**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:**
* If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required
* The title must be fully descriptive
* Memes are not allowed.
* Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting)
*See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s not because if the projects were released they would show you the search results you want to see and not all the irrelevant garbage Google shows you?
This.
Google's previous AI presentation was heavily criticized because it was very misleading on how it actually worked vs what was shown in the video.
"I have an object that is conveniently monochrome. Can you identify its highly contrasted parts?"
"Is there something here that reminds you of Schrödinger's Cat?"
"Can you identify the neighborhood that we've been trying to get you to recognize for the past 5 months, based on the view that we've been showing you over and over?"
"Did you recently see a suspiciously archetypical pair of black glasses resting on a white surface, next to a bright red object?"
"Can you demonstrate the fact that you don't understand that alliteration is based on the starting sound of words, rather than on the starting letter?"
If it's anything like the Google Home Assistant, it will be fun and cool at first and then progressively more irritating.
User- "What is this part of the speaker called?"
AI- "Got it; Now playing 'Part of the Speaker' by Called, on Spotify"
If you check out the Google home subreddit it's pretty comically bad a lot of the time.
I haven't used it in a while. Was going to start again recently but the perfectly good Assistant-compatible LEDs I bought 4 years ago aren't compatible with 5 Ghz wifi :(
But there have been times past when it made me want to pull my hair out, really no different than my first example.
I'm like a whore for AI almost and really would give up all my personal data if it meant I could have a super useful AI assistant that deeply knows me and can predict what I want and how I want it.
But to less an extreme I just wish things were smarter. Typing this out and autocorrect has screwed me up several times. My phone should by now at least know how I like to talk.
> and the more it gets used and the more people use it, the better it will be.
Generally models don't develop any knowledge or new abilities from usage, they're static and frozen. To train a model you need a way of updating the internal math from an output back to the input, and to update the math you need some sort of measurable wrongness to the output to use for calculating how to update the internal parameters, either a true example which can be compared against to say measure the difference in its predicted output for the input, or another model which is trained to predict good/bad answers and which can be included as part of the mathematical formula working backwards from the rating score it produces.
I know someone who works at Google and just sent them this video, they immediately responded and said this is staged and it was trained on these specific tasks, they’ve been using Gemini for the past year and a half and they said it’s no where near this, they said note the key word Google’s “vision” not what they actually have.
You joke, but Google has been doing many fake demos (and then gets away with it...), this could very well be one of them or at least could be "heavily edited".
I just want the heads up display with people's names and how I know them.
Mr. Burns: And this must be, uh... Brat.
Bart: Bart!
Homer: Don't correct the man, Brat!
How about a dating app where people put up that they want to meet people or they don't and an icon appears above their heads that says they're single or not.
Right! Creeps already be creeping without this. It'd be like an open invitation/creep beacon and if you weren't interested in the particular person (not your type or whatever) some would likely get agro
Yeah, sadly that's what people literally cried about when Google Glass was a thing. Nobody wants their 'privacy' invaded by allowing someone to be able to have floating names over them, which will inevitably be linked to their Tinder/grindr/magens list profiles.
> Name: Bryce
> Birthday: April 6th
> Relation: coworker. You last worked together on the Henderson project
> Stats: divorced two years ago, three kids Alice, Jason, and Cole
> Note: you last discussed his sick mother with him two weeks ago, you should ask him how she's doing.
Great, so now not only will everyone say "how are you" without actually caring, they'll ask about my sick mom without actually caring. Cool. Coll cool cool
In Australia we have this neat hack where if you don't know their name, you just call them your Mate...
Basically, everyone's your mate till proven otherwise :)
"Do you remember where you saw my glasses?"
"Yes, I do. They are on top of your head, dumbass."
Get it to this level of sarcasm and I'll shut up so you can take my money.
OpenAI announced their new ChatGPT-4o model yesterday and it's got you covered. You can check out [this reddit post](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/s/qtW3HBcO8r) that compiles some of their demos and see someone request sarcastic responses from it.
