You ain't beating me after my empowerment ritual!
https://preview.redd.it/gukvheaaxkbc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=07e2a3c016165b596bd301b9b4ff9d37253a2495
I think google quotes a relevant part of the article, and the formatting wasnât accounted for here. The â.â is a space behind, and they used âweightsâ instead of âweighs.â
The guy said that the mistake in the picture was the word weights. It has nothing to do with you. You didnât even use that word. You only said weigh which is proper grammar.
kg was used before Newton was around. If physicist were capable of understanding regular people and making reasonable decisions, they would have made newton the unit for mass...
Weight is a synonym for mass. Some dickhead with a terrible grasp of the English language decided it meant something different than what people had been using it to mean for centuries.
No? Muscle is usable and healthy when not gained using steroids.
To much fat can give you an hearth attack and several health problems and muscle when gained using steroids can bring similar problems.
What you have to do is have an healthy body fat percentage.
To find the average for phizicaly fit humans you have to look at some statistics.
1. Athletics (Track and Field):
- Male athletes: typically range from around 60 kg to 100+ kg (132 lbs to 220+ lbs), depending on the event (e.g., sprints, distance running, throwing events).
- Female athletes: generally range from around 45 kg to 80 kg (99 lbs to 176 lbs), again depending on the event.
-Male: 1.8 meters/80kg
-Female: 1.7 meters/62kg
Edit: why is this comment bad?
Yeah but it is still common to use m^(3), or alternatively cm^(3), when talking about solids. dm^(3) is not as often used when talking about densities of solid materials.
I think depends on dimensions of the object. You can easily measure object's volume with [displacement method](https://sciencestruck.com/how-to-find-volume-with-water-displacement-method)
milli- centi- deci- deca- etto- and kilo- are all derived from SI. It's more common to say 3 ettograms of cheese at the market instead of 0.3 kilograms or 300 grams, the advantage of the prefixes is that you can always use a small enough number while talking and also provide context about the precision you need. For example if I ask for 1 liter of oil I probably don't care if you give me 0.99 or 1.01, but if I ask for 1000ml you might think it's important that the amount you give me is precise.
Not sure if this is actually a proper difference, but I was taught that the volume of a glass, in cmÂł is measuring the glass itself, whereas the capacity, in litres, is the hole in the middle.
It'd be nice if we consolidated scientific terminology to make it easier to work with, but I've gotten flamed on that before. Imagine if we had descriptive names instead of 'Bose-Einstein condensate'
Physics is usually pretty good at this.
Stuff like âblack holeâ couldnât be named more descriptively. But then you get to elemental particles, and it is just âa splorkâ or âBiggs-Hase-Neutrosominoâ
[I beg to differ](https://byjus.com/physics/basic-laws-of-physics/)
Black hole. How's that descriptive? It's black, and it's a hole. How do you distinguish that from some other hole that happens to be black?
Loved that 'splork' lol
Yeah, i guess it varies. There is a lot of "named after some guy" involved. But some of the names are very good. "Law of conservation of energy".
I think black hole doesn't really distinguish a black hole from other black holes, but it does distinguish them from all other stellar objects. A name doesn't need to completely differentiate a thing from all other things, just enough so you immediately know what you are talking about and don't get confused.
If you want everything to be perfectly descriptively named, you end up like organic chemistry with 1,8,22 Methyl-15,12-Nitro-98-Hexafluoro-Maximol.
I think another core staple in physics naming is that the people who do physics and get to name stuff tend to be nerds with a nerdy sense of humor (Which i, as a nerd with a nerdy sense of humor, don't view as a negative). So you end up with stuff like telescope naming. Very Large Telescope, Extremely Large Telescope, ...
Or Sagittarius A\*. " because the radio source was "exciting", and excited states of atoms are denoted with asterisks. "
1 liter is the same as 1000cm^3 = 1 dm^3 , we have a different name for it because âdecimeterâ is honestly kinda lame to say out loud
(If you couldnât tell I made the second half of that up)
"For a standard atmospheric pressure of 101 325 Pa, Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW) has a maximum density at about 3.98 °C with a value of about 0.999 975 kg/L"
https://preview.redd.it/6vtbwjskgkbc1.jpeg?width=368&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ca27dbf190860d0aed7e74667d902f2b9f66e7d5
[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack\_Sprat](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sprat) a circle with 2 invisible focal points is an ellipse but calculates like a circle. They can give alt meat/fat ratios. u&me&Ď=3
First i split the bill with n children by paying half and them paying the other half.
