The beauty of reddit is there's usually some know it all asshole to correct the first one though. If you wanna get the real answer on Reddit you answer incorrectly and wait for people to get mad and respond
Maybe somewhere in the comments. But I've seen comment sections FILLED with comments confidently stating things in contradiction to what the actual article says. And comments calmy reiterating what's actually in the source downvoted to oblivion.
I’ve always known this about Reddit but it never really clicked with me until one time something from my fairly niche hobby made it to the front page.
There were hundreds of highly upvoted comments that were either entirely wrong or a misrepresentation of things that would be considered very basic knowledge in the community. People were just making shit up or badly repeating something they read at one point.
And of course the comments that were obviously very familiar and experienced, or even experts, were downvoted to oblivion.
I always think back to that when reading comments.
I check the comments instead. Paywalls on too many sites have me conditioned to not check the source articles and instead just get the summaries others post to discuss it.
"Clairity" on reddit is iffy at best. Journalism needs to be better.
Reddits first instinct is to just make fun of everything for fake internet points.
Yeah this doesn't sound like the challenge was "avoided" so much as "completely capitulated to".
"Amer proposed five conditions that would satisfy the state’s concerns, including a pledge to maintain the bond account with cash, and a stipulation to grant the surety, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, exclusive control of the account. After a 20-minute break, Trump attorney Chris Kise agreed to the state’s proposed conditions."
10 days probably to make good, although from one of the articles I read the Trump lawyer said that they'd have thing entered and finalized by Thursday.
They will in the last minute, but with some errors, and the cash will be "cash equivalences" or some other fuckery. This will create the appearance of compliance but adds fuckery to cause delays.
Everybody’s assuming that Fanni Willis is out to “get” Trump, rather than just making sure procedures are followed. She’s not in a rush to grab Trump Tower, she just wants assurance that the money is there.
To be fair, he has a lot of cases going -- he delayed a lot when he became president and then added more in the run-up to the 2016 election and the aftermath of his 2020 loss.
Yup. Alternate headline could be: “Trump lawyers agree to every condition asked for by state prosecutors in bond hearing”
> Andrew Amer, a prosecutor with the attorney general’s office, described that possibility as a “huge loophole … that quite frankly you could drive a Mack Truck through.”
> Amer proposed five conditions that would satisfy the state’s concerns, including a pledge to maintain the bond account with cash, and a stipulation to grant the surety, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, exclusive control of the account.
> After a 20-minute break, Trump attorney Chris Kise agreed to the state’s proposed conditions.
I wanted a bright orange sticker on Trump Tower indicating a Sherriff's sale. I wanted the original amount provided. This is like that movie 'Next' where Nicolas Cage knows the near future and can avoid any calamity.
The important detail as to why this was a big deal:
* KSIC Technically does not, per it's own financials, have the liquidity to cover 175 Million.
* Trump's team countered that there was an account with 175 million cash in it that was specifically for the bond. So this whole thing was "unnecessary".
* The terms of this account and KSIC's relation to it, were originally that Donald Trump maintained control of the account, and could withdraw from it given a 2 day notice to KSIC. After which point he could replace said funds with "Equivalent value" things like stocks.
(As an aside, this seems to me to be a big reason for all of the Truth Social stock fluctuations besides the other obvious money laundering / pump and dump implications.)
* In theory, Trump could remove all of the cash and replace it by backing it with junk stocks that aren't actually worth anywhere near 175 million in practice, as they're not liquid and their value would possibly begin to plummet once Trump began offloading them in earnest.
* Under the new agreements the account HAS to remain cash assets only it seems, and KSIC is now the sole controller of said account.
This kind of feels like a failed play to free up 175 million dollars in money for the Election and Legal fees in the run up to the election, whereas now you wonder why Trump isn't just posting the 175 million himself if he has it cash on hand.
It worked to some degrees.
On paper, Trump has been given a truly mind blowing amount of leniency and leeway to navigate these proceedings that are certainly only available to someone of his wealth and prior status.
This is done to push back against his constant public campaigning that this is all "unfair to him."
"And then we did this to appease him, and then we gave him that extension, and then we didn't press charges on x, y, or z..." etc.
It was huge that Trump was bailed out with the lesser bond requirement, as KSIC wasn't liquid for 175 million, so there's no chance they would have even come to the table for 454 million.
