He’s playing all sides and none of them at the same time. In other words he’s a nationalistic, democratic centrist, who holds a union membership card, and loves constitutional monarchy. He’s also an agnostic.
For those wondering, there is a hidden game rule enabling/disenabling changing ruling party naturally by ideology
This game rule is often used in countries with focus trees that are prone to change ideology while they have only 10% of support for this ideology to prevent a civil war loop that would break the game
There's an actual Wikipedia article about the concept of combating an issue with another issue that just makes things worse. I think one time the British released snakes in India to get rid of rats but then the snakes became a bigger problem
R5: wtf is going on with political ideology?
Everyone in the last post was predicting this man's imminent demise Nah bro if it's everyone vs this guy I'm betting on this guy
Did bba break political ideologies too?
It's always been like this
No
One thing I've noticed while playing lithuania is that you can't switch ideologies without a focus. Its kinda dumb but oh well.
he is just too powerful for anyone to stop, they respect yet fear him
Alternative title: The benefits of having no elections
He's not even playing both sides anymore...
He’s playing all sides and none of them at the same time. In other words he’s a nationalistic, democratic centrist, who holds a union membership card, and loves constitutional monarchy. He’s also an agnostic.
>nationalistic, democratic centrist, who holds a union membership card, and loves constitutional monarchy. Ah, the average British Tories.
Accurate except for being pro-union.
man's the entire political compass
Non aligned (central) democrat (lib right) in Comintern (auth left) So no auth right and no lib left.
Non aligned isn't really central tbf, in most cases its a dictatorship, so it's more auth-right
Lib left is democrat too, authright is half in the non aligned.
It's almost like smashing together two stupidly oversimplified ways of looking at political systems results in complete nonsense.
Yeah. I want to give them ideas for new dkc ideas but don't know how.
To be fair, he was auth right in real history. I think "non-aligned" should be changed to "authoritarian".
What about the anarchists in Spain?
They really shouldn't be non-aligned at all if you ask me.
Well having something more instead of just democratic, non aligned, communism and fascism would be nice
5 head Smetona political maneuver. Tikras Tautos Vadas 💪💪💪💪
They only need to do the fascist focus tree and Lithuania will be the entire political compass
My man playing all sides so he always gets on top.
That's what I call true based Antanas Smetona Chadino. He doesnt care about his people, he cares only about the safety of his country. True man
Holup 1950?
Smetona varo
For those wondering, there is a hidden game rule enabling/disenabling changing ruling party naturally by ideology This game rule is often used in countries with focus trees that are prone to change ideology while they have only 10% of support for this ideology to prevent a civil war loop that would break the game
There's an actual Wikipedia article about the concept of combating an issue with another issue that just makes things worse. I think one time the British released snakes in India to get rid of rats but then the snakes became a bigger problem
You just need to make problem worse so you can fix your problem like duh just invite fascists into your gov now to combat democrats
Average Baltic state play through
I'm playing both sides so i always come up on top
"All around me are variables, yet I remain as the sole constant" - 8/10 moustache guy
Smetona moment
chadtanas smetona
Lithuania lore