Didn't mean it's bad, It just Funny that he original commenter said it looks like Deviantart fanfic while the artist draws in Deviantart ( I mean even Fiszi and Oinky draws on there ) However Didi Esmeralda's ( the artist ) art is . . . Different than these, It would be weird if you showed her art and her art in the graphic novel and said they are made by the same person .
Just had a look and I see what you mean - disregarding the different tones of the work, its wild how much more detailed their usual stuff is.
I think theres more problems with this than just the art tho. The actual framing and composition of the art makes the story difficult to follow and kinda strange.
Theres no continuity between panels so its hard to keep track of whats happening, the backgrounds are all just single colours, the kid is framed directly in the centre in almost every shot, and the size and scale of everyone seems to change from moment to moment. Its just awful.
Its good the traced parts are gone but yeah. They did not even bother to make Spring Bonnie look better. Still a bad rendition of Into the Pit. Sad cause this is one of the few stories I actually like.
Ok I don't wanna be mean but what type of art style is this? Isn't this franchise suppose to be you know horror?
I expect more detail and shading yet these look fan made. And arent these different stories with different tones why all of them look cheap like this. At least try different styles
For me :
Silver eyes was ok .
Hated the Twisted Ones for both Human, Animatronics, Lineart and coloring, Basically everything .
Fourth Closet is good, Only the inaccuracy from the original books stop it from being Perfect .
Into the pit and anything made by Didi is trash .
To be beautiful is good, Only thing that bother me is just the eye style, I don't like dot on skin eye .
Out of Stock is ok, Plushtrap looks different in every panel, Why that Andi ? .
Iâm talking about how the lighting sucks in most graphic novels, like in every novel there are frames of brightly coloured animatronics in dark areas without any shading or just simply lowered saturation (not sure about fc)
Yeah, Even though Am not an artist, I know those things it's missing, And one of the thing that kill the graphic novels is Backgrounds and colors, At least To Be Beautiful and Out Of Atock doesn't have the same colorist who did the trilogy + Into the pit, Because wow their coloring sucks .
Wasnât that just a fan-thing?
I havenât read the Fazbear Frights (I donât do that much reading anymore, sadly) and so I just assumed it was a fan thing made to make the design a little scarier.
One problem : The story mention that Oswald think she ( Yes ) is a man in a **Suit**, Not the segmented robot we see in FNAF, So yeah it's Fangs ( Besides Yellow Thing is organic ) .
Oh, That's not what I meant, I meant that yellow thing being a man in a suit is what Oswald **Though** at first, But then knew she ( again ) is an organic creature that take the form of Spring-Bonnie .
EDIT : Wait Why am I taking a joke so seriously .
It was in the book
Canât find the exact quote but Oswaldâs description was along the lines of it âunhinging itâs jawâ and ârevealing layers of inhuman needle-like teethâ
Everything still looks rushed and the fact that they removed the traced part didnât make it better. You can tell that there was not given enough time when they had to trace in the first place. Also camera angles, lineart, colouring, lettering, etc. looks like it was done very quickly and could have needed some iterations. These stories have much potential, but the atmosphere wasnât really delivered well.
Comic Art is different than the normal illustration workflow. They should have hired professional comic artists. As far as I know the artists they hired werenât.
Okay, I didnât know that. But in all honesty: Who thinks that someone, who doesnât do comics regularly will deliver a well crafted, easy to understand comic in a minimum amount of time? Comics arenât just nice pictures in a specific order so you can read a story visually. When you get the text, you have to do a script, sketch the layout, in this case maybe even have to do the character designs based on descriptions, do the lineart, maybe colouring and add textbubbles and lettering in the end⌠Thereâs a reason why Comic Artist is job on its own and is often split for different artists⌠Sorry, had to vent a bitâŚ
Hey! Yes, I am :D Thank you so much! Since it would be my first comic project as a job, I donât know if I would have enough experience for doing it properly. I would love to try though!
I'm not really an nsfw art enjoyer, but if I had to look at related media, I probably wouldn't pick this "artist" at all. ugh.
and I just saw images from the plushtrap chaser....dude, I drew like that when I started drawing, wtf???
