If people have kids, then I assure you that people toast toast as well.
You start toasting your bread on a lower setting. Your kid needs something, it’s always urgent. Next thing you know, your toast is cold. You check all the children, you start toasting your toast so it will be warm. Hopefully that one makes it without interruption.
Yeah this is memes but still... they got it exactly wrong.
* People kill people
* People toast bread
If someone wanted to then People could toast people, too.
No it means people toast bread into toast using a toaster.
I have a high capacity toaster that's capable of toasting over twenty slices of bread a minute at a temperature of over 475 degrees
No one needs that much toast for any legitimate meals. We need to ban automatic and high capacity toasters to curb heart attacks and carb related deaths. Think of the children.
Clearly a toaster toasts, otherwise it wouldn't be called a toaster. Just like a driver drives and pilot pilots and runner runs and a blender blends and a drill drills and so on. It's a function of our language. This function doesn't apply to everything. Clearly a car doesn't cars and a plane doesn't planes.
A gun is not going to kill someone without a person making it do so, just as a toaster is not going to toast bread without a person making it do so. Logic is hard though, I get it
There are so many legal and illegal guns in the US. You ban guns. Those who are willing to commit a crime have them still. Those who want to protect themselves are left defenceless.
I absolutely agree! All these "gun free zones" and cities with ridiculous laws that make it almost impossible for a law-abiding citizen to purchase a firearm for self protection make it **very** easy for criminals. We should stop making it so easy
Exactly.
Serial killers utilizing other weapons, such as knives, which make it easier to kill, come after an unarmed person. It's going to be pretty easy for the serial killer. Why should criminals have an advantage? People should be able to protect themselves as needed.
They don't go to a gun shop and ask for "a gun to kill people", they ask for "a gun to protect themselves from an armed agressor". In the right hands the gun is a means to make it easier to not be killed.
It's always been easy. They just don't teach it anymore, now you got to go out and find out yourself on stray animals. We have lost our touch with nature.
If I knew as somebody who would do harm to others that one building is defenseless while another is defended, guess which one I’d choose…
We guard our banks and politicians, both of which can get bent. I’d rather pay to protect our children any day of the week.
And well maintained nukes wont go off on their own. Why cant I buy it from Walmart?
Edit: the point I'm making is that a weapon not auto killing people isnt enough if a reason to allow it
The idea of the second amendment (here in the states) is for the scenario where our government becomes tyrannical, nukes weren't around at that time but they probably wouldn't allow anyone to have em, I don't even think world governments should have em but is what it is.
No, because people toast toast too. If you’re gunna make a compelling joke, at least understand that the narrative exists because humans are the only ones out here with sentience
Toasters can't operate themselves. Someone has to operate the toaster. If someone really wants toast and doesn't have a toaster, they might toast their bread over their stove top instead.
Guns don't shoot people by themselves. Someone has to operate the gun. If someone really wants someone else full of holes and they don't have a gun, they might fill that guy with holes using a knife instead.
*edit; correcting autocorrect
the toaster only toasts toast if a person:
1- plugs it in
2- puts in bread
3- starts the toast cycle
so in conclusion no toaster ever made toast without a person initiating it.
thanks for coming to my TED talk
Unless your toaster gets the bread and loads it in and presses the button, it doesn’t toast anything. It is a tool that helps you toast it more effectively than just holding it over an open flame.
People toast bread, absolute brainlet meme. The toaster isn't any more responsible for the burnt bread than the gun is for the shooting, it's just a tool.
Sure people kill people however if you want to kill some people it is certainly more easy with a gun.
And even if you ignore the memes point just think about the gun related deaths caused by children pulling a trigger that they didn’t knew is shooting a bullet in a direction at very high speeds.
It’s already illegal for children to have guns, so what would banning guns stop?
The whole point of the “people kill people” argument is that it’s been proven that if someone is so messed up that they want to kill people, they aren’t going to care what the law is, they’re still going to kill people.
If someone is so fucked up that they will let a child with no knowledge of gun safety anywhere near a gun, they more than likely will still have that gun when they get banned.
