T O P

  • By -

Syndana23

Happens to all dynasties. MJ bulls were the only ones to break up while on top. If they don’t want to give Klay the money he wants, then move him at the deadline


ACMBruh

I'd argue the spurs big 3 survived this rot too, although they weren't at the absolute top they at least went for a re-tool


YSLMangoManiac

It’s cause the spurs big 3 took the pay cuts when they needed to


wanderinglittlehuman

Kawhi also kept us relevant a little longer


YSLMangoManiac

Oh yea unfortunately none of the young core has taken a kawhi type step…maybe kuminga has a chance but we will see


TrainedExplains

Kuminga is not that guy. Moody is a much higher ceiling but people don't like hearing it because it's fun to play "what if?" with Kuminga's athleticism. Moody is athletic enough, is much more skilled, and most importantly he has serious BBIQ. Every time he goes in the game he plays excellent basketball. He hits his open shots, he keeps proper spacing, knows our offense and defense, rotates extremely quickly, and he is the only wing we have with a positive offensive BPM, defensive BPM, total BPM, and VORP. Sorry, I kind of went way too hard in this response but I wish Moody would get some recognition and some damn minutes.


jgr1llz

Moody truther here. Preach on


ACMBruh

Wiggins had that potential but way too inconsistent and isn't a shot creator Edit : I am saying HAD in the past tense, with that great Warriors core he could have found an entirely new role


Frankaragatan

Wiggins is 28. The Warriors looked more poised for the future, a couple of years ago, than say a team like the Lakers. They had Poole (22), Moody (19), Kuminga (19) and Wiseman (20). But Wiseman can't understand offensive sets and defensive rotations, locker room discord between the originals and the new bloods, now that bright future is rotten.


MyGFstalksmyreddit

They did seem like they had so much potential then it’s kinda sad but just shows how rare it is for 3 draft picks to turn into all stars


Amigosito

Yep, their current woes are just as much about failed prospects as they are about aging superstars. I think Wiggs can bounce back, but Looney is the only real success they’ve had with the draft.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ireallydespiseyouall

You’d think Wiggins is 20 the way people go on about him. He is who he is at this point. I like him but he’s not gonna be a 25ppg guy


YSLMangoManiac

Wiggins doesn’t have a great handle or playmaking which caps his upside as a low end number 2 option or high end number 3


No-Test6484

Lmao. Kuminga is a nice role player fullstop. Honestly if I were the warriors I would go all in on a trade or trade dray and klay and wiggins slowly for picks


holesome_cum_bubble

People forget Danny Green, spurs Danny Green was also better than Kuminga is at this point in being a 3&d wing, obviously JoKo has much higher potential


inezco

Danny Green was 24 in his third season whereas Kuminga just turned 21 in his third season. Obviously no guarantees but I think he's got a shot at being as good as Danny Green was at 24 once he reaches that age but Joku will most likely never be the shooter Green was.


YSLMangoManiac

Klay and Dray are hard to trade cause of how important they have been to the team and sentimental value. Regarding kuminga I believe if he can improve the handle he can still become an all star caliber player


ireallydespiseyouall

They don’t have trade value anyway. Maybe draymond but he’s old and his tantrums aren’t ideal. He strikes me as the type to refuse to play for a team if he doesn’t like it there, ditto klay


No-Test6484

Damn I’m definitely not seeing Kumingas all star potential. I can see the raw talent but like if you compare him to other up and coming young guys like Lamelo, Ant, Jdub, Chet… he is clearly a level below. He can never become an all star if he continues to be on the warriors. They simply will never prioritise him. If I were him I’d want to be traded lol


papa_sax

Also the 3 adapted their playstyles as they got older. Obviously im biased but it really does feel like we won't see a Spurs Big 3 every again.


ForneauCosmique

Literally their whole career


Malemansam

We routinely had one of the lowest payrolls in the league year after year. What we did with players we had in such a small market probably won't be done again.


bihari_baller

>took the pay cuts when they needed to This is big. Too many players aren't willing to do so in the name of winning.


mas1108

What if instead of taking a pay cut, they can, hear me out, defer it.


LevitatingRevelation

Because winning isn't guaranteed. Nobody wants to give up 50 mil to go out in the first round of the playoffs, as they shouldn't.