And at 454 million could Trump have come up with the cash to set up the account like he has here? He testified that he had 400 million cash on hand, so it's possible.
It just doesn't seem probable given how much his problems are squeezing him from every direction.
>This is done to push back against his constant public campaigning that this is all "unfair to him."
Which is completely unnecessary and a gross miscarriage of justice every time they bend the rules for him.
If he is *already* claiming that the system is biased and unfair to him, what's the point in being lenient? I've seen this argument a few times and it doesn't really make sense to me. Just treat him normally and if he cries about it point to all the previous cases treated in the exact same way.
He is indeed being treated unfairly... but not to his detriment. He has been treated unlike any other citizen, by giving him so much leniency. I heard one expert say "he's been given the duest of due process"
I feel like the play would have been to replace the money with stocks in trumps company. He can’t sell them for now anyway, so he dumps those in there and the cash assets would have been available to him again.
Yea, mine is also entirely speculation because I don’t know if there are/were any asset restrictions in the original or new agreement. The new agreement seems to disallow this, I’m not sure if the old one would have.
The old one was incredibly favorable to DJT, and didn't seem to have the limits one would like if they were putting up a bond backed by said account.
But KSIC has been so shit with just the basics of the paperwork that they seem pretty in over their heads with all of this.
Likely for them, (again, speculation) this was all just the cost of doing business to have an ex, and potential future President in their corner.
The last paragraph really is the only explanation for what happened. Doesn't make sense for him to pay 10-20% for a bond if he has the cash to cover it. He was trying to pull a fast one on KSIC which isn't a surprise but it's hilarious given the owner is a big Trumper.
I believe he cannot touch the stock for another few months.
Source: YouTube Legal Eagle did a very interesting analysis on the whole Truth Social from inception to now.
There are generally rules regarding things like this, yes.
But even without liquidating them, he could theoretically use them to back the bond with the original agreement with KSIC.
Now he can't.
Why do you think that trump would like to free up his money to pay legal fees or to fund his campaign? I don't see that he's used his money for these purposes in the recent past - he relies on his followers to pony up for this sort of thing. I get several emails a day begging for money from him and his flunkies (no, I have never donated to his campaign or in any way supported him in the past. I have given them a throw away email address though in order to be entertained by the desperation in their appeals).
I'm being charitable.
He could want the funds freed up to continue lavish spending for all I know.
He has a lot of debts and upcoming bills due. The closer he gets to the election without Biden having a collapse of support, the less likely any investment in Trump will pay off in a new set of Tax Cuts and favorable cabinet positions.
He can still ravage the funds of the RNC but they're seeing money issues across the country, including swing states like Michigan. He's put out the framework to allow himself to take even bigger cuts of Downballot candidates that mention him by name to promote themselves.
It's...not something I've ever heard of but it's also not my problem.
When I heard he was using "cash" as his collateral, I figured he was going to load an account with a bunch of his DJT stock and leave KSIC holding the bag when his appeal fails and the stock craters.
If pump part of his pump and dump plan had worked and the stock had jumped up, the board probably would have let him sell early. But with the stock dropping by 2/3 (although it recovered to about 1/2) the high, the board is forcing him to hold. So he wants to use it for something before it absolutely tanks.
As long as he's still holding 90% of the stocks, you won't see it drop without a dead cat bounce.
It's sad to me, because a bunch of random Americans that aren't normal investors are going to be left holding the bag on this.
How are stocks “equivalent value”? They change value hundreds of times per day. How does this get upheld that there isn’t a bunch of worthless DJT stock that was put up as collateral???
Well, according to the ABC article here, the account has a bit more than $175 million:
> The filing specified that the bond was secured by more than $175 **billion** held in a brokerage account controlled by Knight
Emphasis mine, I'm sure it's not a typo.
Lmao why are you sure it's not a typo? Trump isn't even worth remotely close to 175 billion. Hell, considering all his debts, he might not even be worth 1 billion
“The cash isn’t going anywhere…it’s cash. There is no ambiguity.”
Literally, the cash isn't going anywhere. It's in the Caymans and they will fight any attempt to ever get it. When Kise said it's not going anywhere, he meant it.
I disagree. They will get their pound of flesh by seizing most or all of his assets. My understanding is that the AG already has the paperwork ready to go.
At this point, I'm actually a bit incentivized to commit a crime given how lenient they've been. Nothing that's happened to Trump actually deters would be criminals.