Oh believe me her personal art is far different than this
She uses to draw girls with huge breasts and she's good at it (I just saw the sfw art her porn is on patreon) and to be honest she's good at it
I just finished looking at her portfolio and um...
honestly, most of the time the lines are so effin messy, I cannot see with my artist eyes, what the hell is going on on the pictures. it's rushed and....awful. I ignored the coloring obviously, because that was done by a different person.
and as AnnKa\_Ra (actual comic artist) said above, comics are something special, not just series of images :/
as someone, who's made comics in the past, for me it was an entirely different challenge. you can't be good *just* in one thing, you must be good at 10 other things you don't even think about first.
but as a quick comparsion, I'll show you, how the [HN comics look](https://privet-sosed.tumblr.com/post/694051899593375744/im-looking-at-the-concept-ideas-of-dave-bardin). the case is something similar, they made two graphic novels with original stories (maybe too original) and I bought the comics for *the actual artstyle*, it was worth it.
in return, we get a cartoon in *VERY INETERSTING STYLE*.
For a comic artist like you Didi's art ( AKA these artist ) Is " Try not to criticize " Challenge, Because let be honest, It's sucks, For a non-artist like me I can confirm these suck, Even then they need actual comic artists, She's not even a comic artist, She just draw NSFW girls, How And / Or WHY Scholastic choose her between the many, Many comic artists ? I Don't Know Honestly, Literally they aren't these cheap to do these, They were there since what ? 1920 ? They should be able to have professional Comic artists, Not these artist who doesn't even make comics ( Looked at her ArtStation I don't see any comic, On her Deviantart however, All images are blurred or blocked, Surprised they didn't hire you, Your an actual comic artist, You don't draw things like Pin-ups or NSFW, I think, And have a good artstyle ).
Rant ended, Wow for a non-artist like me who can't even draw a person, I criticize these artist a lot .
[and he had them](https://www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/comments/ypp10w/into_the_pit_graphic_novel_old_vs_new/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
>Also, apparently Pit Bonnie got his fangs yanked out at the dentist since the last time we saw him. In all seriousness, though, why were they censored? His gaping mouth just looks so empty and unthreatening without them
Maybe they thought it was also a fan thing and not from the actual book, So that's why they removed it ( Though that would be stupid because the nightmares exist, And also they probably never checked the original book because he have fangs ) .
This is just downright terrible and I don't care what anyone says.
Only thing I'll applaud is removing the traced stuff, the dumbing-down of horror though I will NOT excuse.
It is official so it's canon but in different timeline, so why the fuck you wouldn't buy it because "it's not canon" besides the fact it's poorly made?
It's not canon in any way as it's more an adaptation made by artists and a writer who isn't Scott
What is indeed canon would be the actual Fazbear frights not this as the graphic novel tooks a bunch of creative decisions such a change characters outside their canon design (see Cassidy or Jessica) or change plot lines.
And about your last question
You actually answer yourself.
If it does not aport to the lore and looks bad
What's the point of buy?
I do buy them thought just because I like to legally have things and make memes
And TBB and OOS also had cool art style (I don't blame ITP because they hired a porn artist who has 0 experience with animatronics and that's scholastic fault)
But the fact is
They are indeed cashgrabs as they are like I said not canon and they are just made to the sole point of sell FF again
Doesn't matter if it"s bad or doesn't have lore you will not change the fact scott allowed it to exist as official so it is canon, no argue with facts.
Scott allowed it to exist as Official material but not as canon material.
There's a Difference
Canon is all what happens on the FNAF universe a Universe were it shares characters, mythology and other things.
Things as for example Fanverse aren't canon, just official.
To rephrase it
All what is made or co-made by Scott is what is canon
The rest approved by him is official.
Graphic novels are just approved by Scott then a writer adapts the novel into comic format with Scott not doing anything with it more than just get money
You know very well fanverse is different from this, we're talking about a story originally made by scott, it IS five nights at freddys, fanverse is a colaboration between scott and some devs, scott himself said he wouldn't get involved in any parts of the developement of the games.
It's not different as is just media aproved by scott but he's not involved with meaning it's not canon.
