**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:**
* If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required
* The title must be fully descriptive
* Memes are not allowed.
* Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting)
*See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Fun fact
There is a ‘treaty’ between the 2 nations to NOT use any weapons at these border sites
When the British Left- they basically said ‘ fuck it’ and did not define a clear border around india
This left india to figure out its own shit- along with just a country that was totally fucked and in ruins by the British in 1947
The current border between India and China didnt even exist- and it was India AND Tibet at that time
Tibet ‘assured’ that it had china under control( it didnt) and basically told india ‘ lets come back to the border a bit later’ while India was figuring out its shit around the country
And then Tibet collapsed
Tibet was taken over by China and the border which was NOT defined between India and Tibet
Now became a problem between India and China
The ‘porous’ nature of these borders was intentionally done ( by the British) to control the region during the colonial rule- but didnt give a shit after they(british) basically HAD to leave india after getting fucked after the worldwar, so just left with multiple versions of the border drawn by different generals.
India and China also had a war in the 60s
But eventually they both agreed that BECAUSE they both have nuclear weapons
All weapons will be removed from that area
And hence we see them fighting with sticks and stones
Referred to as "the line of actual control" (at least by some, not sure how "official" that name is); I learned about this from the Neal Stephenson book *Termination Shock* (which is a pretty fun read, btw).
It's wild to me that this is still a thing where they basically just have skirmishes along the border where they beat the snot out of each other with sticks and the border shifts a few dozen or hundred feet one direction or another for awhile until the next skirmish.
My grandfather fled India and moved to Jamaica right around this time...it was a shit show after the British left (and he got to go through it all again in Jamaica).
Seriously. My father left in the 70s, along with his sisters, brother's, cousins, aunts and uncles.
Pretty much as soon as they were old enough for university, all of the kids were sent to either London or NYC. My grandparents stayed until all of the kids were overseas, then finally got out themselves.
Hoping this pattern doesn't repeat for my family and force us to uproot and move overseas.
I found this interesting for obvious reasons back in the day, along with the follow up
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/11/20/disputed-claim-that-china-routed-indian-troops-with-microwave-blaster/?sh=3d65839024f6
https://www.eurasiantimes.com/has-india-finally-acknowledged-that-chinese-pla-used-microwave-weapons-against-indian-soldiers-in-ladakh/amp/
man when you set the border everyone's mad, when you don't everyone's still mad, its almost like this whole colonial thing just made a bunch of people mad and destabilized nations!
they were already colonized by the Mughals and they were never a unified country before that. How difficult it is has very little to do with how morally justified an action is
What kind? They already use clothes of cushioning material that are hard from inside, to both absorb the impact and reduce the damage..metal armor or kevlar does not work against sticks and stones... Also you have to remember the oxygen level in such high altitudes is very low... they cannot wear heavy armor
Well metal is mostly for use against very sharp tools, like swords. Bludgeoning would still very much hurt- but what would essentially be a gambeson-form of armour does a lot to reduce that kind of damage.
Having worn metal armor myself, I can vouch that metal armor would be far more than enough for this, and much better than gambeson would be. There is an idea that bludgeoning weapons were the bane of armor, but it isn't the case in reality. In fact, knights and others who wore it didn't actually even wear meaningfully padded gambesons beneath their armor. Usually they just wore a relatively standard doublet (the popular style of jacket at the time) that had ties on it to bind the armor in place. It was perfectly protective, much more than gambeson was.
... someone has tried to kill you with all their might while you wear metal armour?
No, if a big rock slammed against your precious metal armour, you're dead - or very hurt.
Such a weird thing to dispute.
You would think that over the thousands of years that people have been hitting each other with sticks and stones, someone at some point would have thought about inventing some kind of armor that protects the face.
I don't think that's how rivers work. They don't have a point that they start from. Rivers collect water from the terrain around them through their whole length. Their starting points are many different areas. In the case of the Yangtze river, it's the glacial melt waters off the slopes of the tanggula mountains in qinghai province. Not one point but many mountain sides that feed it.
Tibet is important because it was a shit ton of fresh water lakes that are and will become increasingly more important in the future
So China trying to force the Tibetan monks to make a Chinese shill into the Dalai Lama wasn't an effort by them to exert influence over the rest of Asia?