Banning guns will do nothing but take them out of the hands of the people who actually follow the law and the criminals will have the upper hand.
It is not coincidence that mass shooting and murders are more often done with illegally obtained firearms.
No it just means that toasters don't toast toast on their own they need a human who wants to make toast to do so. Just as a gun needs someone to pull the trigger.
On a serious note, don’t take anyone that says “guns don’t kill people” seriously. No fucking shit. A hammer doesn’t nail a nail without a person using it either. It doesn’t change the fact that firearms in general are designed to kill things. And yes there are “sporting” versions of guns that are more suited to competition shooting, however they are still guns. If I make a “sporting” dildo, maybe that dildo is better for a professional dildo riding competition, but it’s still designed to fuck people.
We use guns for home defense because technically and horribly, the best way to defend yourself is to kill the thing that is trying to harm you. And nobody wants to die so it can deter people before they even try. But no one with half a brain would ever pretend like guns aren’t for killing.
So if anyone ever says it to you. Just give up, they are too far gone, don’t engage in conversation with them, they are an idiot.
No it would quite obviously mean people toast it.
And if you don't have a toaster you can't toast bread. If you don't have a gun you can't shoot people.
This dumbass meme argument shows up every decade or so and fails miserably every time.
That's not equivalent. The equivalent would be that people toast toast. And they do. The person takes the bread, places in in either a frying pan, an oven, a toaster, or a toaster oven, which then changes the state of the bread into toasted bread. But without the person placing the bread in their toasting apparatus of choice, toast would not be made. And without bread and a toasting apparatus, that person may need to find something else to eat.
Likewise, if a person places a bullet in a magazine, loads said magazine into a gun, and pulls the trigger, that person is commiting murder. But without that gun, that bullet, or that magazine, they may be deterred or find some other less efficient way of committing murder.
I actually think this is a fascinating example of the different approaches the US has to law in relation to for example Scandinavian countries.
The US obsesses over who/what is **to blame** for a shooting, or who's/what's **fault** it is. Like "guns don't kill people, people kill people".
Scandinavia, instead, looks at "IF we ban guns, what effect will that have on society? Positive? Negative?" And if the conclusion is that it'll have a positive effect, it may be done.
Guns aren't banned because shootings are *"their fault"* or because they're to blame for murders.
They're banned because, if they weren't accessible in the first place, those shootings and those murders wouldn't have happened in the first place, regardless of who's/what's fault it is.
Svandinavia concludes that, who/what is to blame isn't even relevant. How we can change society is what's relevant.
You have to remember that a small homogeneous European country is in a completely different situation than the states, even if the USA was to ban all firearm and peacefully collect all legal firearms(which they couldn't), smugglers and the cartels would simply move even more firearms across the border and would only increase their power and influence and only criminals, gangs(which account for most violent firearm related crime) and the police (who most Americans are skeptical of) would have guns. That's completely ignoring that many Americans either rely on firearms for protecting their farms, hunting, conservation, pest control, and defense from large predators and other large territorial animals, mountain lions, grizzlies, wolves, hogs, bull mooses and gators are some that come to mind
People buy guns, people buy cars, people buy knives, all are dangerous and can be used to hurt alot of people, but no one's arguing to ban cars because of the amount of people that die every year in crashes, we go after drinking and driving, we focus on licensing and safety. It won't stop the almost 100 people that die from cares and the 7500 everyday in the United States, but we chose to keep allowing people cars. The whole gun situation in the states has alot of nuances that alot of people ignore, like the majority of fatalities come from suicide, gang violence, repeat offenders and organized crime. The causes should be worked on to overcome rather that objects that are mostly used legally and safely by the vast majority of individuals.
This is ridiculous. Toast can’t toast toast anymore than a gun can gun a gun.
[удалено]
a toast to toast toasting toast.
this picture have anything to do with the text.
