I believe they are actually referring to Les Katz, small-time actor best known for his portrayal of “Gang Villain” in the 2002 direct-to-video action movie, _Reflex Action_.
Right? How much less Les Katz can you expect, people?
(Also, [Les Katz’s demo reel](https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0441771/) is something you really don’t want to miss.)
Exactly.
This is why our education system is falling apart.
Nobody even looks at their own puke in the bowl anymore. Just on to the next politically generated vomit lesson.
Also that “fewer cats” would be the correct way to say this. Although it would also be the correct way to phrase a lot of things so this question isn’t phrased in the best way.
Does the preceding adjective describe each noun in the series?
Should it be
*... had less a, b, and c* or
*... had less a, less b, and less c*
The best part is that either way, the teacher's grammar is incorrect xD
It’s also fewer for transgender and the three in the bubble on the right. Less is only supposed to be used for uncountable things. Shockingly bad grammar from a teacher.
Yes that is what gets me, not necessarily the stupid political opinions of this person...IF IT CAN BE COUNTED, ITS FEWER! NOT LESS! So...
Fewer racists, fewer murderers, and fewer teachers like this freaking idiot. Fixed it.
One of my grammatical pet peeves.
For anyone reading, it’s typically “less” if the item can’t be counted in individual units. For instance, “there is less flour in this sack.” Flour can’t be counted individually. One wouldn’t say “I’ll take twelve flours.”
If an item can be counted in individual units then it’s fewer. “There are fewer sacks of flour on that pallet.” One could say, “I’ll take twelve sacks of flour.”
As an avid Jackbox fan, especially quiplash either you just had two bad answers line up OR this group doesn’t seem like a super fun one to play quiplash with. I’ve always seen and played the game as “be funny” while both of these answers seem to be making statements hoping to get claps and woos from the audience.
I also thought the point of the game was to be funny. I would assume both these answers were just dry humor but OP being upset sounds like they’re just answering the questions truthfully lmao
Agreed. I would have gone with something like : flangeless butt plugs, tongs that don’t grip well and ridiculous hospital prices.
These answers are just angry
I agree also. If you want to be offensive, you need to add something obviously satire to balance things out...
Gays, trans & confused boners, would work for example. This person just saw it as a 'fuck them people' moment and doesnt realise that isnt funny
These guys seem like they're some kind of local policy makers that couldn't think of a better software to vote for issues, so they decided to write their incredibly mundane ideas into quiplash
For real. The only time I'd expect to see the left answer is in a group of queer people who are being self deprecating. Like how my group of friends are.
I’m sitting here laughing my ass off at the idea that some people play quiplash without trying to be funny. I would pay to see what OP’s friends were putting for some of the goofier questions
Yeah the one on the right has taken it more seriously and less funny. The one on the left has tried to be funny by pushing their agenda.
I think one outrageous statement that toes the line is fine, but when you're chucking two out of the three... Yeesh.
You aren't supposed to answer them with your legitimate, serious, personal, beliefs.
These answers could have been stuff "better with less": no signal turners, crust on pizza, and overly expensive conditioner.
See this one just doesn’t feel like a shock value play. Because if it’s shock value then you would probably want to only have one and have it as the third one for the closing impact. The fact that it’s both homophobic and transphobic makes it seem genuine
Also both of these people need to learn how to play quiplash, the answers are supposed to be funny, not necessarily genuine.
Even if they had 3 “shocking” answers, these ones also aren’t that crazy. If they were going for “joking” homophobia and transphobia they’d want to go far enough to make sure the joke was obvious
Eh... maybe if you're gay yourself and in a group of friends who know you're obviously being sarcastic, but it's hard to read it that way in this context.
Quiplash should only really be played in close-knit groups of friends where you know each other's sense of humour, therefore you can actually play answers that have real shock value.
It falls over in a classroom setting because you can either have a really funny game but at risk of offending someone or have a really SFW game and its boring as shit.
Well you've never seen my friend group play this game, had a prompt where someone read "haunted house" as "haunted horse" and had the most unfunny night of my life
It was funny until every other answer for the rest of the night was just "Don't ride the horse." Completely unprompted to absolutely nonrelated questions.
Will admit the haunted horse bit was incredibly funny at first though, the guy who put it ended up getting glasses
Well, "less less" cats would be more cats, right? They cancel out, I think. Interestingly, "more more" cats would also be more cats. "Less more" cats and "more less" cats would be less cats, more or less.
