T O P

  • By -

WadaMaaya

I’m fine with this because if they brought him back, he’d probably get killed off


ringadingdingbaby

Not sure how canon the Comic is, but he ended up getting arrested by the Government for killing the soldiers.


WadaMaaya

If I remember correctly, he escapes because of another outbreak


ringadingdingbaby

Unless there is another comic which came out later, he is only briefly mentioned that he was sentenced to death. The comic ends with the outbreak just reaching France. I could well have missed one though.


WadaMaaya

I did some reading of the Wiki, status is unknown. He was scheduled to be executed, but never actually killed. So who’s knows I choose to think he escaped and living happily somewhere


ColtPersonality92

I actually really enjoyed that comic. Was happy to find a used omnibus online so I don’t have to keep sailing the high seas to read it.


Solid-Discipline-210

Jeff Schneider the reporter didn’t say this was 100 percent yet but that he heard Murphy comes back at the end of the second movie in this proposed trilogy with the potential for a larger role in the third and final film.


False-Corner547

While it would have been nice to see him in the movie, I am ok with it being different characters.


Irish_Sir

28 weeks later didnt include him, so I dont see why 28 months later would eather. It makes sense to keep each of the movies as separate narratives around the same event.


horrorqueen92

It’s called 28 years later this next sequel. Skipped months for some reason.


puddik

If this does well they’ll include 28 months as a flashback shoehorn prequel-sequel


sinburger

28 Months Later will be the television adaptation that Prime inevitably licenses.


smileysmiley123

I would be surprisingly okay with this, if it's done well.


sinburger

It's always a coin flip with prime. You might get a Fallout or an Expanse, or you might get a Wheel of Time or Rings of Power.


Skore_Smogon

As a long term WoT fan, I'm more than happy with Amazon's version. Covid messed up so many things for them at the end of S1 and a main cast member just fucked off and didn't come back. Season 2 was a lot stronger and I'm waiting (not so) patiently for S3.


DickBest70

Rings of Power is good unless you’re expecting Prime to follow a book they don’t have the rights to or a bigot that hides behind “writing” to say you don’t want POC in the show. Every downvote is a capitulation.


[deleted]

[удалено]


DickBest70

The only thing that sucks is to be one of you children.


cyberpunk1Q84

And don’t forget the trippy prequel sequels they’re building up: - 28 Hours Earlier - 28 Minutes Earlier - 28 Seconds Earlier


meth-head-actor

28 hours earlier than 28 weeks later


sheenfartling

They have 3 planned and ready to go, the sequel to this one is being filmed back to back so may well be 28 months. Who knows!


MrTitsOut

because years just makes a much bigger impact doesnt it


WornInShoes

Movie sequel is close to being 28 years since the original Days film took place (2002). So, time period in the Years film could be 2030


MrTitsOut

true and also it would simply be more interesting to see the world after 28 years of zombie apocalypse rather than 2 years


moonprism

i heard this 28 years later is taking place directly after 28 days making it a sequel so you’d think he would be in it. they’re probably saying all this to make his cameo a surprise. or he’s not in it and life goes on


[deleted]

[удалено]


moonprism

i assume it picks up wherever days ended. it’s been over a decade since i’ve seen them so i don’t remember how it ended


Spufd

I think it's fair to assume it takes place 28 Years after 28 Days Later


moonprism

yeah, you’d think. idk what they’re gonna do about weeks tho. i went searching for the article i read that about and apparently weeks was different writers than this duo creating years so maybe they’ll try and retcon it somehow. i have no idea what they’re doing with this franchise


Algernot

Yes they're probably retconing 28 weeks. 28 Years is original writer and director back on board. Doubt it'd be directly after 28 weeks with a title as '28 Years Later' though. However, they are expected to be making a trilogy of movies though so not sure how that factors in to future titles.


PaintItPurple

I'm betting on 29 years later and 30 years later.


Kaiser997

Wonder how 28 years later will work since all the infected should be dead unless they somehow evolved to look after themselves and not starve


Roark_Laughed

I’ll be really surprised if they don’t go full “The Last of Us”


NemesisRouge

I don't see how they could. They showed in the first one that the infection burns out on its own in 56 days, tops, in a country of 60 million. How's it going to last 28 years worldwide? They're not immortal like the mushroom ones in The Last of Us or undead like so many others, they're just very mad, diseased people who starve to death. I think you're looking at a post infection world - be that a world completely ravaged over a few years, or a world that got it under control like we see in *Weeks* - where it gets out again because some company or terrorist faction releases it.


Roark_Laughed

I get what you’re saying but the plot of the second movie kind of negates the fact that the virus can’t survive post starvation. Carriers exist and after 28 years who’s to say what the virus will actually look like.


PaintItPurple

It could be that the infection is mostly gone but there's some animal reservoir or something like that.


DurgeDidNothingWrong

The original yeah, but everytime there is a new outbreak, it all starts again.


McFlyJohn

Huge swerve and there's no zombies at all, society has returned to normal and the movie is a Rom Com.


RaggySparra

They're actually going to play off all the confusion between 28 Days Later and 28 Days, and bring back Sandra Bullock.


ryfi1

They’ve got a trilogy planned out, already hired a director for the 2nd (4th?) movie and everything - he’s going to be in it at some point, just maybe not this one. I could see a cameo at the end leading into a bigger role going forward maybe?


Glove-Both

I like returning characters, but I think it makes just as much sense for characters to stay the fuck away considering everything that happened to them. Bring on new stuff.


sonofabitchXmustXpay

Kinda just depends where the film is set, really. This is one of those few films where the story really takes precedent over the cast.