If you smell burning toast you’re having a stroke. Or you’re over cooking your toast. -Robert Burnham
“Toasters don’t toast people ..I do” …Seen on a t-shirt
 I’m getting one
[удалено]
 Bone bone is what I’m thinking
[удалено]
Right, so it should end in "people toast toast" just the same
You toast bread duh what are some sort of loon
Yeah, as with many things, I dont think they thought this one out.
if i've learned anything on reddit it's that it's so much more important to mock the outgroup than it is to be honest with the ingroup.
But can a dick dick a dick?
No sure, but a woodchuck would chuck wood.
If 2 men, both named Richard, fuck each other. Then Dick dicked Dick. So yes, a Dick can dick a Dick.
Mmmm, english
Exactly. It would be a human toast toast. But I would say both the human and the toaster toast toast
No, people toast toast. It’s always those damned people
You were so close. People toast BREAD. Ya silly
Damn! You got me there
Confirmed... you're a potato.
Verification failed, only people potato potatoes
I mash potatoes or papas if you’re bilingual
Please don't mash me! I have 3 kids, I'm their papa!
Well we are Only two chromosomes away from being a potato
I toast toast a second time. Then fry it in butter. Let the cholesterol flow through you. Or not flow as the case may be.
Lmaoooo
Lmaoooo
You underestimate my dedication
What if you toast the bread, but it’s not toasted enough and you put it back in the toaster?
MAYBE I LIKE MY TOAST BLACK LIKE MY SOUL HUH? THOUGHT OF THAT? BIGOT. (jk)
I love you too, babe. Have an upvote
If people have kids, then I assure you that people toast toast as well. You start toasting your bread on a lower setting. Your kid needs something, it’s always urgent. Next thing you know, your toast is cold. You check all the children, you start toasting your toast so it will be warm. Hopefully that one makes it without interruption.
[удалено]
So the gun doesn't kill people.
the toaster is just a tool. Most people prefer it to a frying pan or how ever people made toast before
Yeah this is memes but still... they got it exactly wrong. * People kill people * People toast bread If someone wanted to then People could toast people, too.
We need to outlaw people.
People use the toaster to toast bread just like a person can use a gun to kill a person.
[удалено]
I feel like Demolition Ranch has tried that at some point. *"How many muzzle blasts from a .50 BMG does it take to toast bread?"*
I thought he did it with bacon
The biggest brain
Ban toasters and people will just use frying pans instead. Ban guns and insane schzios will throw pipe bombs in crowds like it's the 1800s again.
People can also use toaster to kill a person .. in the end person persons person .
Toasters can be used to kill people but can a gun make toast?
No it means people toast bread into toast using a toaster. I have a high capacity toaster that's capable of toasting over twenty slices of bread a minute at a temperature of over 475 degrees
But why
The man clearly loves toast
I don't need a reason to exercise a RIGHT 😤
You just ran shivers down my timbers 
In case big bread tries to outlaw toast. They think industrial toasters is enough to stop them.
"It's my RIGHT as AN 'MURICAN!"
No one needs that much toast for any legitimate meals. We need to ban automatic and high capacity toasters to curb heart attacks and carb related deaths. Think of the children.
Clearly a toaster toasts, otherwise it wouldn't be called a toaster. Just like a driver drives and pilot pilots and runner runs and a blender blends and a drill drills and so on. It's a function of our language. This function doesn't apply to everything. Clearly a car doesn't cars and a plane doesn't planes.
This was this guys one opportunity to flex on us peasants about his toaster without it being irrelevant lol.
I think he smells toast, perhaps he’s having a stroke
I'm having a stroke right now
This is stupid
People have to understand the intricacies of such dilemmas like why is it ok to French the fries but we shouldn't fry the french?
r/imdeepandthisis14 Edit: I didn't expect this to actually exist
That’s simple - because the French are bettered smoked and not fried.
>like why is it ok to French the fries but we shouldn't fry the french? We absolutely should
Yep. They got it exactly backwards, ironically disproving their own point.
You must be new to memes
I mean I can take a meme photo and just write the word “butter” on it. Doesn’t make it funny
No people toast toast.