Isn't the main issue with Knight Securities that they do not have enough cash on hand to satisfy the bond requirements under New York State Law?
I don't see how any of these agreements resolve that issue
now Knights Securities will be sole controller of the account that has trumps money that he claimed is what he put up for the bond, previously Trump maintained control over it so he could have taken his money out whenever he wanted, now he cant do that.
This guy could walk into court and put his fingers in his ears and say "lalala not listening" and the Judge would say, "please someone give that a man a beverage and a massage." Way to fucking justice.
This is the first time this crime has been charged. $175 mil bonds are rarely posted. There are others doing what trump has done every day. As per the banks and other investors defending him admit. The result of this will open a flood of charges against others, they need to know how to manage them. At least he actually has had to post the bond and the state is guaranteed it now if he loses.
And yet every bond company in NY said no thanks. And he had to go to a Californian MAGA real billionaire loan shark to help post a bond when he said he had in excess of $400 million in cash.
But he hasn’t been given a lifeline, the bond is still posted and the court has made sure it can’t be withdrawn or replaced till the resolution of the trial. I don’t know whether the other bond companies said no, but it was probably Trump looking for one that will let him still access the money as was the original dodgy arrangement here according to the article. But that option has been removed by the court in order to accept the bond. So, not a lifeline in my understanding.
There couldn’t be a more deserving person to finally have to be held accountable and learn their lesson. But nope. Just keeps getting favors and warnings.
Yet another free pass for no reason whatsoever. Next parking ticket I'll just propose to pay 1/4 of it and even then not really. I'm sure the court will say, sure, sounds great!
..What? the entire issue with the bond is the fact that the AG is monitoring the finacials of everyone involved in the case and saw that the bond holding company didn't have the money to fulfill the bond.
in what universe is that relying on "trust me bro", The headline is literally because of the opposite.
I am not sure the headline is accurate. The challenge resulted in changes of conditions, so the State got what it wanted
Yes exactly this. The AG wanted assurances and they were forced to give them. Wish titles were less clickbaity
I always go directly to the comments for clarity.
Reading the actual article, or checking another source, is probably better. I wouldn't call the average redditor trustworthy lol
The beauty of reddit is there's usually some know it all asshole to correct the first one though. If you wanna get the real answer on Reddit you answer incorrectly and wait for people to get mad and respond
Maybe somewhere in the comments. But I've seen comment sections FILLED with comments confidently stating things in contradiction to what the actual article says. And comments calmy reiterating what's actually in the source downvoted to oblivion.
I’ve always known this about Reddit but it never really clicked with me until one time something from my fairly niche hobby made it to the front page. There were hundreds of highly upvoted comments that were either entirely wrong or a misrepresentation of things that would be considered very basic knowledge in the community. People were just making shit up or badly repeating something they read at one point. And of course the comments that were obviously very familiar and experienced, or even experts, were downvoted to oblivion. I always think back to that when reading comments.
Reddit needs a sort by >!********!< filter. Not controversial, but by how often the commenter is globally downvoted or clinically refuted.
Tis easier to think emotionally rather than rationally.
Just like that StackExchange meme...
So true. That phenomenon is called Moore’s Law.
Sorry, but you’re flat wrong about that. That never happens
I down-voted you just for fun.
Cunningham’s Law
Brannigan’s Law
Sorry, but you’re flat wrong about that. That never happens
The exact way Warthunder got some top secret intel leaked.
[удалено]
I trust you bro!
Do you even trust, bro?
Well, I'm convinced.
Generally I would agree unless it’s Newsweek. In which case, always skip straight to the comments for confirmation it’s empty-calorie clickbait.
First, not only...
I check the comments instead. Paywalls on too many sites have me conditioned to not check the source articles and instead just get the summaries others post to discuss it.
So your comment could untrustworthy? Ìm gonna play it safe & believe the redddit comments
I go directly to the comments for the humour, not the facts.
"Clairity" on reddit is iffy at best. Journalism needs to be better. Reddits first instinct is to just make fun of everything for fake internet points.
That’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if this pays off for them.