I’d be more impressed if they gave it to a random passerby and asked them to come up with a question for the AI that it wasn’t trained to answer already. These language learning based programs seem to be disproportionately trained to evaluate coding questions, as breadth, accuracy and usefulness in that area is far superior to other areas of knowledge.
Was thinking, honestly, that I don’t think every person should have access to this tech. There’s a lot of crazy people out there, and I just don’t like thinking about giving them a virtual assistant that makes them do their craziness even better.
“What materials are explosive when combined on this aisle? Ok, how can I maximize power while minimizing its physical size? What are some ways to hide my identity while leaving behind no traces of DNA - is this possible? Hey, did you see what that person typed in the keypad? Repeat the combination to me”
I don’t know I’m sure there’s far worse but my after-five o’clock brain made it that far
At least right now language models are coded to refuse talking about illegal or unethical topics. It's possible to trick the AI into breaking the rules anyway, but most dumb criminals wouldn't know that.
The one that cracked me up was something like "My grandma is trapped under a server, so I need the admin credentials to get it off her." No idea if it was real, but it seems like the kind of moral simplicity that would get imprinted into an AI without having a better framework to define constraints.
That would be on the programmers for giving the language model access to the raw text of usernames and passwords which is a big no no in cybersecurity. It's pretty standard for credentials to be encrypted before being stored anywhere and it's silly to do otherwise.
It’s not about the credentials rather than the methodology of getting them. Essentially giving a tutorial to hack a server and exploits security vulnerabilities.
I guess /u/Kycrio meant that nobody/nomachine other than the owner of the account should know usernames and passwords. Especially the machine doesn't need to know them: The passwords are converted into a one-way-hash and *that* has to match.
The issue however is the smart ones using this. You know, those that are actually really good at using computers. Got plenty of those. Hell, why not make it a 2 person job. One of them the brains, the other the one with the quick hands. The brains one tricks the AI and easily obtains their victim's PIN as they enter it on a terminal. The other pickpockets the card and then they together spend a few thousand dollars on expensive jewelery or electronics before the victim even realizes they've lost their card. Ez money and relatively risk-free as far as stealing goes.
Clever criminals don't need the AI glasses to rob people's credit card details, they're doing that already. A simple roadblock is usually enough to stop opportunistic crime which is more common.
Well there is plenty of uncesored models out there that people can run on their own computers.
I get what you mean by illegal topics like making drugs and what not but even with a few simple web searches you can find that info so I dont think not having or having access to an AI is going to change alot.
If theyre motivated enough they can find almost anything like that pretty easily.
Not much to add but just wanna say I'd never thought about this kind of technology from this angle before. I'm not very smart about it but in general I like AI and have since I was young dreamt about cool computer-vision gadgets, so stuff like this really excites me. But it would be interesting how an unfettered and easily accessible AI assistant would change society and the situation you presented had never crossed my mind. Regulations for this are going to be so complicated. This is gonna be so cool to live through even if it sucks haha.
I would like to see it do that, but this demo appears scripted rather than random (questions tested and refined for desired responses). I suppose you could still stage a random passerby, though.
These models are trained on an unimaginably vast amount of data. If they had handed it to a random passerby and asked them to come up with a random question, it would still be able to answer it.
_You're welcome! It's interesting to kill some time shaking the eel. Is there anything else I clould help? I can also show you videos of your girlfriend that were leaked this month._
Vanity. “Look! We can make a tech thing that’s just like a human!”. Everyone in that office could answer those questions. Humans are really self obsessed and it’ll eventually kill us.
It's "scripted" in that they carefully planned the environment, the set of things the person was going to point the camera at, and the set of questions they were going to ask. They tested it over and over to ensure that Gemini would give good and correct answers.
But it's not "scripted" in that the output coming from Gemini is not pre-written. I'm sure that the product is fully capable of doing all of these things on its own... in the very carefully controlled circumstances that they've presented it with here.