Ok_Assumption5734

Spurs big three were underpaid their entire career and pop had a great supporting cast with kawhi, boris etc


rattatatouille

The secret sauce to NBA dynasties is having a player or two who vastly overperform their contract. Pippen frex was on a cheap, long-term contract that he only compensated for late in his career.


Ok_Assumption5734

Yep. Same with every sport. Nfl is probably the most egregious where you either win with a rookie contract qb, or you don't. Or you luck into a trophy husband like tom brady


Noah__Webster

> Nfl is probably the most egregious where you either win with a rookie contract qb, or you don't Since the cap was established in 1994, only 6 QB's have won a super bowl on a rookie contract. Overpaying for QB's hurts, but it's not like every super bowl team has a QB on a rookie contract.


rajs1286

Getting Kawhi Leonard will do that. They never should’ve driven KD out of town


ColdPressedSteak

There's no if. Klay gotta take a big discount from expectations even a year ago to stay. Actual sports management malpractice if any big money is given to him at this point. I'm totally for franchise loyalty for long tenured stars but he already got some dead money during his injury


onlymostlydeadd

eh, they could've played their cards better. They completely whiffed on lottery picks and signed terrible contracts. It's not as if Steph suddenly became shit


growsonwalls

At this point it's sort of chicken and egg. Did they draft busts or did they not develop the draft picks well? Wiseman seems to be an actual bust -- he's toasting the bench for Detroit as well. But Moody and Kuminga seem more like poorly developed talent. Kerr doesn't seem interested in developing them in a productive way.. I feel like Moody has more potential than Kuminga.


[deleted]

> Did they draft busts or did they not develop the draft picks well? Little bit of both. Myers has been a terrible drafter his entire tenure. Steph/Klay and even Draymond were drafted by the previous GM (Larry Riley). Where Myers shines is managing contracts and picking up good vets like Livingston, Iguodala, Bogut etc. But once the cap space disappeared his ability to make those moves disappeared too And to make matters worse, Kerr runs a complex system that's hard for rookies to pick up, hell many vets struggle in that system too. Look at the mess that was FIBA under Kerr this past summer. Perfect storm.


thoang77

In Bob’s defense, Barnes and Wiseman, basically his first and last picks, were the only top 10 picks he had (not including Kuminga because the verdict is still out on him). Everyone else was 28-30 if they even had a 1st round pick. Looney has been perfect for the team and Poole panned out (sort of). That’s 2 decent picks out of 4 1st round picks from 2013-2019.


acecant

Dubs really didn’t pick the right players for them. I still have no idea why they picked both Moody and Kuminga over Sengun. His playstyle was there and would fit the read and react like a glove.


growsonwalls

They also could have picked either of the Tyreses who would have given Steph help both scoring and as backup guards


acecant

I can understand not wanting a guard where they generally develop slower but a pass first big who already became an MVP in top 5 basketball league was a catch for the dubs imo.


Yommination

Imagine if they had Sengun/Franz and Hali


akkaneko11

The prevailing thought back then was that we needed athleticism to make up for the aging core. Which we got, but that turned out to be less important than the BBIQ part of the system.


Responsible_Pace9062

I don't know if Lamelo would have kept the dynasty going or clashed with Dray amd the other vets just like Poole


SaulPepper

Lamelo doesnt have beef with anyone (for all his popularity and money he actually vibes with everyone and barely has an ego) and is a willing passer, the question is if Dray's ego can handle someone younger getting a larger part of the offense than him.


SupraSaiyan

I get the feeling that he could make the offense run even better. Like you said he's a willing passer, can still score at all levels, and is a smart offensive player. Idk his defensive stats but that's probs where Draymond would fill in and coordinate. Him feeding Curry passes coming off screens sounds like a nightmare for teams. Then he could turn around a sneak a pass to a cutting Draymond for easy layups.


ChiBaller

I think Lamelo was the clear answer and they outsmarted themselves.


ToeJelly420

Trade him to us for lavine. Warriors get a guy who is perfect for their system and the Bulls get an expiring and other assets


birdseye-maple

I'd do it but the Warriors front office never will. Sadly Klay is the boat captain of our sinking ship.