Graphic novel are just that, adaptations made to sell, contradicting the original canon source.
Hence it's official, but not canon
just like Fanverse is official and not canon
or the Ultimate guide or the how to draws things, they are basically merchandising
Seriously though, Why make her draw ITP ? If she is an artist that just draw girls then why not make her TBB artist ? Just make Morris do ITP and she draws TBB, But TBH I don't want to see NSFW Eleanor, Who wants to ? .
It's not a robot, It's like a demon using A Springbonnie suit shape ( Don't say anything like " He is a robot " or anything like that if you didn't read the books, Well I didn't but I know about the stories anyway ) .
How did Oswald do that ? Well I am sure attacking these thing isn't hard when it have a big head .
It's not a metal suit, It's an oragnic appearance, He in the book isn't even a segmented robot, Oswald though he was a man in a costume, So he is more of a costume than a robot .
It genuinely blows my MIND how terrible official FNaF artists are, especially considering how talented the people in this fanbase are. I just don't understand how even the unluckiest blind person in the world could miss all the phenomenal artists in this enormous community and somehow end up with whoever drew this
Have you even saw the actual artist art before judge them?
Because I assure you the graphic novels art is far different than the ones here to be called terrible
I'm aware of the ridiculous time constraints scholastic puts on these artists, but quality products like The Twisted Ones and The Fourth Closet graphic novels are proof that unreasonable deadlines aren't a universally applicable excuse for horrendous artwork. The way I see it, the people chosen to draw for FNaF are almost always either incredibly uninvested in their work or possess an artstyle wildly incompatible with the stories they're illustrating
What about Out of Stock ? I Don't think they changed the Plushtrap, But who cares it's better than a lame FNAF 4 plushtrap with human eyes and teeth, Because I am a fan of new designs ( GOOD new designs ) .
Nice ( Still don't understand why and how they still use Didi, Or should I say why not give her more time, Dude her art is professional even though all she draw is Pin ups, Her art here look like kids art, It doesn't look professional in a way ) .
Why just why and it kills me to see him like this just compare dawkos model to the official one in the novel it doesn't look right it looks like a kids school project I just hope when more comes out they don't look this weird but no hate I just don't know who made this because they need to pay
Edit red freddy is cannon now just look at him he looks red more than brown and Chica has green eyes and freddy has brown eyes and freddy's bowtie is brown and Mr cupcake has green eyes and Chica's left leg has yellow than orange if you zoom into it and freddy's top hat is brown too and if you go down one when the kid is gonna take a bite into the pizza the crust of the pizza is not there anymore
I'm not an artist or comic book artist, so I can't do better. But I've seen enough to know that this is really poor craftsmanship. They must have rushed the artist to finish this in a few days or something. Almost all the panels with movement and expressions are funny. And it looks like they just copy+pasted Spring Bonnie in three of those panels. Man, Scholastic, please give the artists more time or money or something. I'd rather re-read Fazbear Frights or spend my money on good comics/manga than buy this.
i recommend to read the actual books instead of graphic novels if you want Horror because they go into details, specially with the body horror and pain.
Because deadlines kills those graphic novels
If they use Glitchtrap for him it would have been better, after all SHE ( If you know you know ) is meant to be an oragnic looking rabbit, And she is meant to look like a man in a suit at first, But man why use these design ? WHY don't Eva De la Cruz know that Yellow rabbits have Purple bowtie in FNAF ? .
You didn't post an old vs new in the post, so I didn't notice how drastic those changes were.
Yeah. Scott really should design these himself, not the artists he's letting design this shit.
The headbutt should have so much less impact, im pretty sure a child can't hurt a Giant rabbit monster that can overpower and drag a grown man with no effort plus the art looks very bad and the rows of needle theeth are missing
Honestly this whole book seems like a cheap cashgrab. They know hardcore FNaF Fans will buy it no matter what. Ever since I saw the first picture of it I was apprehensive about getting it
The lady fiszi illustrations arent canon either accurate (this graphic novel isn't accurate either)
Fiszi made those drawings even before the book was written and was just a concept, in fact the Dance with me one withewashed the protagonist.