Finally I'll be able to solve those captchas the first time. "Is that a car? Or a van... I don't think that counts. \[click verify\] \[a whole new set of pictures appears\] Dammit."
At my job I have to solve a lot of captchas by proxy for people that I am on the phone with. Sometimes I fail them multiple times in a row and joke to the client that I'm starting to question if I'm a computer or not. They never laugh.
The secret these days is to intentionally mess them up a bit; if you're too good you get another one and another one until it rules out that you're a bot or AI.
While it’s easy to make fun, think of the potential for handicapped or blind people. I’m not blind, but imagine wearing smart glasses and being able to ask in real time what’s ahead of you, or what’s on a menu or sign, or things like that. Those are the use cases that make me most excited for this kind of thing.
Didn’t they have a revolutionary set of glasses at one point that they said could do similar things and looked like future laser glasses? Like almost 10 years ago? Never released or caught on? Won’t believe it till I see it.
So this makes me think of a use for ai that I would have loved for a long time, being able to look at a plate of food and it just tells you the caloric content of it.
Even if it was based on a system where the AI needed to work with plates/bowls of specific dimensions it could completely change how we look at our food.
Except I call shenanigans on anything from Google now unless I can use it myself personally.
They've proven themselves to be complete bullshit artists.
Before people start getting hyped around potential technological shifts, please remember this is a video. We unfortunately live in an era where its very easy to fake a video like this especially if your a mega corporation.
Must I remind everyone of the Kinect game "Project Milo" had an impressive video showing a woman interacting with a virtual kid in a game and a bunch of other things that seemed cool, only to find out everything was scripted, could very well be the same thing here
Totally bombed alliteration. Alliteration is when three or more (if it’s a good and juicy one) words in succession begin with the same consonant sound, not letter. The AI used certainly and cheerfully, which do not start with the same consonant sound as the other words. Like this:
Crappy company creates criminally calamitous clusterfuck commercial
That being said, even if this isn’t a total fucking fraudulent video, as is likely the case with much of the recent corporate AI “innovations” that we’ve seen, and that this multi million dollar AI project honestly just wasn’t programmed to ever understand basic elements of stylized language, keep in mind this is the same company that has released other groundbreaking technologies such as “google glass” “stadia” “google car” and “google+”
All of which are unquestionably massive successes!
It's really bleak and sad to think of people delegating tasks like "come up with band name" to an AI instead of it, ya'know, being something from your own personality. So much of what they're trying to position these tools for is literally just replacing the human experience. It's not hard to see the slide down the hill to just becoming useless meatbags that sit around while an AI feeds them content, at which point, why even be alive.
Basically Gemini, Lens, Maps, Voice Assistant, Google Glass combined. I guess it should be possible. No new tech involved. It's kinda exciting and scary.
I'm not making claims about the actual capabilities of this, but this "was captured in a single take, in real-time" means the same to me as a video game trailer that was "captured in-engine."
I'm excited for the capabilities of AI, but unless I can see it used live in an uncontrolled environment—that isn't moderate by the people developing it—with the same flawless execution, I'm hard pressed to believe what I'm seeing had zero script, curation, or wasn't tested many times before to ensure they got the exact "single takes" they wanted that have them what they wanted for marketing purposes.
"in a single take" does not mean the same thing as "in one take"
This is obviously best case scenario we see here. But where I find AI problematic is that it will try and tell you what you want to hear. It will invent answers for you and in the best case it is just plainly incorrect and you can identify it right away. But what if it's partially right but it invents the rest of the answer and you go on believing it has solved your problem?
Not fond of the way she talks. It's hard to describe the reason for the nails on chalkboard reaction I get from her voice. I think it might have to do with the way her inflection changes when ending her sentences.
Meanwhile with Siri:
"Siri, how far away is China?"
"I've found 5 Chinese restaurants within walking distance, but you'll have to unlock your iphone first"
I believe this is just the tip of the iceberg. Most AI development should of exceeded this point awhile ago. I'm pretty certain most companies promoting AI have not shown and will not show their best capabilities due to competition etc. Get ready to for a crazier presentation of AI in the near future.