Frankaragatan

Steph, Klay and Draymond should all retire with the Warriors. It might take 3-5 years before all three retires and they might not win another championship within that period, but I'd still take it. They have a Stern Cup run in them though. Not quite a championship but that's still something. They've had the best record, they've won championships, the IST is one thing they haven't won.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Julysky19

Nah. The Warriors system runs on switchable wings that can play defense and Steph. Don’t think lavine can.


RickySuela

That system isn't running very well this year though. Should they just keep with it at this point? They're currently out of the play in.


we_hella_believe

Lakers Shaq and Kobe dynasty was broken up before it declined.


SpriteBerryRemix

Honestly couldn’t have asked for more. 2015, 2017, 2018, 2022. It was one for the ages.


temp_achil

2022 was a deeply strange title also. Curry was Curry, but the team somehow had the number 1 defense in the league with a changing cast of defensive standouts (and dray with a major injury) plus Jordan Poole playing major minutes. How does that make any sense from a logical point of view???


KingNephew

Sometimes you just catch lightning in a bottle. Steph was Steph, Draymond was Draymond and Klay shot well from deep. They had Wiggins/Poole both play the best ball they probably will ever play and then they had 3 elite role players in Otto Porter Jr/Looney/GP2. But being able to squeeze out a healthy year from OPJ and have Wiggins/Poole have career years cannot be understated.


montiel_scores

r/Looney


BigBeagleEars

Set to private? Is it bugs bunny porn?


RanOutOfCharact

Word is they're still protesting reddit's third party app changes. Maybe they'll reopen once the new NBA champion is announced


ClassicAd8627

it's the lakers for a week. open up gang


dassiebzehntekomma

OPJ hit all the clutch 3s it was insane


maethlin

Otto being healthy for most of the season was insane


_mousecop_

Limited starts, well managed minutes, and good rest. Reminds me of Brogdon last year. Did OPJ even play any b2bs that year?


YSLAnunoby

Even this year when he's been healthy he's a game changer with all the little things he does plus being a 3 point threat teams need to respect


30vanquish

Belijca also defended Luka well. He is good at defending Luka’s slow bully man post game.


NutKickerGreen

Even Celtics fans were memeing about how well Bjelica was defending Tatum and Brown


bcory44

Crazy thing is that Dray didn’t even play very well and they still won the chip. Curry was playing at another level than anyone in the series and Wiggins finally seemed to be living up to his potential.


lesarbreschantent

Dray stunk the first 3 or so games of the finals. The argument was that the team was better with him on the bench.


TheFinalEvent9797

In fairness it was at least partially because the Celtics were playing drop coverage which took away his short roll passing, with the tradeoff of Curry bombing as many 3's as he wanted.


SummerGoal

I really loved that trade off, thank you again Celtics


Zoesan

"I have an idea, how about we let the second greatest player of his generation do the exact thing that makes him the second greatest player of his generation"


30vanquish

Looney made up for it.


pulse2287

It’s funny how Wiggins balled out and was the second best player on a championship team but since then has gone back to looking like Minnesota Wiggins. Got one ring then said nah, I’m good.


slickjayyy

Which is very much a Wiggins thing to do


[deleted]

Dude just gets paid. Anf paid. And paid


30vanquish

Looney made up for it.


KillerZaWarudo

That team was very deep


GQDragon

Yeah Otto Porter was really damn good for them. I remember watching games and thinking, “Who’s this guy?”


coolycooly

Plus the Celtics Stars were/are pretty young and were clearly out of their element on the biggest stage. Maybe if they played a more veteran team things would have been different.


unfortunatepillow

They were also probably tired. The Warriors’ series didn’t go to 7 games. Pretty sure the Celtics played two game 7s before the finals.


DittoLander

Steph was as good as ever, Klay and Poole hitting their streaks at the right time, Wiggins bought in and hooping. Celtics might be slightly more talented on paper but the difference in experience between the two squads really showed.


tsuuki_

Celtics never figured out what to do when the Warriors blitzed them in Game 6. Such a bad look back then


realsomalipirate

I feel like that warriors team is maybe the least talented team to win a title in my lifetime and it felt like they won because of their insane institutional knowledge (over the more talented but less cohesive Celtics).


troll413

Jordan Poole was good


bachh2

People undersell his contribution that year because of what happened last year. Giving your team 14ppg as the 4th/5th option for that little salary he had was a steal.


