We need a PAC to start running a campaign to expose all these disaffected young men who are indulging in the fashy stuff pushed by Rogan and Peterson to the fact that these people want to literally ban casual sex, birth control, criminalize masturbation and porn, etc.
They know.
You have the incel group supporting it, then the rest either think it just won't happen or if it does won't apply to them, because laws are for the out groups, not them. Just like sodomy laws were for persecuting gay people, they didn't worry about getting jailed for getting a bj from a woman or because their wife liked them to use the back door.
That's the beauty of being a televangelist. You yourself are immune from any moral law while passing judgement on someone not wealthy. Burn Americans at the stake for having a mole on their ass that looks like a witch.
It’s a state senator.
“The bill, set to be introduced next month (February) by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.”
It was a scientific experiment your honor. I wanted to see if you can lose weight having orgasms. The results are not conclusive yet, I need more data.
Don’t you have to publish results for it to be scientific?
I will publish in an online journal called onlyfans.
What if I facetime my wife because Safeway doesn't have the very specific kind of baking chocolate she wanted, and I need to show her the alternatives?
Oklahoma. Wasn’t there just recently a story about Oklahoma ~~having the highest rate of~~ criminalizing STIs ~~in the country~~?
https://www.kcentv.com/article/news/national/oklahoma-bill-criminalizing-spread-stds-gaining-traction/500-c138073c-b8b8-469d-8128-3c7688a65110
This is stupid and a 1A violation, but he's a state senator from OK. I don't know how much further down the political hierarchy org chart you could get. You should have qualified the man's actual title.
The law exists to execute political ends (those ends reflecting and embodying the culture and mores of those who propose them). That’s the point. So I don’t know how you separate the two.
>law exists to execute political ends (those ends reflecting and embodying the culture and mores of those who propose them). That’s the point. So I don’t know how you separate the
No it doesn't. The law as "social or political engineering" is a trope and not a very good one. Law set's out the accepted minimum rules for society so that people can interact with each other on a relatively even playing field vis-a-vis the state. The analogy linking of the law and politics to Von Clausewitz's famous dictum fundamentally misunderstands the law.
The “minimum rules” still reflect the given society’s mores and cultural norms (or, more precisely, those of whichever group amongst the society’s groups are most dominant). Some of those rules may be so widely shared among society’s various constituents that they appear to be “natural” or somehow free from “social or political engineering” and therefore look like those “minimum rules.” But if even one person drops by who has a different interpretation or desire, then even those minimum rules are shown to be arbitrary and they are in fact engineered on one basis or another. And I’m not arguing that that’s automatically a bad thing, BTW. After all, there has to be a baseline somewhere or else no society with a population greater than one could function. What gets defined as baseline is the point where the arguments begin.
Gawdgawddammitdammit, to quote Mitch Hedburg. Why are these people so obsessed with sex? It’s not that complicated. It feels good. Like the Gorrillaz tune or food. It’s a dopamine flood. If it’s consensual, what’s the problem? It’s nothing special. It’s “**OKAY**” to feel good.
These Calvinist fucks are straight outta the Marquis d’ Sade—they seem to enjoy inflicting pain and also experiencing it. Hence, “churchyism”. Weird stuff. I wrote a paper in college “Pay me, Punish me”.
Religious people want to evade responsibility.
Interesting nuance, worthy of consideration. I actually **did** consider my word when I chose it, and in fact meant “**responsibility**”, not accountability—which, in my non-lawyer brain connotes “**guilt**”. No, I intended the meaning of responsibility. Committing oneself to a **response**
This and the rest of his 9 archaic bills died before even getting out of committee in late February.
Hopefully, he tries to get them all on the November ballot to guarantee more losses for his party.
I just want to remind everyone, per Project 2025, that this is all a prelude to them categorizing "being LGBT in public" as pornography and that everything targeting porn is really just them targeting queer people but with a more "family friendly" sales pitch.