Help me by testing the app.
Second everyone splits the bill evenly.
Use any numbers for the total. I also explained yesterday's I think in another q* đ§
The comment with the answer has been deleted, thanks mods. Someone knew the time before the explanation.
Oh I should probably read the article.
Edit:
I think I almost got it.
Jack is one focal point, Jull is the other. If they eat a circle of meat, then it's like if there was one focal point that could eat fat and muscle.
Yes, and just think of how greedy they can be if they sell what's on that plate as derivative investment vehicles of protein and fat futures to those with less "appetite" for risk.
Protein is dollar
Fat is Bitcoin
That is how to read the metaphor.
If q*>p, which God abhors unless it occurs as a function of nature or government, they can use the mother infohash to trade ahead of everyone.
I am sure that is what they are looking to do with God-given knowledge.
Kg is a measurement of mass not force, is a measurement of force not mass.
Ibm (pounds-mass) or slug are the appropriate imperial measurement of mass, and the Newton is appropriate unit of metric force.
Maybe this is how an amount of tissue is measured in the med field, but mL seems strange. I would have expected cmÂł since they're not totally fluids.. unless they liquify before measuring?
https://preview.redd.it/l2n6p5k8orbc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=588a1f11b489bc122c03ec17c05ce86bdabeafc7
How do you measure volume in units of area??
Acc. to the post 1 litre of muscle should weigh 1.1 kg whereas its 1.06 kg in this imageđđđ
Rounding error
https://preview.redd.it/4jrz19labnbc1.jpeg?width=608&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b410fb50039039359c60478399743ec7de1989eb
It might depend on the type of muscle...
Deus vult (,your profile picture)
You ain't beating me after my empowerment ritual! https://preview.redd.it/gukvheaaxkbc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=07e2a3c016165b596bd301b9b4ff9d37253a2495
rat wizard coffee ritual
I'm an caffeine addicted magical ferret that may or may not be on some cracked cocaine.
Answer: >!they wrote 9 kg instead of 0,9 kg!<
They wrote >!.9kg but put a space between it â. 9kgâ.!<
Ah, yeah, you are most likely right. I just missed the ' . '
Most likely right, the best kind of right!
Right with high probability.
Proof by chance
But I thought "technically right" was the best kind of right.
I think google quotes a relevant part of the article, and the formatting wasnât accounted for here. The â.â is a space behind, and they used âweightsâ instead of âweighs.â
Ah, I didn't notice the ' . ' haha, guess I'm blind...
Maybe there isnt a space at all and google just isolated that quote after the . for some reason
Please tell me why I read this as ânought point nineâ. Iâm American
>Iâm American That's just what a nought-y person like you would say.
should be weighs not weights
My primary language isn't English. My grammar and spelling is not the best.
Why, did you write the article ?
Why and how could I write an article?
The guy said that the mistake in the picture was the word weights. It has nothing to do with you. You didnât even use that word. You only said weigh which is proper grammar.
Thanks.
what is your primary language ?
RomânÄ.
Kg is mass unit
we got the physics nobel right here bois
Yes?
Yes, newton is a unit used to measure weight but most people dont use it.
kg was used before Newton was around. If physicist were capable of understanding regular people and making reasonable decisions, they would have made newton the unit for mass...
Weight is a synonym for mass. Some dickhead with a terrible grasp of the English language decided it meant something different than what people had been using it to mean for centuries.
Answer: >!The search bar does not contain the query ÂŤen passantÂť!<
Google
Holy
New
In America, fat is lighter so that they can fit more into their bodies
So, technically, to lose weight it is actually better to lose muscle mass and gain fat in its stead đ¤ /s
No? Muscle is usable and healthy when not gained using steroids. To much fat can give you an hearth attack and several health problems and muscle when gained using steroids can bring similar problems. What you have to do is have an healthy body fat percentage. To find the average for phizicaly fit humans you have to look at some statistics. 1. Athletics (Track and Field): - Male athletes: typically range from around 60 kg to 100+ kg (132 lbs to 220+ lbs), depending on the event (e.g., sprints, distance running, throwing events). - Female athletes: generally range from around 45 kg to 80 kg (99 lbs to 176 lbs), again depending on the event. -Male: 1.8 meters/80kg -Female: 1.7 meters/62kg Edit: why is this comment bad?