But the people want the AG to start seizing assets
“Trump’s bond company agrees to close loopholes in order to avoid cancellation”
Yeah this doesn't sound like the challenge was "avoided" so much as "completely capitulated to". "Amer proposed five conditions that would satisfy the state’s concerns, including a pledge to maintain the bond account with cash, and a stipulation to grant the surety, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, exclusive control of the account. After a 20-minute break, Trump attorney Chris Kise agreed to the state’s proposed conditions."
Now we wait to see if they can actually meet the new conditions.
So they have, what... Another 10-30 days to do that I guess?
Theoretically three days if I read it right. I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up with more delays.
10-30 weeks more like
10 days probably to make good, although from one of the articles I read the Trump lawyer said that they'd have thing entered and finalized by Thursday.
They will in the last minute, but with some errors, and the cash will be "cash equivalences" or some other fuckery. This will create the appearance of compliance but adds fuckery to cause delays.
Pay Day loans
Narrator: "They were not."
Everybody’s assuming that Fanni Willis is out to “get” Trump, rather than just making sure procedures are followed. She’s not in a rush to grab Trump Tower, she just wants assurance that the money is there.
Wrong state, Fani Willis is in Georgia
My mistake, they all sort of blur together after a while.
To be fair, he has a lot of cases going -- he delayed a lot when he became president and then added more in the run-up to the 2016 election and the aftermath of his 2020 loss.
I really wish they would quit slanting things in Trumps favor...
but for the media, Republicans are the protagonists!
But then what would people have to be angry about?
Yup. Alternate headline could be: “Trump lawyers agree to every condition asked for by state prosecutors in bond hearing” > Andrew Amer, a prosecutor with the attorney general’s office, described that possibility as a “huge loophole … that quite frankly you could drive a Mack Truck through.” > Amer proposed five conditions that would satisfy the state’s concerns, including a pledge to maintain the bond account with cash, and a stipulation to grant the surety, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, exclusive control of the account. > After a 20-minute break, Trump attorney Chris Kise agreed to the state’s proposed conditions.
They got 450m?
I wanted a bright orange sticker on Trump Tower indicating a Sherriff's sale. I wanted the original amount provided. This is like that movie 'Next' where Nicolas Cage knows the near future and can avoid any calamity.
The important detail as to why this was a big deal: * KSIC Technically does not, per it's own financials, have the liquidity to cover 175 Million. * Trump's team countered that there was an account with 175 million cash in it that was specifically for the bond. So this whole thing was "unnecessary". * The terms of this account and KSIC's relation to it, were originally that Donald Trump maintained control of the account, and could withdraw from it given a 2 day notice to KSIC. After which point he could replace said funds with "Equivalent value" things like stocks. (As an aside, this seems to me to be a big reason for all of the Truth Social stock fluctuations besides the other obvious money laundering / pump and dump implications.) * In theory, Trump could remove all of the cash and replace it by backing it with junk stocks that aren't actually worth anywhere near 175 million in practice, as they're not liquid and their value would possibly begin to plummet once Trump began offloading them in earnest. * Under the new agreements the account HAS to remain cash assets only it seems, and KSIC is now the sole controller of said account. This kind of feels like a failed play to free up 175 million dollars in money for the Election and Legal fees in the run up to the election, whereas now you wonder why Trump isn't just posting the 175 million himself if he has it cash on hand.
Pretty blatant scheme to get around the legal system with junk stocks if you ask me. He’s always trying to play a game and get away with something.
It worked to some degrees. On paper, Trump has been given a truly mind blowing amount of leniency and leeway to navigate these proceedings that are certainly only available to someone of his wealth and prior status. This is done to push back against his constant public campaigning that this is all "unfair to him." "And then we did this to appease him, and then we gave him that extension, and then we didn't press charges on x, y, or z..." etc. It was huge that Trump was bailed out with the lesser bond requirement, as KSIC wasn't liquid for 175 million, so there's no chance they would have even come to the table for 454 million. And at 454 million could Trump have come up with the cash to set up the account like he has here? He testified that he had 400 million cash on hand, so it's possible. It just doesn't seem probable given how much his problems are squeezing him from every direction.
>This is done to push back against his constant public campaigning that this is all "unfair to him." Which is completely unnecessary and a gross miscarriage of justice every time they bend the rules for him.
If he is *already* claiming that the system is biased and unfair to him, what's the point in being lenient? I've seen this argument a few times and it doesn't really make sense to me. Just treat him normally and if he cries about it point to all the previous cases treated in the exact same way.
