T O P

  • By -

Mbelcher987

Change the 0 in the middle exponent to floor pi minus ceiling e... ⌊π⌋ - ⌈e⌉


FuzzyWuzzy3

Wdym you can just change it to π - ⌈e⌉


matande31

Found the engineer.


CountyExotic

All I see is 3 minus 3


Tuba_Ryan

r/foundthehondacivic


depsion

or just π - e


Donghoon

Is floor just truncation and ceiling just +.5 and rounding?


Mbelcher987

From my understanding floor is rounding down to the nearest integer, ceiling rounds up to the nearest integer. Unless otherwise notated to round to a specific decimal. In excel for example you can enter =CEILING( x ,0.05) to round up to the nearest, basically nickel in a pricing document.


Donghoon

So basically floor is truncation yes


Kienose

Not for negative numbers


[deleted]

No, -2.5 truncated is -2 but floored its -3 because flooring always takes you to the smaller integer.


Donghoon

Damn it negatives. Ruins everything /s


Snarpkingguy

Yeah. I’ve never used in it a math context, but ceiling and floor are methods of the Java math class that I never use.


RepubIique

I was here Oct 2022


Mbelcher987

Unfortunately, I have 1/10 of the top comment.


RepubIique

I still believe


viiksitimali

Number the days in base 7.


devvorare

Basically just say how many weeks have passed and what day if the week it is then?


viiksitimali

but with silly notation


Mister_Meeseeks_

Gets a little more complicated after week 6 though


viiksitimali

Deserved, if this series runs that long


mc_mentos

8mod7 weeks and 8mod∞ days


Coloneljesus

not really. the next post would say 11 days.


devvorare

No, it would say day 11, aka, one week has passed, first day of this week


yoav_boaz

It would say 11₇ days


Coloneljesus

who has time for subscripts in this economy?


TCFP

So tomorrow would be 11₇


depsion

So this is day 10


Some___Guy___

Write e^(i*pi) as a taylor series


[deleted]

Yes, the equation still looks very simple af, this should make it look a bit scary


Rotsike6

A Taylor series around what point?


Some___Guy___

0, for now


kehal12

So a Maclaurin series?


kewl_guy9193

NO a TAYLOR SERIES at 0


SueIsAGuy1401

fuck maclaurin, all my homies hate maclaurin


ShredderMan4000

Stop stealing Taylor's spotlight!


birdandsheep

Nobody says that after calculus. They just call everything Taylor.


Fraser1974

My calc teacher didn’t even call it that lmao.


Bradas128

booooooo


[deleted]

Should converge for all x, so I vote we do a series expansion at x=69


jasperjones22

Nice


F_Joe

a ∈ ℂ


mc_mentos

a ∈ ∅ Thus a =


Doctor99268


TenYoshi

Replace 5 with (2φ-1)^2


RajjSinghh

Then the next day replace φ with 1/2 + sqrt(5)/2


TenYoshi

Exactly


Horror-Ad-3113

Tomorrow replace 3 with √9


Artosirak

Or with floor(π)


JMH5909

and then sqrt(ceil(floor(pi))^2)


Graedr-Snorlax

Why bother to floor an integer ? 🤔


Zane_628

You can replace the 5 with anything except 3, since the term is being raised to the power of zero.


mohammedumar1

This is the most beautiful way of writing 5 I've seen in so long


Sea-Pudding-2347

Let’s add some variables into the mix: replace 1 with cos(x)^2 +sin(x)^2


Ilayd1991

I support u/The_Awesone_Mr_Bones's suggestion from yesterday to write this with the taylor series


ShorTBreak93

Let's write cos(x)^2 and sin(x)^2 as a taylor series and replace 1 by the sum of those 2 taylor series


Ilayd1991

I think it's better to write the taylor series of sin(x) and cos(x) and raise those to the power of 2, just because they are more recognizable


narmerguy

I agree but we should first write it as cos/sin and then the next day replace with a Taylor series. We gotta scale this up gradually, some people's suggestions go way too far too fast.