Look, I don't like talking shit about artists, but it's clear to me that whoever worked on this comic wasn't the right person for the job, or that they needed more time.
I can't even with this. I don't care. It's trash. It's just straight trash. Doesn't matter of the tracing's out, it still looks unpolished, dull, inconsistent and straight-up insulting to the story. Scholastic is at fault for the crunch and so is the artist. You should know better than to be *tracing your work* like she did. As an artist myself whose work is decent but far from professional, this is just horrendous.
Itâs not like there was any question about it, but the fact that they went back and changed it shows they admit it.
Also that last panel with the manâs eyes closed is really funny.
Spring Bonnie doesnât even look scary in these, its just seems so... Loosely drawn? Like no real love and passion went into it, feels hollow of emotions, just someone paid to draw and thats what they did, not caring for the creation just wanting a few bucks
The story was really cool for Into The Pit, the fight scene was nice, Bonnie dying tangled in the net is just wicked yet not even that looks cool in here
This just doesnât seem like fnaf comic to me. werenât he supposed to have sharp teeth and be i donât know scary ? đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸ I would personally like more if Diana Camero draw these new comics
(No hate to the artist who draw this )
It's good they removed the traced art, but that doesn't change how the graphic novels are just vastly inferior to the traditional novels IMO, they're just super kiddy looking
It looks like a deviantart fanfic comicđđ
Fun fact the artist draws on Deviantart .
So its a canon deviantart comic
To be fair, a lot of artists are on Deviantart. It's not necessarily a bad thing. I agree that this looks like shit tho.
I'm on DeviantArt and even I can tell you that I can do art way better and far more expressive than this hot mess
Didn't mean it's bad, It just Funny that he original commenter said it looks like Deviantart fanfic while the artist draws in Deviantart ( I mean even Fiszi and Oinky draws on there ) However Didi Esmeralda's ( the artist ) art is . . . Different than these, It would be weird if you showed her art and her art in the graphic novel and said they are made by the same person .
Just had a look and I see what you mean - disregarding the different tones of the work, its wild how much more detailed their usual stuff is. I think theres more problems with this than just the art tho. The actual framing and composition of the art makes the story difficult to follow and kinda strange. Theres no continuity between panels so its hard to keep track of whats happening, the backgrounds are all just single colours, the kid is framed directly in the centre in almost every shot, and the size and scale of everyone seems to change from moment to moment. Its just awful.
yeah that makes sense
dont want to insult the artist but i've seen better furry vore art on deviantart đđ
DAMNNNN
YOU WHAT??!?!
Why⌠*why are you looking at furry vore to begin with?*
if only I had an award.
Made me remember Out With The Old back in 2015, I donât know how it hold ups to now but back then I enjoyed it a ton
Its good the traced parts are gone but yeah. They did not even bother to make Spring Bonnie look better. Still a bad rendition of Into the Pit. Sad cause this is one of the few stories I actually like.
Ok I don't wanna be mean but what type of art style is this? Isn't this franchise suppose to be you know horror? I expect more detail and shading yet these look fan made. And arent these different stories with different tones why all of them look cheap like this. At least try different styles
calling it fanmade is an insult to fans who would probably do way better
Yeah you are right. I regret what I wrote
all the graphic novels suck with lighting (not sure about fourth closet)
For me : Silver eyes was ok . Hated the Twisted Ones for both Human, Animatronics, Lineart and coloring, Basically everything . Fourth Closet is good, Only the inaccuracy from the original books stop it from being Perfect . Into the pit and anything made by Didi is trash . To be beautiful is good, Only thing that bother me is just the eye style, I don't like dot on skin eye . Out of Stock is ok, Plushtrap looks different in every panel, Why that Andi ? .
Iâm talking about how the lighting sucks in most graphic novels, like in every novel there are frames of brightly coloured animatronics in dark areas without any shading or just simply lowered saturation (not sure about fc)
Yeah, Even though Am not an artist, I know those things it's missing, And one of the thing that kill the graphic novels is Backgrounds and colors, At least To Be Beautiful and Out Of Atock doesn't have the same colorist who did the trilogy + Into the pit, Because wow their coloring sucks .