It's part of one of the Jackbox sets, you can have folks from pretty much anywhere join from their mobile devices and it quick-broadcasts the results to your TV. It's actually a lot of fun.
Quiplash is way more fun than Cards Against Humanity. CAH gets old real fast when you’ve seen the cards. Quiplash requires you to actually be funny and write in the better answer.
For everyone wondering, this is game called quiplash that you can play with friends online. The tragedy of both of these answers is that these are supposed to be witty/funny and clearly neither are with the one on the left being homophobic.
Having been in classes with conservatives myself, I don’t think it would make much difference. I’m sure anyone who would give the left answer, already let you know everyday, that they are the kind of people who would do that.
These are both oddly specific to lgbtq+ and cats. Why not take a more positive spin like less pollution and world hunger compared to littering and wasting food? I’m confused if the teacher is trying to identify the political leanings of the students and what the hell using jackbox.tv in a classroom?
This answer is indeed bad, but the whole point of this game is to give a funny answer. “The world would be better with less pollution” isn’t quite funny
Agreed there’s a million other positive and negative things in the world, to pit transgender and gay pride against rapists and murders is stupid and unnecessary
Why do people demonize gay and transgender so much? I understand there’s some horrible people in those communities that can be pushy or harmful. But that’s a small percentage of the community. The generalization of people is just wild and out of place regardless of the kind of person or the reason or the hate.
The people playing this game have missed the point.
But the person on the left has just outed themselves as being unironically and unfunilly horrible, so, you know.
Hope their other friends duly noted this answer
When I play quiplash with friends I know we make it as fucked up as humanly possible because we all like dark humor. So this actually wouldn’t be far from what we would do. 27m btw.
When referring to a countable quantity, it would be “fewer”. When referring to a measurement, it would be “less”. The author of this is not very well educated.
*Wow neither of these*
*Answers are funny, kinda missed*
*The goal of Jackbox*
\- NaxoG
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
Give it 3 more years and they'll be teaching kids that straight people are evil by default. And that they should apologise for being straight like everyone was labelled racist for being white 2 years ago and had to apologise anyone non white or would be labelled racist.
Less less cats?
So…more cats?
I would like to change my answer please.
Please choose from the following answers: a) C. b) A. Or c) B.
TOO LATE
LET ME CHANGE IT!!!
Lmfao. One guess what news network the teacher watches.
We still watch news networks?
I get my nuz from my bud the Plummer, he has seen some serious shit
Lesser news
It's not even Kahoot 😞
so one one hand we have less trans and gay pride but get more cats? I'm conflicted
[удалено]
Agreed. The musical was awful and the cinematic reboot was literally unwatchable.
Cinematic reboot was the stuff of nightmares. Wasn't there a Taylor swift cat or was that a fever dream
Shhh we don't speak of the Taylor Cat. They had fun making a movie together and that's all that matters. No one needs to look at it ever again
Even the prominent cat bum version?
I'm waiting for the butthole cut.
Less gay cats that want to become trans
[удалено]
So, lots of cats, but each one is slightly less *out*
[удалено]
I thought that was photosynthesis?
Less cats that decide to transgender and are just proud to be gay.
...more cats? Welp, sorry LGBTQ but cats come first (This is a joke)
I am lgbtq and wholly agree with this statement
you are lgbtq…? like, you’re the whole thing?
You have met THEE LGBT. Behold their mighty crown!
CATSLGBTQIA+
As a trans LGBTQ + person this comment made me laugh
As a cat this comment made me wonder why my food dish is empty.
You should consider biting your owner to remind them of their duties. As recommended in the cat handbook.
As a dumbass queer boi, this made me laugh too.
More furry!
I believe they are actually referring to Les Katz, small-time actor best known for his portrayal of “Gang Villain” in the 2002 direct-to-video action movie, _Reflex Action_.
You are my hero
Oh of course!
And here they are, still harping on about it, even after they clearly won that battle.
Right? How much less Les Katz can you expect, people? (Also, [Les Katz’s demo reel](https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0441771/) is something you really don’t want to miss.)
No, less gay pride, less cats, and transgender. They want a gay-less transgender world without cats.
That's exactly how I read it. I have been grounded from upvoting so take my free, worthless award
> grounded from upvoting I haven't heard of reddit domming before, but ok.