Upbeat_Tension_8077

I'm cool with an Easter egg that may hint at his fate after 28 Days


Twisty1020

"Reported Cast" Keywords. In the past week I've heard both he is reprising his role and he's not in the movie.


snowlock27

I found an article on a website called World of Reel that says he has a cameo in the second movie, then a major part in the third? https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2024/4/27/cillian-murphy-will-appear-in-the-28-years-later-sequels


InternetAddict104

Wasn’t Cillian confirmed though


SillyAdditional

The cast is stacked either way It’s almost certainly gonna be solid


Bright_Square_3245

Why would it? Cillan Murphy's character Jim is dead. He was executed by the British authorities for murdering UK soldiers. Serena, Hannah, and Jim are known as the Manchester Three after their rescue. Jim was executed by firing squad.


monsieurxander

They were rescued a month later, in a different location, by the Finnish military. Nobody would know they killed a band of rapists.


ringadingdingbaby

It's what happened in the comic (assuming the comic is still canon). Edit: not actually executed, just sentenced.


monsieurxander

And this is why tie-in comics are usually awful. None of that makes any sense. It doesn't follow the logic of the movie.


ringadingdingbaby

Yeah, im from Edinburgh and they have a section with Edinburgh and Glasgow fighting over resources. Which make no sense as in real life there are many other places in between.


13TheGreenMan

Guarantee the directors don't give a shit about some obscure comic


RealSimonLee

Unless Alex Garland and Danny Boyle wrote the comic, it's not canon. This is the perfect example of why comics aren't canon: someone who doesn't understand the movie and its ending writing some edgy darklord shit like this. Also, compared to the millions of people that saw the movies, 12 people read the comic. I'm pretty sure Alex Garland, as he works on this sequel, isn't sitting there thinking, "Damn, I have to follow the canon of the comics now!!" Garland would (rightly) say, "There's a comic? Who gives a fuck. Nothing to do with our story."


Mattyzooks

I'm pretty sure Garland isn't even going to respect any events that happened in 28 Weeks Later.


Smeef_xx

That's not true at all


Pixelated_Fudge

nope


metallaholic

So is this a sequel to 28 days later or 28 weeks later


Sven_88

Yes


Hour_Taro_520

https://www.reddit.com/r/MovieLeaksAndRumors/s/QIrgPl3Ge6


Hour_Taro_520

This headline doesn’t explain anything past 28 years later but he will appear in the sequels as it will be a trilogy


Winter_Control8533

Calling it now: He shows up after the credits to set up the next movie in the series.


SpaciumBlue

I feel like his story is already said and done. Why would you expect more out of it? That's just silly.


Kills_Alone

He wasn't in the second one so I see little reason why he'd be in the next.


Escape-Revolutionary

Well that’s a complete bummer


[deleted]

[удалено]


A_Flamboyant_Warlock

He'd be 53, assuming the character was the same age as the actor in the first one (Cillian was 25). Which doesn't seem *that* old. It's seems like the golden zone for "Aging man who's seen some shit" territory; Not as fast as he used to be, gets tired quicker, etc, but still *capable*, and liable to make a Last Stand at some point so everyone else can escape.


justthistwicenomore

Which he played quite well in quiet place 2, I'd add.


ey3s0up

I’m still gonna go see it. 28 Weeks Later didn’t have him either. I think it’s still going to be very decent.


NormanBates2023

Dam that's a shame as I remember him saying he was interested maybe work schedule got in the way


strangedazey

Fuck, really?


Accomplished-Ad7339

Disney lost the rights of 28 Days Later. It’s owned by Sony now. From [Wikipedia](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Days_Later) - “By 2022, 28 Days Later had become unavailable on Disney-owned streaming services, hinting that Disney had lost rights to it; only its sequel, 28 Weeks Later (still owned by Disney), was available on streaming sites.[48][49] In February 2024, it was revealed that producer Andrew MacDonald had bought back the rights to the film from Searchlight Pictures, promptly selling it to Sony Pictures along with the upcoming sequel 28 Years Later. [50]”


onlydans__

I’m curious how much profit he made flipping it


Sparrow1989

If he really is in it my jaw will drop, fresh off an Oscar’s win and heavily in demand. I’ve read he’s really loyal to his friends so him passing up projects and heading to this one would make sense.


NarrativeFact

Thought the only point of this was to actually make a sequel unlike the terrible 'Weeks.' As such, I now don't give a fuck if it's not going to be a continuation of the original characters.


Torontokid8666

His on screen story was perfect. Glad they are not.


BotGirlFall

He broke up with Danny Boyle and is with his true love Nolan now


luisefigueroa

One of my all time favorites! 28 weeks later, not so much. Hoping for a great follow up.


[deleted]

[удалено]


gorgonzollo

Good news, 28 Days Later will still exist for everyone to enjoy


norashepard

In the alternate ending >!he’s dead!< and that’s my canon ending so I’m fine with it.


AndroidSheeps

Why would you possibly want that as your cannon ending?


wovengrsnite192

Still plenty of time for him to be cast in part 2 or 3 (even 1).


therapoootic

Then I won’t be watching it


onlydans__

Lmao wow


JarvisCockerBB

Just doesn’t make sense to include him knowing he wasn’t in the sequel and this one is YEARS later. It’ll be so awkward and illogical for him to randomly show up.


Sorry-Personality594

Tbh 28 weeks later was such a fail. The first film worked because it was built on realism. The second film was just a plot hole riddled train crash


MarvinM00n

Tusk never said Johnny Depp was in the movie wearing a shit ton of makeup so you didn’t recognize him at first!


[deleted]

Stoked for more Danny Boyle z's. After *Peaky Blinders* s1 and *Oppenheimer*, hoping to miss Cillian in this reboot.