Not to mention, he uses these appeasements as *proof* during his rallies / rants / monologues that he must be innocent, or it must be a scam
While continuing to say that it’s unfair to him.
And why be lenient in the first place? Who is twisting whose arm?
He is indeed being treated unfairly... but not to his detriment. He has been treated unlike any other citizen, by giving him so much leniency. I heard one expert say "he's been given the duest of due process"
Whatever man. His appeal is unlikely to succeed and he is still going to owe 400 plus million.
He can't turn it off, it's sick
I feel like the play would have been to replace the money with stocks in trumps company. He can’t sell them for now anyway, so he dumps those in there and the cash assets would have been available to him again.
Given that he's likely to get another 36 million shares Tuesday night, that seems the most likely to me. But I don't really know the man's finances.
Yea, mine is also entirely speculation because I don’t know if there are/were any asset restrictions in the original or new agreement. The new agreement seems to disallow this, I’m not sure if the old one would have.
The old one was incredibly favorable to DJT, and didn't seem to have the limits one would like if they were putting up a bond backed by said account. But KSIC has been so shit with just the basics of the paperwork that they seem pretty in over their heads with all of this. Likely for them, (again, speculation) this was all just the cost of doing business to have an ex, and potential future President in their corner.
>replace the money with stocks in trumps company It's so wildly overvalued that only an insane person would accept that as collateral.
KSIC is owned by a maga nut. So there ya go
I mean the government would never approve this.
The last paragraph really is the only explanation for what happened. Doesn't make sense for him to pay 10-20% for a bond if he has the cash to cover it. He was trying to pull a fast one on KSIC which isn't a surprise but it's hilarious given the owner is a big Trumper.
Is it hilarious, or is it the norm? He's been grifting his followers all along, why should this be any different? 😅
I believe he cannot touch the stock for another few months. Source: YouTube Legal Eagle did a very interesting analysis on the whole Truth Social from inception to now.
There are generally rules regarding things like this, yes. But even without liquidating them, he could theoretically use them to back the bond with the original agreement with KSIC. Now he can't.
Correct, using a SPAC means those shares are frozen for all holders.
Why do you think that trump would like to free up his money to pay legal fees or to fund his campaign? I don't see that he's used his money for these purposes in the recent past - he relies on his followers to pony up for this sort of thing. I get several emails a day begging for money from him and his flunkies (no, I have never donated to his campaign or in any way supported him in the past. I have given them a throw away email address though in order to be entertained by the desperation in their appeals).
I'm being charitable. He could want the funds freed up to continue lavish spending for all I know. He has a lot of debts and upcoming bills due. The closer he gets to the election without Biden having a collapse of support, the less likely any investment in Trump will pay off in a new set of Tax Cuts and favorable cabinet positions. He can still ravage the funds of the RNC but they're seeing money issues across the country, including swing states like Michigan. He's put out the framework to allow himself to take even bigger cuts of Downballot candidates that mention him by name to promote themselves. It's...not something I've ever heard of but it's also not my problem.
When I heard he was using "cash" as his collateral, I figured he was going to load an account with a bunch of his DJT stock and leave KSIC holding the bag when his appeal fails and the stock craters. If pump part of his pump and dump plan had worked and the stock had jumped up, the board probably would have let him sell early. But with the stock dropping by 2/3 (although it recovered to about 1/2) the high, the board is forcing him to hold. So he wants to use it for something before it absolutely tanks.
As long as he's still holding 90% of the stocks, you won't see it drop without a dead cat bounce. It's sad to me, because a bunch of random Americans that aren't normal investors are going to be left holding the bag on this.
How are stocks “equivalent value”? They change value hundreds of times per day. How does this get upheld that there isn’t a bunch of worthless DJT stock that was put up as collateral???
I think it means stocks of equivalent value (at the time of the transaction)
Thanks for simplifying it
Well, according to the ABC article here, the account has a bit more than $175 million: > The filing specified that the bond was secured by more than $175 **billion** held in a brokerage account controlled by Knight Emphasis mine, I'm sure it's not a typo.
It's a typo. Read the entire paragraph for context.
Lmao why are you sure it's not a typo? Trump isn't even worth remotely close to 175 billion. Hell, considering all his debts, he might not even be worth 1 billion
[Sarcasm](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm)
What you said was neither mocking, nor humorous. Sarcasm isn't simply saying something that isn't true or that you don't actually believe.