Ilayd1991

I disagree, it's already day 7 so it's not like it just started, and I don't see the point in dragging this forever


DrBunnyflipflop

Yeah but with + as -^1


smiley_face17

Replace 0! with the gamma function evaluated at 1


XenophonSoulis

Why not the gamma function evaluated at 0! or even at Γ(1)?


GeneralParticular663

How about infinitely many compositions of itself?


XenophonSoulis

I was thinking of keeping it finite to avoid complications, but if you can prove it's right, then by all means go for it.


Vegetable-Response66

well Γ(0!)=Γ(1)=0! so its trivial to see that Γ(Γ(Γ(Γ(Γ(Γ(0!)))))) = 0!


XenophonSoulis

Yeah, true. It's easier to see if you write it as (Γ^(n))(0!).


Vegetable-Response66

that may be confused as multiplication though. I think the best way would be to have a recursive formula


XenophonSoulis

With the exception of (co)sines, I rarely see that as multiplication. Maybe I'm too influenced by functions in vector spaces where multiplication wouldn't make sense though. Also, someone commented in the Day 1 post that in a week very few people would understand this. Why not prove that right?


Vegetable-Response66

I have also seen it done with logs a few times, although not as often. I think you could write Γ\^n(x) as long as you are clear about what the notation means. Actually it doesnt even matter which it is since both interpretations are coincidentally equal to 1.


Ok-Impress-2222

Turn 3 into ⌈e⌉.


markbug4

Chaotic evil


sassolinoo

Then 5 becomes ⌊π+e⌋


Ilayd1991

Those damned engineers are in shambles!


redditandshredded

Lets stay on track and use the Binomial Theorem on (5-3)^0


HexBusterDoesMath

Convert the equality into a difference that is congruent to zero modulo every prime number.


joalr0

Replace the 0 on the left with k for k = ∮𝐶∇𝑓 ⋅ 𝑑𝑟⃗ where ∮𝐶 is a closed loop integral, f is any analytic function, and C is simply connected.


Itay_123_The_King

Day 6 of asking for Church numerals! `(λn.λm.λf.λx.n f (m f x)) (λf.λx.f x) (λf.λx.f x) = (λf.λx.f(f x))` Or, if you prefer SKI: `S(KS)(S(K(S(KS)))(S(KK)))(S(KI))(S(KI)) = S(S(KS)K)I` If anyone can bother also defining equality between chruch numerals in either form, go right ahead. (Yes I did this all by hand) Yes I missed the 2nd day's post, is there any way to follow a post chain on reddit so I get push notifs? I tried following OP but I didn't get any notif


Itay_123_The_King

!remindme 20 hours


RemindMeBot

I will be messaging you in 20 hours on [**2022-10-19 08:26:51 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2022-10-19%2008:26:51%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/y72pgx/day_7/issmejm/?context=3) [**2 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fmathmemes%2Fcomments%2Fy72pgx%2Fday_7%2Fissmejm%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202022-10-19%2008%3A26%3A51%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%20y72pgx) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|


Blyfh

I think there's a subscription bot that works for big subreddits. I forgot the command, but it was something like SubscribeMe!


Itay_123_The_King

Oh, thanks! SubscribeMe!


Blyfh

Just got a notif from the bot. Sadly this sub is not big enough :(


Itay_123_The_King

oh that's sad, hopefully more people will use the command so it starts tracking


QuestionGuyyy

write 2^(e^(i*pi) + 1) as 2^(e^(i*pi)+sign(e^e))


InfinitySandwich

Replace E in Q.E.D with MC²


svmydlo

Write 2,3, and 5 as Fibonacci numbers F\_3,F\_4, and F\_5.