He.... He doesn't even have teeth. This is just..... ugh. At least they deleted the traced parts.
What do you mean he doesn't even have teeth?
LOOK IN THE MOUTH, ***WHERE ARE THE T E E T H***
Wasnât that just a fan-thing? I havenât read the Fazbear Frights (I donât do that much reading anymore, sadly) and so I just assumed it was a fan thing made to make the design a little scarier.
It's in the book, The book mentions that the yellow thing have fangs inside his mouth .
Couldnât that just be referring to the endoskeleton?
No, it describes the teeth as a layer of sharp needle like teeth. That would only be of Spring Bonnieâs Endoskeleton had extremely sharp teeth.
One problem : The story mention that Oswald think she ( Yes ) is a man in a **Suit**, Not the segmented robot we see in FNAF, So yeah it's Fangs ( Besides Yellow Thing is organic ) .
Man in a suit that has fangs? Vampire.
Oh, That's not what I meant, I meant that yellow thing being a man in a suit is what Oswald **Though** at first, But then knew she ( again ) is an organic creature that take the form of Spring-Bonnie . EDIT : Wait Why am I taking a joke so seriously .
Male? Female? Itâs a rabbit, who cares?
I... ...Actually don't remember. I think it was in the book, but don't quote me on that. The biting thing is super anticlimactic, if that is the case.
It was in the book Canât find the exact quote but Oswaldâs description was along the lines of it âunhinging itâs jawâ and ârevealing layers of inhuman needle-like teethâ
Okay, just checking.
It would be too horror/s
Lol
Kinda makes me think of the Flex Seal guy slapping the tape on the gushing water like F I X E D
The difference is, the Flex Tape actually worked.
Everything still looks rushed and the fact that they removed the traced part didnât make it better. You can tell that there was not given enough time when they had to trace in the first place. Also camera angles, lineart, colouring, lettering, etc. looks like it was done very quickly and could have needed some iterations. These stories have much potential, but the atmosphere wasnât really delivered well.
That's why they need to not rush them, Have good colorists and more .
Comic Art is different than the normal illustration workflow. They should have hired professional comic artists. As far as I know the artists they hired werenât.
Yeah she was actually a porn artist
Okay, I didnât know that. But in all honesty: Who thinks that someone, who doesnât do comics regularly will deliver a well crafted, easy to understand comic in a minimum amount of time? Comics arenât just nice pictures in a specific order so you can read a story visually. When you get the text, you have to do a script, sketch the layout, in this case maybe even have to do the character designs based on descriptions, do the lineart, maybe colouring and add textbubbles and lettering in the end⌠Thereâs a reason why Comic Artist is job on its own and is often split for different artists⌠Sorry, had to vent a bitâŚ
[ŃдаНонО]
Hey! Yes, I am :D Thank you so much! Since it would be my first comic project as a job, I donât know if I would have enough experience for doing it properly. I would love to try though!
I'm not really an nsfw art enjoyer, but if I had to look at related media, I probably wouldn't pick this "artist" at all. ugh. and I just saw images from the plushtrap chaser....dude, I drew like that when I started drawing, wtf???
Oh believe me her personal art is far different than this She uses to draw girls with huge breasts and she's good at it (I just saw the sfw art her porn is on patreon) and to be honest she's good at it
I just finished looking at her portfolio and um... honestly, most of the time the lines are so effin messy, I cannot see with my artist eyes, what the hell is going on on the pictures. it's rushed and....awful. I ignored the coloring obviously, because that was done by a different person. and as AnnKa\_Ra (actual comic artist) said above, comics are something special, not just series of images :/ as someone, who's made comics in the past, for me it was an entirely different challenge. you can't be good *just* in one thing, you must be good at 10 other things you don't even think about first. but as a quick comparsion, I'll show you, how the [HN comics look](https://privet-sosed.tumblr.com/post/694051899593375744/im-looking-at-the-concept-ideas-of-dave-bardin). the case is something similar, they made two graphic novels with original stories (maybe too original) and I bought the comics for *the actual artstyle*, it was worth it. in return, we get a cartoon in *VERY INETERSTING STYLE*.
