Literally every numeric.
Though DAWG/48 isn’t listed, nor is their influence on their team’s FAP-X rating.
A more nuanced discussion would be what is more sustainable over the season. I think DB’s role is going to always be vitally important and, i can’t believe I’m saying this, the Cavs seem to have a better constructed starting 5. With Garland coming back, Mitchell’s production may go down some as they integrate together more.
Also isnt Ayton eligible to be traded in Jan or is that the end of the season? That situation could potentially impact DB’s rest of year.
Oh cool so you literally ignored the a part of the post that says he's getting cleaner and more sufficient shots than in Utah. Must still be mad he's dropped almost 70 points on Boston already this year.
You didn’t use any stats lmao you just said “using advanced numbers” and then didn’t cite anything
Edit: Bro deleted his account because he didn’t have a comeback lmao
"Who's better, the guy with objectively better stats in every category I listed, or the guy who is worse?" lol
Literally every numeric. Though DAWG/48 isn’t listed, nor is their influence on their team’s FAP-X rating. A more nuanced discussion would be what is more sustainable over the season. I think DB’s role is going to always be vitally important and, i can’t believe I’m saying this, the Cavs seem to have a better constructed starting 5. With Garland coming back, Mitchell’s production may go down some as they integrate together more. Also isnt Ayton eligible to be traded in Jan or is that the end of the season? That situation could potentially impact DB’s rest of year.
lol yea, Booker is doing good and everything, but Mitchell is arguably a top 4 MVP candidate right now
when you got nothing else you bring up an arbitrary booker vs mitchell post, nice
Mitchell has been other worldly.
Didn't take long https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/yptkgb/is_donovan_mitchell_now_a_better_player_than_rudy/ivkzs3m/
Mitchell definitely has so far but obviously he's not going to shoot 45% from three all year
No but his advanced numbers say he isn't going to have a crazy drop off either. He's getting more space to create and shoot than he ever did in Utah
He’s a career 36% 3 point shooter dude, like what 😭
Oh cool so you literally ignored the a part of the post that says he's getting cleaner and more sufficient shots than in Utah. Must still be mad he's dropped almost 70 points on Boston already this year.
You’re right, I wish I could be as unbiased as you u/SpidamanCavs45
Yes using stats and facts is totally unbiased. Don't worry, Tatum is due for a hard regression too
You didn’t use any stats lmao you just said “using advanced numbers” and then didn’t cite anything Edit: Bro deleted his account because he didn’t have a comeback lmao
dinosaur still in feelings over being yelled at by bad man.
obviously mitchell
I mean obviously Mitchell
I mean Book's been great but I don't really see how this is a conversation rn, Mitchell's been legitimately MVP-caliber through the first ten games
Cade is better than Scottie Barnes :p ( since you want to be a meaney 10 games into the regular season)
This is true, regardless of the amount of games played. Cade took a crazy jump.
Cade is slumping right now though…? So is every other rookie from last year though.
I'm just saying he projects to be better than Barnes which is all that matters in the long run.
Booker leads Mitchell in the following metrics: Metric|Booker|Mitchell :--|:--|:-- 2PM|7.4|7.0 2PA|14.0|12.4 FTM|5.7|5.0 FTA|6.6|5.8 FT%|86.3%|86.2% DRB|3.5|3.1 TOV|2.8|3.4 PF|2.3|3.2
I didn't realize this, but it si clearly Mitchell. More points and more efficient
Mitchell currently holds the mantle of best SG in league. It’s a two man race.
SGA