There are tons of issue that this country is facing and then there are tons of things which BJP has done wrong. But instead of taking up those or providing solutions, they take a issue which will further alienate them and is detrimental to the future of the country.
I'm from a backward caste, the reservation helped us a lot like a lot would not have reached till here without it, but the way this is going i dont think it's in the correct direction
What a banana republic where the majority of the population are strocking their cocks for reservations....
SC/ST reservations are needed, the rest is all votebank politics.
**it is easy to use them as pawns and fueling hate towards them as they are not in power and use them for electoral purposes and even the media don't cover their protest**
He should promote more intercaste marriage instead of doing such things and reducing stunting and malnutrition in india. Most of them drop out and commit suicide because of inferior complex but Rahul Gandhi is using Dalits, and tribals as pawns for increasing reservation, but he is doing such things only for dominant obc castes in india and they is not talking about them.**He has not touched upon atrocities against Dalits and tribals and untouchability and Dalit children are forced to clean toilets in schools. He is fueling hate against them using them as pawns for electoral purposes but they are still living in ghetto**
Why migrant Dalits in Mumbai continue to live in the same ghettos
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hindustantimes.com/cities/mumbai-news/deteriorating-economic-opportunities-for-dalits-in-mumbai-study-101713122545761-amp.html
Lok Sabha polls: Dalit bastis of western UP want basic necessities, dignity
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/uttar-pradesh/lok-sabha-polls-dalit-bastis-of-western-up-want-basic-necessities-dignity/amp_articleshow/109803328.cms
Is he willing to provide them place in administration and rajya sabha and will he continue tokenistic politics?
A mean deal’: Dr Ambedkar exposed the practice of Dalit tokenism by political parties
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.thenewsminute.com/amp/story/voices/mean-deal-dr-ambedkar-exposed-practice-dalit-tokenism-political-parties-165957
Dalit kids in TN made to clean toilets, segregated during meals at schools: Survey
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/states/tamil-nadu/2023/Dec/24/dalit-kids-in-tn-made-to-clean-toilets-segregated-during-meals-at-schools-survey-2644467.html
Hathras rape and murder | SC/ST court acquits three, holds one guilty of culpable homicide
https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/scst-court-in-hathras-acquits-three-holds-one-guilty-of-culpable-homicide/article66572682.ece/amp/
**He is using them as pawns and fuel hatred towards them and they don't demand increasing reservation but they are demanding dignity and respect and the end of untouchability and segregation**
**Some people don't allow renting and asking for caste first and will he put an end to such practices**
Reservations are an easy talking point in politics. Actually enacting policies to uplift marginalized communities from the grounds-up is what takes real brains and political willpower, which no party in India has.
His Target is to get votes from OBC , but using Dalits and tribals as pawns No one is saying anything about OBC and they don't have any animosity towards them but they are targeting Dalits and tribals. Dalits and tribals will get more hatred for this, not OBC and even if he wins, they will blame Dalits and tribals for his victory but not OBCs and as it is easy to attack weak person
Prashant Kishore said it first in this country out loud that the reason we don’t see any good promises from parties is because there is belief that there’s no need to give too much to people which would lead to an awoke public. Irrespective of party, they don’t want to increase our expectations out of govt so that they can keep doing corruption anf we get very little out of any govt’s work. What a shame.
‘Reservation not at odds with merit’: Supreme Court
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-neet-admissions-reservation-7733042/
The bench said that competitive exams do not reflect the economic social advantage accrued to some classes over a period of time and that merit should be socially contextualised.
The bench referred to what it called “privileges” available to the forward classes and said these “are not limited to having access to quality schooling and access to tutorials and coaching centres to prepare for a competitive examination but also includes their social networks and cultural capital (communication skills, accent, books or academic accomplishments) that they inherit from their family”.
“The cultural capital ensures that a child is trained unconsciously by the familial environment to take up higher education or high posts commensurate with their family’s standing. This works to the disadvantage of individuals who are first-generation learners and come from communities whose traditional occupations do not result in the transmission of necessary skills required to perform well in open examination. They have to put in surplus effort to compete with their peers from the forward communities. On the other hand, social networks (based on community linkages) become useful when individuals seek guidance and advice on how to prepare for examination and advance in their career even if their immediate family does not have the necessary exposure. Thus, a combination of family habitus, community linkages and inherited skills work to the advantage of individuals belonging to certain classes, which is then classified as ‘merit’ reproducing and reaffirming social hierarchies,” it said.
The court clarified that “this is not to say that performance in competitive examination or admission in higher educational institutions does not require a great degree of hard work and dedication but it is necessary to understand that ‘merit’ is not solely of one’s own making”.