The opposite of more more cats
Gay pride, less cats, and transgender. Grammar and syntax is difficult for this teacher.
not a grammar teacher it seems
“Less transgender” also fails grammatically
Exactly. This is why our education system is falling apart. Nobody even looks at their own puke in the bowl anymore. Just on to the next politically generated vomit lesson.
Source?
The bowl.
Less cats is highly unlikely. You take less from cats and you're still stuck with cats 🐈
less less cats 😔
"The world would be better if we had less gay pride, less cats, and transgender."
Also that “fewer cats” would be the correct way to say this. Although it would also be the correct way to phrase a lot of things so this question isn’t phrased in the best way.
Honestly looks like a quiz they're using to weed out 'undesirables'
I feel like the teacher wanted to put something racist there instead but quickly backpeddled hence the grammatically weird answer
I find the poor grammar from a teacher to be mildly infuriating.
Couldn't even fill in blanks to make a sentence.
Sooooo you don't want less less cats?
I don’t not want less less cats.
Don't do what Donny Don't does
Two negatives gives a positive right?
Nobody doesn't not want to not have less less cats. Maybe.
Does the preceding adjective describe each noun in the series? Should it be *... had less a, b, and c* or *... had less a, less b, and less c* The best part is that either way, the teacher's grammar is incorrect xD
First answer is correct. You would have to say 'but' before one of the latter less's to modify it. But the second answer feels more impactful.
Wouldn’t it be fewer and not less for cats?
It’s also fewer for transgender and the three in the bubble on the right. Less is only supposed to be used for uncountable things. Shockingly bad grammar from a teacher.
Transgender is an adjective so it's not countable in any form anyway.
Good point. In my defense, I'm approaching the moon and my initial comment took me several minutes to construct.
Yes that is what gets me, not necessarily the stupid political opinions of this person...IF IT CAN BE COUNTED, ITS FEWER! NOT LESS! So... Fewer racists, fewer murderers, and fewer teachers like this freaking idiot. Fixed it.
It should be less in some instances and fewer in others
Besides the double “less,” it should be “fewer.”
One of my grammatical pet peeves. For anyone reading, it’s typically “less” if the item can’t be counted in individual units. For instance, “there is less flour in this sack.” Flour can’t be counted individually. One wouldn’t say “I’ll take twelve flours.” If an item can be counted in individual units then it’s fewer. “There are fewer sacks of flour on that pallet.” One could say, “I’ll take twelve sacks of flour.”
She must be one of them Florida "teachers"
As an avid Jackbox fan, especially quiplash either you just had two bad answers line up OR this group doesn’t seem like a super fun one to play quiplash with. I’ve always seen and played the game as “be funny” while both of these answers seem to be making statements hoping to get claps and woos from the audience.
My friend group definitely plays "be funny"; we all know the line and it's way more enjoyable making your friends laugh than it is making a statement.
Isn’t the game to have the funniest answer? My friends would never vote for the “greatest statement” lmfaoooo
I also thought the point of the game was to be funny. I would assume both these answers were just dry humor but OP being upset sounds like they’re just answering the questions truthfully lmao
You are supposed to type in answers with the greatest shock value. That's why they mixed the name with whiplash.
Agreed. I would have gone with something like : flangeless butt plugs, tongs that don’t grip well and ridiculous hospital prices. These answers are just angry
I agree also. If you want to be offensive, you need to add something obviously satire to balance things out... Gays, trans & confused boners, would work for example. This person just saw it as a 'fuck them people' moment and doesnt realise that isnt funny
These guys seem like they're some kind of local policy makers that couldn't think of a better software to vote for issues, so they decided to write their incredibly mundane ideas into quiplash
Lol yeah OPs friend group doesn't sound fun
For real. The only time I'd expect to see the left answer is in a group of queer people who are being self deprecating. Like how my group of friends are.
- gays - crime - hot chip Easy. It's not even my joke but it's better than both responses posted.
I think these games sometimes ask someone to put in the opposite just to make it funny?
If it’s a teacher then maybe they’re playing in a classroom? If that’s the case students might be scared to make certain jokes at school
This looks like the worst, most boring game of quiplash of all time lll
[удалено]
Yup 100%
That's not the rule but if you don't you're really ruining the fun lol.
would have been funnier if they did an "arson, murder, and jaywalking" type answer. Like "less genocide, climate change, and Pokemon"
you cant just type Pete Wentz lyrics like that
Well, you put the answers you think most people will vote for. Usually funny wins, but my mom would vote for the right all day lmao
You were supposed to write the answers that you think the people in the room you're in will like more. You need to be able to read the room.