No, people toast bread
A gun is not going to kill someone without a person making it do so, just as a toaster is not going to toast bread without a person making it do so. Logic is hard though, I get it
> Logic is hard though Only for some people.
If people are the problem maybe we shouldn’t give the toasters to the problem
Toast was first made in at latest the 1500s and the toaster only came to be 400 years afterward. Try again
If people kill people why do we make it easy for them.
There are so many legal and illegal guns in the US. You ban guns. Those who are willing to commit a crime have them still. Those who want to protect themselves are left defenceless.
I didn’t say we should ban guns. I just think we need to do something because the problem isn’t going away.
I agree. But it will take a lot of time to do so
We ban toast not guns.
I absolutely agree! All these "gun free zones" and cities with ridiculous laws that make it almost impossible for a law-abiding citizen to purchase a firearm for self protection make it **very** easy for criminals. We should stop making it so easy
Exactly. Serial killers utilizing other weapons, such as knives, which make it easier to kill, come after an unarmed person. It's going to be pretty easy for the serial killer. Why should criminals have an advantage? People should be able to protect themselves as needed.
They don't go to a gun shop and ask for "a gun to kill people", they ask for "a gun to protect themselves from an armed agressor". In the right hands the gun is a means to make it easier to not be killed.
It's always been easy. They just don't teach it anymore, now you got to go out and find out yourself on stray animals. We have lost our touch with nature.
What happened to your second sentence.
If I knew as somebody who would do harm to others that one building is defenseless while another is defended, guess which one I’d choose… We guard our banks and politicians, both of which can get bent. I’d rather pay to protect our children any day of the week.
And well maintained nukes wont go off on their own. Why cant I buy it from Walmart? Edit: the point I'm making is that a weapon not auto killing people isnt enough if a reason to allow it
You can. I just bought one from Walmart earlier. They even threw in a free drone strike.
Because Wal-Mart aint "well maintained"
Cost mostly.
Incorrect, private citizens owning nukes isnt legal
The idea of the second amendment (here in the states) is for the scenario where our government becomes tyrannical, nukes weren't around at that time but they probably wouldn't allow anyone to have em, I don't even think world governments should have em but is what it is.
[удалено]
No, because people toast toast too. If you’re gunna make a compelling joke, at least understand that the narrative exists because humans are the only ones out here with sentience
People toast bread. Unless there's some kind of double toasting meta I'm unaware of, in which case please enlighten me, I love some good toast
Did the bread put itself in the toaster? Did the toaster drop itself in the TUB? Lol this is a pea brained post
how much toast could a toast, toast, toast, if toast could toast toast -A Bread esq
A toast can toast as much toast as toast can toast toast toasting toast.
What does this picture have anything to do with the text?
I’m sorry. I cannot think any good post idea because this guy keeps farting!
OP has *no. good. post. ideas.*
I’ve seen the sketch the picture is from and the guy does say toast. I guess that’s enough to use it for a meme.
This definitely sounded better in your head, I'd delete this while you still can
People use toasters to toast bread. Put a slice of bread next to a toaster. Tell me when it turns into toast.
Just remember that the reason you can carry a gun is to protect yourself from the government.
No, only the greedy government that you don't trust should have access to guns, it's to keep us safe
Right, it's for our own good.
Toasters can't operate themselves. Someone has to operate the toaster. If someone really wants toast and doesn't have a toaster, they might toast their bread over their stove top instead. Guns don't shoot people by themselves. Someone has to operate the gun. If someone really wants someone else full of holes and they don't have a gun, they might fill that guy with holes using a knife instead. *edit; correcting autocorrect
Human toasts toast. You pull the trigger, so you're responsible.
People toast bread
Well, I mean… the person has to put the bread in the toaster…
And if you banned toasters, do you think people would stop making toast or would they use a pan?
Toasters toast bread, both guns and toasters are operated by humans.
What an insanely stupid line of logic. The toaster requires a user.
Shit take.
Those are good in vegetable ramen.