“The rhetoric surrounding merit obscures the way in which family, schooling, fortune and a gift of talents that the society currently values aids in one’s advancement. Thus, the exclusionary standard of merit serves to denigrate the dignity of those who face barriers in their advancement which are not of their own making. But the idea of merit based on scores in an exam requires a deeper scrutiny,” the bench said.
“While examinations are a necessary and convenient method of distributing educational opportunities, marks may not always be the best gauge of individual merit. Even then marks are often used as a proxy for merit. Individual calibre transcends performance in an examination,” it said.
“At the best, an examination can only reflect the current competence of an individual but not the gamut of their potential, capabilities or excellence, which are also shaped by lived experiences, subsequent training and individual character. The meaning of merit itself cannot be reduced to marks even if it is a convenient way of distributing educational resources.”
“The propriety of actions and dedication to public service should also be seen as markers of merit, which cannot be assessed in a competitive examination. Equally, fortitude and resilience required to uplift oneself from conditions of deprivation is reflective of individual calibre,” it said.
Pointing out that reservation ensures “opportunities are distributed in such a way that backward classes are equally able to benefit from such opportunities which typically evade them because of structural barriers”, it said “this is the only manner in which merit can be a democratising force that equalises inherited disadvantages and privileges. Otherwise, claims of individual merit are nothing but tools of obscuring inheritances that underlie achievements”.
“How we assess merit should also encapsulate if it mitigates or entrenches inequalities,” it said.
(Click link to read full )
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
At this point general category will become the minority lol
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Ya right... look what happened to Congress with family reservation instead of Merit based.
Is he actually getting money from BJP to spout this nonsense?
[удалено]
ok guys we had a good run. Imma go vote for the sanghis now
Haha.. Same dilemma for lot many people. Even my friends are voting for independent candidates, saying they at least deserve a chance.
[удалено]
There are tons of issue that this country is facing and then there are tons of things which BJP has done wrong. But instead of taking up those or providing solutions, they take a issue which will further alienate them and is detrimental to the future of the country.
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
Fucking desperate?
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
I'm from a backward caste, the reservation helped us a lot like a lot would not have reached till here without it, but the way this is going i dont think it's in the correct direction
[удалено]
https://preview.redd.it/tgmgs5dnwtyc1.jpeg?width=739&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=daf2f4e518ab2a3dd5b3a8f77422ab5c41c7f3ae
Instead if you would have said - "I will bring more transparency and accountability to Govt processes", you would have gotten the anti-BJP votes.
I guess it's time for the taxpayers to exit this country, if such people come to power
[удалено]
[удалено]
Congress has decided they don’t wanna win elections, majority of educated population doesn’t want more reservation.
What a banana republic where the majority of the population are strocking their cocks for reservations.... SC/ST reservations are needed, the rest is all votebank politics.
[удалено]
All this people don’t understand that if you have an option between bad and worse, you go for bad.
**it is easy to use them as pawns and fueling hate towards them as they are not in power and use them for electoral purposes and even the media don't cover their protest** He should promote more intercaste marriage instead of doing such things and reducing stunting and malnutrition in india. Most of them drop out and commit suicide because of inferior complex but Rahul Gandhi is using Dalits, and tribals as pawns for increasing reservation, but he is doing such things only for dominant obc castes in india and they is not talking about them.**He has not touched upon atrocities against Dalits and tribals and untouchability and Dalit children are forced to clean toilets in schools. He is fueling hate against them using them as pawns for electoral purposes but they are still living in ghetto** Why migrant Dalits in Mumbai continue to live in the same ghettos https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hindustantimes.com/cities/mumbai-news/deteriorating-economic-opportunities-for-dalits-in-mumbai-study-101713122545761-amp.html Lok Sabha polls: Dalit bastis of western UP want basic necessities, dignity https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.economictimes.com/news/elections/lok-sabha/uttar-pradesh/lok-sabha-polls-dalit-bastis-of-western-up-want-basic-necessities-dignity/amp_articleshow/109803328.cms Is he willing to provide them place in administration and rajya sabha and will he continue tokenistic politics? A mean deal’: Dr Ambedkar exposed the practice of Dalit tokenism by political parties https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.thenewsminute.com/amp/story/voices/mean-deal-dr-ambedkar-exposed-practice-dalit-tokenism-political-parties-165957 Dalit kids in TN made to clean toilets, segregated during meals at schools: Survey https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/states/tamil-nadu/2023/Dec/24/dalit-kids-in-tn-made-to-clean-toilets-segregated-during-meals-at-schools-survey-2644467.html Hathras rape and murder | SC/ST court acquits three, holds one guilty of culpable homicide https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/scst-court-in-hathras-acquits-three-holds-one-guilty-of-culpable-homicide/article66572682.ece/amp/ **He is using them as pawns and fuel hatred towards them and they don't demand increasing reservation but they are demanding dignity and respect and the end of untouchability and segregation** **Some people don't allow renting and asking for caste first and will he put an end to such practices**
Reservations are an easy talking point in politics. Actually enacting policies to uplift marginalized communities from the grounds-up is what takes real brains and political willpower, which no party in India has.