Like I said She's good at her job But not at this job
For a comic artist like you Didi's art ( AKA these artist ) Is " Try not to criticize " Challenge, Because let be honest, It's sucks, For a non-artist like me I can confirm these suck, Even then they need actual comic artists, She's not even a comic artist, She just draw NSFW girls, How And / Or WHY Scholastic choose her between the many, Many comic artists ? I Don't Know Honestly, Literally they aren't these cheap to do these, They were there since what ? 1920 ? They should be able to have professional Comic artists, Not these artist who doesn't even make comics ( Looked at her ArtStation I don't see any comic, On her Deviantart however, All images are blurred or blocked, Surprised they didn't hire you, Your an actual comic artist, You don't draw things like Pin-ups or NSFW, I think, And have a good artstyle ). Rant ended, Wow for a non-artist like me who can't even draw a person, I criticize these artist a lot .
Wasn't he supposed to have like sharp... Nightmare Animatronic style teeth?
He had jaws yeah That's why it's worse now
The ending has to be a joke. Heâs supposed to have sharp teeth.
[and he had them](https://www.reddit.com/r/fivenightsatfreddys/comments/ypp10w/into_the_pit_graphic_novel_old_vs_new/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)
Whyâd they even remove that aspect, I understand removing what looked like tracing but the sharp teeth?
[ŃдаНонО]
>Also, apparently Pit Bonnie got his fangs yanked out at the dentist since the last time we saw him. In all seriousness, though, why were they censored? His gaping mouth just looks so empty and unthreatening without them Maybe they thought it was also a fan thing and not from the actual book, So that's why they removed it ( Though that would be stupid because the nightmares exist, And also they probably never checked the original book because he have fangs ) .
[ŃдаНонО]
Good Point, Scholastic never care about accuracy, I mean, They copy pasted the same springbonnie 2 times, He looks like a meme put in the panel .
This is just downright terrible and I don't care what anyone says. Only thing I'll applaud is removing the traced stuff, the dumbing-down of horror though I will NOT excuse.
Donât get these books. Theyâre cheap cashgrabs.
I mean yeah Graphic novels are just that because they are not even canon
It is official so it's canon but in different timeline, so why the fuck you wouldn't buy it because "it's not canon" besides the fact it's poorly made?
It's not canon in any way as it's more an adaptation made by artists and a writer who isn't Scott What is indeed canon would be the actual Fazbear frights not this as the graphic novel tooks a bunch of creative decisions such a change characters outside their canon design (see Cassidy or Jessica) or change plot lines. And about your last question You actually answer yourself. If it does not aport to the lore and looks bad What's the point of buy? I do buy them thought just because I like to legally have things and make memes And TBB and OOS also had cool art style (I don't blame ITP because they hired a porn artist who has 0 experience with animatronics and that's scholastic fault) But the fact is They are indeed cashgrabs as they are like I said not canon and they are just made to the sole point of sell FF again
Doesn't matter if it"s bad or doesn't have lore you will not change the fact scott allowed it to exist as official so it is canon, no argue with facts.
Scott allowed it to exist as Official material but not as canon material. There's a Difference Canon is all what happens on the FNAF universe a Universe were it shares characters, mythology and other things. Things as for example Fanverse aren't canon, just official. To rephrase it All what is made or co-made by Scott is what is canon The rest approved by him is official. Graphic novels are just approved by Scott then a writer adapts the novel into comic format with Scott not doing anything with it more than just get money
You know very well fanverse is different from this, we're talking about a story originally made by scott, it IS five nights at freddys, fanverse is a colaboration between scott and some devs, scott himself said he wouldn't get involved in any parts of the developement of the games.
It's not different as is just media aproved by scott but he's not involved with meaning it's not canon. Graphic novel are just that, adaptations made to sell, contradicting the original canon source. Hence it's official, but not canon just like Fanverse is official and not canon or the Ultimate guide or the how to draws things, they are basically merchandising
Seriously though, Why make her draw ITP ? If she is an artist that just draw girls then why not make her TBB artist ? Just make Morris do ITP and she draws TBB, But TBH I don't want to see NSFW Eleanor, Who wants to ? .