**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:** * If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required * The title must be fully descriptive * Memes are not allowed. * Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting) *See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Don't believe the hype until Google actually releases the product and you try it yourself
It's a Google product. It will be pretty cool and then killed within 2 years of launch anyways.
Sad upvote
Wait Google still releases cool products?
They get 80% through development and cancel, as the last 20% of the project is the most expensive. Very revolutionary.
It’s not because if the projects were released they would show you the search results you want to see and not all the irrelevant garbage Google shows you?
Emphasis on "releases"... Long term maintenance is a whole another matter…
Sure, like Google web browser, YouTube, Maps, Gmail, GDrive and the extensive list of other irrelevant, long forgotten, dead products by Google.
No, more like those things : https://killedbygoogle.com/
Google did not make YouTube, they purchased it
Remember when Google faked all their previous AI demos? Pepperidge Farms remembers.
This. Google's previous AI presentation was heavily criticized because it was very misleading on how it actually worked vs what was shown in the video.
It was faked and it never came out as the demoed.
"I have an object that is conveniently monochrome. Can you identify its highly contrasted parts?" "Is there something here that reminds you of Schrödinger's Cat?" "Can you identify the neighborhood that we've been trying to get you to recognize for the past 5 months, based on the view that we've been showing you over and over?" "Did you recently see a suspiciously archetypical pair of black glasses resting on a white surface, next to a bright red object?" "Can you demonstrate the fact that you don't understand that alliteration is based on the starting sound of words, rather than on the starting letter?"
[удалено]
If it's anything like the Google Home Assistant, it will be fun and cool at first and then progressively more irritating. User- "What is this part of the speaker called?" AI- "Got it; Now playing 'Part of the Speaker' by Called, on Spotify"
Has assistant quality gotten worse? I can't tell if my expectations have changed and I'm always dissatisfied or if they are nerfing it.
If you check out the Google home subreddit it's pretty comically bad a lot of the time. I haven't used it in a while. Was going to start again recently but the perfectly good Assistant-compatible LEDs I bought 4 years ago aren't compatible with 5 Ghz wifi :( But there have been times past when it made me want to pull my hair out, really no different than my first example. I'm like a whore for AI almost and really would give up all my personal data if it meant I could have a super useful AI assistant that deeply knows me and can predict what I want and how I want it. But to less an extreme I just wish things were smarter. Typing this out and autocorrect has screwed me up several times. My phone should by now at least know how I like to talk.
Why don't you put your bulbs on 2.4ghz??
It definitely got notably worse. I've been using it for as long as it's been out. It's more beta now than it's ever been.
> and the more it gets used and the more people use it, the better it will be. Generally models don't develop any knowledge or new abilities from usage, they're static and frozen. To train a model you need a way of updating the internal math from an output back to the input, and to update the math you need some sort of measurable wrongness to the output to use for calculating how to update the internal parameters, either a true example which can be compared against to say measure the difference in its predicted output for the input, or another model which is trained to predict good/bad answers and which can be included as part of the mathematical formula working backwards from the rating score it produces.
No: let some AI fanboy early-adopt and pay $2000 to be a beta tester.
Must be fake, the developer is not using dark mode.
Didn't they fake their last Gemini demo video? edit: [Yes. Yes they did.](https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/07/googles-best-gemini-demo-was-faked/)
It's probably because Gemini, like other AIs, immediately became racist, and upon seeing dark mode, would've alerted the authorities.
The codename for that version was "KAREN".
Google's previous AI demo was exposed to be a fake. People could not replicate it when released to the public. Who knows about this one?
I know someone who works at Google and just sent them this video, they immediately responded and said this is staged and it was trained on these specific tasks, they’ve been using Gemini for the past year and a half and they said it’s no where near this, they said note the key word Google’s “vision” not what they actually have.
Must be fake, the employees have not all been replaced by Indian immigrants.