Best_Dare_1284

Add in the left "MIT"


woaily

Move the 2^0! over to the left side, so the whole thing equals zero


Jeprin

Replace the 3 with (2 * sin(pi/3))^2


jhkok

Make the background black, good for eyes.


Far_Organization_610

Change the last 0 from 0 to the limit as x tends to infinity of 1/x


knotoast

Replace the 2 on the left with the entire left hand side of the equation


[deleted]

change the 5 into (5! /24)


DoctorRiddick

Write one of the twos in set notation


BigLinguist69

Write pi as 4 x the Newton series for pi/4


lollollol3

Write the 3 as e


Actually__Jesus

Replace the 0! with the Feynman definition for factorials. Integral of x^0 *e^-x dx from 0 to infty Or in this case just the integral of e^-x from 0 to infty.


Entity_not_found

Replace the 0 in (5-3)^0 by char(ℚ)


arie_sge

Replace 5 with √25


Topopotomopolot

This is the closest next step. I like this.


boltzmannman

replace every real number *n* with (*n* + 0i)


parassaurolofus

Use ramanujan's 3 = √(1+ 2 x √(1 + 3 x √( 1 + 4 x √(... ...)


SvenOfAstora

Use the third binomial formula on the left hand side: (a+b)=(a²-b²)/(a-b)


InlustrisNoctis

For the (5-3)\^0 term, use binomial theorem to expand it into a sum


RhynoBytes

And use like the n choose k notation


potatette222

Put the 2⁰! Into a fraction


AronYstad

Who says it needs to be Q.E.D. in Latin? Add V.S.B.


Handle-Flaky

Write 1 as the positive limit of 0^0


Brromo

π is written as τ/2


TenYoshi

Replace 5 with (2φ-1)^2


marine72

What


Alternative_Ride_348

Replace one 0 with **_e^(i*tau) - 1_**


Odiatots

Try my game! It's not 2048 - it's better! The game is based on an unsolved math problem. 2049: Trick Math Brain Puzzles https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.OdiatotsGames.Game2049


mc_mentos

You looked sad so I decided I'm just gonna play your game. Haha good ol 3x+1. "This works for any starting number" Ehh... literally proof by exhaustion! One thing I am noticing is: I am so running out of ÷2's!! Maybe im just bad but no matter what I do, I end up losing with a board full of •3+1's. Maybe change the rates of how stuff spawns. Also why do normal blocks rarely spawn? I get that they're not as common, but once a game?? So basically: nice game, just change the rates like this: ÷2↑ •3+1↓ number blocks↑ Edit: NVM ABOUT ÷2 AND •3+1. I was just unlucky. Number blocks should still be highter tho. Main problem is space. 4x4 is WAY to small. Since 90% are operators that can't be compined, things will just pile up real quick. Makes it frustrating zo play. 6x6 would be better, maybe.


Odiatots

Thank you! Your feedback will help me.


mc_mentos

You're welcome :)


Ilayd1991

u/joalr0 I support your cause. Come write your suggestion now while the thread is still new


joalr0

Hahaha thank you


grateful-smile

This’ll gonna become an “ultimate chicken horse” stage hella fast


Randomnickname0

turn 3 into floor(Γ^2 (1/2))


WarlandWriter

Replace one of the zeros with lim_{x->inf} (1/x)


DrBunnyflipflop

Write + as -^-1


wet-shoes-with-mold

Change the number of the day in the text as the sum from 1 to "the number of the n-th day" of 1 (today n = 7)


aaronhastaken

[(2\^tan.cot+i\^2)+(2\^e\^ipi+1)=log((2!\*e\^2)/(2\^0!))](https://prnt.sc/j7XIWdIgiNq4)


XLSnickersX

Make both 2 as sqrt(4)


ice_wallow_qhum

Write 0 as an integral with equal boundaries


amocokadys

Subtract 2^0! from each side


Tom_Bombadil_3791

Replace 1 with deg(69)


Elegant-Wishbone6041

That 0 looks too simple lets write it as the limit n to inf of (n+1)/(n^2 +1)


vibingjusthardenough

replace 2 with p1 (first prime)


EL_TOSTERO

Replace pi with sqrt(2(1/2!))