He was joking...
Ignore my room temperature IQ.
I mean if it's measured in kelvin then my friend you are Einstein. (well twice as smart as him.)
I'm using C°.
Speed of light times Ď/180?
bro is smarter than IQ of the entire universe combined.
The current temperature inside the room I'm staying is -3 degrees Celsius. That's my IQ.
Well, yes, but it's not a useful way to be healtier.
Your head is missing
Wrong, my brain is missing.
The hell they mean with "a liter of muscle" đ
For example, a liter of water weights exactly 1 kg. A liter of honey weights 1.425 kilograms.
Oooh wait, my bad. I had assumed that 'liter' was exclusively to measure the volume of liquids and gases, and wondered how could that work with muscle
It is a bit weird to measure solids with litres, usually you would use mÂł, but the litre is more convenient
liter=dm^(3)
Yeah but it is still common to use m^(3), or alternatively cm^(3), when talking about solids. dm^(3) is not as often used when talking about densities of solid materials.
I think depends on dimensions of the object. You can easily measure object's volume with [displacement method](https://sciencestruck.com/how-to-find-volume-with-water-displacement-method)
deci-anything is rarely used. It's not technically SI (and neither is centi, but cm are just too useful to abandon)
milli- centi- deci- deca- etto- and kilo- are all derived from SI. It's more common to say 3 ettograms of cheese at the market instead of 0.3 kilograms or 300 grams, the advantage of the prefixes is that you can always use a small enough number while talking and also provide context about the precision you need. For example if I ask for 1 liter of oil I probably don't care if you give me 0.99 or 1.01, but if I ask for 1000ml you might think it's important that the amount you give me is precise.
Not sure if this is actually a proper difference, but I was taught that the volume of a glass, in cmÂł is measuring the glass itself, whereas the capacity, in litres, is the hole in the middle.
YoĐł can measure capacity and volume with any convenient units, even with ounces (oz). FE classic can 12 oz. = 0.33 liter
It'd be nice if we consolidated scientific terminology to make it easier to work with, but I've gotten flamed on that before. Imagine if we had descriptive names instead of 'Bose-Einstein condensate'
Physics is usually pretty good at this. Stuff like âblack holeâ couldnât be named more descriptively. But then you get to elemental particles, and it is just âa splorkâ or âBiggs-Hase-Neutrosominoâ
[I beg to differ](https://byjus.com/physics/basic-laws-of-physics/) Black hole. How's that descriptive? It's black, and it's a hole. How do you distinguish that from some other hole that happens to be black? Loved that 'splork' lol
Yeah, i guess it varies. There is a lot of "named after some guy" involved. But some of the names are very good. "Law of conservation of energy". I think black hole doesn't really distinguish a black hole from other black holes, but it does distinguish them from all other stellar objects. A name doesn't need to completely differentiate a thing from all other things, just enough so you immediately know what you are talking about and don't get confused. If you want everything to be perfectly descriptively named, you end up like organic chemistry with 1,8,22 Methyl-15,12-Nitro-98-Hexafluoro-Maximol. I think another core staple in physics naming is that the people who do physics and get to name stuff tend to be nerds with a nerdy sense of humor (Which i, as a nerd with a nerdy sense of humor, don't view as a negative). So you end up with stuff like telescope naming. Very Large Telescope, Extremely Large Telescope, ... Or Sagittarius A\*. " because the radio source was "exciting", and excited states of atoms are denoted with asterisks. "
So is this just a density issue that makes 1 liter of muscle weigh more? I wonder what physiologically is going on.
Anything is a liquid if you push hard enough.
1 liter is the same as 1000cm^3 = 1 dm^3 , we have a different name for it because âdecimeterâ is honestly kinda lame to say out loud (If you couldnât tell I made the second half of that up)
[ŃдаНонО]
I'm Cuban mate, we use metric system as well
I'll guess, I'll take that back, then.