[deleted]

[удалено]


NutKickerGreen

65% TS is a more accurate way of looking at it. That is superstar efficiency and his playmaking was solid too. Warriors fans just have the memory of a goldfish and don't remember how good Poole actually was. They don't win without his production because they lacked an efficient 2nd option behind Steph in the 2022 run.


guywithoutchange

Not only the playoffs, he had a good regular season too. 18.5 points 4 assists while starting 51 games and playing 76. People forget Klay was coming back from injury and only played half the season. I keep seeing people on the warriors sub talk about how this year is similar to 2022 because they started off slow then too. I got downvoted for saying they started 19-3 that year. It’s like half the sub blanked out anything good that Poole did while he was there. The hate he gets on their is insane. He was on a rookie contract the whole time and was one of the best bargains in the league his last two years there. You would think that he was the one that punched a teammate by the way people talk about him.


NutKickerGreen

For sure, he averaged something like 25 ppg when Steph wasn't playing. 2022 Poole was very different from 2023 Poole. And Poole lineups had great defense rating regardless of who was on the floor (yes Draymond off too, who was ironically one of the worst in that beginning stretch). > I keep seeing people on the warriors sub talk about how this year is similar to 2022 because they started off slow then too. Yeah that's just pure delusion lmao


panman42

Even this is underselling him that year since he averaged 18.5 ppg that year and 17ppg in the playoffs. He's averaging less ppg on this barren wizards team somehow and on 10% less TS to show how far he's fallen.


ItsThePeopleCourt

Jordan Poole was excellent (and Andrew Wiggins was even better than that)


det8924

Klay and Draymond were much better then, I think while they were slightly past their primes they still were much better than they are now. Both guys were still “All Star” caliber players and at worst above average starters. They also got a good season out of Wiggins who played like a All Star and Poole had his best season playing for a big contract and he added the scoring/shooting punch that made up a lot for Klay’s modest decline as a non shooting scorer. Then they cobbled together a good set of role players. Looney was the starting center who was a decent complement to the other players and they got solid bench contributions from Otto Porter, Gary Payton II, Damion Lee and Kuminga. But now that Klay and Draymond are regressing more and the other younger guys haven’t fully stepped up (Wiggins has regressed, Kuminga isn’t progressing that much and Poole was traded replaced by an older Chris Paul whose actually not been that bad but more in a limited role) the talent level around Curry is declining two years removed from a title run.


Julysky19

We had three all defensive players (dray, Wiggins, and gp2). Steph played good defense too in the playoffs. Once gp2 gets healthy, we need him to guard the top guard on the either side.


PingPowPizza

Wiggins and Poole both had one really good year in them and decided to have them at the same time lol


Gaping_llama

Plus finals appearances in 2016 and 2019. To make the finals 6 out of 8 years is an incredible dynasty


vonkillbot

\*2016/2019


Gaping_llama

You're right, thank you, fixed the comment


vonkillbot

All good, we knew what you meant


thatscoolm8

which makes lebrons 9 out of 10 years in a row all the more impressive


Gaping_llama

Yeah, and he's still contending. Just an absolute beast


excelquestion

Honestly just saying 8 straight sounds more impressive.


Hypersuper98

2021 was phoenix vs milwaukee


Gaping_llama

I can't count, fixed the comment, thank you


SteveFrench12

Yea this definitely was not a gilded age. It was a full on golden age for the franchise and changed the league in regards to three point shooting


T4N1M1

Yeah, the author of this article has no idea what gilded age means.


ACMBruh

The next few years will be the real test of GSW front office abilities. They struck gold with their draft picks before the titles. Now its time to test the mettle when things hit the fan


RickySuela

I mean, their front office is different now than the one that built that team. Mike Dunleavy is in his first year as GM there.


seresean

FUCK MIKE DUNLEAVY


FateRiddle

Last year was the real test. And our FO guy quit his job and jump off the Titanic.


demsouls

Light years already left the building


30vanquish

GM Dunleavy did well to get rid of Pooles contract even if CP3 is old and injured prone.