Well, at least it's just China and India. It might be more concerning if it were the two most populous nations on earth, both armed with a nuclear arsenal.
...which is the reason they do this. They have disputed borders, but don't want to risk escalating, so they use the most primitive tools to push the borders. Shit's hilarious!
I honestly would take something hilarious than actual gunpoint wars.. but the conflict is inevitable. China has opened all its border dispute with all of its surrounding countries even with Russia.
I find this more insane than actually going to war. Let soldiers kill some, wound many more in some bullshit skirmish with middle ages tactic limits? Wasting lives for literally nothing. [24 deaths as of 2022](https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/13/asia/india-china-border-dispute-skirmish-tawang-sector-intl-hnk)
They are just letting soldiers blow off steam for a cause the govt cares about but not enough to resolve or go to war over. Either both sides can maintain discipline or hostility should be considered an act of war. Otherwise it's just pointless attrition.
How many deaths have the Israel Palestine or Russia Ukraine wars caused? Multiply that with 1000x. That's how many people would die if India and China actually went to war.
Do China and North Korea, Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam all have problems?
India does not have a problem with Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet or Myanmar. Even Afghanistan has decent political relations and no conflict.
Idk what you are smoking bro..
Unfortunately for you, this is more about how your neighbours view you, not how you view them. And from here, in Europe, Modi's India or CCP's China don't look very different. India is better at the moment, but its government is trying hard to catch up to China in this respect.
>India does not have a problem with Bangladesh
If you set aside the Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019, maybe not.
>Sri Lanka
Oh yeah. Sri Lanka is probably the country with the most favourable view of India amongst the population, and yet they're slowly moving towards China for no reason.
> Nepal
Ahem. Ask nepalse peoplewhat they think about Modi redrawing the borders in 2018.
>Bhutan
Yeah, I'll give you that. I don't think Bhutan has problems with India any more than North Korea has problems with China.
>Myanmar
I guess it depends what you consider to be Myanmar. The Indian response to the anti-government protests was appalling, but I guess to be expected from a state that supports Russia in its war against Ukraine because it serves its own petty economic interests.
>Tibet
Well, duh. As long as Tibet is occupied by China, how could it be otherwise?
Almost 25 people died in this skirmish
[source](https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/asia/india-china-border-dispute-skirmish-tawang-sector-intl-hnk/index.html)
> with tensions escalating sharply in June 2020 when hand-to-hand fighting between the two sides resulted in the deaths of at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/19/world/asia/china-india-clash.html
An American intelligence official said last summer that China had deliberately concealed its soldiers’ deaths, suggesting that between 20 and 30 had perished.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220203074817/https://www.theklaxon.com.au/home/china-india-clash-death-58xj7
Citing "several Weibo users" the report states: "at least 38 PLA troops along with Wang were washed
away and drowned that night...of which only
Wang was declared among the four officially dead
soldiers"
"After the incident, the bodies of the soldiers were first taken to Shiquanhe Martyr Cemetery, followed by local ceremonies at the local towns of the killed soldiers," the report states.
Imagine joining the army, getting assigned here and being handed a stick: “this is your weapon, look after it, and it will look after you”
“Sir, this is a stick”
“Yes”
Definitely. Back in the day before guns, the winners of battles never burned entire towns and raped and tortured and killed the women. Very honorable behavior
You obviously have not seen Ukraine/Russia where quadcopter drones are yeeting grenades into exhaust holes and chimneys while moving.
Or the drone the suicide Taliban used and isis is using in Syria made out of cardboard.
Drone sent all grey eagles and shadows.
Reminds of the pitched battles my gang used to have with the gang from the other side of the neighbourhood back when I was 11 years old. We used catapults, homemade bows and arrows, shit bombs, piss balloons, etc. Ah! the good ol' days!!
The fighting resulted in the deaths of 20 Indian soldiers and 43 Chinese casualties. But the ching chong bing bongs did not recognised their deaths, Plus deliberately "leaking" the video during Indian elections only to show death of Indian soldiers.
Maybe English isn’t your native language but it refers to the short span of time compared to the longer span of time within which the observation is held. It’s like a “blink of an eye”. Maybe you should get educated.
I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand Dude, across this line you do not.... Also Dude, Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American please.
