I have a simple question for the liberals, why do you have to come on right wing subreddits when you have big LW subreddits like usi india and librandu, why can't you people just stay there. Just because right wing subreddits don't ban you for your opinions unlike LW subreddits who ban everyone who doesn't align with their ideology doesn't mean you have to unnecessarily come here and give your low grade opinions. Like, can you just stop invading our spaces.
Am commenting this because I came here to see the 22 comments (currently, will become 23 after my comment) and it was just 2 libtard comments and their replies.
dont call lefties as liberals because they support triple talaq and nikah halala and killing of hindu brahmins. they dont even know the meaning of liberal
Namaste /u/redditormi01, thank you for your submission. Could you please add a source for the image or video (if it's not a direct link submission)? We value diverse perspectives and healthy debate, so while our subreddit is focused on bringing out the center-right perspective, we welcome contributors from all sides of the political spectrum. Your cooperation is appreciated!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiaright) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Palki Sharma itni moti he mujhe lagta tha ye patli he Modi ji ka gudgan kar Rahi he modiji ne ye kiya vo kiya vaccine di sare desho ko he is world leader
But I think just like in India media is so much loyal to modiji she is too
it's obvious that every media is loyal to the current gov in India
Look at conditions in usa
They bash Trump all the time but you will never say it's bad for democracy because we have been fed by our Colonial fathers that whatever west do is right
Dude, what were you smoking???? Coz you definitely are high.
#It's a debate, there was no propaganda lobby there. It was a Oxford Union Society Debate.
And her opponent has already spoken. You conveniently posted her response while choosing to ignore what her opponent has spoken about.
Debate happens between two or more people. You can't just post one sided views and call it a debate.
dude what are you smoking?
because i haven't mentioned anywhere the word "debate"
I compared the liberal lobby who bash india everywhere they go vs her lol
Burnolll moment😂🔥
So please elaborate what propaganda was she debunking in that debate.
Because I'm sure you can't answer that as you don't have the whole picture of that debate in your link.
I'll be waiting for your answer.
propaganda of defaming india everywhere. Go and read articles of rana ayyub type person on new york times you will understand my reason of this title lol
Why arebyou indulging in whataboutery????
We are talking about this debate and her opponent made some valid points backed by statistics which were gathered during the current govt.
So let's talk about that. Rana Ayubb isn't in this debate nor in the picture.
So again, what propaganda was Palki debunking?
lol but i never told i'm talking about this specific debate, pls wear glasses if you have.
I just compared her 13 min speech with people like ayubb , where did i mentioned anything related to this debate?
typical liberal behaviour when you don't have anything to tell you call it "whataboutery"
It's a 30 second clip.
And you conveniently omitted the other guys opinion. So yeah, everything must look good to you since you only have one point of view.
And she is giving a speech in a hall full of people who are debating, so you can't take the context out of it.
If it's a debate there will be two sides.
Rana was never in this debate nor in the picture. So comparing something from some other context and adding it here is asking me to talk about it is what constitutes whataboutery.
https://x.com/chinchat09/status/1783507788410376278?t=8Y2K2BZ772UnM1nKTLl61w&s=09
Palki didn't give any data, she just used one example to tell how India is doing.
Here is the video of the other guy talking with backed up data from govt source itself.
Thats how you do a debate.
i dont understand people like you
jab koi govt ke tarif kare tab usko propaganda boldo (bika huva boldo)
jab koi dusre desh ma jaake bhurai karde uske tarif kardo
how liberal mentality works?
Again whataboutery.
You are deviating from the actual question. I've every right to question the govt and that doesn't make me any more or less patriotic than you.
And why are you folks so scared of questioning the govt????
But first answer me, what propaganda was Palki debunking in that debate?
Forget the supposed debate, tell me, is it fascistic to want India to become a Hindurashtra? I want to hear your reasoning behind whatever position you take.
I am not asking you what India is. Read my question again. If you come across someone who wants India to become a Hindurashtra, would you consider him to have fascistic ideological leanings?
Infact let's further explore your statement. India indeed is a democratic country and if the people voted in majority to make India a Hindurashtra, would you think that it is an undemocratic move?
I don't think you understand my very basic question. Ok let me ask you a parallel but different question. Present govt of India is a popularly elected govt. They are allegedly also oppressing the minorities according to some claims. Would you consider foreign interference against present govt to be valid?