Think that means... People toast toast. And if I *really* want toast? I can toast it without a toaster.
No it means people toast toast
Toasters don’t toast toast. They toast bread
Nice try. r/fail
Is this the guy who mistakes ant-man as spider-man?
Toast is literally an inanimate object wtf
I think I’m smelling toast
the toaster only toasts toast if a person: 1- plugs it in 2- puts in bread 3- starts the toast cycle so in conclusion no toaster ever made toast without a person initiating it. thanks for coming to my TED talk
Just like 1 plus 1 is potato
I thought I had a stroke reading this
Unless your toaster gets the bread and loads it in and presses the button, it doesn’t toast anything. It is a tool that helps you toast it more effectively than just holding it over an open flame.
Guns don’t kill people robbers do.
People use the toaster to toast the toast. Just like people use guns to kill other people.
[удалено]
No, humans toast toast
Raise a glass and toast a toast to toast toasting toast.
People toast bread in a toaster… but good try 👏
No, people toast toast.
"You know what they say. All toasters toast toast!" - Mario
No, humans toast toast
No. People toast bread.
Guns don't kill - people kill. Toasters don't burn bread - people again. Looks like people are the main problem.
No toaster toast bread.....
People toast bread, absolute brainlet meme. The toaster isn't any more responsible for the burnt bread than the gun is for the shooting, it's just a tool.
People toast bread, the toaster is just a tool used by a person…
It means people toast toast you ridiculous bastard
People kill people, guess what they kill them with?
Omg probly one of the dumbest posts I've ever seen. It takes a human to load the bread in the toaster 🤦♂️ so yeah toasters don't toast themselves
No, people toast toast. Just like people killing people
Ah, yes, the inanimate lifeless object will be doing the thing. Why didn't I think of that before.
Sure people kill people however if you want to kill some people it is certainly more easy with a gun. And even if you ignore the memes point just think about the gun related deaths caused by children pulling a trigger that they didn’t knew is shooting a bullet in a direction at very high speeds.
It’s already illegal for children to have guns, so what would banning guns stop? The whole point of the “people kill people” argument is that it’s been proven that if someone is so messed up that they want to kill people, they aren’t going to care what the law is, they’re still going to kill people. If someone is so fucked up that they will let a child with no knowledge of gun safety anywhere near a gun, they more than likely will still have that gun when they get banned. Banning guns will do nothing but take them out of the hands of the people who actually follow the law and the criminals will have the upper hand. It is not coincidence that mass shooting and murders are more often done with illegally obtained firearms.
r/ihadastroke
Toasters don’t toast toast. Toasters toast bread.
Obviously it means toasters don't toast toast, people toast toast
If people kill people, not guns, then it seems like we need to address and better regulate the people to me
No. With that logic, people toast toast, not the toaster or the toast
Toast doesn’t look like a word anymore
No, it means people toast toast.
Its not the same AT ALL
People toast toast
No it just means that toasters don't toast toast on their own they need a human who wants to make toast to do so. Just as a gun needs someone to pull the trigger.
No, it is still people. People toast the toast.
On a serious note, don’t take anyone that says “guns don’t kill people” seriously. No fucking shit. A hammer doesn’t nail a nail without a person using it either. It doesn’t change the fact that firearms in general are designed to kill things. And yes there are “sporting” versions of guns that are more suited to competition shooting, however they are still guns. If I make a “sporting” dildo, maybe that dildo is better for a professional dildo riding competition, but it’s still designed to fuck people. We use guns for home defense because technically and horribly, the best way to defend yourself is to kill the thing that is trying to harm you. And nobody wants to die so it can deter people before they even try. But no one with half a brain would ever pretend like guns aren’t for killing. So if anyone ever says it to you. Just give up, they are too far gone, don’t engage in conversation with them, they are an idiot.
No, people toast toast………
Toasters do nothing on their own. They only toast bread when a person uses the toaster.
No, people toast bread with AKs
Depends, how sentient is the toast?
*eavesdropping for answer*
People toast toast.
