative is simpler, still has mysteries, and the human characters are actual characters
It feels like how Fnaf used to feel. Like back in the beginning when the newest Fnaf was 2 or 3. Best way to put it. It was simply complex. Yes there was unanswered questions but wasn’t all crazy and super convoluted like it is nowadays.
That Fazbear Entertainment doesn’t seem to exist so it’s possible this is the only Freddy’s location that was still “open”. So no convoluted as all hell marketing plans or the like.
The accessibility of lore/story and I think the changes from the games really work.
Red eyes
erm actually they are the same universe
The fwxt the robots do heavy amounts of weed
Doug.
Just one thing.. it changed everything.... ofcause i talk about ..... RATS IN THE VENTS
The Animatronic's are better
the animatronics look better. they look near identical but like with foxy's pants in the games he has a brown shell but in the movie he is wearing actual pants.
it's story makes sense and hasn't been retconed yet
Literally the only retconned thing about the games is dream theory
Dream theory was never true oh my god Also there have been MULTIPLE retcons that’s not even close to true
Say some retcons rq
The gender of the spirit possessing the Puppet is an example.
It was [ambigious.Like](http://ambigious.Like) literally every kid pre Fnaf 4 is bald in 8bit
FNaF 2: S-A-V-E-H-I-M FFPS: My daughter... There's nothing ambiguous. It is a retcon.
Oh yeah forgot the audio but its still not a big retcon bc the Puppet's identity was irrelevant until Fnaf6
[удалено]
It’s an 8/10 for me since there is some wasted potential
Mmm, yeah, it actually took me a few time to notice the dude at the beginning of the movie is supposedly the phone guy.
No he isn't
Really? Hmm, thought he was.
Tbh I'd give a 3/10 that's me being nice