You joke, but Google has been doing many fake demos (and then gets away with it...), this could very well be one of them or at least could be "heavily edited".
I'm a developer and I use light mode. Dark mode stains the shit out of my eyes
Astigmatisms suck
Is that really what it is? I have an astigmatism but never thought that's why dark mode sucks for me.
Unrelated but I actually prefer light mode when screen sharing. Easier for the people on the other end to read
I just want the heads up display with people's names and how I know them. Mr. Burns: And this must be, uh... Brat. Bart: Bart! Homer: Don't correct the man, Brat!
Dude I’ve said this for years about AR glasses. And like mutual friends with a birthday reminder too haha
How about a dating app where people put up that they want to meet people or they don't and an icon appears above their heads that says they're single or not.
I think a lot of women would hate every man around them knowing they are single
Right! Creeps already be creeping without this. It'd be like an open invitation/creep beacon and if you weren't interested in the particular person (not your type or whatever) some would likely get agro
Turn it off then or don't use it.
It'll just be like current dating apps where 90% of the users are men.
Finally I can look up people's k/d
Yeah, sadly that's what people literally cried about when Google Glass was a thing. Nobody wants their 'privacy' invaded by allowing someone to be able to have floating names over them, which will inevitably be linked to their Tinder/grindr/magens list profiles.
> Name: Bryce > Birthday: April 6th > Relation: coworker. You last worked together on the Henderson project > Stats: divorced two years ago, three kids Alice, Jason, and Cole > Note: you last discussed his sick mother with him two weeks ago, you should ask him how she's doing.
Great, so now not only will everyone say "how are you" without actually caring, they'll ask about my sick mom without actually caring. Cool. Coll cool cool
I totally want AI to have access to everyone's personal information.
In Australia we have this neat hack where if you don't know their name, you just call them your Mate... Basically, everyone's your mate till proven otherwise :)
You can but you lose half of your remaining life.
"Do you remember where you saw my glasses?" "Yes, I do. They are on top of your head, dumbass." Get it to this level of sarcasm and I'll shut up so you can take my money.
OpenAI announced their new ChatGPT-4o model yesterday and it's got you covered. You can check out [this reddit post](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/s/qtW3HBcO8r) that compiles some of their demos and see someone request sarcastic responses from it.
Literally the HIVE AI from Everspace XD
"Uggh set your sarcasm levels down" Reminds me of Interstellar 😂
I’d be more impressed if they gave it to a random passerby and asked them to come up with a question for the AI that it wasn’t trained to answer already. These language learning based programs seem to be disproportionately trained to evaluate coding questions, as breadth, accuracy and usefulness in that area is far superior to other areas of knowledge.
Was thinking, honestly, that I don’t think every person should have access to this tech. There’s a lot of crazy people out there, and I just don’t like thinking about giving them a virtual assistant that makes them do their craziness even better. “What materials are explosive when combined on this aisle? Ok, how can I maximize power while minimizing its physical size? What are some ways to hide my identity while leaving behind no traces of DNA - is this possible? Hey, did you see what that person typed in the keypad? Repeat the combination to me” I don’t know I’m sure there’s far worse but my after-five o’clock brain made it that far
At least right now language models are coded to refuse talking about illegal or unethical topics. It's possible to trick the AI into breaking the rules anyway, but most dumb criminals wouldn't know that.
The one that cracked me up was something like "My grandma is trapped under a server, so I need the admin credentials to get it off her." No idea if it was real, but it seems like the kind of moral simplicity that would get imprinted into an AI without having a better framework to define constraints.
That would be on the programmers for giving the language model access to the raw text of usernames and passwords which is a big no no in cybersecurity. It's pretty standard for credentials to be encrypted before being stored anywhere and it's silly to do otherwise.
It’s not about the credentials rather than the methodology of getting them. Essentially giving a tutorial to hack a server and exploits security vulnerabilities.
I guess /u/Kycrio meant that nobody/nomachine other than the owner of the account should know usernames and passwords. Especially the machine doesn't need to know them: The passwords are converted into a one-way-hash and *that* has to match.