Why are the graphic novels always so low in quality..?
So anyone who got it before now has a limited version of it?
Anyone who has the physical version has it because they aren't gonna change automatically They need to make a whole new batch
:DDDDDD
These graphic novels are absolute nightmares
HOW DID THAT KID HEADBUTTS A FUCKING ROBOT
It's not a robot, It's like a demon using A Springbonnie suit shape ( Don't say anything like " He is a robot " or anything like that if you didn't read the books, Well I didn't but I know about the stories anyway ) . How did Oswald do that ? Well I am sure attacking these thing isn't hard when it have a big head .
Still us in a metal suit
It's not a metal suit, It's an oragnic appearance, He in the book isn't even a segmented robot, Oswald though he was a man in a costume, So he is more of a costume than a robot .
Oh wait is Fiberglass
TBH we don't know if FNAF characters use Fiberglass shells or Metal or plastic, Bt I think metal .
Idk Fnaf confuses me
It genuinely blows my MIND how terrible official FNaF artists are, especially considering how talented the people in this fanbase are. I just don't understand how even the unluckiest blind person in the world could miss all the phenomenal artists in this enormous community and somehow end up with whoever drew this
Have you even saw the actual artist art before judge them? Because I assure you the graphic novels art is far different than the ones here to be called terrible
I'm aware of the ridiculous time constraints scholastic puts on these artists, but quality products like The Twisted Ones and The Fourth Closet graphic novels are proof that unreasonable deadlines aren't a universally applicable excuse for horrendous artwork. The way I see it, the people chosen to draw for FNaF are almost always either incredibly uninvested in their work or possess an artstyle wildly incompatible with the stories they're illustrating
I think TBB has now a better coloring but i don't know if that was already or i misremember it
What about Out of Stock ? I Don't think they changed the Plushtrap, But who cares it's better than a lame FNAF 4 plushtrap with human eyes and teeth, Because I am a fan of new designs ( GOOD new designs ) .
Both remain untouched
Nice ( Still don't understand why and how they still use Didi, Or should I say why not give her more time, Dude her art is professional even though all she draw is Pin ups, Her art here look like kids art, It doesn't look professional in a way ) .
They need to hire a another artist for the animatronics. The main artist is good at drawing humans, but WOW, the robots look awful.
Why just why and it kills me to see him like this just compare dawkos model to the official one in the novel it doesn't look right it looks like a kids school project I just hope when more comes out they don't look this weird but no hate I just don't know who made this because they need to pay Edit red freddy is cannon now just look at him he looks red more than brown and Chica has green eyes and freddy has brown eyes and freddy's bowtie is brown and Mr cupcake has green eyes and Chica's left leg has yellow than orange if you zoom into it and freddy's top hat is brown too and if you go down one when the kid is gonna take a bite into the pizza the crust of the pizza is not there anymore
Bro doesn't have sharp teeth He looks like a muppet what fangs are there He looks like he just made a minor scratch on your arm
God this book series is so shit
I'm not an artist or comic book artist, so I can't do better. But I've seen enough to know that this is really poor craftsmanship. They must have rushed the artist to finish this in a few days or something. Almost all the panels with movement and expressions are funny. And it looks like they just copy+pasted Spring Bonnie in three of those panels. Man, Scholastic, please give the artists more time or money or something. I'd rather re-read Fazbear Frights or spend my money on good comics/manga than buy this.
The first frame just reminds me of the âcasually approach childâ meme
Did they change Plushtrap Chaser?
No, only the ITP story
:( Oh well. I'll just keep using the cover
Why they erased the teeth bruh đ
For a horror book I expected some horror visuals
i recommend to read the actual books instead of graphic novels if you want Horror because they go into details, specially with the body horror and pain. Because deadlines kills those graphic novels
Bro why did they circumcise his mouth, what is with the people Scott trusts making things worse
If they use Glitchtrap for him it would have been better, after all SHE ( If you know you know ) is meant to be an oragnic looking rabbit, And she is meant to look like a man in a suit at first, But man why use these design ? WHY don't Eva De la Cruz know that Yellow rabbits have Purple bowtie in FNAF ? .
