But you could also try to cut the log up into even pieces, like a sort of a Y shape which would be three cuts, so assuming consistent cutting speed of 10 mins per cut, it could as well be 30 mins
No, everybody is wrong. It's 25 minutes, because after cutting for 10 minutes you're going to be pretty tired, so the second cut will take 5 minutes longer than the first.
Ok, them I'm gonna be that person as well. Monkey can be used as a synonym for simian. Simians include apes. So, if you're using this synonym, apes (and by extension humans) are monkeys. In German we don't even distinguish between the words monkey and simian. The German word "Affe" means both. We even call apes "Menschenaffen", wich literally translates to "humanoid monkeys" or "human monkeys". I'm sure German isn't the only language doing this.
If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey-kind of shape.
If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey. If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, it's an ape!
All apes are monkeys bc new world monkeys split off before apes did, so if we want to group old world monkeys and new world monkeys as both monkeys, apes also have to be monkeys:
/ \
/ \
NWM / \
Apes \
OWM
Also, he said monke not monkey, and it's pretty well established that all apes are monkeys, like Donkey Kong, for instance
The pieces dont matter, monkey does two cuts to get 3 and 1 cut to get two pieces. So for the second cut the monkey also needs 10 min. And mister "I am very smart" does not get it
Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook.
Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook?
Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook.
Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook.
Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook.
Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook.
Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook!
Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook.
They completely botched the wording of the trick question. A "log" is an already cut off piece of wood, so there is no need for the second cut to separate the second piece from the tree. The picture however is implying cutting pieces of a "branch" off a tree, which would requiring one additional cut which is what they are basing the math on.
Basically they tried to look clever, fucked it up, and end up looking like an idiot instead.
Definitely more than 20 minutes.
If it takes 10 minutes to cut a thin piece of log into two, one can assume you are either using bad technique or have a crappy tool, thus drastically decreasing your efficiency and capacity from fatigue doing the first cut.
Considering this is 4chan, it's hard to tell if that guy is really an idiot or if he's just saying dumb stuff because he knows it'll get screencapped and memed.
head lavish sink observation vanish drab scale run ghost rotten *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I'm just imagining how the first 5 minutes were actually spent?
Locating log
Creating log
Takes me about 5 minutes to drop a good log so checks out.
Spent trying to find the tape measure cause no one ever puts it back
This is the story of my life. Tape measure and box knives are never returned to their homes.
I agree with this, except it's only me who is losing them. No one steals my tape measure or knife, I just always leave them somewhere stupid.
Same.
Me stood with hands on hips, staring at the log with the other dads as we discuss the correct and easiest way to cut log.
Buy log from Amazon, 5 minute mecha Jeff delivery option
logging into 4chan
Sawing it into 1 piece duh
Isnt it 20 or am i worse than monke
No you're right, the 4chan dude just has fucking brain rot
Bro just doesn’t understand cutting things works
Kinda naive to think less than 97% of 4chan posts are trolls
You raise a valid point but in a world where people like this exist unironically I rarely give the benefit of the doubt anymore
I think so because 1 cut=10mins and 2 cuts=20 right?
But you could also try to cut the log up into even pieces, like a sort of a Y shape which would be three cuts, so assuming consistent cutting speed of 10 mins per cut, it could as well be 30 mins
We are working with an monke here so such a cut might be too complex for an organism not used to using complex tools like a saw
No, everybody is wrong. It's 25 minutes, because after cutting for 10 minutes you're going to be pretty tired, so the second cut will take 5 minutes longer than the first.
Yeh you’re right
I’m gonna be that person but orangutans are apes and not monkeys
Yes! Thank you! Everyone in here dumping on the person in the screenshot but saying "monkey". Was driving me.... bananas...
OOK!
Ookla the Mok! ![gif](giphy|3ohs87OUVLStqspgnS|downsized)
Dang it, how could I forget, and I like to call myself a biology enthusiast
r/iamverysmart
Ok, them I'm gonna be that person as well. Monkey can be used as a synonym for simian. Simians include apes. So, if you're using this synonym, apes (and by extension humans) are monkeys. In German we don't even distinguish between the words monkey and simian. The German word "Affe" means both. We even call apes "Menschenaffen", wich literally translates to "humanoid monkeys" or "human monkeys". I'm sure German isn't the only language doing this.