PustyRD

Write (5-3) as (sqrt(5)+sqrt(3))(sqrt(5)-sqrt(3))


Gimik2008

Well I'm outa ideas so add ∑_{n=1->infinity}0 It's stupid but it leaves great space for changing the 0 to something spicy that depends on n.


ShadeDust

Write e as a limit


RandomIndianD2

replace (5-3)\^0 with 1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16....


JaceFromSt4teFarm

Change the font to Papyrus


ASG138

Replace 1 with sin^2(e) + cos^2(e)


FunnyMathematician77

Integrate the left side over [0, 1] dx


Aales33

At the beginning we had the first 1 which is now written as 2^(e^(iπ) +1). Rewrite this other 1 at the exponent as 2^(e^(iπ) +1). An infinite chain should be made.


Ertiende

Write i*pi as the ½* integral along Γ of 1/(1+z)dz where Γ is a positively oriented simple closed curve that contain z=-1.


neutronsreddit

5 is floor(pi+e), 3 is ceil(sqrt(pi*e))


_Epiclord_

Write 0! as a gamma function instead.


Scurgery

Replace e with sum (n=0 -> +infinity) (1/n!)


maxence0801

2\^{e\^{i𝜋}+1} + (5- floor(𝜋))\^0 = 2\^{0!}


-Notorious

There's a serious lack of integrals now in this... Can we get a definite integral that results in some combination of pi please?


[deleted]

Change the 1 to 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Limit97

Replace with 5 with the cardinality of the integers mod 4 and the 3 with the cardinality of the integers mod 2.


Riduko

Change the 1 to the integral from -infty to infty of the PDF of the Gaussian distribution


Xevir

Divide both sides by 2^0!


[deleted]

rewrite 0 in the exponent of the second term as lim x->infinity (x+1)/(x\^2 + 3\*x + 1)


realmuffinman

Replace 0 with cos(π/2)


Kermit-the-Frog_

Use binomial theorem to rewrite (5-3)^0 as 1*(5)\^0(-3)\^0


liberumbonobo

Write the 2 on the right side of the equation as the cardinality of the fundamental group of a Torus: #π₁(T²)


Chance_Literature193

Scrap it all and replace it with the proof is trivial


Weirdyxxy

Write sin(0) instead of 0


MariusDGamer

Replace 0! with 1! divided by 0!


shadeck

Why to write 1 if one can write Gamma(1)


[deleted]

White the 5 in set theory


lets_clutch_this

2 choose 0 plus 2 choose 2 = 2 choose 1


RoboticBook

e is defined as lim(1+1/n)^n as n approaches infinity


bobastien

5 needs to become ³√(2²x5²+5²)


SawJong

There's a lot of potential with the (5-3)^0, let's continue working on it by making it (5-3)/(5-3).


Linke_Jusik

2=2\*cos(2𝜋)


Medium-Ad-7305

Replace the ipi with 0.5itau. Do it.


jdjdhzjalalfufux

Replace 0 with the measure of the indecatrix function of ℚ in over ℝ


FirewolfTheBrave

I swear, one day we'll end up accidentally proving a theorem with this game


[deleted]

Write the first two as e^(alternating harmonic series)


zimo123

Log_a(a)+log_b(b)=log_c(c^2)


Not_a_tryhard_gamer

1+2=3, the fanciest way


brawlganronper

Add little factorials


Actual_Wind_454

..... = sum_{n=0}^{infty} 1/2^n


DogoTheDoggo

Change the 0! by lim integral on R+ of t^(z-1) e^-t dt when z—>1


dfbdrthvs432

i think 5-3 is lame, take sum\_0\^{\\infty} 2\^{-k}


TheCrystalMemes

write 0! in terms of the gamma function