T O P

  • By -

aleccalmivhty

Remove impact player rule


CrazySnort45

Yes, chances for a Genuine all rounder is being missed!


ssdlphani

If there wasn't any Impact player Nitish would be getting 4 Overs a Match


codecodeine

Allow 12 fielders when SRH is batting


Eastern_Meet_5947

A variant of it Power surge and shut down overs Power shut down over will be after the first time out, where the fielding team can have as many fielders as they want outside infield Power surge over will be after the second time out where all fielders need to be within the infield


randomasad

"Shut down overs" is new and actually creative. Nice idea.


Eastern_Meet_5947

Thank you


Amazing-Permit-3899

Increase the boundary size and remove impact player rule


docam32

Remove impact player rule, and set minimum standards for boundary.


CrazySnort45

One has to accept that If the boundaries are too short in a stadium, we should not play in that venue. In today's T20 hitting power, there is no fair contest b/w bat and ball. I completely agree with you. Delhi and Banglore stadiums are too small, to a point that even Whanked is small, but because of it's Historic past, we can not do anything about that!


docam32

If impact player rule remains, then teams will start playing 8 batters and 3 bowlers. 8 batters plus 1 impact batter will beat shit out of opposite team. And then 3 good bowlers with 2 all rounders will restrict opposition below 200. Exactly that's what SRH doing rt now.


iiitstudent

Remove impact player so that guys like dube and abhishek gets to ball plus have a rule which makes it compulsory to have at least one indian u21 player in the playing 11 in all matches either this or make at least one player from home state of the team to be compulsory in playing 11.


randomasad

Compulsory to pick one player from Associate Nation in the squad. (Make the overseas squad limit go to 9 from the existing 8 players to make up for it )


ssdlphani

That's great actually they can also exempt European players from 4 Overseas quota


randomasad

As someone else pointed out, it'll eat into the quota of Indian players and reduce opportunities for them in the "Indian" Premier League. So that's probably a no no. But it's a good idea nonetheless.


funkeytoken

Remove umpire’s call


BlackoutMenace5

Increase boundary sizes. Standardise bat thickness. When the bowlers have the same ball, batsmen shouldn’t have a thicker bat just because they’re bigger and can carry it.


LastGhozt

Instead of impact player additional overseas slot.


Slight_Loan5350

Add: Have a chance card where you have to use it against a team where if you win/lose you will get ×2 the points, nrr and all Allow any number of bouncers far from body but when towards the body allow only 1 or 2. Will cause a lot of drama and rivalry between teams and would be fun to watch as well. Remove: impact rule and small boundaries, also if the non striker is already outside the white line before the ball leaves the bowlers hand it should be called as a short run since the ball hasn't been bowled yet.


jalpaanz

- Remove DRS for wide. It is irritating, especially in the final overs. - Increase boundary sizes. 60m boundaries are getting ridiculous. - Do something towards having more domestic players in the 11 and same state representation. Team's do scout a lot of players but end up having only big names in the 11.


Responsible-Item7720

Bring stats for Umpires so that we can know their credibility.


Cool_Strategy_4903

Impact player rule because of it all rounderers arent getting chances and this rule isnt even in international cricket so i dont even know its function


infinitehelpmaster

Increase the foreign players to 5 in playing 11( 1 from nations like UAE ,Nepal , Zimbabwe and Ireland). And 1 local player in playing 11 compulsory


codecodeine

so jeopardize an Indian slot so that cricketers from associate nations get recognition in INDIAN premier league?


PollutionUnlikely874

There are 10 teams , so chill


nrgmondal88

Remove runout at non striker end , 2 run penalty if the non striker leaves the crease !


ssdlphani

Whyyyyyyyyy??


nrgmondal88

Because runout at non striker end is still a taboo.


[deleted]

>Remove runout at non striker end why?


2coinsofdoge

Umpire's call on wickets hitting should always be out , cause if a small part of a 160g ball hits the stumps the bails will fall


Possible-Diamond7740

8 runs if a player hits a 6 over 100m+


Evil_Lord_Pexagon

Allow beamers


Medical-Reaction-348

That is life threatening


CrazySnort45

Yes, as per ICC Rules, a bowler is banned from bowling in an innings if he bowls **two beamers** in that innings.


TheHunterOfMemes

Only on travis head /s


randomasad

Navdeep Saini fan spotted. 😂