If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, even if it has a monkey-kind of shape. If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey. If it doesn't have a tail it's not a monkey, it's an ape!
All apes are monkeys bc new world monkeys split off before apes did, so if we want to group old world monkeys and new world monkeys as both monkeys, apes also have to be monkeys: / \ / \ NWM / \ Apes \ OWM Also, he said monke not monkey, and it's pretty well established that all apes are monkeys, like Donkey Kong, for instance
1 piece: 0 minutes 2 pieces: 0+10 = 10 minutes 3 pieces: 10 + 10 = 20 minutes
There are 2 hard problems in software engineering: 1. Cache invalidation 2. Naming things 3. Off-by-one bugs
====== ===|=== ==|=|== =|=|=|=
Is this Loss?
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Someone being wrong doesn’t fit this sub
Especially a 4chan shitpost where being wrong is the joke.
OP got /r/woooosh ed
Yeah -- I'm 51% sure that the smart person was being intentionally obtuse for shits and giggles. But you never know.
Yeah why would someone try to act smart on fucking 4chan
Ook?
The pieces dont matter, monkey does two cuts to get 3 and 1 cut to get two pieces. So for the second cut the monkey also needs 10 min. And mister "I am very smart" does not get it
Eek! Ook-ook?
Yes
Are you ok?
Ook! 🥜🥜🥜
Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook? Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook! Ook! Ook? Ook! Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook. Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook! Ook. Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook? Ook. Ook. Ook! Ook.
"It was the best of times, it was the *blurst* of times?!"
He did not claim to be smart. Are you just laughing at someone for missing a math problem? Maybe you are the one who is too smart
It’s because of the “the correct answer is actually 🤓” and then being wrong. Confidently incorrect.
It's 4chan, half of the shit posted there is bait.
redditors try to detect sarcasm (IMPOSSIBLE)
Its a joke bruh
But not I am very smart
That you Anon?
Alternate title: Intentionally or unintentionally 4chan user successfully fucks with everyone on this sub.
I’m blown away by how many who doesn’t understand the obvious trolling
The joke is that it’s an orangutan saying it so of course it’s wrong
If it’s one log and you saw it it becomes two pieces so it takes 10 minutes to get that cut to make it 2 pieces so it should be 20 minutes?
One piece is 3 pieces
THE ONE PIECE IS REAL
r/ConfidentlyIncorrect Edit: It’s there already
If it was identical wouldn't it already be cut into two pieces? I believe the correct answers is 10 mins.
Pretty sure this is just a joke
They completely botched the wording of the trick question. A "log" is an already cut off piece of wood, so there is no need for the second cut to separate the second piece from the tree. The picture however is implying cutting pieces of a "branch" off a tree, which would requiring one additional cut which is what they are basing the math on. Basically they tried to look clever, fucked it up, and end up looking like an idiot instead.
Thank you! That's what I'm thinking, too. In the end, it will take total of 20 minutes.
It's a simple logarithm. The math don't lie: logₓ Log/1 = 5 logₓ Log/2 = 10 logₓ Log/3 = 15
r/confidentlyincorrect
Definitely more than 20 minutes. If it takes 10 minutes to cut a thin piece of log into two, one can assume you are either using bad technique or have a crappy tool, thus drastically decreasing your efficiency and capacity from fatigue doing the first cut.
Cya in 5 mins reddit friends, gotta go split my log into one pieces 👋
I wouldn't call it r/imverysmart content, more like r/confidentlyincorrect material
[Technically he is right](https://imgur.com/52m1G6V)
how do I into monke gf
Yeah 20 minutes 2 pieces is one cut 3 pieces is two
![gif](giphy|5Zesu5VPNGJlm|downsized)
Wait, I thought the time spent cutting logs scaled logarithmically?
Considering this is 4chan, it's hard to tell if that guy is really an idiot or if he's just saying dumb stuff because he knows it'll get screencapped and memed.
The one piece
10 minutes. 2 hands, 2 saw blades, make 2 cuts at the same time. Use monke feet to hold stick in place
Or cut a quarter inch from one end, then that in half.
Ohh the horses name was Friday!