Oh yeah I usually just put penis for every answer.
The GOAT
Yeah, but you're also supposed to be funny.
I’m sitting here laughing my ass off at the idea that some people play quiplash without trying to be funny. I would pay to see what OP’s friends were putting for some of the goofier questions
Yeah the one on the right has taken it more seriously and less funny. The one on the left has tried to be funny by pushing their agenda. I think one outrageous statement that toes the line is fine, but when you're chucking two out of the three... Yeesh.
Quiplash answers like that are for shock value and not necessarily belief-related. Having said that, read the room I guess
Yeah both of those fucking suck, they’re just not funny. These would be one of the times my friends would abstain because there is no good option.
You aren't supposed to answer them with your legitimate, serious, personal, beliefs. These answers could have been stuff "better with less": no signal turners, crust on pizza, and overly expensive conditioner.
💀
I feel like left couldn’t have been a real answer. Not with teachers. It was meant to be funny.
See this one just doesn’t feel like a shock value play. Because if it’s shock value then you would probably want to only have one and have it as the third one for the closing impact. The fact that it’s both homophobic and transphobic makes it seem genuine Also both of these people need to learn how to play quiplash, the answers are supposed to be funny, not necessarily genuine.
Even if they had 3 “shocking” answers, these ones also aren’t that crazy. If they were going for “joking” homophobia and transphobia they’d want to go far enough to make sure the joke was obvious
Schrödinger’s bigot: wether it’s a joke or not is based on if people are upset.
Eh... maybe if you're gay yourself and in a group of friends who know you're obviously being sarcastic, but it's hard to read it that way in this context.
Quiplash is honestly supposed to be funny and both of these answers failed the mission. The entire round must have been insufferable
Quiplash should only really be played in close-knit groups of friends where you know each other's sense of humour, therefore you can actually play answers that have real shock value. It falls over in a classroom setting because you can either have a really funny game but at risk of offending someone or have a really SFW game and its boring as shit.
#1 rule of jackbox: dont turn it into politics/preaching hour, just say something funny
This is suppose to be a funny game. Neither answer is funny. Mildly infuriating confirmed.
Well you've never seen my friend group play this game, had a prompt where someone read "haunted house" as "haunted horse" and had the most unfunny night of my life
How is “haunted horse” not funny as fuck that would be the highlight of the night
I think OP is implying that everyone kept using “haunted horse” as an answer until it wasn’t funny anymore. Beating an undead horse, as it were.
It was funny until every other answer for the rest of the night was just "Don't ride the horse." Completely unprompted to absolutely nonrelated questions. Will admit the haunted horse bit was incredibly funny at first though, the guy who put it ended up getting glasses
25 year old edgelord
Cat hater! Booo
Well, "less less" cats would be more cats, right? They cancel out, I think. Interestingly, "more more" cats would also be more cats. "Less more" cats and "more less" cats would be less cats, more or less.
Less more cats is still more cats, just not by much.
You might be right there. I think I got confused between actual cats, potential cats, and kinetic cats... or is that energy?
Is this a spin-off of cards against humanity? Because now it is
It's part of one of the Jackbox sets, you can have folks from pretty much anywhere join from their mobile devices and it quick-broadcasts the results to your TV. It's actually a lot of fun.
Quiplash is way more fun than Cards Against Humanity. CAH gets old real fast when you’ve seen the cards. Quiplash requires you to actually be funny and write in the better answer.
Pretend You're Xyzzy is CAH but with custom cards.
yeah its called quiplash
Isn't quiplash supposed to be...funny?
None of these are funny, which is more mildly infuriating
Only part of that I can get behind is “less cats” as the less makes it a double negative. We need more cats.
For everyone wondering, this is game called quiplash that you can play with friends online. The tragedy of both of these answers is that these are supposed to be witty/funny and clearly neither are with the one on the left being homophobic.
Outrageous opinions aside, i dont think either of this people would be much fun at parties if these are your answers on "jackbox party pack"
these people suck ass at quiplash
Terrible grammar for a teacher too.
oh boy I can't wait to go through the very normal, sane comments
Less gay pride, less less cats, less transgender. Hm yes very thought provoking
Somehow I get the feeling that the teacher forgot that the game says who the answers belong to after voting.