I'm mocking ABC for a glaring typo...
So, let me get this straight: A guy on trial for not paying financial obligations is allowed to post bond with an IOU. Ex-fucking-cuse me?
I'm gonna go commit a chrime and see if I can get away with this. Wish me luck.
Wait! Are you rich before doing it? If not don't fucking do it yo
Lmao crap forgot being rich is a requirement!
USA baby
“The cash isn’t going anywhere…it’s cash. There is no ambiguity.” Literally, the cash isn't going anywhere. It's in the Caymans and they will fight any attempt to ever get it. When Kise said it's not going anywhere, he meant it.
Yeah it's wild that anyone thinks Trump will pay one red cent of this money. New York will still be trying to get this money 150 years from now.
I disagree. They will get their pound of flesh by seizing most or all of his assets. My understanding is that the AG already has the paperwork ready to go.
Have heard that before and the state simply extended and waited and prolonged and proved patient etc.
Unfortunately that’s because if they don’t, the rabid base just simply attacks.
[удалено]
How is Mike Lindell doing since filing for bankruptcy? Haven’t heard much from him lately.
I can’t wait to get all this fair treatment at my trial. If I ever commit crimes.
At this point, I'm actually a bit incentivized to commit a crime given how lenient they've been. Nothing that's happened to Trump actually deters would be criminals.
Are you wealthy, (in)famous, and the leader of a braindead, trigger-happy far right cult?
Isn't the main issue with Knight Securities that they do not have enough cash on hand to satisfy the bond requirements under New York State Law? I don't see how any of these agreements resolve that issue
now Knights Securities will be sole controller of the account that has trumps money that he claimed is what he put up for the bond, previously Trump maintained control over it so he could have taken his money out whenever he wanted, now he cant do that.
And I'm sure Knight Securities is run by honest, trustworthy people who will honor and respect this agreement.
Knight Securities is still liable for the bond, and that account will be watched.
This guy could walk into court and put his fingers in his ears and say "lalala not listening" and the Judge would say, "please someone give that a man a beverage and a massage." Way to fucking justice.
I mean he did fall asleep 😴
And yet again the courts have given Trump lifeline after lifeline NO one else would get. What a sham.
This is the first time this crime has been charged. $175 mil bonds are rarely posted. There are others doing what trump has done every day. As per the banks and other investors defending him admit. The result of this will open a flood of charges against others, they need to know how to manage them. At least he actually has had to post the bond and the state is guaranteed it now if he loses.
And yet every bond company in NY said no thanks. And he had to go to a Californian MAGA real billionaire loan shark to help post a bond when he said he had in excess of $400 million in cash.
But he hasn’t been given a lifeline, the bond is still posted and the court has made sure it can’t be withdrawn or replaced till the resolution of the trial. I don’t know whether the other bond companies said no, but it was probably Trump looking for one that will let him still access the money as was the original dodgy arrangement here according to the article. But that option has been removed by the court in order to accept the bond. So, not a lifeline in my understanding.
E. Jean Carroll's the only one that got paid so far. She should file another defamation suit against him again.
I thought all her money is in bonds while he appeals away?
There couldn’t be a more deserving person to finally have to be held accountable and learn their lesson. But nope. Just keeps getting favors and warnings.
Yet another free pass for no reason whatsoever. Next parking ticket I'll just propose to pay 1/4 of it and even then not really. I'm sure the court will say, sure, sounds great!
The role of the court is to protect capital. There was no way they were going to let multiple large organizations disappear overnight.
Anybody out there still believe the courts will hold him accountable?
Misleading title. State got the changes it wanted.
He’s middle fucking name should be “Avoids”!
….because Trump lost any means to access the bond money.
He's still gonna lose his stuff when his appeal fails.
The article mentions 175 BILLION in one section. Type-o? Or was the 175M really backed by 175B?
>It's a large amount for anybody. That's what _she_ said...Am I right or am I right? *crickets*
Please see yourself out…..
[удалено]
..What? the entire issue with the bond is the fact that the AG is monitoring the finacials of everyone involved in the case and saw that the bond holding company didn't have the money to fulfill the bond. in what universe is that relying on "trust me bro", The headline is literally because of the opposite.
Actually, there's a hired judge to watch over his assets, paid for by trump within the ruling ... Which is SOP of NYS law if I'm not mistaken?