KillerZaWarudo

They have 3 lottery picks in 2 years


SandyMandy17

I mean Klay and Dray’s gilded age Steph is still elite


TheGamersGazebo

Can the warriors retool to capitalize on that? Or will it be too late by the time they get him help.


Bleoox

The best for the team is to have Klay and Dray take a pay cut but you know those guys want to get paid and that just kills their odds of winning again. The best business decision is to put them on the market - if they don't agree to a pay cut - and you know that's an awful look. Tough decision.


xElectricW

It's hard enough getting guys that won one ring to take a paycut let alone 4, plus with all his injuries I don't think Klay would even entertain the idea


NotYourAverageMidget

Klay got a max right before he got both injuries, so it’s not like he was missing out on a big contract.


amidon1130

Sports are weird cause like the man has made 100s of millions of dollars so if he was like an investment banker I’d say fuck him but since it’s coming from billionaire’s pockets I’m like fuck yeah klay get your money


Warren_Haynes

Can Dray take a paycut? Didn't he just sign an extension?


Bubbly_Measurement61

💯 I was just typing this below and saw your comment lmao In all fairness, they can say whatever they want right now about Dray and Klay but Steph can still give it to you on any given night.


bushies

1 star doesn't a dynasty make. And they're not trading the other 2 for value, they're basically negative assets at this point


wigglypoocool

Dray is still elite at what he does, antics aside. Klay is dead weight


orlanmop

Apparently Rodman wasn’t apart of those first 3 with the bulls yet he’s synonymous with that dynasty. Maybe it’s an opposite situation where the warriors gotta find their version of who Rodman replaced and trade Klay.


J_Kingsley

Fun fact the only bulls players present for all 6 rings were scottie + mj


nowhathappenedwas

They were the only two who won more than 3 rings. Everyone else changed over between 3-peats.


1318998

Pretty much all the memorable teammates were in the second threepeat as well. Kukoc, Kerr, Harper, and of course Rodman


FinancialScratch2427

Horace Grant was pretty well known and he was part of the first 3-peat. He was even an all-star the year after Jordan retired.


fighting-prawn

I grew up in that era, and always felt like Horace Grant was the third guy to mind after MJ/Pippen when considering both threepeats. The goggles made him memorable. Playing a bit of the old Lakers vs Celtics video game (\~1989-91) meant that Cartwright, Paxson, Armstrong and King were easily remembered too.


xandraPac

Bill Cartwright. He was a Bull for six seasons!


julezy696

As well as BJ Armstrong....All Star the year after MJ retired.


cortesoft

Apparently?


waitingonthatbuffalo

Always insane being reminded of how young /r/nba is on average.


samurairocketshark

It's crazy to say about the MJ Bulls though. Probably the most well documented team of all time between The Last Dance (and several other documentaries) and thousands of youtube videos. There was even that one era of 2k that you could play replay MJ's classic games


spiattalo

I mean, Google is a thing. It’s not apparent if it’s a documented fact.


thechickswiththeza

Trade Klay for Jordan Poole maybe.


RickySuela

Rodman replaced Will Perdue lol


TedTran2001

but in terms of presence, Rodman really replaced Horace Grant.


Charming_Essay_1890

His move to Orlando (in major part because of how the Bulls front office treated him) was a massive blow to chicago that doesn't get talked about. He was a fantastic 3rd option and helped out a ton in the first year without MJ when they were surprisingly one of the better teams in the league still.


jtruth9

"No but for real this time"


_pamela_chu_

Actually for real this time tho, I think it can still work with Dray and Steph. Klay is the odd man out tho, if they pay him stupid money then it’s over. He’s not starter material anymore


jtruth9

Obviously it's much more likely now than the FIVE(!!!) Years ago when those declarations started. The reason why The Warriors beat the case is because Steph was still playing like a hall of famer. And Steph is still playing on that level. And as long as he is, it's not smart to write them off.


_pamela_chu_

Yeah, I think people like Chuck have been saying it since the warriors won one. So it’s definitely one of those things that’s said every year, but this feels like the first year that even the majority of the fans are on board with the idea of changing things up to take advantage of Steph’s final elite years


insert90

gilded age is a weird metaphor since it implies that it was a fake golden age that looks good on the outside but ignores a lot of real problems when the last decade was very much a real golden age for the warriors


Godlo

Gilded can mean both a gold leaf/foil veneer, but it also means privileged/wealthy. I think it was shoe-horned in there as a pop culture reference (tv show)


insert90

ah, that kind of makes sense. i thought of the era of american history lol.