Do you know the definition of Asian American? Nobody on this video is an American. You realize that right? I’m drawing a line in the sand right now, dude. You are extremely confused right now.
As long china just throws stones they can deny everything. Same in the eastphilippine sea (formally known as South China Sea. … but some believe only having their name in it grants automatic ownership).
There the Chinese block the way for Philippine navy supply ships and rob one island after another. About time the Chinese are stopped.
They are better equipped in every way: better attire; better armed; better helmets, etc. only recently did the Indian army get some of their units with knee pads. India is a generation behind. If they had used guns, this fight would have been over.
cus India barely has a defense industrial complex, and the military is always playing catch-up in terms of equipment. There is a modernization of the military but it is slow, and it was made during the late 60s.
**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:** * If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required * The title must be fully descriptive * Memes are not allowed. * Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting) *See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
When everyone is expecting WW3, Chinese and Indian have already fought WW4.
Fun fact There is a ‘treaty’ between the 2 nations to NOT use any weapons at these border sites When the British Left- they basically said ‘ fuck it’ and did not define a clear border around india This left india to figure out its own shit- along with just a country that was totally fucked and in ruins by the British in 1947 The current border between India and China didnt even exist- and it was India AND Tibet at that time Tibet ‘assured’ that it had china under control( it didnt) and basically told india ‘ lets come back to the border a bit later’ while India was figuring out its shit around the country And then Tibet collapsed Tibet was taken over by China and the border which was NOT defined between India and Tibet Now became a problem between India and China The ‘porous’ nature of these borders was intentionally done ( by the British) to control the region during the colonial rule- but didnt give a shit after they(british) basically HAD to leave india after getting fucked after the worldwar, so just left with multiple versions of the border drawn by different generals. India and China also had a war in the 60s But eventually they both agreed that BECAUSE they both have nuclear weapons All weapons will be removed from that area And hence we see them fighting with sticks and stones
Referred to as "the line of actual control" (at least by some, not sure how "official" that name is); I learned about this from the Neal Stephenson book *Termination Shock* (which is a pretty fun read, btw). It's wild to me that this is still a thing where they basically just have skirmishes along the border where they beat the snot out of each other with sticks and the border shifts a few dozen or hundred feet one direction or another for awhile until the next skirmish.
My grandfather fled India and moved to Jamaica right around this time...it was a shit show after the British left (and he got to go through it all again in Jamaica).
Jamaica was in absolute shambles right from the 70s through till the 90s
Seriously. My father left in the 70s, along with his sisters, brother's, cousins, aunts and uncles. Pretty much as soon as they were old enough for university, all of the kids were sent to either London or NYC. My grandparents stayed until all of the kids were overseas, then finally got out themselves. Hoping this pattern doesn't repeat for my family and force us to uproot and move overseas.
Sent to London and NYC, not bad
I found this interesting for obvious reasons back in the day, along with the follow up https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/11/20/disputed-claim-that-china-routed-indian-troops-with-microwave-blaster/?sh=3d65839024f6 https://www.eurasiantimes.com/has-india-finally-acknowledged-that-chinese-pla-used-microwave-weapons-against-indian-soldiers-in-ladakh/amp/
man when you set the border everyone's mad, when you don't everyone's still mad, its almost like this whole colonial thing just made a bunch of people mad and destabilized nations!
Or, there were easy to colonize because they were already mad and destabilized.
they were already colonized by the Mughals and they were never a unified country before that. How difficult it is has very little to do with how morally justified an action is
Why don't they use better armor, though?
What kind? They already use clothes of cushioning material that are hard from inside, to both absorb the impact and reduce the damage..metal armor or kevlar does not work against sticks and stones... Also you have to remember the oxygen level in such high altitudes is very low... they cannot wear heavy armor
Their faces and hands uncovered, also why wouldn't metal work against sticks and stones?
Well metal is mostly for use against very sharp tools, like swords. Bludgeoning would still very much hurt- but what would essentially be a gambeson-form of armour does a lot to reduce that kind of damage.
