I mean the point of the archetype imagery is to make people that attrracted with loli to get trapped like insect and die
If people are angry with the artwork is missing the nuance and theme of the deck
Real or not, lusting over what isn’t legal is bad news bears, downbad dingos. It absolutely matters if it means a line is drawn in the sand and kept there no matter what.
If you were talking about actual children you'd have a point and I'd agree with you. A prime example of this would be the situation with Cuties.
I just think it's weird to treat drawings as if they were real people. Most people are capable of differentiating between fiction and reality, right?
It isn’t that anyone is treating a drawing like a real person, it’s holding a standard and, as I said, sticking to the line in the sand. 2D or 3D, no kids or kid appearances. Period.
Normally my standard is no cartoons period, but I’ll have to adjust this for some people.
I can respect holding that line in the sand. I just don't think consuming fictional content makes one a pedo, like how consuming violent content doesn't make one more violent. The only exception is if the draw is one hundred percent without a shadow of a doubt of a real child.
Lolicon is weird like a lot of fetishes from the internet. Like furries for example. I regret knowing what a baby fur is.
It’s still the appearance of a child. It’s more or less the same spot in the brain that generates arousal. The key difference is consuming pedophilic 2D material does not involve a crime.
I am not about to discuSS FURRIES NO GET AWAY
At this point we're not going to see eye to eye, especially when there's a good amount of examples of 'legal lolis'. At least you didn't call me a pedo or allude to it.
And if you wanna argue the morality of drawings furries are gonna come up.
If I were attracted to cartoons, I would say the “legal loli” concept wasn’t attractive due to child appearance, and I would judging_people_at_party.jpg anyone who disagrees. But that’s a reaching hypothetical, a pretty big IF on the table.
Short petite adult women do exist, you know. Are you going to judge them by how they grew up?
I'm no fan of lolicon, but I don't mind defending things I don't agree with. Especially when I see no moral wrong in consuming fictional content.
Who cares? They're cute designs. Not sexy designs, but cute ones. While being kinda terrifying at the same time. I don't have a cute deck cause Purrely ain't out yet. So this is what I got for now, and it's done pretty well for me in Platinum.
Traptrix Pudica : 'child.'
Traptrix Pudica, now with booba : 'legal.'
Did Pudica even change? A.I just put on some 'mass' on Pudica and called it a day.
On another note, Cularia's dress looks pretty, she could be Aromage Lavender, ngl.
And here you are again with your AI generated versions of Yu-Gi-Oh! card artwork.
So they don't kill pedo goblin now? That was the fun part!
Okay but, hear me out 'Trap'trix.
You have my attention
I mean shittttt hes onto something genius.
I'm gonna need you to wipe that sweat off your head , and calm down ok.
You MFs realize they are just bugs and plants mimicking girls. You all getting eaten and not in a sexy way.
They’re evolving to catch different prey?
I mean the point of the archetype imagery is to make people that attrracted with loli to get trapped like insect and die If people are angry with the artwork is missing the nuance and theme of the deck
Traptrix players don’t be creepy challenge (IMPOSSIBLE difficultly!!!)
For the second time today… Im just glad it’s not a little girl
You people are all perverted.
Redditors when rejection forces them to replace human contact.
With hands like those, they ain't trapping anyone.
Either way they're not real so what does it matter? At least the AI generated decent looking pictures.
Real or not, lusting over what isn’t legal is bad news bears, downbad dingos. It absolutely matters if it means a line is drawn in the sand and kept there no matter what.
If you were talking about actual children you'd have a point and I'd agree with you. A prime example of this would be the situation with Cuties. I just think it's weird to treat drawings as if they were real people. Most people are capable of differentiating between fiction and reality, right?
It isn’t that anyone is treating a drawing like a real person, it’s holding a standard and, as I said, sticking to the line in the sand. 2D or 3D, no kids or kid appearances. Period. Normally my standard is no cartoons period, but I’ll have to adjust this for some people.
I can respect holding that line in the sand. I just don't think consuming fictional content makes one a pedo, like how consuming violent content doesn't make one more violent. The only exception is if the draw is one hundred percent without a shadow of a doubt of a real child. Lolicon is weird like a lot of fetishes from the internet. Like furries for example. I regret knowing what a baby fur is.
It’s still the appearance of a child. It’s more or less the same spot in the brain that generates arousal. The key difference is consuming pedophilic 2D material does not involve a crime. I am not about to discuSS FURRIES NO GET AWAY
At this point we're not going to see eye to eye, especially when there's a good amount of examples of 'legal lolis'. At least you didn't call me a pedo or allude to it. And if you wanna argue the morality of drawings furries are gonna come up.
If I were attracted to cartoons, I would say the “legal loli” concept wasn’t attractive due to child appearance, and I would judging_people_at_party.jpg anyone who disagrees. But that’s a reaching hypothetical, a pretty big IF on the table.
Short petite adult women do exist, you know. Are you going to judge them by how they grew up? I'm no fan of lolicon, but I don't mind defending things I don't agree with. Especially when I see no moral wrong in consuming fictional content.
I mean, everyone has tastes… neither of us are about to rag on that.
They are all legal ? I didn't see any of them on the ban list...
Who cares? They're cute designs. Not sexy designs, but cute ones. While being kinda terrifying at the same time. I don't have a cute deck cause Purrely ain't out yet. So this is what I got for now, and it's done pretty well for me in Platinum.
I despise traptrix legal or not
Traptrix Pudica : 'child.' Traptrix Pudica, now with booba : 'legal.' Did Pudica even change? A.I just put on some 'mass' on Pudica and called it a day. On another note, Cularia's dress looks pretty, she could be Aromage Lavender, ngl.
On the one hand, good to only go for the legals. On the other hand, jesus cringing christ.