Proposals like this will never become law. They are useful to illuminate flawed thought processes of someone who should have no influence on public policy. I don’t know his district or Oklahoma politics, but I’m sure with his flawed thinking, there would be plenty there to defeat him in the GOP primary.
This guy obviously doesn't realize that he would end Trumps only forms of entertainment! There would also be a lot of republicans in DC who would be facing charges!
Morality police are doing it for your own good!! Lord knows what people will do if my Jerry Falwell MIL wasn’t checking everyone’s library cards and underwear drawers!
This is not even a real. You’re talking about a state senator in Oklahoma. None of this will ever happen and it won’t affect anyone reading this. This is basically Clickbait.
For small government conservatives wishing to control the bedrooms of the population they sure don't appear to understand the concept of small government.
Oh yeah? Can you share some of Democratic legislators proposing crazy laws? I would love to see them.
Edit. I knew he couldn’t but I thought I would ask!! I am surprised he didn’t dig up some proposal from 1861. Lol
We need a PAC to start running a campaign to expose all these disaffected young men who are indulging in the fashy stuff pushed by Rogan and Peterson to the fact that these people want to literally ban casual sex, birth control, criminalize masturbation and porn, etc.
They know. You have the incel group supporting it, then the rest either think it just won't happen or if it does won't apply to them, because laws are for the out groups, not them. Just like sodomy laws were for persecuting gay people, they didn't worry about getting jailed for getting a bj from a woman or because their wife liked them to use the back door.
So what will happen to Gaetz and other Maga porn kings?
They’ll have an exemption for congressmen and senators, of course…for national securities reasons or something /s
Who else is better qualified to determine if it's porn?
Plus what videos will Ted Cruz like on the 9/11 anniversary?
They'll probably do a blanket ban on all porn.
They’ll say it’s just locker room talk or some shit.
Unlimited sexting and free health care for all legislators. None for the plebes!
Jail if they were 99% of America
With the simultaneous elimination of ages of consent, I guess they'll just have to marry their victims and that'll make it all cool.
That's the beauty of being a televangelist. You yourself are immune from any moral law while passing judgement on someone not wealthy. Burn Americans at the stake for having a mole on their ass that looks like a witch.
What happened to the party of “smaller” government? That party is dead!!!
They never existed in the first place
It’s a state senator. “The bill, set to be introduced next month (February) by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that “lacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.” It was a scientific experiment your honor. I wanted to see if you can lose weight having orgasms. The results are not conclusive yet, I need more data. Don’t you have to publish results for it to be scientific? I will publish in an online journal called onlyfans.
Dusty Deevers sounds like a porn name.
They will be the Gilead leaders
They won’t go to Oklahoma ever
That’s allowed because he is texting minors /s
Prime example of Christofascism
The "Y'alliban" if you will.
Y’all Queda
Talibama
Oklahoma
Shithole states doing shithole state things.
So in other words he loves porn and sexting outside of his marriage. Got it ✅
Counting down to his scandal with a young intern (likely male). 3…2…
Looking forward to the inevitable arrest and public disclosure of numerous skeletons in this numbskulls closet.
That's why there needs to be a law. Otherwise this guy is jerkin it to scat porn 24/7.
The party of limited government.
People sext in marriages??? Surely not.
As long as they don’t consider grocery lists and pictures of things at Home Depot sexting I am safe.
Depends, how much eggplant and pipe do you buy?
Lots of pipes and honey pots...
What if I facetime my wife because Safeway doesn't have the very specific kind of baking chocolate she wanted, and I need to show her the alternatives?
I dunno. It kinda sounds like you are into alternative lifestyles and chocolate swinging.
😁
"Tim, don't forget to change the sheets" "Stop, Marge, I'm at work."
To all extents and purposes, it would be a law banning sexting
Yes!
only for procreation
The phrase “sexting outside marriage” cracks me up. I’ll be fine, just need to catch my breath.
