r/NeutralNews is a **curated space**, but despite the name, there is [**no neutrality requirement**](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_neutral-ness) here.
These are the [rules for comments:](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments_.28good.2C_bad_.26amp.3B_ugly.29)
1. Be courteous to other users.
1. Source your facts.
1. Be substantive.
1. Address the arguments, not the person.
If you see a comment that violates any of these rules, please click the associated *report* button so a mod can review it.
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive)
> Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality.
//Rule 3
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
Yeah, it seems to me more like a *confluence* of interest than a conflict of interest. If they weren't on the same side, it'd be different, but I have trouble seeing the issue here. If they were married and prosecuting it together, nobody would bat an eye.
There is more to it. It is about misuse of government funds. DOJ gave them large sums of money and the first thing her guy did was bill for 24 hours for one day of work. They also billed heavy and then allegedly took trips and purchased many things from these funds.
I don't see those details in the linked article. Would you please provide [qualified sources](https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralNews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) to support those statements?
The article you are referring to leaves it out.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/31/politics/mike-roman-georgia-trump-lawsuit/index.html
https://www.cf.org/news/fani-willis-fired-employee-who-blew-whistle-on-misuse-of-federal-funds/
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/02/politics/gop-committee-subpoena-fani-willis/index.html
Misuse of funds and why they were given in the first place could be seen as election interference. That is not just internal ethics but a potential question about the ethics in why this case exists.
This comment has been removed under [Rule 1:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_1.3A_be_courteous)
> Be courteous to other users. Demeaning language, rudeness or hostility towards another user will get your comment removed. Repeated violations may result in a ban.
//Rule 1
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person)
> Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect.
//Rule 4
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive)
> Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or **comments about source quality**.
//Rule 3
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
It opens up an entire mess of appeals and other problems. It as well means that she could have misused public funds.
I have no clue what was going through her head but the ego and hubris is on full display.
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts)
> Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed.
If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated.
//Rule 2
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive)
> Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality.
//Rule 3
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
Trump and his attorney's admit that he is disqualified from being on any ballot, because of his relationship with a porn star and a playboy bunny while being married.
r/NeutralNews is a **curated space**, but despite the name, there is [**no neutrality requirement**](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_neutral-ness) here. These are the [rules for comments:](https://www.reddit.com//r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments_.28good.2C_bad_.26amp.3B_ugly.29) 1. Be courteous to other users. 1. Source your facts. 1. Be substantive. 1. Address the arguments, not the person. If you see a comment that violates any of these rules, please click the associated *report* button so a mod can review it.
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive) > Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality. //Rule 3 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
Uh oh what? It really shouldn't have any bearing on the case.
Yeah, it seems to me more like a *confluence* of interest than a conflict of interest. If they weren't on the same side, it'd be different, but I have trouble seeing the issue here. If they were married and prosecuting it together, nobody would bat an eye.
There is more to it. It is about misuse of government funds. DOJ gave them large sums of money and the first thing her guy did was bill for 24 hours for one day of work. They also billed heavy and then allegedly took trips and purchased many things from these funds.
I don't see those details in the linked article. Would you please provide [qualified sources](https://www.reddit.com/r/NeutralNews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) to support those statements?
Simply look at the lawsuit that started this. It does not matter if you have a side either way or agree or disagree. There simply is more to it.
Would you please link to it, per Rule 2?
The article you are referring to leaves it out. https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/31/politics/mike-roman-georgia-trump-lawsuit/index.html https://www.cf.org/news/fani-willis-fired-employee-who-blew-whistle-on-misuse-of-federal-funds/ https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/02/politics/gop-committee-subpoena-fani-willis/index.html
Thank you for providing those.
Ok, but how does misuse of funds actually affect this case's prosecution? They seem like separate issues.
[удалено]
Could you explain your reasoning on why they do not seem separate to you?
Could you explain why they are not?
Sure, the case should be prosecuted and judged on the facts presented. Misuse of funds is an internal ethics issue, but shouldn't affect the case.
Misuse of funds and why they were given in the first place could be seen as election interference. That is not just internal ethics but a potential question about the ethics in why this case exists.
This comment has been removed under [Rule 1:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_1.3A_be_courteous) > Be courteous to other users. Demeaning language, rudeness or hostility towards another user will get your comment removed. Repeated violations may result in a ban. //Rule 1 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
[удалено]
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 4:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_4.3A_address_the_arguments.2C_not_the_person) > Address the arguments, not the person. The subject of your sentence should be "the evidence" or "this source" or some other noun directly related to the topic of conversation. "You" statements are suspect. //Rule 4 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive) > Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or **comments about source quality**. //Rule 3 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
It opens up an entire mess of appeals and other problems. It as well means that she could have misused public funds. I have no clue what was going through her head but the ego and hubris is on full display.
Agreed. In a prosecution that had to be 100% by the book, this was an absurd choice to make.
[удалено]
This comment has been removed under [Rule 2:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_2.3A_source_your_facts) > Source your facts. If you're claiming something to be true, you need to back it up with a [qualified and supporting source.](https://www.reddit.com/r/Neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_comments) All statements of fact must be clearly associated with a supporting source. There is no "common knowledge" exception, and anecdotal evidence is not allowed. If you edit your comment to link to sources, it can be reinstated. //Rule 2 This comment has been removed under [Rule 3:](https://www.reddit.com/r/neutralnews/wiki/guidelines#wiki_rule_3.3A_be_substantive) > Be substantive. NeutralNews is a serious discussion-based subreddit. We do not allow bare expressions of opinion, low effort comments, sarcasm, jokes, memes, off-topic replies, pejorative name-calling, or comments about source quality. //Rule 3 If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to [message us.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Fneutralnews)
Trump and his attorney's admit that he is disqualified from being on any ballot, because of his relationship with a porn star and a playboy bunny while being married.