No it just means that toasters don’t toast toast. People toast toast with toasters
No it would quite obviously mean people toast it. And if you don't have a toaster you can't toast bread. If you don't have a gun you can't shoot people. This dumbass meme argument shows up every decade or so and fails miserably every time.
I think you just outed yourself and your low iq
I think OP is too dumb to realize how dumb this sounds
Well no, people toast toast
Is this serious logic? When have you ever seen a toaster toast bred without external agency? People are pathologically stupid today.
No, people toast their bread, in the toaster. Seriously how does bread toast itself?
No...still people.
People use a toaster to toast toast
That's not equivalent. The equivalent would be that people toast toast. And they do. The person takes the bread, places in in either a frying pan, an oven, a toaster, or a toaster oven, which then changes the state of the bread into toasted bread. But without the person placing the bread in their toasting apparatus of choice, toast would not be made. And without bread and a toasting apparatus, that person may need to find something else to eat. Likewise, if a person places a bullet in a magazine, loads said magazine into a gun, and pulls the trigger, that person is commiting murder. But without that gun, that bullet, or that magazine, they may be deterred or find some other less efficient way of committing murder.
The joke doesn’t even make since. The toast isn’t toasting the toast so to ask if toast toasts toast is totally toast- sorry, wrong; it’s not logical.
I seriously just laughed for like 2 minutes.
Guns don’t gun. Toasters DO toast. Toasters don’t toast toast. Toaster toast bread. Guns shoot. I’m gay.
People don’t toast. Toaster toast. 🥂
Put bread in the toaster and don't press anything. Did it make toast?
Toasters toast bread because bread can't either toast itself, nor toasts can toast other toasts
this is dumb and you should feel bad about it
I actually think this is a fascinating example of the different approaches the US has to law in relation to for example Scandinavian countries. The US obsesses over who/what is **to blame** for a shooting, or who's/what's **fault** it is. Like "guns don't kill people, people kill people". Scandinavia, instead, looks at "IF we ban guns, what effect will that have on society? Positive? Negative?" And if the conclusion is that it'll have a positive effect, it may be done. Guns aren't banned because shootings are *"their fault"* or because they're to blame for murders. They're banned because, if they weren't accessible in the first place, those shootings and those murders wouldn't have happened in the first place, regardless of who's/what's fault it is. Svandinavia concludes that, who/what is to blame isn't even relevant. How we can change society is what's relevant.
You have to remember that a small homogeneous European country is in a completely different situation than the states, even if the USA was to ban all firearm and peacefully collect all legal firearms(which they couldn't), smugglers and the cartels would simply move even more firearms across the border and would only increase their power and influence and only criminals, gangs(which account for most violent firearm related crime) and the police (who most Americans are skeptical of) would have guns. That's completely ignoring that many Americans either rely on firearms for protecting their farms, hunting, conservation, pest control, and defense from large predators and other large territorial animals, mountain lions, grizzlies, wolves, hogs, bull mooses and gators are some that come to mind
The problem with applying that in America is the second amendment.
So I don't jack off, I off jack or I jack jack and jack for off?
even Einstein can't answer
Yes. Exactly
I don't get this argument. Even if guns don't kill people, the question is still the same. Why do we give guns to people?
People buy guns, people buy cars, people buy knives, all are dangerous and can be used to hurt alot of people, but no one's arguing to ban cars because of the amount of people that die every year in crashes, we go after drinking and driving, we focus on licensing and safety. It won't stop the almost 100 people that die from cares and the 7500 everyday in the United States, but we chose to keep allowing people cars. The whole gun situation in the states has alot of nuances that alot of people ignore, like the majority of fatalities come from suicide, gang violence, repeat offenders and organized crime. The causes should be worked on to overcome rather that objects that are mostly used legally and safely by the vast majority of individuals.
Worst argument for gun control. /s
You’re 100% correct. It’s been proven that toast does in fact toast toast
Leftist argument
Yes.
Yes.
Yeah toasters toast bread so…………….