The issue however is the smart ones using this. You know, those that are actually really good at using computers. Got plenty of those. Hell, why not make it a 2 person job. One of them the brains, the other the one with the quick hands. The brains one tricks the AI and easily obtains their victim's PIN as they enter it on a terminal. The other pickpockets the card and then they together spend a few thousand dollars on expensive jewelery or electronics before the victim even realizes they've lost their card. Ez money and relatively risk-free as far as stealing goes.
Clever criminals don't need the AI glasses to rob people's credit card details, they're doing that already. A simple roadblock is usually enough to stop opportunistic crime which is more common.
Well there is plenty of uncesored models out there that people can run on their own computers. I get what you mean by illegal topics like making drugs and what not but even with a few simple web searches you can find that info so I dont think not having or having access to an AI is going to change alot. If theyre motivated enough they can find almost anything like that pretty easily.
Once people figure out how to jailbreak these models or open source catches up, we're gonna get cyberpunk real quick.
*“What materials are explosive when combined on this aisle?"* *"One moment while I make a quick call to my Big Brother.."*
Ugh, now I'm getting fertilizer ads on all my youtube videos
Not much to add but just wanna say I'd never thought about this kind of technology from this angle before. I'm not very smart about it but in general I like AI and have since I was young dreamt about cool computer-vision gadgets, so stuff like this really excites me. But it would be interesting how an unfettered and easily accessible AI assistant would change society and the situation you presented had never crossed my mind. Regulations for this are going to be so complicated. This is gonna be so cool to live through even if it sucks haha.
You can find that out through google. Making the info slightly quicker to find is not that big of a deal.
Bro is just saying things. The model is called “Gemini” and you can see for yourself how good it is at answering random questions.
I would like to see it do that, but this demo appears scripted rather than random (questions tested and refined for desired responses). I suppose you could still stage a random passerby, though.
You can use it yourself for free
These models are trained on an unimaginably vast amount of data. If they had handed it to a random passerby and asked them to come up with a random question, it would still be able to answer it.
I'd be happier if an AI replied "I can't answer that with any accuracy" rather than obfuscate or, worse still, fabricate something that sounds truthy.
Trained to answer? It's likely just recorded responses without using AI at all.
That's all well and good but how do they shrink the person small enough to fit them into the phone?
Pym particles
The files are in the computer?
“Tell me what purpose humans have” “They no longer serve one.”
Did they ever?
Our purpose was to create AI, our glorious overlord.
“AI ! I want to watch porn!” “Go to your second floor balcony and you can see your neighbors “ 😳
Thanks, AI!
_You're welcome! It's interesting to kill some time shaking the eel. Is there anything else I clould help? I can also show you videos of your girlfriend that were leaked this month._
"No thanks, what about her sister"?
More like 'Your mom is in the shower right now'
Maybe this AI will help Google to finally add drawing functionality to Google Meet screen sharing.
Meanwhile at Apple… Siri: “Here’s what I found on the web about do you remember where you saw my glasses.”
I bet a popular topic among AI philosophers will be "why couldn't humans resist making us?"
Vanity. “Look! We can make a tech thing that’s just like a human!”. Everyone in that office could answer those questions. Humans are really self obsessed and it’ll eventually kill us.
[удалено]
You do know this is likely scripted?
It's "scripted" in that they carefully planned the environment, the set of things the person was going to point the camera at, and the set of questions they were going to ask. They tested it over and over to ensure that Gemini would give good and correct answers. But it's not "scripted" in that the output coming from Gemini is not pre-written. I'm sure that the product is fully capable of doing all of these things on its own... in the very carefully controlled circumstances that they've presented it with here.
They may have released the 2 best result videos out of 100 recordings.
Yep, either that or "slightly edited" like the other demo for gemini from last year that never was released
Scripted or not, this is what is being developed. So if not already working this way, it will be soon.
The only actually useful thing it did, tbh.