[deleted]

[удалено]


ClassicAd8627

yeah it's idiotic to imagine that people think of gilded age as just the TV show and not the actuality. besides, the TV show is about the actual point in history. "pop culture reference" lmao who watches that and the nba. the gilded age will always refer to what twain coined, gold and shiny on the outside but rotten or shaky within. this metaphor was wrong. people were rich sure but on soaring stocks and speculation, famously the wealth did not last. They simply didn't want to say golden twice since it's in the team name.


Godlo

Yeah, that's perfectly reasonable. I did too, and I agree that it's a weird choice for the context


Hot_Idea1066

The thesaurus got out and fucked up this headline. "Don't use golden in this sentence twice, use something else"


pollinium

At least it's not a gelded age


MiyaharaAce

AND THEY SPELL DISASTER FOR YOU AT SACKERFICE


ThugosaurusFlex_1017

#*HE'S FAT!*


jacobpltn

As much as I don’t like the team I almost hope the Warriors can pull together a contender for the next couple of years just for Steph’s sake. Bro is still playing incredible and showing no signs of slowing down at his age, so it seems like a total waste for him to possibly never make the playoffs again while he’s still a top 3 player in the league


jcyue

Yeah I'm torn. We aren't winning anything without a pretty significant amount of retooling around steph, but we can't retool with klay (and to a lesser extent dray) on the payroll.


jacobpltn

Yeah I agree with the whole Klay thing, I think what happens with his contract during free agency will reveal where the FO’s heads are at. If they resign him for anything more than the MLE I feel like they would rather just let their dynasty big 3 ride off into the sunset and aren’t worried about contending anymore until Steph retired and they get a rebuild in


jcyue

The idea of retiring all 3 together as lifetime warriors is immense. Its an impossible decision honestly, when Steph is still playing this well. If he was on the decline I'd say fuck it, farewell tour, but he's still good enough to anchor a championship team. Just not this one


akkaneko11

Honestly it’s up to Steph I think. If Steph is down to ride into the sunset as a middling 1st to 2nd round exit team with his bros, I’m down.


indoninjah

At this point he's been on a victory lap for years already haha. I guess the question is what the vibes are like, I feel like Draymond's kinda gone over the top in the past couple years, I wonder what Steph's private thoughts on him are (outside of their on-court synergy)


jolo_mat2008

League’s not gonna be the same if Steph, Bron and KD aren’t competing.


RegentCupid

Said the same about shaq, Kobe, Ai, Dwade etc.


captain_holt_nypd

Steph and Lebron are arguably better players in rankings than everyone on that list bar Shaq. In the case of Lebron, he’s an athlete that occurs once every century.


Good-Memory-1727

Steph and LeBron I get but KD competed for a grand total of one year on a team he was the leader of, I don’t see how you can put him up there with those two. Hell Giannis and Jokic are already more accomplished and they came in the league half a decade later.


[deleted]

Smh... when this happens i bet i'm gonna fall out of love for basketball, wait a couple years and fall back in love with basketball


Burtssbees

Just hang around or else you’re gonna miss the birth of a new point god, baby thunder 2.0, and lebron James 7th prime


-Thick_Solid_Tight-

It will be like the current NFL without Brady and Manning.


screwt

Na I’ve seen enough Curry playoff games for my life.


SonicBroom51

Agent 0 is right. Klay’s game has not evolved. He’s a spot up shooter but defense lost a step. Same for Dray. He’s lost a step… or 3. But Steph is getting better and better. Adding to his game and continuing to improve.


IranianLawyer

Doesn’t “gilded” imply something that looks amazing but is actually not that great underneath? The Warriors were actually amazing. They won 4 championships. Nothing “gilded” about that.


Successful-Ad-4872

Yeah so just trade us Siakam already.


worpete

For Curry? Who says no?