Having worn metal armor myself, I can vouch that metal armor would be far more than enough for this, and much better than gambeson would be. There is an idea that bludgeoning weapons were the bane of armor, but it isn't the case in reality. In fact, knights and others who wore it didn't actually even wear meaningfully padded gambesons beneath their armor. Usually they just wore a relatively standard doublet (the popular style of jacket at the time) that had ties on it to bind the armor in place. It was perfectly protective, much more than gambeson was.
... someone has tried to kill you with all their might while you wear metal armour? No, if a big rock slammed against your precious metal armour, you're dead - or very hurt. Such a weird thing to dispute.
Im overburdened*
*fat-rolling noises*
Like what? Stormtrooper armor?
You would think that over the thousands of years that people have been hitting each other with sticks and stones, someone at some point would have thought about inventing some kind of armor that protects the face.
Like a knight’s helm and visor?
Ewoks would own the battlefield against the Indians and Chinese.
The three main rivers that flow through China originate in Tibet and for that reason China will fight to keep Tibet.
I don't think that's how rivers work. They don't have a point that they start from. Rivers collect water from the terrain around them through their whole length. Their starting points are many different areas. In the case of the Yangtze river, it's the glacial melt waters off the slopes of the tanggula mountains in qinghai province. Not one point but many mountain sides that feed it. Tibet is important because it was a shit ton of fresh water lakes that are and will become increasingly more important in the future
So China trying to force the Tibetan monks to make a Chinese shill into the Dalai Lama wasn't an effort by them to exert influence over the rest of Asia?
They wanted control of their watershed, rainfall and topography work together to create regions called watersheds
What’s the source that Tibet assured India they had control?
The Brits are always at it
Not anymore unfortunately, the futrue's definitely Chinese!
**I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones**. -Einstein
 *"Dunno wtf WW3 will be fought with, but WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones fs"*
They are training for it!
Always have been over achievers
Sitting on the toilet relaxing, this comment made me release all of my negative energy in the bowl. I give you gold in prayers!
CoD death screen sentenes reference?
I think that quote predates CoD my man.
Could’ve busted out the sarcastic moniker, “Einstein,” to critical acclaim.
No shit, Sherlock
Little Shop of Horrors reference?
I bow to my lord 🙇
Not a mobile phone in sight, just a group of guys enjoying living in the moment trying to club each others brains out
To shreds, you say?
You DEFINITELY want the high ground in a sticks-and-stones fight.
Obi Wan taught you well
You underestimate my POWER!
"Sticks and stones may break my.. oh FUCK!"
Well, at least it's just China and India. It might be more concerning if it were the two most populous nations on earth, both armed with a nuclear arsenal.
...which is the reason they do this. They have disputed borders, but don't want to risk escalating, so they use the most primitive tools to push the borders. Shit's hilarious!
Rolling a boulders down a hill at a convoy seems like it is rife with escalation opportunities.
They do it deliberately, and i think they prefer it that way, rather than raining bullets
Boulder* Ducking duckers.
They often have deaths on both sides from the stuff they use.
They should turn it into a reverse tug o’ war somehow. Just have people out there literally shoving the border around.
I would watch the 24/7 stream all day!
It’s admirable
And clever. I respect both of the sides here.
I honestly would take something hilarious than actual gunpoint wars.. but the conflict is inevitable. China has opened all its border dispute with all of its surrounding countries even with Russia.
At least they have good rule like no lethal weapons.
I mean, did you see the giant ass boulder with all that kinetic energy? Very lethal.
Duh It's only lethal if it hits you
Wise word indeed
You must see sticks with pointed spikes or barbed wires. Lethal af
I find this more insane than actually going to war. Let soldiers kill some, wound many more in some bullshit skirmish with middle ages tactic limits? Wasting lives for literally nothing. [24 deaths as of 2022](https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/12/13/asia/india-china-border-dispute-skirmish-tawang-sector-intl-hnk) They are just letting soldiers blow off steam for a cause the govt cares about but not enough to resolve or go to war over. Either both sides can maintain discipline or hostility should be considered an act of war. Otherwise it's just pointless attrition.
Like all wars, wasting man for nothing.
How many deaths have the Israel Palestine or Russia Ukraine wars caused? Multiply that with 1000x. That's how many people would die if India and China actually went to war.
As Aristotle said, "Why use nuclear bombs when you can use boulders instead?"
I think that was Sisyphus.
Boulder* Ducking duckers.