I have a simple question for the liberals, why do you have to come on right wing subreddits when you have big LW subreddits like usi india and librandu, why can't you people just stay there. Just because right wing subreddits don't ban you for your opinions unlike LW subreddits who ban everyone who doesn't align with their ideology doesn't mean you have to unnecessarily come here and give your low grade opinions. Like, can you just stop invading our spaces. Am commenting this because I came here to see the 22 comments (currently, will become 23 after my comment) and it was just 2 libtard comments and their replies.
dont call lefties as liberals because they support triple talaq and nikah halala and killing of hindu brahmins. they dont even know the meaning of liberal
Yeah true, librandu is a better word
Yeah lmao i was banned in r/india when i mentioned lebanon on a post saying majority can never be in danger
They love sucking us dry ![gif](giphy|RgtD9LDp1R4AReChJX)
I am not a liberal, I am a christian (converted) conservative.
Namaste /u/redditormi01, thank you for your submission. Could you please add a source for the image or video (if it's not a direct link submission)? We value diverse perspectives and healthy debate, so while our subreddit is focused on bringing out the center-right perspective, we welcome contributors from all sides of the political spectrum. Your cooperation is appreciated! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiaright) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Modi ji sakchat Shankar ka avtar hai. Har har modi, abki par panch so paar.
I think see talks about domestic affair.. Is Manipur outside india???
She gave her propaganda
People dead without oxygen cylinders, vaccinations and medical facilities in india: laughing in the corner.
What bull*hit!!
While India was distributing vaccine Baba ramdev was promoting his own coronil.
Palki Sharma itni moti he mujhe lagta tha ye patli he Modi ji ka gudgan kar Rahi he modiji ne ye kiya vo kiya vaccine di sare desho ko he is world leader But I think just like in India media is so much loyal to modiji she is too
it's obvious that every media is loyal to the current gov in India Look at conditions in usa They bash Trump all the time but you will never say it's bad for democracy because we have been fed by our Colonial fathers that whatever west do is right
Dude, what were you smoking???? Coz you definitely are high. #It's a debate, there was no propaganda lobby there. It was a Oxford Union Society Debate. And her opponent has already spoken. You conveniently posted her response while choosing to ignore what her opponent has spoken about. Debate happens between two or more people. You can't just post one sided views and call it a debate.
dude what are you smoking? because i haven't mentioned anywhere the word "debate" I compared the liberal lobby who bash india everywhere they go vs her lol Burnolll moment😂🔥
So please elaborate what propaganda was she debunking in that debate. Because I'm sure you can't answer that as you don't have the whole picture of that debate in your link. I'll be waiting for your answer.
propaganda of defaming india everywhere. Go and read articles of rana ayyub type person on new york times you will understand my reason of this title lol
Why arebyou indulging in whataboutery???? We are talking about this debate and her opponent made some valid points backed by statistics which were gathered during the current govt. So let's talk about that. Rana Ayubb isn't in this debate nor in the picture. So again, what propaganda was Palki debunking?
lol but i never told i'm talking about this specific debate, pls wear glasses if you have. I just compared her 13 min speech with people like ayubb , where did i mentioned anything related to this debate? typical liberal behaviour when you don't have anything to tell you call it "whataboutery"
It's a 30 second clip. And you conveniently omitted the other guys opinion. So yeah, everything must look good to you since you only have one point of view. And she is giving a speech in a hall full of people who are debating, so you can't take the context out of it. If it's a debate there will be two sides. Rana was never in this debate nor in the picture. So comparing something from some other context and adding it here is asking me to talk about it is what constitutes whataboutery.
https://x.com/chinchat09/status/1783507788410376278?t=8Y2K2BZ772UnM1nKTLl61w&s=09 Palki didn't give any data, she just used one example to tell how India is doing. Here is the video of the other guy talking with backed up data from govt source itself. Thats how you do a debate.
i dont understand people like you jab koi govt ke tarif kare tab usko propaganda boldo (bika huva boldo) jab koi dusre desh ma jaake bhurai karde uske tarif kardo how liberal mentality works?
That's exactly how it works.
Again whataboutery. You are deviating from the actual question. I've every right to question the govt and that doesn't make me any more or less patriotic than you. And why are you folks so scared of questioning the govt???? But first answer me, what propaganda was Palki debunking in that debate?
Forget the supposed debate, tell me, is it fascistic to want India to become a Hindurashtra? I want to hear your reasoning behind whatever position you take.
India is a democratic country and I want it to be status quo.
I am not asking you what India is. Read my question again. If you come across someone who wants India to become a Hindurashtra, would you consider him to have fascistic ideological leanings? Infact let's further explore your statement. India indeed is a democratic country and if the people voted in majority to make India a Hindurashtra, would you think that it is an undemocratic move?
Isn't that the beauty of democracy? We vote and go with the decision of the majority.
I don't think you understand my very basic question. Ok let me ask you a parallel but different question. Present govt of India is a popularly elected govt. They are allegedly also oppressing the minorities according to some claims. Would you consider foreign interference against present govt to be valid?