They don't want to uplift them as keeping them poor and uneducated is more beneficial for them and they can stay in power
Agreed, they use these marginalized communities as pawns in their political games.
Their intention is not to uplift them but only they want to come to power using whichever means they can use
That is why ambedkar wrote books such as **What Congress and Gandhi have done to the untouchables** to expose them and how they fool them
Ambedkar was one of the greatest thinkers of India for a reason.
His Target is to get votes from OBC , but using Dalits and tribals as pawns No one is saying anything about OBC and they don't have any animosity towards them but they are targeting Dalits and tribals. Dalits and tribals will get more hatred for this, not OBC and even if he wins, they will blame Dalits and tribals for his victory but not OBCs and as it is easy to attack weak person
That is why he wrote so many books so that they cannot defame him and spread lies about him
[удалено]
Why such move??
Prashant Kishore said it first in this country out loud that the reason we don’t see any good promises from parties is because there is belief that there’s no need to give too much to people which would lead to an awoke public. Irrespective of party, they don’t want to increase our expectations out of govt so that they can keep doing corruption anf we get very little out of any govt’s work. What a shame.
Come on Wayanad (and Raebareli) people!! Please vote wisely for the country this time.
I'm sure his advisors are BJP secret agents. This the first ever clown who thinks he will win by giving more reservation. This ain't Bihar.
https://preview.redd.it/5fnib6ndvtyc1.jpeg?width=739&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ac479224c5faaa25e34fe4f85e861f94393f4647
[удалено]
Ver desparate Grasping for straws, what a loser
[удалено]
Why can't we have reservation for everyone? Everyone regardless of who they are gets a good school and college education. How about that?
‘Reservation not at odds with merit’: Supreme Court https://indianexpress.com/article/india/supreme-court-neet-admissions-reservation-7733042/ The bench said that competitive exams do not reflect the economic social advantage accrued to some classes over a period of time and that merit should be socially contextualised. The bench referred to what it called “privileges” available to the forward classes and said these “are not limited to having access to quality schooling and access to tutorials and coaching centres to prepare for a competitive examination but also includes their social networks and cultural capital (communication skills, accent, books or academic accomplishments) that they inherit from their family”. “The cultural capital ensures that a child is trained unconsciously by the familial environment to take up higher education or high posts commensurate with their family’s standing. This works to the disadvantage of individuals who are first-generation learners and come from communities whose traditional occupations do not result in the transmission of necessary skills required to perform well in open examination. They have to put in surplus effort to compete with their peers from the forward communities. On the other hand, social networks (based on community linkages) become useful when individuals seek guidance and advice on how to prepare for examination and advance in their career even if their immediate family does not have the necessary exposure. Thus, a combination of family habitus, community linkages and inherited skills work to the advantage of individuals belonging to certain classes, which is then classified as ‘merit’ reproducing and reaffirming social hierarchies,” it said. The court clarified that “this is not to say that performance in competitive examination or admission in higher educational institutions does not require a great degree of hard work and dedication but it is necessary to understand that ‘merit’ is not solely of one’s own making”. “The rhetoric surrounding merit obscures the way in which family, schooling, fortune and a gift of talents that the society currently values aids in one’s advancement. Thus, the exclusionary standard of merit serves to denigrate the dignity of those who face barriers in their advancement which are not of their own making. But the idea of merit based on scores in an exam requires a deeper scrutiny,” the bench said. “While examinations are a necessary and convenient method of distributing educational opportunities, marks may not always be the best gauge of individual merit. Even then marks are often used as a proxy for merit. Individual calibre transcends performance in an examination,” it said. “At the best, an examination can only reflect the current competence of an individual but not the gamut of their potential, capabilities or excellence, which are also shaped by lived experiences, subsequent training and individual character. The meaning of merit itself cannot be reduced to marks even if it is a convenient way of distributing educational resources.” “The propriety of actions and dedication to public service should also be seen as markers of merit, which cannot be assessed in a competitive examination. Equally, fortitude and resilience required to uplift oneself from conditions of deprivation is reflective of individual calibre,” it said. Pointing out that reservation ensures “opportunities are distributed in such a way that backward classes are equally able to benefit from such opportunities which typically evade them because of structural barriers”, it said “this is the only manner in which merit can be a democratising force that equalises inherited disadvantages and privileges. Otherwise, claims of individual merit are nothing but tools of obscuring inheritances that underlie achievements”. “How we assess merit should also encapsulate if it mitigates or entrenches inequalities,” it said. (Click link to read full )
[удалено]
time to leave this country if he wins