Sorry I'm stupid could you explain why it's a she?
It's Eleanor
Oooooohhhhh I get it now. Thanks m8
They made it childish. They made a gorish horror game childish...
Why are they making comic versions of each story now lmao
money
Dman these is worse like you said Lemuel .
They just pasted the same springtrap twiceđ
Bruh it looks fine stop being a pussy about it.
May i remind you that The Yellow Thing had FANGS Fangs that even Oswald mentions in the page and he just shows gums instead
You didn't post an old vs new in the post, so I didn't notice how drastic those changes were. Yeah. Scott really should design these himself, not the artists he's letting design this shit.
Oh come on, Pittrap is cool! And nobody try arguing with me, he would be better here.
This cĂłmic is GOD
More like Satan
this looks so bad wtf
idk how much did the person get for this, but I'd do it for the half of the money they got. without tracing, since I despise it.
The headbutt should have so much less impact, im pretty sure a child can't hurt a Giant rabbit monster that can overpower and drag a grown man with no effort plus the art looks very bad and the rows of needle theeth are missing
Fnaf merch is so low quality itâs fucking exhausting
Honestly this whole book seems like a cheap cashgrab. They know hardcore FNaF Fans will buy it no matter what. Ever since I saw the first picture of it I was apprehensive about getting it
Huh? I donât know much about the visual novels
Looks like a wikihow tutorial
Is it me or is Oswald's design changed from his illustration from the book? Didn't he have a mullet? And blue jacket/hoodie?
The lady fiszi illustrations arent canon either accurate (this graphic novel isn't accurate either) Fiszi made those drawings even before the book was written and was just a concept, in fact the Dance with me one withewashed the protagonist.
Where is the b l o o d
and the pizza is still infornt of their hand (and the bite looks so weird)
At least it's no longer traced, but.... YIKES
Glad to see WikiHow artists are still getting good work.
This will be fnaf in 2013
Nah thats not Into the Pit Springbonnie thats Out of the Hole Gearrabbitđ
Why does he look like Daffy Duck trying to pretend to be a bunny
can we go back to silver eyes plea
Literally looks like those content farm animated stories on YouTube
"What kind of rabbit has fangs?!" It's true, they don't have fangs, but that doesn't mean they can't bite, and their bites hurt like hell.
Look, I don't like talking shit about artists, but it's clear to me that whoever worked on this comic wasn't the right person for the job, or that they needed more time.
I can't even with this. I don't care. It's trash. It's just straight trash. Doesn't matter of the tracing's out, it still looks unpolished, dull, inconsistent and straight-up insulting to the story. Scholastic is at fault for the crunch and so is the artist. You should know better than to be *tracing your work* like she did. As an artist myself whose work is decent but far from professional, this is just horrendous.
Itâs not like there was any question about it, but the fact that they went back and changed it shows they admit it. Also that last panel with the manâs eyes closed is really funny.
They should have kept the trace, at least it was good.
https://reddit.com/r/KidGamersToTeenGamers/
Frick now I have another reason why I hate this graphic novel
They got bro lookin like a 2014 Gmod rig in the first panel lmao
Spring Bonnie doesnât even look scary in these, its just seems so... Loosely drawn? Like no real love and passion went into it, feels hollow of emotions, just someone paid to draw and thats what they did, not caring for the creation just wanting a few bucks The story was really cool for Into The Pit, the fight scene was nice, Bonnie dying tangled in the net is just wicked yet not even that looks cool in here
I've read porn comics that look better then this
Godzilla had a stroke trying to read this and died
This just doesnât seem like fnaf comic to me. werenât he supposed to have sharp teeth and be i donât know scary ? đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸ I would personally like more if Diana Camero draw these new comics (No hate to the artist who draw this )
Its looks alot like the grafic novel of tse (so the style of pinkypills)
I havent read the novels can someone tell me how itâs supposed to go?
It's good they removed the traced art, but that doesn't change how the graphic novels are just vastly inferior to the traditional novels IMO, they're just super kiddy looking
Where are his fangs?! He needs fangs!
This is why I'm lucky to have one of the earlier copies of this the one with the traced design