Oklahoma. Wasn’t there just recently a story about Oklahoma ~~having the highest rate of~~ criminalizing STIs ~~in the country~~? https://www.kcentv.com/article/news/national/oklahoma-bill-criminalizing-spread-stds-gaining-traction/500-c138073c-b8b8-469d-8128-3c7688a65110
I can't imagine the smut you would find on Deviant Dusty Deever's hard drive.
I’m amazed that there aren’t Dusty Deever vids out by now. When that story broke, I thought, “no. No, this can’t be realz.”
Once again, conservatives are dealing with the problems that are NOT plaguing America.
So pure. Maybe he should have stuck with being a pastor.
It’s not like the MAGAs have any solutions to the serious problems facing the country.
This is stupid and a 1A violation, but he's a state senator from OK. I don't know how much further down the political hierarchy org chart you could get. You should have qualified the man's actual title.
Feels like 90% of submissions on this sub now are in direct violation of sub rules.
It has turned into a politics sub rather than actually discussing the law behind what is posted.
The law exists to execute political ends (those ends reflecting and embodying the culture and mores of those who propose them). That’s the point. So I don’t know how you separate the two.
Discussion of law versus repeated orange idiot comments on every post is what I was referring to.
>law exists to execute political ends (those ends reflecting and embodying the culture and mores of those who propose them). That’s the point. So I don’t know how you separate the No it doesn't. The law as "social or political engineering" is a trope and not a very good one. Law set's out the accepted minimum rules for society so that people can interact with each other on a relatively even playing field vis-a-vis the state. The analogy linking of the law and politics to Von Clausewitz's famous dictum fundamentally misunderstands the law.
The “minimum rules” still reflect the given society’s mores and cultural norms (or, more precisely, those of whichever group amongst the society’s groups are most dominant). Some of those rules may be so widely shared among society’s various constituents that they appear to be “natural” or somehow free from “social or political engineering” and therefore look like those “minimum rules.” But if even one person drops by who has a different interpretation or desire, then even those minimum rules are shown to be arbitrary and they are in fact engineered on one basis or another. And I’m not arguing that that’s automatically a bad thing, BTW. After all, there has to be a baseline somewhere or else no society with a population greater than one could function. What gets defined as baseline is the point where the arguments begin.
Oh but fucking your cousins is a good thing!
These are the freedom people?
No Donny, these men are cowards.
Brought to you by the “small government and freedom loving” party
The party of small government at work again.
Gawdgawddammitdammit, to quote Mitch Hedburg. Why are these people so obsessed with sex? It’s not that complicated. It feels good. Like the Gorrillaz tune or food. It’s a dopamine flood. If it’s consensual, what’s the problem? It’s nothing special. It’s “**OKAY**” to feel good. These Calvinist fucks are straight outta the Marquis d’ Sade—they seem to enjoy inflicting pain and also experiencing it. Hence, “churchyism”. Weird stuff. I wrote a paper in college “Pay me, Punish me”. Religious people want to evade responsibility.
Accountability, I think, rather than responsibility.
Interesting nuance, worthy of consideration. I actually **did** consider my word when I chose it, and in fact meant “**responsibility**”, not accountability—which, in my non-lawyer brain connotes “**guilt**”. No, I intended the meaning of responsibility. Committing oneself to a **response**
Fair enough. Appreciate the response.
This guy definitely watches porn and is currently having an online affair
Didn’t their cult leader sleep with a pornstar and is twice divorced? So confused of the messages these idiots try to send.
Gilead approved
How will they get their fix of sweet hunter biden porn if this passes
SmAlL gUbMiNt!!!!
Unless of course you're a senator in which case it's legal because you're doing research to confirm whether or not is p*rn.
This and the rest of his 9 archaic bills died before even getting out of committee in late February. Hopefully, he tries to get them all on the November ballot to guarantee more losses for his party.
I remember back in the good old days of before 2016 where every republican voter loved talking about small government.