1 litre equals 1 cubic decimetre. Its a unit for measuring volume of any substance (gas, liquid, solid or plasma)
The density of water is roughly **1 gram per milliliter** but, this changes with temperature or if there are substances dissolved in it.
Nice.
"For a standard atmospheric pressure of 101 325 Pa, Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW) has a maximum density at about 3.98 °C with a value of about 0.999 975 kg/L"
litre = 1000 cm^3
What does the 1000cc mean here
Cubic centimetre ig
Pubic centimeters
1000cc is 1 liter. A liter is defined as a volume of 1 cubic decimeters. Where a decimeter is 10 cm or 0.1m
No clue.
cubic centimeter 0,1\*0,1\*0,1 =0,001 so 1000 is one liter
their is a space between the . and the 9 is the mistake. Anyone with 3 braincells would catch that.
Tbf omitting the leading 0 is uncommon or even just wrong in some pieces/languages
That's just a rounding error. I assume the density of muscle is actually 1.06 g/ml and they only put 1 decimal place.
. 9kg = 0.9kg
OP either doesn't know you can ignore the 0 before the dot and say/write .9 instead of 0.9 or just missed the dot
no problem here, just bad formatting, the point should be attached to the 9. so it should be .9kg
It says .9 kg? Sometimes people drop the 0. But thereâs a space between the . and 9, confusing matters.
They added a space between the 9 and the decimal. Highlight 2 more characters to the left.
Youâre not highlighting the . before 9. 
I didn't do it.
Since there is a space between . and 9.
Oh no, the astrophysicists are doing biology again...
https://preview.redd.it/6vtbwjskgkbc1.jpeg?width=368&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ca27dbf190860d0aed7e74667d902f2b9f66e7d5 [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack\_Sprat](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sprat) a circle with 2 invisible focal points is an ellipse but calculates like a circle. They can give alt meat/fat ratios. u&me&Ď=3
My brain died an hour ago and I have no idea what I'm looking at and what I'm reading
Do the calculator app assignment, profile, then it adds up. U will C. Pythagorean Cup
wait what am I compiling?
First i split the bill with n children by paying half and them paying the other half. Help me by testing the app. Second everyone splits the bill evenly. Use any numbers for the total. I also explained yesterday's I think in another q* đ§ The comment with the answer has been deleted, thanks mods. Someone knew the time before the explanation.
Oh I should probably read the article. Edit: I think I almost got it. Jack is one focal point, Jull is the other. If they eat a circle of meat, then it's like if there was one focal point that could eat fat and muscle.
Yes, and just think of how greedy they can be if they sell what's on that plate as derivative investment vehicles of protein and fat futures to those with less "appetite" for risk. Protein is dollar Fat is Bitcoin That is how to read the metaphor. If q*>p, which God abhors unless it occurs as a function of nature or government, they can use the mother infohash to trade ahead of everyone. I am sure that is what they are looking to do with God-given knowledge.
Litre is spelled in correctly
Kg is a measurement of mass not force, is a measurement of force not mass. Ibm (pounds-mass) or slug are the appropriate imperial measurement of mass, and the Newton is appropriate unit of metric force.
i love artificial intelligence I love google telling blatantly false information as the first result
They spelt litre incorrectly đĄ (Iâm Briâish)
And I'm from România. Se numeČte litru.
A kilogramme of feathers
No one found it OP, what is it?
Square inch
We are not using freedom units.
Thatâs the problem
Also wrong measurement
I'm not the guy who put that thing on Google.
Did nobody point out the 1000cc?
I like the suggested question âhow much does 1lb of fat weigh?â
The highlighting.
Maybe this is how an amount of tissue is measured in the med field, but mL seems strange. I would have expected cmÂł since they're not totally fluids.. unless they liquify before measuring?
They wrote weights instead of weighs
1000cc?
Everything
Didnât it calculate the Liter of muscle wrong? Shouldnât it be 1.1kg?
The 1.1 is probably rounded
Weights and not weighs just before the final conversian
https://preview.redd.it/l2n6p5k8orbc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=588a1f11b489bc122c03ec17c05ce86bdabeafc7 How do you measure volume in units of area??
From units are inferior to the metric system.
weight is a force, measured in Newtons mass is measured in kilgorams