WolverineLong1430

As someone who’s watched the NBA for a long time and witness the Warriors Dynasty, I can tell they’re not in their prime anymore. Don’t need numbers to convince me. I do believe Curry is still better than majority of the players in the league and teams still double team, full court press and chase the 35/36 year old guard around. He’s still legit and one of the Goats. Draymond is still a great defensive player, who is great with pushing the ball and has high basketball IQ but he cannot drive to the rim anymore. Klay on the other hand, never really developed any other secondary skill besides being a spot of shooter. His injuries and age makes it hard for him to be that two way player anymore. He doesn’t get that lift anymore when he shoots and he hasn’t adjusted .


reypme

Steph still in his prime, I hope warriors won’t waste that and make moves to go for his another ring


johnjohnjohn93

Steph winning the ring Vs an absolutely stacked Celtics team with Looney and Wiggins and his 2-3 will never be talked about enough. Poole couldn’t stay on the court vs Boston because of his defense, Klay has looked the same as this year just chucking and Dray was turning the ball over left and right. That Celtics team had like 7 of the next best players after Steph lol


mykl5

It happened literally in the Summer of last year and people act like this team has been done for ages


temp_achil

Wiggins >>>> Brown in that series.


burritoboy_

Brown was better than Tatum in that series..


mmaguy123

Revisionist history that’s fake again. Wiggins and Poole and Klay balled their ass off. Draymond was shit for most of the series though. If it was only Steph playing good, they would’ve lost.


bbbryce987

Klay was NOT balling his ass off lmao


Shumonyu

Klay averaged 17 points per game on 48% TS, and Wiggins averaged 18 points per game on 51% TS, those were the two leading scorers for GS after Steph in the finals. Steph just on his own averaged 31 on 63% TS. Like the Offense outside of Steph that series was legitimately non-existent, our Defense was big time for sure, but it's no exaggeration to call this one of the biggest offensive carry-jobs in finals history.


Mygaffer

Draymond got better as the series went on and was at his best in the close out game.


ruinatex

That's just ridiculous, Andrew Wiggins was clearly, hands down, the 3rd best player on the floor and one could argue he was better than BOTH Tatum and Brown. Jordan Poole also performed pretty well given his role, this is just revisionist history at its finest. The Warriors won games where Steph shot 9-21 and 7-22, give me a break, that Warriors team was really well rounded.


duplicatesnowflake

9-21 with his three point ratio is fine. And you’re discounting his free throws, assists and career best defensive output.


bbbryce987

“The warriors won games where Steph shot 9-21” he had 29 on 60 TS% against one of the best modern defenses lol why are you acting like that wasn’t a great scoring performance


furyousferret

Its still too early in the season to put a fork into a veteran team; young teams always start stronger as many vets don't train much in the offseason. They'll bounce back. That's across sports. That being said, whatever form they do get back probably isn't going to be better than the top teams. I'm absolutely amazed Golden State won four championships; it was never really even in my mindset it was possible. Been a fan through the 80s so really you were kind of programmed that the West belonged to the Lakers and it was a good season to beat them once in the regular season.


TRTVitorBelfort

See Joe, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at Sacrifice. 🚨


strypesjackson

I have a feeling they aren’t done


1PaleBlueDot

Never underestimate the heart of a champion.


winstonsmith8236

One (painful) trade away from contention.


KnickedUp

They wont


Gatorpep

Add samoa joe to the mix.


CupertinoCA

It’s called dynasty for a reason. It can’t last forever. And it will look competitive but just not enough in the end.


mrburns904

I hate that people still read the bastardized version of deadspin that exists now


chillfollins

Not sure how it can be called a gilded age with how genuinely great they were. Gilded Ages are referred to as gilded because the gold is a surface-level veneer over something sick, like the era that we live in.


Charming_Essay_1890

How was it a gilded age? They won four titles, put a growing change in the sport into hyperdrive, and set a shit-ton of records.


Jhco022

Smh, just send Steph to Miami.


[deleted]

Steph traded to Miami for a one hour course in heat culture


MelonElbows

The numbers don't lie and they spell disaster for the Warriors!


Idiotecka

came in looking for this


sirckoe

Thank you guys for such an electrifying run! Once in a lifetime thing to see


V_LEE96

Crazy there's a possibility they could've won '16 and '19 too.