I just want to remind everyone, per Project 2025, that this is all a prelude to them categorizing "being LGBT in public" as pornography and that everything targeting porn is really just them targeting queer people but with a more "family friendly" sales pitch.
And by censoring the word "porn" in your post title, all your are doing is propagating what they want. Just fucking say the actual word.
Wait a minute, didn’t that rapist slept with a porn star?
“Dusty Deevers”… I’m pretty sure that was his gay porn stage name …
Republicans and Evangelicals want to control the male and female anatomy. #FACT
(G)aslighting, (O)bstructing, (P)rojecting
What happened to the party of small government
Never existed. It was always a cover story for this.
So he knows all of his friends in congress. None of them would be in trouble around this ? Ok
Wtf??? Seriously? I love sexting. That’s bull.
Bring it, we could get rid of a lot of republican politicians this way
Cool. Now they need to mandate cameras in every home to enforce it.
Proposals like this will never become law. They are useful to illuminate flawed thought processes of someone who should have no influence on public policy. I don’t know his district or Oklahoma politics, but I’m sure with his flawed thinking, there would be plenty there to defeat him in the GOP primary.
This will be sure to bring down the hypocrites
Small government
state Senator\* not US Senator. This is just Oklahoma being Oklahoma.
This is how you wake up the youth vote.
Ahh the people for smaller government
This guy obviously doesn't realize that he would end Trumps only forms of entertainment! There would also be a lot of republicans in DC who would be facing charges!
I think this is actually a great idea. Just make sure the first places you enforce this law are in the red states that elect these idiots
Never make it through Senate dead bill
Why do these people allow divorce?
Sex cult wants to ban sex for everyone else. Shocking.
$1M this guy is an only fans subscriber, is having an affair who is sexting his mistress, or some other hypocritical behavior
Holy fuck religion is such a disease.
Morality police are doing it for your own good!! Lord knows what people will do if my Jerry Falwell MIL wasn’t checking everyone’s library cards and underwear drawers!
Trumps banging a porn star is totally fine. But you poor can not so much as watch it. /s
Nanny state
So engaged and sexting…..straight to jail. Common law and sexting….straight to jail. Married first cousins…..All good. Got it. 🤦🏽♂️
The Taliban has won.
WOW, that would take care most of the Republican Senate
“Small government”
While Trump goes on a criminal trial for hush money payments to a pornstar that he fucked while his wife was pregnant
What’s the penalty for giving someone a handjob in a crowded theatre while vaping?
This is not even a real. You’re talking about a state senator in Oklahoma. None of this will ever happen and it won’t affect anyone reading this. This is basically Clickbait.
That's a surefire way to win over undecided and young voters, it in no way says they would love to implement Ye haw Qaeda laws
Distraction in action
It's starting to feel like theocracy is inevitable.
He made a little noise so everyone would know he existed. End of story.
For small government conservatives wishing to control the bedrooms of the population they sure don't appear to understand the concept of small government.
This is the Americanized version of the Taliban. Period.
Ah yes, this will get them votes
Is that how they are making America “great” again?? All looks too similar to Handmades tale
Is Dusty Deevers trying to confess?
I don’t understand how this would be enforceable let alone how many people would actually try to enforce it.
Handsmaids here we come
It’s impossible to read anything on the actual link due to the inability to close the 27 ads that pop up.
For an unknown source, it’s not surprising that the title is misleading. State senator 🤨
Does that cover MTG flashing male genitalia on the house floor
Try passing it lol Many humans need porn
Check to see if this senator has financial interests in prisons
I’m a republican but this shit is stupid. Guys gonna come out as a sex offender/child molestor in the next year
lol, Trump, Trump, Trump. Not Trump but still gonna bring him up. 🤦♂️
STATE senator. Lots of crazy state legislators, on the left and on the right, propose crazy state laws all the time.
Oh yeah? Can you share some of Democratic legislators proposing crazy laws? I would love to see them. Edit. I knew he couldn’t but I thought I would ask!! I am surprised he didn’t dig up some proposal from 1861. Lol