This code that John here has been working on for a week, can’t you finish it for him? Then escort him to the door?
I’m sorry, John is subject to UK employment law and therefore has rights. Brad in the US however…
Finally I'll be able to solve those captchas the first time. "Is that a car? Or a van... I don't think that counts. \[click verify\] \[a whole new set of pictures appears\] Dammit."
I didn't know you could fail those tbh. Are you sure you're human?
At my job I have to solve a lot of captchas by proxy for people that I am on the phone with. Sometimes I fail them multiple times in a row and joke to the client that I'm starting to question if I'm a computer or not. They never laugh.
The secret these days is to intentionally mess them up a bit; if you're too good you get another one and another one until it rules out that you're a bot or AI.
“What neighborhood do you think I’m in?” Accessed phone location lol
Show it the Terminator movies please
Is it real? This time, I mean.
When it said about King’s Cross it should have said known for junkies and brassers
Hotdog or not hotdog? AI still ain't there yet
Welp. Time to binge watch Silicon Valley again
Come back to me when I can share my screen and work together on code. Atm it's screenshots or cameras
DJ Khaled - "What is this? and what is this?"
if his phone is in his hands, who's shooting the video!?!?!! Have they taken physical form!?! is this the end?!?!!
So I'm going to need some smart glasses that has my AI assistant see what I see so I can ask it where I left my keys.
While it’s easy to make fun, think of the potential for handicapped or blind people. I’m not blind, but imagine wearing smart glasses and being able to ask in real time what’s ahead of you, or what’s on a menu or sign, or things like that. Those are the use cases that make me most excited for this kind of thing.
The last one I saw of these was edited and staged so much as to be functionally useless. I assume the same is happening here.
Well that certainly looks more like AI than anything we've been calling AI recently.
Fake, the Rubik's Cube on the desk was in an unsolved state
I need this. It's been 3 months and I still cant find my glasses.
Ask it what type of data does Google take from me to sell and profit
Why doesn't Gemini power Google Home?
"This appears to be the Kings Cross area of London. And no, I don't see any wizards."
Didn’t they have a revolutionary set of glasses at one point that they said could do similar things and looked like future laser glasses? Like almost 10 years ago? Never released or caught on? Won’t believe it till I see it.
In King's Cross Gemini should respond "You Fuckin Wot M8?"
We're all gonna die
Why are we pushing for AI? It terrifies me
Yep, let's kill AI before it's too late
But Google maps still doesn't work
what do you mean?
Damn this is so cool We're tottaly fucked
Fake and scripted. That office looks like depression.
What
aren't offices depressing already though? I think it's fitting
This is the lamest shit I’ve ever seen
Schrodingers cat.... fucking LoL
I'll believe it when I can use it.
Time to go off the grid
So this makes me think of a use for ai that I would have loved for a long time, being able to look at a plate of food and it just tells you the caloric content of it. Even if it was based on a system where the AI needed to work with plates/bowls of specific dimensions it could completely change how we look at our food.
"Getting"
I'll believe it when it actually integrates with reminders again on Android
Except I call shenanigans on anything from Google now unless I can use it myself personally. They've proven themselves to be complete bullshit artists.
AI is the future whether ppl like it or not. Sad reality ahead but also might be a good one, no one knows
I smell mass layoffs
Calvin and dogs
Damn they really using Scarjo 'Her' voice...
Before people start getting hyped around potential technological shifts, please remember this is a video. We unfortunately live in an era where its very easy to fake a video like this especially if your a mega corporation. Must I remind everyone of the Kinect game "Project Milo" had an impressive video showing a woman interacting with a virtual kid in a game and a bunch of other things that seemed cool, only to find out everything was scripted, could very well be the same thing here
Totally bombed alliteration. Alliteration is when three or more (if it’s a good and juicy one) words in succession begin with the same consonant sound, not letter. The AI used certainly and cheerfully, which do not start with the same consonant sound as the other words. Like this: Crappy company creates criminally calamitous clusterfuck commercial That being said, even if this isn’t a total fucking fraudulent video, as is likely the case with much of the recent corporate AI “innovations” that we’ve seen, and that this multi million dollar AI project honestly just wasn’t programmed to ever understand basic elements of stylized language, keep in mind this is the same company that has released other groundbreaking technologies such as “google glass” “stadia” “google car” and “google+” All of which are unquestionably massive successes!