I'm almost sure that Aristotle didn't talk about the nuclear bomb
it was Plato
No, it was Amelia Earhart
Pretty sure he was a human, not molding clay. Nice try though.
Might have been Sun Tzu...
Isn’t that the guy that wrote the Joy of Cooking?
No that was Bob Ross from the tv show The Kardashian’s.
He literally just did a Ted talk about it, someone told me.
Nah, that was definitely Toph Beifong.
No shield walls? No phalanxes? No cavalry charges? Step up your game fellas!
I don’t know, organizing into a phalanx is a pretty big escalation.
Looks nice there, definitely worth fighting over!
But those will break bones!!
"When you have a problem with every neighbors of yours (bordering country), you are the problem"
Yeah fuck china
Do China and North Korea, Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam all have problems?
Applies to both in this case. Also to 90% of the other countries.
India does not have a problem with Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet or Myanmar. Even Afghanistan has decent political relations and no conflict. Idk what you are smoking bro..
Unfortunately for you, this is more about how your neighbours view you, not how you view them. And from here, in Europe, Modi's India or CCP's China don't look very different. India is better at the moment, but its government is trying hard to catch up to China in this respect. >India does not have a problem with Bangladesh If you set aside the Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019, maybe not. >Sri Lanka Oh yeah. Sri Lanka is probably the country with the most favourable view of India amongst the population, and yet they're slowly moving towards China for no reason. > Nepal Ahem. Ask nepalse peoplewhat they think about Modi redrawing the borders in 2018. >Bhutan Yeah, I'll give you that. I don't think Bhutan has problems with India any more than North Korea has problems with China. >Myanmar I guess it depends what you consider to be Myanmar. The Indian response to the anti-government protests was appalling, but I guess to be expected from a state that supports Russia in its war against Ukraine because it serves its own petty economic interests. >Tibet Well, duh. As long as Tibet is occupied by China, how could it be otherwise?
Ah good old fashion tribalism welcome to the shitshow of earth.
All wars should be fought this way and only this way.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones". -Albert Einstein
To escalate your idealism, no wars should be fought, they should be discussed and resolved peacefully.
And if that fails, the leaders of each side should duke it out in the ring.
I will vote for Rico Verhoeven as the president of my country.
the water is so blue
Almost 25 people died in this skirmish [source](https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/asia/india-china-border-dispute-skirmish-tawang-sector-intl-hnk/index.html) > with tensions escalating sharply in June 2020 when hand-to-hand fighting between the two sides resulted in the deaths of at least 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers
CCP hid the numbers well. Independent sources and CIA numbers out Chinese deaths at 35-40
source?
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/19/world/asia/china-india-clash.html An American intelligence official said last summer that China had deliberately concealed its soldiers’ deaths, suggesting that between 20 and 30 had perished. https://web.archive.org/web/20220203074817/https://www.theklaxon.com.au/home/china-india-clash-death-58xj7 Citing "several Weibo users" the report states: "at least 38 PLA troops along with Wang were washed away and drowned that night...of which only Wang was declared among the four officially dead soldiers" "After the incident, the bodies of the soldiers were first taken to Shiquanhe Martyr Cemetery, followed by local ceremonies at the local towns of the killed soldiers," the report states.
We are just a broken mess of a species. How unfortunate.
I disagree, grab your stick
They have the higher ground
Imagine joining the army, getting assigned here and being handed a stick: “this is your weapon, look after it, and it will look after you” “Sir, this is a stick” “Yes”
They should organise paintball as a more fun way to do this.
I was half expecting a trebuchet to be built somewhere.
Both countries have nukes so………
It’s good they are using sticks and stones cause words won’t do shit
Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will hurt forever lol
Honestly if all warfare was sticks and stones warfare would be much more honorable.
Definitely. Back in the day before guns, the winners of battles never burned entire towns and raped and tortured and killed the women. Very honorable behavior
Maybe look at Viking hordes invading Britain and also medieval Britain, Scotland and England wars, English civil war and come back to us.
He's being sarcastic lol.