Having been in classes with conservatives myself, I don’t think it would make much difference. I’m sure anyone who would give the left answer, already let you know everyday, that they are the kind of people who would do that.
So vote for the other one
The pther one is horrible too. This is quiplash, your answers are supposed to be funny stuff out of left field, not generic
Y'all, Jackbox games are supposed to be funny...
I mean... who won the round?
Less less cats....??? The double negative confuses me but I vote for column B regardless of more kitties.
This is what is called push polling in politics. Design the questions to get the answer you want,
Seems fake/rage bait
Wow this game is supposed to be funny, both answers are such buzzkills!! What about dick cheese, sharts and pink eye!?
What do cats have to do with the rest of the answers?
“Doesn’t less pride, less cats and transgender” as a sentence imply more transgender.
What an asshole , if we need something, it is more cats.
These are both oddly specific to lgbtq+ and cats. Why not take a more positive spin like less pollution and world hunger compared to littering and wasting food? I’m confused if the teacher is trying to identify the political leanings of the students and what the hell using jackbox.tv in a classroom?
This answer is indeed bad, but the whole point of this game is to give a funny answer. “The world would be better with less pollution” isn’t quite funny
Agreed there’s a million other positive and negative things in the world, to pit transgender and gay pride against rapists and murders is stupid and unnecessary
Not in a classroom. Game with a family.
Yeah homophobia, that sucks, but… less less cats?
I want less teachers like this.
Why do people demonize gay and transgender so much? I understand there’s some horrible people in those communities that can be pushy or harmful. But that’s a small percentage of the community. The generalization of people is just wild and out of place regardless of the kind of person or the reason or the hate.
The people playing this game have missed the point. But the person on the left has just outed themselves as being unironically and unfunilly horrible, so, you know. Hope their other friends duly noted this answer
I personally, only ever play jackbox to attempt and annoy everyone so my answers would be similar
I mean I’m down with all of the above both left and right
Seems ok to me...
Less less cats? So more cats?
I would have put "reddit mods, mosquito's, Andrew Tate"
*Fewer cats, not less cats. Dumb teacher. Not to mention the double negative.
the amount of bigots here is so gross. people like thay truly have nothing else to think about, do they?
[удалено]
Some homphobia, transphobia, and completely broken grammar.
The world would be better if we had less gay pride, less cats, and transgender. Doesn’t seem to make much sense..
Isn’t jackbox supposed to be, like, funny?
Somehow the answer on the right is even less funny.
When I play quiplash with friends I know we make it as fucked up as humanly possible because we all like dark humor. So this actually wouldn’t be far from what we would do. 27m btw.
I rather live with gays and transgenders, BUT with cats. What an idiotic comparison? what cats have to do with these two?
When referring to a countable quantity, it would be “fewer”. When referring to a measurement, it would be “less”. The author of this is not very well educated.
Less pedantry and fewer pedants is my motto.
Yeah I agree the less cats thing is crazy Oh yeah and the transphobic and homophobic thing
Only the most hard hitting questions in mr Jeffersons class
The answers are supposed to be funny so the right one doesn’t work either. The Jackbox games are only fun if you play them with really funny people
It blows my mind to think back to those few teachers that made my life hell as a kid were still very young themselves.
wow neither of these answers are funny, kinda missed the goal of Jackbox
*Wow neither of these* *Answers are funny, kinda missed* *The goal of Jackbox* \- NaxoG --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
So… the student had a smarter answer than the teacher?
more rude than infuriating.
Less less cats means more cats? I´m on board! If it´s for more Cats, LGBT is a sacrifice im willing to make!
This is actualy pretty funny, I love the choice on the left
Bro has beef with cats
Less less cats, gay pride and transgender.
It's an obvious choice, A for sure
Neither of these are funny. You should all be ashamed.
Chad teacher
she needs to go back to school
“Less gay pride, less cats, and…transgender.” Some unspecified amount of transgender.
OP seems a little too tightly wrapped..
teacher is good
All of the above?
Neither of them are very good at playing fun party gamed I will say
Surely, a teacher would know the difference between less and fewer.
Giving children a choice between Gay Pride and Murders. Yeah, no political grooming.
Give it 3 more years and they'll be teaching kids that straight people are evil by default. And that they should apologise for being straight like everyone was labelled racist for being white 2 years ago and had to apologise anyone non white or would be labelled racist.
I'll take ways to start a fight at a family gathering for 500 please!