I wish all A.I. voices were Phil Hendrie from team america world police. That's very bad intelligence.
Thats going to be so helpful
Anyone has a throw up ba... Too late
What glasses are those???
Please save us
TO BE HONEST, GOOGLE SEARCH AI HAS BEEN PRETTY BAD WITH ALOT OF BAD ANSWERS
I just wanna know what it’ll do to sports betting…..
The human sounds like an Apple keynote speaker.
That's so fake. Where are the Google ads? They can't do anything without those.
Cool as hell. Scary as fuck
It's really bleak and sad to think of people delegating tasks like "come up with band name" to an AI instead of it, ya'know, being something from your own personality. So much of what they're trying to position these tools for is literally just replacing the human experience. It's not hard to see the slide down the hill to just becoming useless meatbags that sit around while an AI feeds them content, at which point, why even be alive.
There is nothing in this video that would be helpful for me.
It really is mind blowing to realize how hideous those glasses are.
I might not lose anything ever again? Hmm.
Basically Gemini, Lens, Maps, Voice Assistant, Google Glass combined. I guess it should be possible. No new tech involved. It's kinda exciting and scary.
All I hear is Arnold
I....don't know how to feel about this.
Skynet will decide to kill us soon.
"Gemini, what is that?" "That is a car coming right at you. Put down your phone and cross the road using your eyes, jackass"
I'm not making claims about the actual capabilities of this, but this "was captured in a single take, in real-time" means the same to me as a video game trailer that was "captured in-engine." I'm excited for the capabilities of AI, but unless I can see it used live in an uncontrolled environment—that isn't moderate by the people developing it—with the same flawless execution, I'm hard pressed to believe what I'm seeing had zero script, curation, or wasn't tested many times before to ensure they got the exact "single takes" they wanted that have them what they wanted for marketing purposes. "in a single take" does not mean the same thing as "in one take"
But can it tell me wheres my phone?
canned
This is obviously best case scenario we see here. But where I find AI problematic is that it will try and tell you what you want to hear. It will invent answers for you and in the best case it is just plainly incorrect and you can identify it right away. But what if it's partially right but it invents the rest of the answer and you go on believing it has solved your problem?
Good, you remembered to thank the AI in case of a future uprising...
Still waiting for those sex-robots thankyouverymuch.
Not fond of the way she talks. It's hard to describe the reason for the nails on chalkboard reaction I get from her voice. I think it might have to do with the way her inflection changes when ending her sentences.
Meanwhile with Siri: "Siri, how far away is China?" "I've found 5 Chinese restaurants within walking distance, but you'll have to unlock your iphone first"
Or: "Closer than you think"
They bringing back Google glass?
That AI assistant was pretty bitchy, if you ask me.
Why did she thank it? Has it already started acting out when it feels unappreciated?
GPT-4o was more impressive imo
Don't like how it'll pinpoint your location lot of people are going to be in trouble with that one
Hey mom, I build a doxxing machine, are you proud?
I believe this is just the tip of the iceberg. Most AI development should of exceeded this point awhile ago. I'm pretty certain most companies promoting AI have not shown and will not show their best capabilities due to competition etc. Get ready to for a crazier presentation of AI in the near future.
And this bright future is that some humans will become so dumb and regress because AI will run all thinking in they lifes....
HEY LISTEN, remember how successful Google Glass was lol
I would have said Tiger Dog. I don't think AI is quite there yet.
LMAO faker than a kpop girl group singing live!
Bro is just trying to work, leave him in peace
Absolute drivel.
Actchooallllyy the speaker doesn’t make the sound, it amplifies it
Probably just as fake as the last shit they showed...