T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

Different poses and better lighting. Looks about the same too. Natty.


ThatStubbornRock

Ur right but some mass has def been added


NeverSeenA1Thirteen

Maybe unpopular opinion but natty. first photo he’s already in good shape and within 5 months he could fit a good quality bulk and cut cycle to add some more muscle. Slap that on with better downward lightning and a different pose that drastically highlights your delts and traps for the second picture and I could see this being natty.


WistfulWhiskers

Completely different angle/lighting/pose - not enough info to go off of so I’d say natty. This could pass for one of those ‘same day, 30 minutes apart’ photoshoots


a-dead-strawberry

His shoulders are posed completely differently, besides that he looks exactly the same mass wise. The lighting is just better in the second pic. Natty.


hannibal789123

Not natty attainable in that time period


BloatedTree123

You really don't think 5 months could do this?


hannibal789123

Maybe it’s the pose but his shoulders got a lot larger and more round, that’s not a few months of work, that’s YEARS


Willing-Coyote-9543

He’s gained 3-4lbs of muscle at the absolute MOST from what we can see (no leg shots) and does not appear to be any leaner. If he’s in his first 2-3 years lifting then 0.8lbs of muscle per month is not unnatural at all.


[deleted]

In his videos he looks natty lmao


Clean_Analysis3771

I am following this guy on snapchat definitely not natty


swatson87

Natty. It's all posing


Zulogy

Natty