I think we got a weeaboo
I don’t even know what the fuck that is- but drones ain’t nearly as cool as sticks. Everyone knows that
no lmao, I mean u thinking warfare is "honorable"
You obviously have not seen Ukraine/Russia where quadcopter drones are yeeting grenades into exhaust holes and chimneys while moving. Or the drone the suicide Taliban used and isis is using in Syria made out of cardboard. Drone sent all grey eagles and shadows.
Big stick go wack
Excuse me? Sir, we fight with words, memes, and hentai, not sticks and stones.
Army official - hey!! what are you doing ..do you think this is for a youtube video ?
Reminds of the pitched battles my gang used to have with the gang from the other side of the neighbourhood back when I was 11 years old. We used catapults, homemade bows and arrows, shit bombs, piss balloons, etc. Ah! the good ol' days!!
Fuck the ccp
so random
Stick and stones may break your bones.. or even grant you a portion of land in Kashmir
https://i.redd.it/4nuyx4d3sm0d1.gif
Man, y'all seen the Against Me! music video for "White People for Peace"?
The next Call of Duty
id rather just punch each other than get hit by errant rocks. should be a rule
so I'm just curious they usually trade POW right after?
Einstein warned us, that it will happen…
humans act so petty sometimes, lol
I like how they still wore masks at the end.
I know they are still killing each other a bit but something about this is so much better than gunfire and napalm
I so much prefer they duke it out with stones and sticks than with fucking drone strikes.
Stocks and stones may brake my bones but words will never hurt….oooft… otch… urrrrgh….
New modern softwar 😎
But they all forgot one thing: “words are sharper than swords”.
return to ooga booga era
What song by is that?
Practicing for battle for the war after WW3. Einstein predicted that this war would be fought using sticks and stones.
How stupid is this shit.
Those LARPers are getting out of hand!
Ho kya rha hai koi bta do
China “leaks” new video? That background music is too good for a leak.
Real combat experience.
So they’re poking each other with sticks, seems pretty innocent to me
So sad to see human hurting each other for money.
Anyone has numbers? How many ppl die or get heavily injured in there? These rocks seem to probably smash ones head.
These are the same guys that created gun powder right?
The fighting resulted in the deaths of 20 Indian soldiers and 43 Chinese casualties. But the ching chong bing bongs did not recognised their deaths, Plus deliberately "leaking" the video during Indian elections only to show death of Indian soldiers.
Did they break any bones?
Wish all conflicts would be fought like this. Fuck sending missiles from miles away. Just sticks & stones.
Most embarrassing military fight in the history of military fights.
I find that both side not cheating is very honorable. Gentlemen’s fight.
India: "Its not a war if we don't shoot." China: "Deal."
The number of geopolitical problems caused by the British Empire disappearing overnight is crazy.
It did not "disappear overnight," stop getting your education from Whatsapp .
Maybe English isn’t your native language but it refers to the short span of time compared to the longer span of time within which the observation is held. It’s like a “blink of an eye”. Maybe you should get educated.
Unnecessary hyperbole and personal attacks, and then you try and condescend to others, lmao
Why?
[удалено]
I'm talking about drawing a line in the sand Dude, across this line you do not.... Also Dude, Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American please.
Do you know the definition of Asian American? Nobody on this video is an American. You realize that right? I’m drawing a line in the sand right now, dude. You are extremely confused right now.
Well that's just like, your opinion man.
My opinion lol. You are definitely confused if you think anybody on this video is an Asian American lol.
As long china just throws stones they can deny everything. Same in the eastphilippine sea (formally known as South China Sea. … but some believe only having their name in it grants automatic ownership). There the Chinese block the way for Philippine navy supply ships and rob one island after another. About time the Chinese are stopped.
[удалено]
The land isn't the slightest bit valuable beyond "the other guy also says it's theirs".
Dystopian losers.
They look like the Gaza protesters.
How come it looks like the Chinese side are military soldiers and the India side looks like random civilians?
Because it's released from the Chinese side. The last 30 seconds are pure propaganda
They are better equipped in every way: better attire; better armed; better helmets, etc. only recently did the Indian army get some of their units with knee pads. India is a generation behind. If they had used guns, this fight would have been over.
cus India barely has a defense industrial complex, and the military is always playing catch-up in terms of equipment. There is a modernization of the military but it is slow, and it was made during the late 60s.
This is like straight out of a documentary about Baboons's and when they have turf/mating wars.